Share
array:23 [ "pii" => "S2173578611000047" "issn" => "21735786" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2011.06.002" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2011-05-01" "aid" => "251" "copyright" => "AEU" "copyrightAnyo" => "2010" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "sco" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35:310-4" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2574 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 22 "HTML" => 1906 "PDF" => 646 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S0210480611000386" "issn" => "02104806" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2010.08.007" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2011-05-01" "aid" => "251" "copyright" => "AEU" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "sco" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35:310-4" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 11138 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 17 "HTML" => 10447 "PDF" => 674 ] ] "es" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Casuística</span>" "titulo" => "Simplificación del tratamiento quirúrgico del pene oculto" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "310" "paginaFinal" => "314" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Simplification of the surgical treatment of a hidden penis" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figura 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 1326 "Ancho" => 850 "Tamanyo" => 138313 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Pene atrapado. A. Aspecto preoperatorio y línea de incisión dorsal. B. Resultado postquirúrgico.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "S. Rivas, R. Romero, A. Parente, M. Fanjul, J.M. Angulo" "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "S." "apellidos" => "Rivas" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Romero" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Parente" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Fanjul" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.M." "apellidos" => "Angulo" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2173578611000047" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2011.06.002" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578611000047?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210480611000386?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/02104806/0000003500000005/v2_201304261228/S0210480611000386/v2_201304261228/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2173578611000060" "issn" => "21735786" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2011.06.004" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2011-05-01" "aid" => "260" "copyright" => "AEU" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35:304-9" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2781 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 12 "HTML" => 2407 "PDF" => 362 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Skill and talent</span>" "titulo" => "Vesiculectomy with laparoscopic partial prostatectomy in the treatment of primary adenocarcinoma of the seminal vesicle with carcinomatous transformation of the ejaculatory duct" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "304" "paginaFinal" => "309" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Vesiculectomía con prostatectomía parcial laparoscópica en el tratamiento del adenocarcinoma primario de vesícula seminal con transformación carcinomatosa del conducto eyaculador" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 2573 "Ancho" => 3361 "Tamanyo" => 1144778 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Description of the vesiculectomy and partial prostatectomy technique. A. Retrovesical cyst dissection after opening the peritoneum and Denonvillers. B. Ligation and section of the lateral pedicles of the cyst. C. Opening of the prostate up to the urethra, including verumontanum and central prostate in the resection specimen. D. Closure of the prostatic urethra and surgical site after removal of the specimen.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "J.C. Angulo, I. Romero, P. Cabrera, J. González, J.M. Rodríguez-Barbero, C. Núñez-Mora" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.C." "apellidos" => "Angulo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "I." "apellidos" => "Romero" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Cabrera" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "González" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.M." "apellidos" => "Rodríguez-Barbero" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Núñez-Mora" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0210480611000477" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2011.01.007" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210480611000477?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578611000060?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/21735786/0000003500000005/v1_201304251543/S2173578611000060/v1_201304251543/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:18 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Casuistry</span>" "titulo" => "Simplification of the surgical treatment of a hidden penis" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "310" "paginaFinal" => "314" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "S. Rivas, R. Romero, A. Parente, M. Fanjul, J.M. Angulo" "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "S." "apellidos" => "Rivas" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "susanarivasvila@gmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">¿</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Romero" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Parente" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Fanjul" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.M." "apellidos" => "Angulo" ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "entidad" => "Sección de Urología Infantil, Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Simplificación del tratamiento quirúrgico del pene oculto" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1917 "Ancho" => 2501 "Tamanyo" => 609750 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Buried penis. (A) Preoperative appearance. (B) Denuding of the penis. (C) Exteriorization by means of an incision in the scrotal raphe. (D) Postoperative result.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A hidden or concealed penis is a normal-sized phallus that is under-exposed. Many terms have been used to describe a hidden penis, which has led to confusion and made consensus difficult regarding the management of this disorder. In 1996, Maizels et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> proposed a classification in order to clarify and simplify treatment. According to them, there are three subgroups: buried penis, webbed penis and trapped penis. A buried penis is a normal-sized phallus that is concealed in the pubic tissue due to the lack of fixation of the skin at the base of the penis. In a webbed penis, the problem lies in the disappearance of the penoscrotal angle, due to an abnormally distal extension of the scrotal skin on the ventral surface of the penis. Finally, a trapped penis is the result of scarring subsequent to surgery on the penis, usually circumcisions performed on concealed penises. The term micropenis should not be used to refer to a buried penis, as a micropenis is a normal phallus more than two standard deviations below the average, while a buried penis is normal sized.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There are numerous surgical techniques to treat a concealed penis, and it is commonly accepted that the principle of all of them is to restore the attachment of the penile skin to Buck's fascia, such that both the penopubic angle and the penoscrotal angle are restored.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,3</span></a> There is also general consensus on the psychological and functional impact of this condition and the need for early treatment.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> In this regard, several authors have developed techniques that simplify and minimize surgical complications and recurrence, even in younger patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,4</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In 2007, Borsellino et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> described a technique for the correction of a hidden penis. This technique is relatively simple and allows restoration of penopubic and penoscrotal angles, preventing scarring sequelae.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Patients and methods</span><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">From February 2008 to May 2009, we treated 7 children aged between 1 and 11 years with a mean age of 4.6 years for hidden penis. In five cases the penis was buried, the sixth had his penis trapped in the scar of a circumcision performed for cultural reasons 6 months earlier and the seventh had a webbed penis. In all the cases surgical indication was for cosmetic reasons, secondary phimosis in four, recurrence of balanitis in one and scar-related pain in another. In all cases, the surgical correction technique of choice was that described by Borsellino et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> However, in patients with more pubic fat, in those we foresaw the need for a lipectomy, we made an “S” or “Z” incision, instead of the two small dorsal incisions described in the original technique.</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We performed all the operations under general anesthesia combined with regional anesthesia by means of epidural catheter, which prevented the use of local anesthetics in the surgical site and allowed good intraoperative and postoperative pain control. In all the cases, we completely denuded the penis by means of a coronal incision, unhanging the abnormal fixations of the dartos. We reconstructed the penoscrotal and penopubic angles by attaching the skin dermis to Buck's fascia, lateral to the urethra and lateral to the neurovascular structures, respectively. This procedure was facilitated in the ventral part by means of an incision in the scrotal raphe without affecting the ventral skin of the penis and exteriorizing the penis through it. This was done in 4 patients with absorbable sutures (polyglycolic acid) and in three patients with non-absorbable sutures (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, Gore-Tex) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>). In one of the patients we performed a limited pubic lipectomy through the dorsal incision.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Results</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The mean operative time including anesthesia and nursing procedures was 76<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min (range: 65–90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min). In all cases the patients were discharged 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h after surgery following removal of the epidural catheter. Postoperative follow-up varied from 1 to 15 months. One patient had immediate postoperative lymphedema after surgery, which disappeared completely after two months. Another patient had partial recurrence of the process 4 months after surgery, and underwent surgery with the same technique. One patient suffered hypertrophy of the pubic scar and is currently being treated with silicone gel. In all the cases, including those with postoperative complications, the parents were satisfied with the aesthetic and functional results and considered the procedure to be minimally invasive for their sons.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Discussion</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is indisputable that a small penis in a child causes concern and anxiety in parents.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> Even if it is appropriately sized, a concealed penis is perceived as small, whether because it is buried in the pubic tissue, because it is webbed or because it is trapped in a scar. We believe that proper classification of these disorders is essential for proper treatment.</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There is controversy as to when these disorders should be corrected; however, the development of more refined surgical techniques and advances in postoperative pain management makes us tend to choose early treatment with the aim of avoiding the negative effects that a hidden penis has on the psychological and social development of the child. For this reason, in the same manner as authors such as Casale et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> we maintain that a buried penis can and should be treated at an early age, once the patient begins to walk.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As regards the surgical approach, there are many works that highlight the need to address all those factors that may cause these disorders.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,3,5,6</span></a> We believe it is essential to complete denudation of the penis to remove the abnormal dartos attachments that further its shortening. The appropriate reconstruction of the penoscrotal and penopubic angles by carefully attaching the penile skin to Buck's fascia<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>) is also fundamental for the success of treatment.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">At this point we believe that the fundamental advantage of the technique described by Borsellino et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> is that it allows these attachments without affecting the ventral skin of the penis and the incision is made in the scrotal raphe and the penis is exteriorized through it. Avoiding the ventral incision on the penis minimizes scarring sequelae, and in our experience does not hinder the technique. An “S” incision in patients with more pubic fat facilitates attachment and allows simultaneous lipectomy (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>). We lack experience in the use of liposuction, although some authors present good results<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a>. Originally, we used absorbable sutures to reconstruct the angles, however, early partial recurrence in one of our patients made us prefer to use non-absorbable sutures in the last three cases we operated.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We believe that this technique is useful in the treatment of trapped penis with flawless penile skin. In such case, we recommend performing the treatment in two stages.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,7</span></a></p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Although the series we present is small, and we have no long-term follow-up, we are pleased with the technique because it is easy to perform, has few complications, is perceived by parents as non-aggressive and is highly valued from an aesthetic point of view.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,9</span></a> Early discharge after surgery allows minimizing the impact of hospital stay on patients and their relatives.</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In short, properly classifying concealed penises facilitates planning their treatment and increases the prospects of success. The technique described by Borsellino et al. appears to be effective and in many cases prevents the use of flaps, grafts and ventral incisions. It has few early complications and the final cosmetic result is good. The substitution of two small dorsal incisions with an “S” or “Z” incision allows simultaneous lipectomy. Patients and/or their parents are satisfied with the aesthetic and functional results in the short and medium-term.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:10 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xres98337" "titulo" => array:5 [ 0 => "Abstract" 1 => "Introduction" 2 => "Patients and methods" 3 => "Results" 4 => "Conclusions" ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec85497" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xres98338" "titulo" => array:5 [ 0 => "Resumen" 1 => "Introducción" 2 => "Pacientes y métodos" 3 => "Resultados" 4 => "Conclusiones" ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec85498" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Patients and methods" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 9 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec85497" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Hidden penis" 1 => "Buried penis" 2 => "Webbed penis" 3 => "Trapped penis" 4 => "Children" 5 => "Reconstructive surgery" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec85498" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Pene oculto" 1 => "Pene enterrado" 2 => "Pene palmeado" 3 => "Pene atrapado" 4 => "Niños" 5 => "Cirugía reconstructiva" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Introduction</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The treatment of a hidden penis consists of completely and effectively exteriorizing the penile shaft from a functional and aesthetic point of view.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Patients and methods</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Over a period of 15 months (02/2008–05/2009), we treated 7 children (mean age 4.6 years) with hidden penis (five had a buried penis, one had a webbed penis and another a trapped penis) using the Borsellino reconstruction technique modified with an “S” dorsal incision. We performed a pubic lipectomy in one patient through the same incision. Surgical indication was for aesthetic reasons in all the cases, secondary phimosis in four, repeated balanitis in one and pain in another.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Hospital stay was 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h. With a short-term follow-up (1–12 months), we detected the following complications: partial recurrence, post-surgical lymphedema and hypertrophic scarring, each of them in one case. Patients and parents were satisfied with the result.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Conclusions</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The technique that we present achieves good cosmetic results and has few immediate complications. The substitution of the two dorsal incisions with one “S” incision allows simultaneous lipectomy without the need for another incision.</p>" ] "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Introducción</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">El tratamiento del pene oculto consiste en llevar a cabo una exteriorización completa del cuerpo del pene, que resulte efectiva desde el punto de vista funcional y estético.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Pacientes y métodos</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A lo largo de 15 meses (febrero de 2008 a mayo de 2009) hemos tratado 7 niños (edad media: 4,6 años) con pene oculto (5 con pene enterrado, uno palmeado y otro atrapado) con la reconstrucción de Borsellino modificada mediante incisión en «S» en la parte dorsal. En un paciente se realizó lipectomía púbica a través de la misma incisión. La indicación quirúrgica fue por motivos estéticos en todos los casos, fimosis secundaria en 4, balanitis de repetición en uno y dolor en otro.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Resultados</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La estancia hospitalaria fue de 24 horas. Con un seguimiento a corto plazo (1–12 meses) las complicaciones detectadas fueron: recidiva parcial, linfedema posquirúrgico y cicatriz hipertrófica, cada una de ellas en un caso. Pacientes y padres se encuentran satisfechos con el resultado.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La técnica que presentamos consigue un buen resultado cosmético y presenta pocas complicaciones inmediatas. La sustitución de las dos incisiones dorsales por una sola en «S» permite lipectomía simultánea sin nueva incisión.</p>" ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara">Please cite this article as: Rivas S, et al. Simplificación del tratamiento quirúrgico del pene oculto. Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35:310–14.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:3 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1917 "Ancho" => 2501 "Tamanyo" => 609750 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Buried penis. (A) Preoperative appearance. (B) Denuding of the penis. (C) Exteriorization by means of an incision in the scrotal raphe. (D) Postoperative result.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 2099 "Ancho" => 2918 "Tamanyo" => 566568 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Webbed penis. (A) Preoperative appearance. (B) Design of incisions. (C) Postoperative appearance, frontal view with dorsal incisions. (D) Side view with ventral incision.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 2211 "Ancho" => 1418 "Tamanyo" => 252124 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Trapped penis. (A) Preoperative appearance and dorsal incision line. (B) Postoperative result.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:9 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and technique to correct the disorder" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M. Maizels" 1 => "M. Zaontz" 2 => "J. Donovan" 3 => "P.N. Bushnick" 4 => "C.F. Firlit" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1996" "volumen" => "136" "paginaInicial" => "268" "paginaFinal" => "271" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2873259" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Surgical approach to concealed penis: technical refinements and outcome" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A. Borsellino" 1 => "A. Spagnoli" 2 => "L. Vallasciani" 3 => "L. Martín" 4 => "F. Ferro" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.065" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Urology" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "69" "paginaInicial" => "1195" "paginaFinal" => "1198" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17572214" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Concealed penis in childhood: a spectrum of etiology and treatment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A.J. Casale" 1 => "S.D. Beck" 2 => "M. Cain" 3 => "M. Adams" 4 => "R. Rink" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "162" "paginaInicial" => "1165" "paginaFinal" => "1168" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10458457" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Results of a simplified technique for buried penis repair" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "T.L. Frenkl" 1 => "S. Agarwal" 2 => "A. Caldamone" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/01.ju.0000107824.72182.95" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "171" "paginaInicial" => "826" "paginaFinal" => "828" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14713835" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Concealed penis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J. Radhakrishnan" 1 => "A. Razzaq" 2 => "K. Manickam" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00383-002-0770-y" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Pediatr Surg Int" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "668" "paginaFinal" => "672" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12598960" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Long-term outcome of the surgical treatment of concealed penis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "A. Herndon" 1 => "A.J. Casale" 2 => "M. Cain" 3 => "R. Rink" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "170" "paginaInicial" => "1689" "paginaFinal" => "1691" ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Penoplasty for buried penis secondary to radical circumcision" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J. Radhakrishnan" 1 => "H.M. Reyes" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Pediatr Surg" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "19" "paginaInicial" => "629" "paginaFinal" => "631" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6520666" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Outcome after repair of congenital penile malformations" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "R.H. Ringert" 1 => "M. Hermanns" 2 => "G. Zoeller" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Andrologia" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "31" "paginaInicial" => "21" "paginaFinal" => "26" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10643515" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Anatomical alignment for the correction of buried penis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "W. Cromie" 1 => "M. Ritchey" 2 => "R. Smith" 3 => "G. Zagaja" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1998" "volumen" => "160" "paginaInicial" => "1482" "paginaFinal" => "1484" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9751399" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/21735786/0000003500000005/v1_201304251543/S2173578611000047/v1_201304251543/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "6272" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Casuistry" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/21735786/0000003500000005/v1_201304251543/S2173578611000047/v1_201304251543/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578611000047?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
