array:23 [ "pii" => "S2173578614001620" "issn" => "21735786" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2014.11.011" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-01-01" "aid" => "634" "copyright" => "AEU" "copyrightAnyo" => "2013" "documento" => "article" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:13-9" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 436 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 11 "HTML" => 317 "PDF" => 108 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S0210480614000461" "issn" => "02104806" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2014.02.009" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-01-01" "aid" => "634" "copyright" => "AEU" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:13-9" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 478 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 10 "HTML" => 310 "PDF" => 158 ] ] "es" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Artículo original</span>" "titulo" => "Ecografía doppler transrectal durante la biopsia prostática: utilidad clínica y limitaciones" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "13" "paginaFinal" => "19" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Transrectal doppler ultrasound during prostate biopsy: Clinical utility and limitations" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figura 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1213 "Ancho" => 1651 "Tamanyo" => 101097 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Curvas ROC para el total de pacientes (n<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>111). El área bajo la curva PD es mayor con respecto a las demás (p<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,05).</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "A. Ezquer, M.C. Ortega Hrescak, C. Sanagua, P. Roggia-Rebullida, R. López, F. Cenice, F.H. Veglia, F. Veglia, A. Fernández" "autores" => array:9 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Ezquer" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M.C." "apellidos" => "Ortega Hrescak" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Sanagua" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Roggia-Rebullida" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "López" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Cenice" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F.H." "apellidos" => "Veglia" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Veglia" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Fernández" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2173578614001620" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2014.11.011" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578614001620?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210480614000461?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/02104806/0000003900000001/v2_201706012252/S0210480614000461/v2_201706012252/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S2173578614001565" "issn" => "21735786" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2014.11.005" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-01-01" "aid" => "663" "copyright" => "AEU" "documento" => "article" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:20-5" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 255 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 8 "HTML" => 139 "PDF" => 108 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Pentafecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: First 100 cases in Latinoamerican Hospital" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "20" "paginaFinal" => "25" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Resultados de pentafecta en prostatectomía radical robótica: primeros 100 casos en un hospital público latinoamericano" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 1012 "Ancho" => 1631 "Tamanyo" => 75935 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Recovery of post-RALP urinary continence.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "J. Gárate, R. Sánchez-Salas, R. Valero, R. Matheus, A. León, H. Dávila" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Gárate" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Sánchez-Salas" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Valero" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Matheus" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "León" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "H." "apellidos" => "Dávila" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0210480614001430" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2013.12.014" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210480614001430?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578614001565?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/21735786/0000003900000001/v1_201501230116/S2173578614001565/v1_201501230116/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S2173578614001589" "issn" => "21735786" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2014.11.007" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-01-01" "aid" => "662" "copyright" => "AEU" "documento" => "article" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:8-12" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 175 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 10 "HTML" => 99 "PDF" => 66 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Prospective study of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal cryotherapy: Case selection as an optimization factor for a technique" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "8" "paginaFinal" => "12" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Estudio prospectivo de crioterapia renal percutánea ecoguiada: selección de casos como factor de optimización de una técnica" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1722 "Ancho" => 1554 "Tamanyo" => 75447 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Kaplan–Meier curve of overall survival.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "O. Rodríguez-Faba, J. Palou, A. Rosales, P. de la Torre, J. Martí, A. Palazzetti, H. Villavicencio" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "O." "apellidos" => "Rodríguez-Faba" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Palou" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Rosales" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "de la Torre" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Martí" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Palazzetti" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "H." "apellidos" => "Villavicencio" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0210480614001429" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2014.03.011" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210480614001429?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578614001589?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/21735786/0000003900000001/v1_201501230116/S2173578614001589/v1_201501230116/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:20 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Transrectal doppler ultrasound during prostate biopsy: Clinical utility and limitations" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "13" "paginaFinal" => "19" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "A. Ezquer, M.C. Ortega Hrescak, C. Sanagua, P. Roggia-Rebullida, R. López, F. Cenice, F.H. Veglia, F. Veglia, A. Fernández" "autores" => array:9 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Ezquer" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "anjoez@gmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M.C." "apellidos" => "Ortega Hrescak" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Sanagua" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Roggia-Rebullida" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "López" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Cenice" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F.H." "apellidos" => "Veglia" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Veglia" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Fernández" ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "entidad" => "Instituto Urológico Privado Prof. Dr. Ronald Parada Parejas, San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Ecografía doppler transrectal durante la biopsia prostática: utilidad clínica y limitaciones" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1213 "Ancho" => 1556 "Tamanyo" => 94841 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">ROC curves for all patients (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>111). The area under the PD curve is higher compared to the others (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05).</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The diagnosis of prostate cancer is currently based on the combination of different procedures. In general, the most commonly used ones in routine urological practice are prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination, digital rectal examination (DRE) and, depending on the results and findings obtained, an ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy (TPB).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,2</span></a> However, the frequency of positive biopsies for prostate cancer remains low. Although TPB is widely used to guide the needle, its clinical utility is compromised by an unsatisfactory positive predictive value (PPV).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> In this context, a limitation of the technique is reflected on the relatively low specificity for the detection of hypoechoic nodules in the peripheral area (PA). Hence, different authors have suggested the need not only for biopsies of possible nodules, but also a randomized sextant system.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4–6</span></a> Systematic sextant biopsy under ultrasound control generally shows prostate cancer in 20–30% of men with serum PSA levels from 4.1 to 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml and in 50–67% of those with PSA levels higher than 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7,8</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In an attempt to overcome the constraints of standard diagnostic methods, new techniques have been developed. Among these, color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) has been described as being more sensitive than grayscale imaging in traditional ultrasound. Rifkin et al. were the first to suggest that most of the cancers detected in the PA and visible on transrectal ultrasound showed hypervascularization when analyzed by CDU.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> Thereafter, the distribution of signals as shown by CDU on a normal prostate gland has also contributed to clarify the changes in that pattern in relation to malignancy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> Nonetheless, its use could be limited in the clinical setting since there is evidence that the addition of CDU increases PPV, but decreases sensitivity for the detection of prostate cancer.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0055"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11,12</span></a> Furthermore, blood flows in small cancerous lesions are difficult to identify.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0055"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11,13</span></a> Pelzer et al. studied a total of 380 patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml, assessing the results obtained when using Doppler ultrasound plus an intravenous contrast substance compared to traditional grayscale ultrasound. The cancer detection rate with the method using the combination of Doppler plus contrast was significantly higher than that obtained with grayscale ultrasound (32.6 versus 17.9% <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.01).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0070"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> In the same way, in the study conducted by Halpern et al. on a total of 301 patients, it was concluded that prostate cancer detection was 1.5 times more likely when using Doppler ultrasound in suspected areas, when compared to randomized grayscale systematic biopsy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0075"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The power Doppler (PD) technique has a theoretical advantage over CDU, enabling a better detection of slow blood flows.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> Several investigations have suggested that PD can better characterize anechoic lesions in the peripheral area<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> and help identify appropriate sites for biopsy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18,19</span></a> In a recently published study, it was estimated that the areas with abnormal blood flow accumulation that can be detected with PD may be present in 96% of the spots with prostate adenocarcinoma in patients with elevated PSA and a suspicious DRE.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a></p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">While the advances in Doppler imaging techniques provide advantages, randomized grayscale systematic biopsy is still widely used, which suggests that a larger number of studies is necessary in order to register new methodologies. Currently, a valid option would be the use of both methods in a complementary manner.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21</span></a></p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">On the basis of that cited above, the aim of this study was to: determine the clinical utility and limitations of prostate biopsy guided by PD in patients with elevated serum PSA levels.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Materials and methods</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">From April 2012 to May 2013, we included a total of 111 men over age 45 with a serum PSA level higher than 4.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/dl. These patients underwent TPB using CHISON-Q6 portable ultrasound equipment with color Doppler system and a 6.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MHz Electronic Micro-Convex transducer, using grayscale features for the systematic biopsy and then using PD.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Prior to the procedure, each patient underwent preparation, consisting of previous fasting for 8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h, an evacuating enema 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h before the study, urine culture, updated prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time to evaluate the antibiotic therapy to be used. Hypoechogenic nodules on the PA were considered positive in the grayscale mode. The PD study was subsequently carried out, where the vascularization of suspicious images was analyzed according to the following system<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a>: 0 with no abnormal accumulation; 1 mild focal accumulation; 2 high focal accumulation; and 3 diffuse accumulation. Grades from 1 to 3 were considered positive and grade 0 was considered negative.</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Prostate tissue sample collection was performed using an 18G-caliber HISTO Biocore II MG needle, of 25<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm in length, and using an automatic gun for TRU-CUT needles with a 2.2-cm penetration (HISTO DANA 2.2 MG). 2 samples were taken from each hypoechogenic area and/or positive PD, followed by a randomized systematic biopsy, in accordance with the protocol proposed by Vashi et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>), which determines the number of samples to be taken depending on prostate volume. When PD showed a diffuse accumulation pattern in terms of vascularization (grade 3), the sample was collected from the area with the highest signal strength. Besides, in those cases with clearly suspicious DRE, the sample was directly taken from that area with manual guidance. Those patients with neither suspicious DRE found, nor with hypoechogenic areas and with a negative PD, only underwent a systematic biopsy. Tissue samples taken from each region were separately submitted for pathologic analysis.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We calculated the validity (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the 3 tests (DRE, standard grayscale ultrasound and PD) and compared whether their validity differed by using the Chi-square test and the ROC curve diagram. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. We used IBM SPSS Statistics 15 and Stata 11 software for calculations.</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Results</span><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A diagnosis of prostate cancer was found in 48 patients (43%) of the total of the 111 patients included in this study. The relationship between what was found by biopsy and the PD findings is shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>. Out of the 111 patients analyzed in this study, 59 cases (53%) were defined as positive at PD, whereas the remaining 52 (47%) were defined as negative by that test. Out of the total of patients with a PD with positive characteristics, 39 (66%) of them corresponded to a diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma and 20 (34%) had benign findings (BPH and/or an inflammatory process). 100% of the patients with a Gleason score ≥7 (22) showed a vascularization grade 3 (diffuse accumulation) at the time of PD.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There was a total of 20 cases of false positives at PD, which corresponded to 13 cases with inflammatory changes and 7 with characteristics of benign prostatic hyperplasia. It is also important to highlight that 9 cases of false negatives were found at PD, which could be due to the existence, at least in some of them, of an acoustic shadow caused by the presence of prostate calcifications in the peripheral area. Comparatively speaking, out of the total of 48 patients with a diagnosis of cancer, the PD was positive in 39 cases and grayscale ultrasound imaging was positive in 31 cases. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a> shows a summary of the existing relationship between the results of both PD and grayscale TPB among those patients with a positive biopsy result, as well as among all patients. Of 36 cases with hypoechogenicity characteristics plus hypervascularization, 23 (63%) were positive at biopsy (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>). When contrasting the results, cancer was found in only 8 (26%) patients out of the 30 who showed hypoechogenicity with normal vascularization, whereas the diagnosis of cancer was positive in 16 (70%) cases out of the 23 who showed normal echogenicity with hypervascularization (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a> comparatively shows the values corresponding to the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) of the 3 diagnostic methods used.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The overall sensitivity of PD (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>111) was 81%, its specificity 68%, PPV 66% and its NPV 82%. When comparing the results with those obtained for DRE and grayscale TPB, we observed that the parameters assessed (sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV) were higher for PD, this difference being statistically significant (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05). <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Fig. 4</a> graphically represents by using ROC curves the results achieved for the 3 methods, and one can observe that PD showed greater diagnostic accuracy (PD curve).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Of the 42 patients with PSA values between 4 and 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml, the biopsy was positive for cancer in 11 cases (45%), and PD found 25 cases positive (26%). PD and grayscale TPB independently detected neoplastic foci in 10 and 4 patients, respectively. Besides, within the group with PSA values between 4 and 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml, PD also appeared to be superior as a diagnostic method versus grayscale TPB (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>). <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0025">Fig. 5</a> shows the graph of the ROC curves for this group of patients.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0025"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Discussion</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A review of the evidence available suggests that a single taking of a sextant biopsy is associated with a significant rate of false negatives.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23,24</span></a> However, it is still difficult to find the ideal methodology to perform this procedure. Several schemes have been developed to improve the diagnostic yield of prostate biopsies, which aim at increasing the number of samples, until a saturation biopsy with 45 cores is achieved.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a> For some authors, the combination of sextant and guided methods maximizes the sensitivity of the biopsy, detects cancers in early stages and does not increase the detection of potentially insignificant tumors.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26,27</span></a> It is clear that a huge effort has been focused on the early detection of the disease. In the last decade, serum PSA measurement as a screening test has played a central role in this strategy. However, the frequency of positive biopsies for prostate cancer is still low among men, with serum PSA levels between 4.1 and 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml, and many of them undergo unnecessary procedures. There are publications demonstrating that CDU has a higher sensitivity than grayscale TPB for the detection of prostate tumors.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> However, CDU can not identify small and weak blood flows in tumor vessels.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0065"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13,16</span></a> PD has a theoretical advantage over CDU since it can distinguish slow-flow vessels irrespective of flow direction.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> Sakarya et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> evaluated the usefulness of PD in 36 patients with possible prostate cancer and found that its sensitivity, specificity and PPV were 90, 75 and 82%, respectively. According to this, PD would increase sensitivity and would help identify the appropriate sites for biopsy. Okihara et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> reported a high performance of PD in the detection of prostate cancer, with a sensitivity of 98% and a NPV of 99%. These results suggest that PD could reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in patients with abnormally elevated PSA levels in the blood. In more recent years, the combination of the Doppler procedure with the use of intravenous contrast has provided satisfactory results, increasing cancer detection rates with elevated Gleason scores and decreasing the number of samples taken, both in patients undergoing first-time prostate biopsy<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> and in those with a previous diagnosis of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> In the present work, the diagnosis of prostate cancer was found in 48 patients (43%) out of the total of 111 patients included in this study. The rate of false negatives was significantly lower in the case of PD (19%) when compared to grayscale TPB (35%) and DRE (33%). According to our results, among the total of patients evaluated, there were 36 with hypoechogenicity characteristics plus hypervascularization, 23 (63%) of whom were positive at biopsy, suggesting that those sites with alterations on the gray scale (hypoechogenic) associated with hypervascularization at PD should be firmly considered for biopsy taking. When carrying out the same analysis, it caught our attention that cancer was only found in 8 (26%) patients out of the 30 who showed hypoechogenicity with normal vascularization, whereas the diagnosis of cancer was positive in 16 (70%) cases of the 23 who showed normal echogenicity with hypervascularization. The findings shown herein would indicate that PD could provide more useful information for the selection of the sites considered to be biopsied. In the study carried out by Ho et al., they determined that the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for PD were 66.7, 24.4, 19.4 and 73% respectively<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a>; more recently, Sauvain et al. used PD for the detection of low-risk prostate cancer (PSA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml) in a total of 243 patients, finding sensitivity, specificity and PPV values of 87, 71 and 85% respectively.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> Consistently with what other authors have published, this study demonstrates a superiority of the results of prostate cancer detection tests in favor of PD, basically due to the fact that its sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were higher than those of the other 2 methods taken into consideration (DRE and grayscale TPB). For a PSA range between 4 and 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml, PD would show greater usefulness, although it is clear that the number of patients studied within this range of values was small.</p><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is important to bear in mind that for some authors it is relevant to consider the existence or not of palpable nodules when choosing an interventionist practice pattern,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0055"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11,32</span></a> which is in concordance with our results, since there were only 3 patients where the biopsy was positive while having normal DRE and PD.</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">On some occasions, it is hard to differentiate between cancerous lesions and inflammatory areas by using PD, since both can show hypervascularization areas. Numerous attempts have been made in the search for specific findings enabling better differentiation between malignant and benign lesions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,33</span></a> Okihara et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> concluded that prostate volume was significantly greater in the positive PD cases without cancer than in the negative PD cases of a similar group. It is speculated that enlarged prostate tissue requires greater vascular flow. Prostate calculi would seem to be a cause of confusion which may hide a cancerous lesion in the transition area. Since prostate calculi are generally located in the border between peripheral and transition areas, their acoustic shadow can interfere with ultrasound observation in the transition area.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">33</span></a> The results found in the present work showed a total of 9 patients with a positive biopsy and PD with normal flow, which shows similarity with what has been expressed by other authors regarding the restrictions of this method.</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is worth mentioning that nowadays new imaging methods are gaining in importance regarding the diagnosis of prostate cancer, as in the case of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Even though in our environment there is still little experience with the use of MRI for prostate disease, important series have already been published on the international stage demonstrating that multiparametric MRI provides a good detection rate of prostate cancer,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">34,35</span></a> and even evaluates the existence of extracapsular disease.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0195"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">36</span></a> While these results are better than those achieved by biopsy under transrectal ultrasound guidance, we believe that its implementation is more difficult due to the costs involved.</p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We should not fail to mention some limitations in this study. All the procedures were carried out using CHISON Q6 equipment with color Doppler system and a 6.0-MHz Electronic Micro-Convex transducer, so our results may be different to those obtained with other tools. As shown by Halpern et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">37</span></a> the lateral decubitus position may cause increased Doppler flow on the dependent's side. However, the results of his study also revealed an asymmetry in blood flow, despite the lithotomy position. On the other hand, a 60-MHz transrectal transducer was used. The use of more modern technology is likely to enable improved sensitivity of the method.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">37,38</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Conclusions</span><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">PD can identify appropriate sites for biopsy as hypervascularizated ones and improve the cancer detection rate when compared to grayscale transrectal ultrasound and systematic biopsies. However, inflammatory reactions and prostate calculi would represent the main causes of results with false positives and false negatives, respectively, thus compromising the usefulness of the method. Therefore, we conclude that, at present, the use of PD does not appear to identify prostate cancer with a sufficient degree of accuracy to omit grayscale guided systematic biopsy, the combined use of these methods being preferable.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:11 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xres413784" "titulo" => array:5 [ 0 => "Abstract" 1 => "Objective" 2 => "Materials and methods" 3 => "Results" 4 => "Conclusion" ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec389448" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xres413785" "titulo" => array:5 [ 0 => "Resumen" 1 => "Objetivo" 2 => "Materiales y método" 3 => "Resultados" 4 => "Conclusión" ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec389449" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Materials and methods" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 10 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2013-11-10" "fechaAceptado" => "2014-02-02" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec389448" "palabras" => array:3 [ 0 => "Prostate neoplasms" 1 => "Doppler" 2 => "Transrectal ultrasound" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec389449" "palabras" => array:3 [ 0 => "Neoplasias de próstata" 1 => "Doppler" 2 => "Ecografía transrectal" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Objective</span><p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">To determine the clinical utility and limitations of guided prostate biopsy power Doppler in patients with elevated serum PSA levels.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Materials and methods</span><p id="spar0080" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Prospective study. From April 2012 to May 2013, 111 men over 45 years of age with serum PSA level greater than 4.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/dl who underwent a transrectal prostate biopsy were included. The hypoechoic nodules in the peripheral region were considered positive on the gray scale. Subsequently, the study was conducted with the power Doppler, where the vascularization of suspicious images was analyzed for sampling. In addition, samples were taken from the suspected areas when performing the digital rectal examination. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the three tests (digital rectal examination, standard gray scale ultrasound and power Doppler).</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0085" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 48 of the 111 patients (43%). Fifty-nine cases (53%) were defined as positive with the power Doppler. Of these, 39 (66%) corresponded to a diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma. The power Doppler was positive in 39 cases of the 48 patients diagnosed with cancer and the gray scale ultrasound was positive in 31 cases. Overall sensitivity of the power Doppler was 81%, specificity 68%, PPV 66% and NPV 82%, which was higher compared to the other methods (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.05).</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusion</span><p id="spar0090" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Currently, prostate biopsy using power Doppler does not seem to identify prostate cancer with sufficient accuracy to omit the guided systematic biopsy gray scale, the combined use of these methods.</p>" ] "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Objetivo</span><p id="spar0095" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Determinar la utilidad clínica y limitaciones de la biopsia de próstata guiada por power doppler en pacientes con elevación de los niveles séricos de PSA.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Materiales y método</span><p id="spar0100" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Estudio prospectivo. Desde abril del 2012 a mayo del 2013 se incluyeron un total de 111 hombres mayores de 45 años con un nivel de PSA sérico mayor a 4,0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/dl, los cuales fueron sometidos a una biopsia prostática transrectal. Los nódulos hipoecogénicos en la zona periférica fueron considerados positivos en la escala de grises. Posteriormente se efectuó el estudio con el power doppler, donde la vascularización de las imágenes sospechosas fue analizada para tomar las muestras. Además se tomó muestra de las zonas sospechosas al examen digitorrectal. Se calculó la sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y valor predictivo negativo de las 3 pruebas (examen digitorrectal, ecografía estándar con escala de grises, y power doppler).</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0105" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">El diagnóstico de cáncer de próstata fue hallado en 48 pacientes (43%) del total de 111. Cincuenta y nueve casos (53%) fueron definidos como positivo al power doppler, y de estos 39 (66%) correspondieron a un diagnóstico de adenocarcinoma de próstata. Del total de los 48 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer el power doppler fue positivo en 39 casos y la ecografía en escala de grises fue positiva en 31 casos. La sensibilidad global del power doppler fue del 81%, especificidad del 68%, VPP 66% y VPN 82%, lo cual resultó superior en comparación con los otros métodos (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,05).</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusión</span><p id="spar0110" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">En la actualidad la biopsia prostática utilizando power doppler no parece identificar el cáncer de próstata con una precisión suficiente para omitir la biopsia sistemática guiada por escala de grises, siendo preferible el uso combinado de estos métodos being preferable.</p>" ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Ezquer A, Ortega Hrescak MC, Sanagua C, Roggia-Rebullida P, López R, Cenice F, et al. Ecografía doppler transrectal durante la biopsia prostática: utilidad clínica y limitaciones. Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:13–19.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:8 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1080 "Ancho" => 1614 "Tamanyo" => 66855 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Randomized biopsy protocol according to the glanular volume.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 517 "Ancho" => 1302 "Tamanyo" => 89102 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">70-year-old patient with PSA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml. (A) Transrectal ultrasound is observed grayscale showing a hypoechoic nodule in the peripheral zone. (B) That nodule clearly shows hypervascularization at PD (focus of prostate adenocarcinoma).</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 577 "Ancho" => 1351 "Tamanyo" => 85642 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">62-year-old patient with PSA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml. (A) Transrectal ultrasound is observed grayscale without a suspected focus. (B) A focal area with hypervascularization at PD (focus of prostate adenocarcinoma) is observed.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1213 "Ancho" => 1556 "Tamanyo" => 94841 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">ROC curves for all patients (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>111). The area under the PD curve is higher compared to the others (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05).</p>" ] ] 4 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0025" "etiqueta" => "Figure 5" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr5.jpeg" "Alto" => 1244 "Ancho" => 1560 "Tamanyo" => 95856 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">ROC curves for all patients with PSA values between 4 and 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>42). The area under the PD curve is higher compared to the others (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05).</p>" ] ] 5 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col">Biopsy \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">PD</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Positive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Positive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Negative \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="4" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Gleason</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≤<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">23 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≥<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Subtotal \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">39 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">48 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="4" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="4" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Negative</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Inflammatory changes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">12 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>BPH/normal \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">31 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">38 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Subtotal \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">43 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">63 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="4" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Total</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">59 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">52 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">111 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab644359.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Relationship between PD and biopsy results.</p>" ] ] 6 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0120" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Data: number of patients with positive/negative biopsy, with the PD and TPB findings grayscale.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col">Hypervascularized zone at PD \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Hypoechoic area by TPB</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Positive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Negative \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Positive \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">23/36 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">16/23 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">39/59 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Negative \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">8/30 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1/22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9/52 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">31/67 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">17/44 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">48/111 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab644357.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0115" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Relationship between PD and TPB grayscale with the results of the biopsy (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>111).</p>" ] ] 7 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0015" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Diagnostic method \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Sensitivity \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Specificity \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">PPV \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">NPV \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="5" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Overall (n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">=</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">111)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>DRE \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">66% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">62% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">57% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">70% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>TPB grayscale \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">65% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">44% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">47% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">62% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PD \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">81% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">68% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">66% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">82% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> value \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="5" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="5" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">PSA 4–10</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">ng/ml (n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">=</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">42)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>DRE \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">65% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">8% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">66% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>TPB grayscale \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">36% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">52% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">21% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">69% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PD \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">91% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">68% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">50% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">95% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> value \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab644358.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0125" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Comparison of the results of the tests for the detection of prostate cancer.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:38 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A multicenter evaluation of PSA and digital rectal examination (DRE) for early detection of prostate cancer in 6,371 volunteers" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "W.J. Catalona" 1 => "J.P. Richie" 2 => "F.R. Ahman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "149" "paginaInicial" => "412" "paginaFinal" => "421" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8426432" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "W.H. Cooper" 1 => "B.R. Mosley" 2 => "C.T. Rutherford" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1990" "volumen" => "143" "paginaInicial" => "1146" "paginaFinal" => "1154" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1692885" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project: findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2,425 men" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "C. Mettlin" 1 => "F. Lee" 2 => "J. Grago" 3 => "G.P. Murphy" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Cancer" "fecha" => "1991" "volumen" => "67" "paginaInicial" => "2949" "paginaFinal" => "2958" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1710531" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "K.K. Hodge" 1 => "J.E. McNeal" 2 => "M.K. Terris" 3 => "T.A. Stamey" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1989" "volumen" => "142" "paginaInicial" => "71" "paginaFinal" => "75" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2659827" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The ability of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer in men with the clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "D.E. Coplen" 1 => "G.L. Andriole" 2 => "J.J.J. Yuan" 3 => "W.J. Catalona" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1991" "volumen" => "146" "paginaInicial" => "75" "paginaFinal" => "77" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1711588" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Systematic prostatic biopsies in 100 men with no suspicion of cancer on digital rectal examination" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "G. Vallancien" 1 => "D. Prapotnich" 2 => "B. Veillon" 3 => "J.M. Brisset" 4 => "J. Andre-Bougaran" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1991" "volumen" => "146" "paginaInicial" => "1308" "paginaFinal" => "1312" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1719243" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "W.J. Catalona" 1 => "D.S. Smith" 2 => "T.L. Ratliff" 3 => "K.M. Dodds" 4 => "D.E. Coplen" 5 => "J.J. Yuan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1056/NEJM199104253241702" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med" "fecha" => "1991" "volumen" => "324" "paginaInicial" => "1156" "paginaFinal" => "1160" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707140" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0015028207006541" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00150282" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Screening for prostatic carcinoma with prostate specific antigen" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.K. Brawer" 1 => "M.P. Chetne" 2 => "J. Beatie" 3 => "D.M. Buchner" 4 => "R.L. Vessella" 5 => "P.H. Lange" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1992" "volumen" => "147" "paginaInicial" => "841" "paginaFinal" => "845" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1371559" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prostate: technique, results and potential application of color Doppler US scanning" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.D. Rifkin" 1 => "G.S. Sudakoff" 2 => "A.A. Archibald" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1148/radiology.186.2.7678467" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Radiology" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "186" "paginaInicial" => "509" "paginaFinal" => "513" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7678467" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0050" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Normal prostate gland: examination with color Doppler US" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "C.E. Neumaier" 1 => "C. Martinoli" 2 => "L.E. Derchi" 3 => "E. Silvestri" 4 => "I. Rosenberg" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617860" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Radiology" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "196" "paginaInicial" => "453" "paginaFinal" => "457" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7617860" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0055" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prostate cancer and the role of color Doppler US" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "I.M.G. Kelly" 1 => "W.R. Lees" 2 => "D. Rickards" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1148/radiology.186.1.8416557" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Radiology" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "186" "paginaInicial" => "153" "paginaFinal" => "156" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8416557" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0060" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Color doppler-guided prostate biopsies in 591 patients with an elevated serum PSA level: impact on Gleason score for nonpalpable lesions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "F.X. Cornud" 1 => "D. Belin" 2 => "Y. Piron" 3 => "Y. Chrétien" 4 => "T. Flam" 5 => "J.M. Casanova" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00632-2" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Urology" "fecha" => "1997" "volumen" => "49" "paginaInicial" => "709" "paginaFinal" => "715" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9145975" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0065" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Power Doppler US: a potential useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J.M. Rubin" 1 => "R. Bude" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115639" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Radiology" "fecha" => "1994" "volumen" => "190" "paginaInicial" => "853" "paginaFinal" => "856" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8115639" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0070" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml using a combined approach of contrast enhanced colour Doppler targeted and systematic biopsy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Pelzer" 1 => "J. Bektic" 2 => "A.P. Berger" 3 => "L. Pallwein" 4 => "E.J. Halpern" 5 => "W. Horninger" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/01.ju.0000158444.56199.03" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "173" "paginaInicial" => "1926" "paginaFinal" => "1929" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15879783" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0075" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Detection of prostate carcinoma with contrast-enhanced sonography using intermittent harmonic imaging" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "E.J. Halpern" 1 => "J.R. Ramey" 2 => "S.E. Strup" 3 => "F. Frauscher" 4 => "P. McCue" 5 => "L.G. Gomella" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/cncr.21440" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Cancer" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "104" "paginaInicial" => "2373" "paginaFinal" => "2383" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16240450" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0080" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Correlation of color Doppler flow in the prostate with tissue microvascularity" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "E. Louva" 1 => "P.J. Littrup" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Cancer" "fecha" => "1998" "volumen" => "83" "paginaInicial" => "135" "paginaFinal" => "140" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9655303" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0085" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Power Doppler ultrasonography and hypoechoic nodules of the peripheral prostate: perspectives and limitations" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J.L. Sauvain" 1 => "P. Palascak" 2 => "J.M. Bremon" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Radiol" "fecha" => "1997" "volumen" => "78" "paginaInicial" => "491" "paginaFinal" => "497" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9296029" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Diffuse prostatic lesions: role of color Doppler and power Doppler ultrasonography" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J.Y. Cho" 1 => "S.H. Kim" 2 => "S.E. Lee" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Ultrasound Med" "fecha" => "1998" "volumen" => "17" "paginaInicial" => "283" "paginaFinal" => "287" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9586699" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Transrectal power Doppler imaging in the detection of prostate cancer" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "K. Okihara" 1 => "M. Kojima" 2 => "T. Nakanouchi" 3 => "K. Okada" 4 => "T. Miki" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "BJU Int" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "85" "paginaInicial" => "1053" "paginaFinal" => "1057" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10848693" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S1473309912702220" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "14733099" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluation of power Doppler ultrasonography for prostate biopsy in men with elevated serum prostate specific antigen levels" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "C.C. Ho" 1 => "T.W. Khor" 2 => "P. Singam" 3 => "E.H. Goh" 4 => "G.H. Tan" 5 => "B. Bahadzor" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Ter" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "163" "paginaInicial" => "211" "paginaFinal" => "214" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22964693" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Does transrectal color Doppler ultrasound improve the diagnosis of prostate cancer?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A. Del Rosso" 1 => "E.D. di Pierro" 2 => "S. Masciovecchio" 3 => "G.P. Galatioto" 4 => "C. Vicentini" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arch Ital Urol Androl" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "84" "paginaInicial" => "22" "paginaFinal" => "25" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22649956" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0015028205039695" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00150282" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A model for the number of cores per prostate biopsy based on patient age and prostate gland volume" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "A.R. Vashi" 1 => "K.J. Wojno" 2 => "B. Gillespie" 3 => "J.E. Oesterling" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1998" "volumen" => "159" "paginaInicial" => "920" "paginaFinal" => "924" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9474183" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0015028206046784" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00150282" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prevalence and predictors of a positive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "N.E. Fleshner" 1 => "M. O'Sullivan" 2 => "W.R. Fair" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1997" "volumen" => "158" "paginaInicial" => "505" "paginaFinal" => "508" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9224334" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Repeat prostate biopsy: who, how and when?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "B. Djavan" 1 => "M. Remzi" 2 => "C.C. Schulman" 3 => "M. Marberger" 4 => "A.R. Zlotta" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Urol" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "42" "paginaInicial" => "93" "paginaFinal" => "103" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12160578" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "C.S. Stewart" 1 => "B.C. Leibovich" 2 => "A.L. Weaver" 3 => "M.M. Lieber" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "166" "paginaInicial" => "86" "paginaFinal" => "92" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11435830" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.L. Gore" 1 => "S.F. Shariat" 2 => "B.J. Miles" 3 => "D. Kadmon" 4 => "N. Jiang" 5 => "T.M. Wheeler" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "165" "paginaInicial" => "1554" "paginaFinal" => "1559" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11342916" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Outcome of laterally directed sextant biopsies of the prostate in screened males aged 50–66 years: implications for sampling order" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "G. Aus" 1 => "S. Bergdahl" 2 => "J. Hugosson" 3 => "P. Lodding" 4 => "C.G. Pihl" 5 => "E. Pileblad" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "52523" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Urol" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "39" "paginaInicial" => "655" "paginaFinal" => "660" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11464054" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The role of power Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a preliminary study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M.E. Sakarya" 1 => "H. Arslan" 2 => "O. Unal" 3 => "M.K. Atilla" 4 => "S. Aydin" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Urol" "fecha" => "1998" "volumen" => "82" "paginaInicial" => "386" "paginaFinal" => "388" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9772875" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Status of transrectal ultrasound imaging of the prostate" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "F. Aigner" 1 => "M. Mitterberger" 2 => "P. Rehder" 3 => "L. Pallwein" 4 => "D. Junker" 5 => "W. Horninger" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1089/end.2009.0640" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Endourol" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "24" "paginaInicial" => "685" "paginaFinal" => "691" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433367" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Contrast-enhanced colour Doppler-targeted vs a 10-core systematic repeat biopsy strategy in patients with previous high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M. Mitterberger" 1 => "W. Horninger" 2 => "F. Aigner" 3 => "G.M. Pinggera" 4 => "P. Rehder" 5 => "E. Steiner" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08963.x" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "BJU Int" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "105" "paginaInicial" => "1660" "paginaFinal" => "1662" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19863528" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0015028211002469" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00150282" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "31" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Value of transrectal power Doppler sonography in the detection of low-risk prostate cancers" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.L. Sauvain" 1 => "E. Sauvain" 2 => "P. Rohmer" 3 => "D. Louis" 4 => "N. Nader" 5 => "R. Papavero" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.diii.2012.09.003" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Diagn Interv Imaging" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "94" "paginaInicial" => "60" "paginaFinal" => "67" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23211834" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "32" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prostate cancer: diagnosis with color Doppler sonography with histologic correlation of each biopsy site" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J.S. Newman" 1 => "R.L. Bree" 2 => "J.M. Rubin" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1148/radiology.195.1.7534429" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Radiology" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "195" "paginaInicial" => "86" "paginaFinal" => "90" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7534429" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0140673603151628" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "01406736" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "33" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography and conventional examination methods: the value of diagnostic predictors of prostate cancer" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "D. Unal" 1 => "J.P.M. Sedelaar" 2 => "R.G. Aarnink" 3 => "G.J. van Leenders" 4 => "H. Wijkstra" 5 => "F.M. Debruyne" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "BJU Int" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "86" "paginaInicial" => "58" "paginaFinal" => "64" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10961276" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 33 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "34" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.R. Rastinehad" 1 => "B. Turkbey" 2 => "S.S. Salami" 3 => "O. Yaskiv" 4 => "A.K. George" 5 => "M. Fakhoury" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.007" "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "2013" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21575967" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 34 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "35" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Value of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting biopsy results in first or repeat biopsy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "H. Habchi" 1 => "F. Bratan" 2 => "A. Paye" 3 => "G. Pagnoux" 4 => "T. Sanzalone" 5 => "F. Mège-Lechevallier" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Radiol" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "69" "paginaInicial" => "120" "paginaFinal" => "128" "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0015028207014252" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00150282" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 35 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0195" "etiqueta" => "36" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "F. Lista" 1 => "H. Gimbernat" 2 => "F. Cáceres" 3 => "J.M. Rodríguez-Barbero" 4 => "E. Castillo" 5 => "J.C. Angulo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2013.11.003" "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Actas Urol Esp" "fecha" => "2013" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24210656" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 36 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0185" "etiqueta" => "37" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "High-frequency Doppler US of the prostate: effect of patient position" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "E.J. Halpern" 1 => "F. Frauscher" 2 => "F. Forsberg" 3 => "S.E. Strup" 4 => "L.N. Nazarian" 5 => "P. O’Kane" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1148/radiol.2223010946" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Radiology" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "222" "paginaInicial" => "634" "paginaFinal" => "639" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11867778" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 37 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0190" "etiqueta" => "38" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prostate: high frequency Doppler US imaging for cancer detection" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "E.J. Halpern" 1 => "F. Frauscher" 2 => "S.E. Strup" 3 => "S.E. Strup" 4 => "L.N. Nazarian" 5 => "P. O’Kane" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1148/radiol.2251011938" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Radiology" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "225" "paginaInicial" => "71" "paginaFinal" => "77" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12354987" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/21735786/0000003900000001/v1_201501230116/S2173578614001620/v1_201501230116/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "6274" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Original articles" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/21735786/0000003900000001/v1_201501230116/S2173578614001620/v1_201501230116/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578614001620?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
Journal Information
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Original article
Transrectal doppler ultrasound during prostate biopsy: Clinical utility and limitations
Ecografía doppler transrectal durante la biopsia prostática: utilidad clínica y limitaciones
A. Ezquer
, M.C. Ortega Hrescak, C. Sanagua, P. Roggia-Rebullida, R. López, F. Cenice, F.H. Veglia, F. Veglia, A. Fernández
Corresponding author
Instituto Urológico Privado Prof. Dr. Ronald Parada Parejas, San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina