Share
array:23 [ "pii" => "S2173578615000244" "issn" => "21735786" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2015.02.008" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-04-01" "aid" => "686" "copyright" => "AEU" "copyrightAnyo" => "2014" "documento" => "simple-article" "subdocumento" => "crp" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:195-200" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 152 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 12 "HTML" => 102 "PDF" => 38 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S0210480614002915" "issn" => "02104806" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2014.06.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-04-01" "aid" => "686" "copyright" => "AEU" "documento" => "simple-article" "subdocumento" => "crp" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:195-200" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 239 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 8 "HTML" => 174 "PDF" => 57 ] ] "es" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Casuística</span>" "titulo" => "Reimplantación ureteral laparoendoscópica por puerto único transumbilical" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "195" "paginaFinal" => "200" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ureteral reimplantation" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figura 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1058 "Ancho" => 2167 "Tamanyo" => 244819 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A. Incisión umbilical para la colocación del sistema de puerto único. B. Cicatriz prácticamente invisible a las 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h de la cirugía.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "H. Gimbernat, C. Redondo, A. García-Tello, E. Mateo, J.M. García-Mediero, J.C. Angulo" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "H." "apellidos" => "Gimbernat" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Redondo" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "García-Tello" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "E." "apellidos" => "Mateo" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.M." "apellidos" => "García-Mediero" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.C." "apellidos" => "Angulo" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2173578615000244" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2015.02.008" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578615000244?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210480614002915?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/02104806/0000003900000003/v2_201503280410/S0210480614002915/v2_201503280410/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S217357861500027X" "issn" => "21735786" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2015.02.011" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-04-01" "aid" => "687" "copyright" => "AEU" "documento" => "simple-article" "subdocumento" => "cor" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:201-2" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 140 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 15 "HTML" => 97 "PDF" => 28 ] ] "en" => array:11 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Letter to the Editor</span>" "titulo" => "Ultrafine structure of calcium oxalate monohydrate renal calculi" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "201" "paginaFinal" => "202" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Estructura ultrafina de cálculos renales de oxalato cálcico monohidrato" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 2136 "Ancho" => 2496 "Tamanyo" => 900879 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">General image of thin concentric layer dividing blocks of columnar crystals (A) in a calcium oxalate monohydrate papillary renal calculus and (B) in a calcium oxalate monohydrate renal calculus formed in a renal cavity. (C) 3-D topographic map of the concentric layer. Scan 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μm<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>×<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μm. (D) 3-D adhesion map combined of the same area as depicted in C. Scan 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μm<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>×<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μm.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "F. Grases, O. Söhnel, M. Zelenková, A. Costa-Bauzá" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Grases" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "O." "apellidos" => "Söhnel" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Zelenková" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Costa-Bauzá" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0210480614003052" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2014.05.012" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210480614003052?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S217357861500027X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/21735786/0000003900000003/v2_201503280430/S217357861500027X/v2_201503280430/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S2173578615000268" "issn" => "21735786" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuroe.2015.02.010" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-04-01" "aid" => "679" "copyright" => "AEU" "documento" => "article" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:188-94" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 247 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 6 "HTML" => 204 "PDF" => 37 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Skill and talent</span>" "titulo" => "The best option: Umbilical LESS radical nephrectomy with vaginal extraction" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "188" "paginaFinal" => "194" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "La opción óptima: nefrectomía radical LESS umbilical con extracción vaginal" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0025" "etiqueta" => "Figure 5" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr5.jpeg" "Alto" => 1376 "Ancho" => 991 "Tamanyo" => 243153 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Surgical specimen, piece of left radical nephrectomy.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "G. Andrés, J.M. García-Mediero, A. García-Tello, I. Arance, P.M. Cabrera, J.C. Angulo" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "G." "apellidos" => "Andrés" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.M." "apellidos" => "García-Mediero" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "García-Tello" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "I." "apellidos" => "Arance" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P.M." "apellidos" => "Cabrera" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.C." "apellidos" => "Angulo" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0210480614002009" "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2014.05.007" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210480614002009?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578615000268?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/21735786/0000003900000003/v2_201503280430/S2173578615000268/v2_201503280430/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:19 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Casuistry</span>" "titulo" => "Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ureteral reimplantation" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "195" "paginaFinal" => "200" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "H. Gimbernat, C. Redondo, A. García-Tello, E. Mateo, J.M. García-Mediero, J.C. Angulo" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "H." "apellidos" => "Gimbernat" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Redondo" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "García-Tello" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "E." "apellidos" => "Mateo" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.M." "apellidos" => "García-Mediero" ] 5 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "J.C." "apellidos" => "Angulo" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "javier.angulo@salud.madrid.org" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Departamento Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Reimplantación ureteral laparoendoscópica por puerto único transumbilical" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1043 "Ancho" => 1402 "Tamanyo" => 213852 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Various moments of surgery. (A) Placement of hydrophilic guidewire into the spatulated ureter through a percutaneously inserted needle. (B) Placement of double-J catheter over the wire. (C) Ureteral reimplantation in the bladder by means of continuous suture. (D) End of the suture.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The fundamental goal in ureteral reconstructive surgery is to establish a lasting permeability of the collecting system, for which it is necessary to conduct an adequate ureteral mobilization, which preserves vascularization, and to perform a tight and free-of-tension anastomosis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> Although the laparoscopic approach is fully established today for ablative urological procedures, in the case of reconstructive surgery, the open pathway is still a choice in a large number of centers.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> Laparoscopy has proven effective for different reconstructive procedures, offering lower postoperative pain, blood loss, and convalescence than in its open equivalent, as well as a better cosmetic result.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> Therefore, it is the approach of choice in experienced centers.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) represents the natural evolution of minimally invasive surgery. In the literature, series of cases and retrospective studies with a large number of LESS procedures have been described. The major challenges of this technique include the limitation on triangulation of instruments, with the resulting crash thereof, resulting in considerable difficulty to perform sutures.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> There is no doubt that, in a reconstructive procedure, this limitation is particularly problematic.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> However, the simultaneous use of accessory minilaparoscopy material through a 3.5-mm port makes it possible to carry out any suture and greatly facilitates the procedure.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,7,8</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The results of reconstructive LESS procedures seem comparable to those of conventional laparoscopy, although more data on the safety of this type of procedures are needed.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> In general, it is assumed that LESS surgery involves advantages associated with lower indemnity of the abdominal wall, leading to less postoperative pain, cosmetic improvement, and even more rapid recovery,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,9</span></a> especially if the extraction of the specimen is avoided as in reconstructive surgery. We reviewed the experience at our center in ureteral reimplantation surgery using LESS hybrid approach for distal ureteral stenosis secondary to benign processes.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Patients and method</span><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Since February 2012, 5 patients have undergone laparoscopic reimplantation through multichannel single port of transumbilical placement in our center. Three patients were women and 2 were men with a median age of 49 (IQR 34) years. Reimplantation was left in all cases. In the fourth of the 5 patients, it was secondary to ureteral stenosis, with a median length of 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm (IQR 1.46; range 0.5–4). The remaining case had a malformation origin, performing reimplantation after left ureterocele excision of symptomatic adult type. In the cases due to stenosis, the etiology was iatrogenic in 3 patients, secondary to gynecological procedure (hysterectomy with double adnexectomy in which there was ureteral ligation) in one of them, and in the other 2 to urologic procedures (radical prostatectomy with lymphadenectomy on which ureteral injury occurred and ureteroscopy for ureteral lithiasis with partial tear of distal ureter and subsequent stenosis). The fourth case with stenosis was secondary to ureteral endometriosis.</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In all patients, bladder catheter was left for a median of 7 (IQR 3) days and double-J ureteral catheter for 30 (IQR 15) days. One month after the removal of the ureteral catheter, intravenous urography was performed in all cases (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>). Next, the surgical technique used is described.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Surgical technique</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Transperitoneal approach is conducted through single-port multichannel system KeyPort<span class="elsevierStyleSup">®</span> (Richard Wolf, Knitlingen, Germany) of umbilical placement. For this, a 2–2.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm intraumbilical incision is performed (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>). In all cases a 3.5-mm minilaparoscopy accessory port was also used in the left iliac fossa (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>). In those cases where the reimplantation was performed by ureterocele and ureteral endometriosis, double-J catheter was also placed in a retrograde way endoscopically before performing the laparoscopic approach.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The left ureter is identified and dissected below the junction of the iliac vessels to its insertion into the bladder with identification, placement of distal clip, and resection of the portion of stenotic ureter. In patients with ureterocele, dissection of this structure was also performed, for which cystotomy was required and later cystorrhaphy with V-LOC 3-0 suture.</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Opening of the space of Retzius and bladder release are carried out. We proceed to ureteral section and removal of the clip, followed by spatulation of the ureter. The site of ureteral reimplantation without tension is chosen, conducting bladder opening on 2 levels, muscle first and then mucosa. Subsequently, ureteral retrograde guidewire is placed through a needle introduced percutaneously, to then place over the guidewire a double J catheter, whose distal portion is inserted through the incision of the bladder mucosa (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Fig. 4</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Ureteral reimplantation in the bladder is completed by means of 2 continuous monocryl 3–0 hemisutures (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Fig. 4</a>). Subsequently, apposition of the muscle fibers and periosteum is practiced above the anastomosed ureter, by way of submucosal tunnel that provides a certain anti-reflux mechanism. If the ureteral stenotic segment is long, as in the case of post-ureterosocopy stenosis affecting a long segment of distal ureter, we proceed to fix the bladder lateral side to the lower psoas muscle. Suture tightness is verified by intravesical infusion of saline.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Results</span><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">None of the presented cases required reconversion to open surgery or conventional laparoscopy. The duration of the intervention was 145<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min (IQR 60). The median estimated intraoperative bleeding was 100<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cc (IQR 75). No patient required transfusion. The drainage was removed after 48<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h in all patients. There were no minor or major postoperative complications and the hospitalization time was 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>d (IQR 0.5) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The pathologic examination revealed in the 3 cases of iatrogenic stenosis presence of periluminal fibrosis and chronic inflammation, whereas in the other 2, the diagnosis of ureterocele and ureteral endometriosis was confirmed.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the control intravenous urography, 4 of the 5 patients completely recovered ureteral morphology in control intravenous urography, while in one case we found a kidney decreased in size, but without delay in removing the contrast, a result of previous ureterohydronephrosis. With a median follow-up of 11 months (IQR 14; range 6–27), we have not identified recurrence of the hydronephrotic process or worsening of the renal function in any of the cases.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Discussion</span><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Reconstructive urologic procedures are indicated in a wide variety of diseases, including UPJ obstruction, iatrogenesis on the ureter, stenosis, endometriosis, or malignancy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10–12</span></a> The use in these cases of minimally invasive approaches has increased markedly in recent years. There are few series comparing open and laparoscopic surgery, among which are that of Rassweiler et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> which has 10 laparoscopic reimplantations and 10 open by means of psoic bladder with or without Boari flap, and that of Simmons et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> which compares 12 laparoscopic procedures and 34 open. In the series of Nuñez et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> with 6 laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in psoic bladder, followed for over 2 years, no patient had restenosis or impaired renal function.</p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Data on outcomes in single-site laparoscopic reconstructive surgery are even more scarce.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> The broadest multicenter casuistry of patients treated with LESS approach in urological surgery is the one presented by Kaouk et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> in which 1076 consecutive cases performed between 2007 and 2010 in 18 institutions are analyzed. Among them, the vast majority of cases were excisional surgery with only a total of 98 cases (8.4%) of reconstructive surgery for obstruction of the upper urinary tract, including UPJ obstruction, ureteral stenosis, and retrocaval ureter. The authors explain this relative lack of reconstructive procedures due to the obvious ergonomic difficulties of the LESS approach, requiring a very solid prior laparoscopic training. The lack of triangulation, the vision in 2 dimensions, and the crash of the instruments represent additional challenges to conventional laparoscopic surgery. An effective strategy is the introduction of an accessory minilaparoscopy ergonomic, as it has been done in the casuistry that we describe.</p><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Khanna et al. published in 2012 the first study that analyzes medium-term results of patients undergoing reconstructive LESS surgery in the same institution.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> 32 procedures were performed including pyeloplasties, ileal interposition, ureteral reimplantation, and retrocaval ureter. Ureteroneocystostomy was performed in 3 patients. In 93.8% of the patients who reported surgery, this was successful from the clinical point of view, and the only late complication recorded was incisional hernia in one case. Another important experience regarding reconstructive LESS surgery is the series of Tracy et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> comparing the perioperative outcomes of 14 LESS pyeloplasties and 28 conventional laparoscopic ones, showing shorter surgical time, with less blood loss in the laparoendoscopic approach. We observed no significant differences in the number and severity of complications, or in analgesic requirements. Similarly, Stein et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0195"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> compared 16 LESS pyeloplasties and 16 conventional laparoscopic ones, finding no significant differences between both groups.</p><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In summary, although in urological reconstructive surgery it is very convenient and necessary to raise the possibility of approach with no apparent incision (due to the desirable absence of scar in these cases), the overall experience is very limited, and more so if we refer exclusively to the particular experience of LESS ureteral reimplantation. Single-site surgery comes with the intention of further reducing the invasiveness of laparoscopy, with obvious benefits in terms of cosmetic results and trauma to the abdominal wall. In fact, although much lower than in open surgery, multiple incisions of multiport laparoscopy involve risk of complications at the site of trocar placement.</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is interesting to assess the importance that the patient gives for the cosmetic result after a surgical procedure. Olweny et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0200"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> assessed the significance of scars in urologic patients with respect to other parameters in patients undergoing open renal surgery, laparoscopic, or LESS. Before surgery, younger patients and those undergoing interventions for benign condition gave remarkably more importance to the number and size of the scars of older patients and those with oncological disease. The relative low age of our patients, and the fact that all presented benign processes thus favor the choice of the laparoendoscopic approach.</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Now, there is no doubt that LESS surgery has faced significant ergonomic difficulties, some of which are still present.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> Most of these problems are surmountable with a specific training program and improve with practice and a good knowledge of the instruments.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7,20,21</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Conclusions</span><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The technique of hybrid LESS laparoscopic ureteroneocystosotomy, which uses single umbilical port and ancillary minilaparoscopy material, is a safe alternative in centers with experience in this approach. The expected results seem comparable to those of conventional multiport laparoscopy, with marked cosmetic improvement. In cases of benign processes and often postiatrogenia, these excellent results are presented as very desirable, so we believe that the use of LESS surgery will increase in this indication.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:12 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres467339" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Objective" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Materials and method" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec490118" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres467340" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Material y método" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec490119" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Patients and method" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Surgical technique" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Results" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 11 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec490118" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Ureteral stenosis" 1 => "Reconstructive surgery" 2 => "Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery" 3 => "Ureteral reimplantation" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec490119" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Estenosis ureteral" 1 => "Cirugía reconstructiva" 2 => "Cirugía laparoendoscópica por puerto único" 3 => "Reimplantación ureteral" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Objective</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">To analyze the outcomes of umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) ureteral reimplantation using a reusable single-port platform.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Materials and method</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The casuistic of LESS ureteral reimplantation in 5 patients is presented. The surgical technique using KeyPort system (reusable umbilical single-site platform) is described. Dissection, suctioning and suturing by minilaparoscopy through 3.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm accessory port in the iliac fossa are performed. Operative and postoperative outcomes are presented. The median follow-up at time of analysis was 11<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>14 months.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The median age of patients was 49<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>34 years; male-female ratio was 1:1.15. Left surgery was carried out in all cases. In 4 patients, the etiology was secondary to stenosis (3 iatrogenic and 1 pelvic endometriosis). In the remaining case, the procedure was performed after excision of a symptomatic adult ureterocele. In all cases, bladder catheter and double-J ureteral catheter were inserted for 7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3 and 30<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>days and then removed. No conversion to convectional laparoscopic or open surgery occurred. The surgery time was 145<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>60<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min, and intraoperative bleeding was 100<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>75<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cc. Neither transfusion nor high analgesia was necessary. No postoperative complications, minor or major, have been reported. Hospital stay was 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.5 days. In any patient, restenosis or worsening of renal function occurred.</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusions</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">In experimented centers, transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ureteroneocystostomy is a safe alternative with comparable results to conventional laparoscopy and an excellent cosmetic result at low cost thanks to device reuse.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Objective" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Materials and method" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Objetivo</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Análisis de los resultados obtenidos mediante técnica de reimplantación ureteral laparoendoscópica por puerto único (LESS) transumbilical con plataforma de puerto único reutilizable.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Material y método</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se presenta la casuística de 5 pacientes sometidos a reimplantación ureteral LESS. Se describe la técnica quirúrgica empleada con plataforma de puerto único KeyPort<span class="elsevierStyleSup">®</span> de colocación umbilical y puerto accesorio de 3,5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm en la fosa iliaca, a través del cual se emplea material de minilaparoscopia que facilita la disección, aspiración y sutura. Se presentan los resultados operatorios y postoperatorios obtenidos. La mediana de seguimiento en el momento del análisis fue de 11<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>14 meses.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La mediana de edad de los pacientes fue 49<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>34 años y la proporción hombre/mujer 1:1,5. En todos los casos la reimplantación fue izquierda. La etiología fue secundaria a estenosis en 4 casos (3 iatrogénica y una debida a endometriosis pélvica) y en el caso restante se realizó tras escisión de ureterocele tipo adulto sintomático. En todos los casos se dejó sonda vesical por un tiempo de 7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>d y catéter ureteral doble-J 30<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>d. No hubo reconversión a cirugía laparoscópica convencional ni abierta en ningún caso, y la duración de la intervención fue 145<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>60<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min con un sangrado intraoperatorio de 100<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>75<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cc. No se precisó transfusión ni analgesia al alta. No hubo complicaciones postoperatorias menores ni mayores y el tiempo de hospitalización fue 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>d. Ningún paciente presentó reestenosis ni empeoramiento de la función renal.</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La técnica de ureteroneocistosotomía laparoendoscópica a través de puerto único transumbilical constituye una alternativa segura en centros con experiencia en este abordaje, con resultados equiparables a la laparoscopia convencional y excelente resultado cosmético a muy bajo coste debido al carácter reutilizable del dispositivo.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Material y método" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Gimbernat H, Redondo C, García-Tello A, Mateo E, García-Mediero JM, Angulo JC. Reimplantación ureteral laparoendoscópica por puerto único transumbilical. Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:195–200.</p>" ] ] "apendice" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "apendice" => "<p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The following are the supplementary data to this article:<elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0005"></elsevierMultimedia></p>" "etiqueta" => "Appendix A" "titulo" => "Supplementary data" "identificador" => "sec0045" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:6 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 806 "Ancho" => 1300 "Tamanyo" => 129094 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Imaging study. (A) Descending pyelography combined with preoperative cystography. (B) Postoperative intravenous urography.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 635 "Ancho" => 1301 "Tamanyo" => 140688 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">(A) Umbilical incision for placement of the single-site system. Virtually invisible scar 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h after surgery.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 690 "Ancho" => 995 "Tamanyo" => 175405 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Operative field image showing KeyPort umbilical system and accessory minilaparoscopy port of 3.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm in the left iliac fossa (both reusable).</p>" ] ] 3 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1043 "Ancho" => 1402 "Tamanyo" => 213852 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Various moments of surgery. (A) Placement of hydrophilic guidewire into the spatulated ureter through a percutaneously inserted needle. (B) Placement of double-J catheter over the wire. (C) Ureteral reimplantation in the bladder by means of continuous suture. (D) End of the suture.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Patient \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Sex \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Age (years) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Indication for surgery \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Surgical time (min) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Estimated bleeding (ml) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Hospital stay (days) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Time of double-J (days) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Time of bladder catheter (days) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Follow-up (months) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Female \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">78 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Distal ureter stenosis due to gynecological iatrogenesis \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">140 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">30 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">29 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Female \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">49 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Distal ureter stenosis after ureteroscopy \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">210 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">30 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Male \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Orthotopic-type uretererocele \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">170 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">45 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Female \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">44 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Stenosis of the distal ureter due to endometriosis \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">120 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">250 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">30 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Male \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">62 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Post-prostatectomy distal ureter stenosis \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">145 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">45 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab722328.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Main features and operative data of the patients that make up the series.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:5 [ "identificador" => "upi0005" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAECOMPONENTE" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "Ecomponente" => array:3 [ "fichero" => "mmc1.mp4" "ficheroTamanyo" => 86361241 "Video" => array:2 [ "flv" => array:5 [ "fichero" => "mmc1.flv" "poster" => "mmc1.jpg" "tiempo" => 0 "alto" => 0 "ancho" => 0 ] "mp4" => array:2 [ "fichero" => "mmc1.m4v" "poster" => "mmc1.jpg" ] ] ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:21 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction for benign stricture disease" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M.N. Simmons" 1 => "I.S. Gill" 2 => "A.F. Fergany" 3 => "J.H. Kaouk" 4 => "M.M. Desai" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.067" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Urology" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "69" "paginaInicial" => "280" "paginaFinal" => "284" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17320664" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Role of laparoscopy in reconstructive surgery" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J. Rassweiler" 1 => "G. Pini" 2 => "A.S. Gözen" 3 => "J. Klein" 4 => "D. Teber" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833f21bd" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Curr Opin Urol" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "471" "paginaFinal" => "482" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20871405" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Laparoscopic reconstructive urology" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J.H. Kaouk" 1 => "I.S. Gill" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/01.ju.0000073207.06071.dc" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "170" "paginaInicial" => "1070" "paginaFinal" => "1078" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14501695" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0022347609001097" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00223476" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation-extravesical technique (RALUR-EV)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "P.P. Dangle" 1 => "A. Shah" 2 => "M.S. Gundeti" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/bju.12813" "Revista" => array:2 [ "tituloSerie" => "BJU Int" "fecha" => "2014" ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Current state of single-port transumbilical surgery in urology: challenges and applications" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.M. García-Mediero" 1 => "P.M. Cabrera" 2 => "F. Cáceres" 3 => "E. Mateo" 4 => "A. García-Tello" 5 => "J.C. Angulo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2012.07.001" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Actas Urol Esp" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "37" "paginaInicial" => "106" "paginaFinal" => "113" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22999345" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0016508507016344" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00165085" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Single site reconstructive procedures in urology: medium term results" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Khanna" 1 => "W. Isac" 2 => "H. Laydner" 3 => "R. Autorino" 4 => "M.A. White" 5 => "S. Hillyer" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.070" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "187" "paginaInicial" => "1702" "paginaFinal" => "1706" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22425117" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Umbilical laparoendoscopic urological surgery with a novel reusable device" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. García-Tello" 1 => "P.M. Cabrera" 2 => "F. Cáceres" 3 => "F. Ramón de Fata" 4 => "E. Mateo" 5 => "J.C. Angulo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3109/21681805.2013.876096" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Scand J Urol" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "48" "paginaInicial" => "301" "paginaFinal" => "308" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24446863" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0140673603123781" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "01406736" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pure single-port laparoscopic surgery or mix of techniques?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "E. Liatsikos" 1 => "I. Kyriazis" 2 => "P. Kallidonis" 3 => "M. Do" 4 => "A. Dietel" 5 => "J.U. Stolzenburg" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00345-011-0766-0" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "World J Urol" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "581" "paginaFinal" => "587" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22016141" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Autorino" 1 => "J.A. Cadeddu" 2 => "M.M. Desai" 3 => "M. Gettman" 4 => "I.S. Gill" 5 => "L.R. Kavoussi" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.030" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Urol" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "59" "paginaInicial" => "26" "paginaFinal" => "45" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20828918" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy for distal ureteral injuries" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "P. Modi" 1 => "R. Goel" 2 => "S. Dodiya" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.048" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Urology" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "66" "paginaInicial" => "751" "paginaFinal" => "753" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16230130" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy and psoas hitch for post-hysterectomy ureterovaginal fistula" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "P. Modi" 1 => "R. Gupta" 2 => "S.J. Rizvi" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.029" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "180" "paginaInicial" => "615" "paginaFinal" => "617" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18554656" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Iatrogenic ureteral injuries: a 20-year experience in treating 165 injuries" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "A.A. Selzman" 1 => "J.P. Spirnak" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Urol" "fecha" => "1996" "volumen" => "155" "paginaInicial" => "878" "paginaFinal" => "881" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8583597" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0016508510000041" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00165085" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ureteral reimplantation for management of ureteral strictures: a retrospective comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J.J. Rassweiler" 1 => "A.S. Gözen" 2 => "T. Erdogru" 3 => "M. Sugiono" 4 => "D. Teber" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.004" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Urol" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "51" "paginaInicial" => "512" "paginaFinal" => "522" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16949730" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Treatment of distal ureteral stricture by laparoscopic ureterovesical reimplantation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "C. Núñez-Mora" 1 => "J.M. García-Mediero" 2 => "P.M. Cabrera" 3 => "E. Hernández" 4 => "A. García-Tello" 5 => "J.C. Angulo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2010.10.001" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Actas Urol Esp" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "35" "paginaInicial" => "31" "paginaFinal" => "36" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21256392" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Laparoendoscopic management of midureteral strictures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C. Komminos" 1 => "K.C. Koo" 2 => "K.H. Rha" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.4111/kju.2014.55.1.2" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Korean J Urol" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "55" "paginaInicial" => "2" "paginaFinal" => "8" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24466390" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0185" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.H. Kaouk" 1 => "R. Autorino" 2 => "F.J. Kim" 3 => "D.H. Han" 4 => "S.W. Lee" 5 => "S. Yinghao" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.002" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Urol" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "60" "paginaInicial" => "998" "paginaFinal" => "1005" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21684069" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0190" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "C.R. Tracy" 1 => "J.D. Raman" 2 => "A. Bagrodia" 3 => "J.A. Cadeddu" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.089" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Urology" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "74" "paginaInicial" => "1029" "paginaFinal" => "1034" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19660793" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0195" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: a comparison with the standard laparoscopic technique" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R.J. Stein" 1 => "A.K. Berger" 2 => "R. Brandina" 3 => "N.S. Patel" 4 => "D. Canes" 5 => "B.H. Irwin" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09558.x" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "BJU Int" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "107" "paginaInicial" => "811" "paginaFinal" => "815" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20804488" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0016508508009037" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00165085" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0200" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Importance of cosmesis to patients undergoing renal surgery: a comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS), laparoscopic and open surgery" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "E.O. Olweny" 1 => "S.A. Mir" 2 => "S.L. Best" 3 => "S.K. Park" 4 => "C. DonnallyIii" 5 => "J.A. Cadeddu" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10784.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "BJU Int" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "110" "paginaInicial" => "268" "paginaFinal" => "272" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22177193" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0205" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Onset of a training program for single-port laparoscopic urology" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "F. Cáceres" 1 => "P.M. Cabrera" 2 => "E. Mateo" 3 => "G. Andrés" 4 => "F. Lista" 5 => "A. García-Tello" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.acuro.2012.03.012" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Actas Urol Esp" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "36" "paginaInicial" => "418" "paginaFinal" => "424" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22704788" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0210" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Where do we really stand with LESS and NOTES?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.T. Gettman" 1 => "W.M. White" 2 => "M. Aron" 3 => "R. Autorino" 4 => "T. Averch" 5 => "G. Box" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.016" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Urol" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "59" "paginaInicial" => "231" "paginaFinal" => "234" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21122977" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/21735786/0000003900000003/v2_201503280430/S2173578615000244/v2_201503280430/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "6272" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Casuistry" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/21735786/0000003900000003/v2_201503280430/S2173578615000244/v2_201503280430/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173578615000244?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
