covid
Buscar en
Allergologia et Immunopathologia
Toda la web
Inicio Allergologia et Immunopathologia Fulminant digital necrosis in a patient with prostate adenocarcinoma
Journal Information
Vol. 38. Issue 1.
Pages 48-50 (January - February 2010)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 38. Issue 1.
Pages 48-50 (January - February 2010)
Research letter
Full text access
Fulminant digital necrosis in a patient with prostate adenocarcinoma
Visits
9542
M.V. Paolinia,
Corresponding author
virpaolini@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, G. Jankilevichb, C. Grazianoc, D.S. Fernández Romeroa
a Immunology Unit Hospital Carlos G. Durand. Buenos Aires Argentina, Argentina
b Oncology Section Hospital Carlos G. Durand. Buenos Aires Argentina, Argentina
c Urology Division. Hospital Carlos G. Durand. Buenos Aires Argentina, Argentina
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Full Text
To the Editor:

Association between thrombotic disorders and malignancy is rare but has been well described1. Digital ischaemia and neoplasia were first reported in 1884 by O’Connor.2 After that very few case reports of digital ischaemia and neoplasia have been published. Most of the reports showed digital, bilateral and symmetric ischaemic lesions involving mainly upper extremities beginning as cyanosis or digital colour changes with cold exposure (Raynaud syndrome) and rapidly progressing to gangrene. Arteritis, hypercoagulability and hyperviscosity are postulated as mechanisms responsible for digital vasospasm and arterial obstruction in association with neoplasia.

Digital necrosis as paraneoplastic syndrome was reported in association with several neoplasias including haematological and solid tumours but not with prostate adenocarcinoma.3

A 73-year-old Chinese male was admitted to the hospital because of bilateral, symmetric digital ischaemia evolving to gangrene in two months (Figure 1A, B). The patient had no previous history of Raynaud, livedo, autoimmune disease, drug or toxic exposure, past or present infections, or neoplasia. He denied the use of medicinal herbs. An arteriovenous ecodoppler showed no alterations.

Figure 1.

(A,B). Pre-treatment. An area of necrotic skin on the left palm and several necrotic fingers in both hands can be observed.

(0.14MB).

His blood and serum test showed severe eosinophilia (absolute count 6000/mm3), augmented Eritrosedimentation rate and PCR, positive Rheumatoid Factor (RF), and polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia, HIV, HBV and HCV were negative. Bone Marrow aspiration showed no abnormal findings. Biopsy of perilesional skin showed leucocytoclasic vasculitis, fibrinoid thrombi and focal epidermic necrosis. Immunologic tests for ANA, cryoglobulins, C ANCA, P ANCA, anti-MPO, anti-PR3, lupus anticoagulant, Ig G, IgM Acls and B2 GPI were negative.

He added low extremities pain and paraesthesia with electromyographic signs of peripheral axonal neuropathy. There were no other signs or symptoms of systemic vasculitis.

Due to the rapid progression of digital lesions treatment with glucocorticoids and ciclofosfamide was started. Digital lesions became stable (Figure 2A,B) with normalisation of eosinophil counts, gammaglobulin values and negativisation of RF. Clinical examination revealed a prostatic nodule coincident with an increased PSA value. A prostate biopsy was proposed but patient refused the procedure. After discharge he continued well receiving ciclofosfamide for 20 months until he developed acute urinary obstruction and eosinophilia (absolute count 800/mm3). A rectal examination showed prostate tumour and the PSA was 94.77g/ml. A transrectal biopsy was done and diagnosis of adenocarcinoma (Gleason 5+4) was made. Immunosupression was discontinued and he started complete androgenic blockade with resolution of obstructive urinary symptoms and normalisation of PSA value, sustaining digital lesions improvement.

Figure 2.

(A,B). Post treatment, after 20 months. Spontaneous healing of necrotic lesions is in progress.

(0.13MB).

Digital ischaemia, although uncommon, has been described as a paraneoplastic syndrome in different kinds of neoplasias. The probable mechanisms of digital arterial obstruction in association with malignancy are arteritis, hypercoagulability and hyperviscosity.

Arteritis of diverse aetiologies has been clearly associated with digital artery vasospasm and obstruction producing finger ischaemia and gangrene.4–6 Arteritis in the affected vessels has been reported in some patients with tumour associated digital ischaemia. The cause of the arteritis is unknown but it is suggested that tumour antigen-antibody complexes deposition and subsequent complement activation in contact with the arterial wall induce this digital vasculitis, which improves with reduction of the tumour burden by therapy.7

Viscosity abnormalities have also been proposed as a mechanism of ischaemia, which could be attributed to a severely elevated whole blood viscosity or an increase in circulating blood proteins (for example: cryoglobulins).7 Moreover hyperviscosity caused by cryoglobulinaemia and arteritis may coexist.

Hypercoagulability in the absence of arteritis or hyperviscosity has been detected in 50–90% of patients with malignant tumours, especially those with metastases.8,9

Digital necrosis has been described in several opportunities as a paraneoplastic syndrome in different set of tumours but has not been reported as initial presentation in prostate cancer. Moreover there are few cases of vasculitic digital necrosis proved by biopsy in gangrene secondary to neoplasia,3 as we report here. The detection of antibodies in patient serum against tumour antigens by immunofluorescence would be very useful to prove this association but when the patient acceded to the biopsy he was under immunosuppression and his digital lesions were no more active, thus performing this test lost value. Other probable causes of vasculitic digital necrosis were excluded such as septic vasculitis since the patient did not show signs of infection, or hypersensitivity vasculitis since there was no history of offending drug consumption before development of lesions. There were no other signs of major organ involvement which discarded Systemic Vasculitic Syndromes.

The relationship with hypereosinophilia is another consideration in our patient. In this case digital necrosis could also be explained by the hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) associated to neoplasia. Patients with HES may experience cold-induced Raynaud's phenomenon and can develop finger or toe digital necrosis. Reported cases have occurred in those with HES alone and in a patient with eosinophilia and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome who had digital vasculitis arteriographic evidence.10

In our case the severity and rapid progression of lesions observed could be attributable to the association of at least two mechanisms: the arteritis and hypereosinophilia.

Digital necrosis associated with malignancy is severe and rapidly progressive within a few days. In this case, immunosupression resulted in a rapid symptomatic relief of pain with stabilisation of distal digital necrosis. Long-term sustained remission was achieved by tumour treatment with hormonal blockade.

Excluding other causes of vasculitis, the presence of severe vasculitic lesions confined to both hands simultaneously with prostatic adenocarcinoma could suggest a causal relationship.

References
[1]
E.E. Sproul.
Carcinoma and venous thrombosis.
Am J Cancer, 34 (1983), pp. 566-585
[2]
B. O’Connor.
Symmetrical gangrene.
Br Med J, 1 (1884), pp. 460
[3]
L.M. Taylor Jr, G.M. Baur, J.M. Porter.
Finger gangrene caused by small artery occlusive disease.
Ann Surg, 193 (1981), pp. 543-561
[4]
S.A. Friedman, H. Bienenstock, I.H. Richter.
Malignancy and arteriopathy.
Angiology, 20 (1969), pp. 136-143
[5]
J.R. O’Donnell, T.V. Keaveny, L.G. O’Connell.
Digital arteritis as a presenting feature of malignant disease.
Irish J Med Sci, 149 (1980), pp. 326-390
[6]
J. Rosch, J.M. Porter, B.J. Gralino.
Cryodynamic hand angiography in the diagnosis and management of Raynaud's syndrome.
Circulation, 55 (1977), pp. 807-814
[7]
C.A. Domz, C.G. Chapman.
Pseudo-Raynaud's: cryoglobulinemia secondary to occult neoplasm.
CalifMed, 95 (1961), pp. 391-393
[8]
N.C.J. Sun, W.M. McAfee, G.J. Hum, et al.
Hemostatic abnormalities in malignancy, a prospective study of one hundred patients.
Am J Clin Pathol, 71 (1979), pp. 10-16
[9]
G.H. Sack, J. Levin, W.R. Bell.
Trousseau's syndrome and other manifestations of chronic disseminated coagulopathy in patients with neoplasms: clinical pathophysiologic and therapeutic features.
Medicine (Baltimore), 56 (1977), pp. 1-37
[10]
P.F. Weller, G.J. Bubley.
The Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome.
Blood, 83 (1994), pp. 2759-2779
Copyright © 2009. SEICAP
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.aller.2020.04.001
No mostrar más