covid
Buscar en
Angiología
Toda la web
Inicio Angiología Resultados del uso de venas del brazo en cirugía de revascularización infraing...
Journal Information
Vol. 58. Issue 4.
Pages 303-309 (January 2006)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 58. Issue 4.
Pages 303-309 (January 2006)
Full text access
Resultados del uso de venas del brazo en cirugía de revascularización infrainguinal
The results of using arm veins in infrainguinal revascularisation surgery
Visits
3154
C. Aparicio-Martínez
Corresponding author
caparicio@fjd.es

Correspondencia: Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular. Clínica Nuestra Señora de la Concepción. Avda. Reyes Católicos, 2. E-28040 Madrid. Fax: +34 915 494 207.
, T. Bolívar-Gómez, V. Esteban-Álvarez, E. Pérez-López, S. Limón-Fernández, N. Vallejo-Díaz, A. González-García, A. Arribas-Díaz, A. del Río-Prego
Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular. Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Clínica Nuestra Señora de la Concepción. Madrid, España
This item has received
Article information
Resumen
Introducción

La vena safena interna es el conducto de elección en cirugía de revascularización infrainguinal. Su ausencia plantea una serie de alternativas entre las cuales se halla la utilización de venas del brazo.

Objetivo

Evaluar los resultados del uso de venas del brazo en cirugía de revascularización infrainguinal.

Pacientes y métodos

Se revisaron 27 procedimientos de derivación entre 1998 y de 2004. Se realizó un mapeo sistemático mediante eco-Doppler. 14 (52%) fueron procedimientos primarios debido a una isquemia crítica de la extremidad y 13 (48%) fueron intervenciones secundarias sobre injertos previos. El vaso receptor fue la tercera porción de la poplítea en tres casos, tibial anterior en siete, tibial posterior en otros siete, peronea en cinco y pedia en otros cinco. Se realizó el seguimiento mediante eco-Doppler previo al alta a los 3, 6,9 y 12 meses, y posteriomente cada 6 meses. Los resultados se analizaron mediante la tabla de vida para el cálculo de las permeabilidades y la tasa de rescate de la extremidad.

Resultados

El seguimiento medio fue de 21,3 meses. Durante un período de 7 años se realizaron 28 procedimientos secundarios. Las permeabilidades acumuladas fueron: primaria, a 30 días, 100%; al año, 45,3%, y a 3 años, 19,2%; primaria asistida, a 30 días, 100%; al año, 87,2%, y a 3 años, 80,2%. La tasa de rescate de la extremidad fue del 88,8% a 5 años.

Conclusiones

Las venas del brazo ofrecen resultados aceptables en cirugía de revascularización infrainguinal. Un seguimiento estrecho mediante eco-Doppler combinado con los procedimientos secundarios adecuados permite obtener buenas tasas de permeabilidad y rescate de la extremidad a corto y medio plazo.

Palabras clave:
Eco-Doppler
Isquemia crítica
Permeabilidad
Revascularización infrainguinal
Vena safena interna
Venas del brazo
Summary
Introduction

The great saphenous vein is the preferred conduit in infrainguinal revascularisation surgery. Its absence means that other alternatives must be considered, one of which is the utilisation of veins from the arm.

Aim

To evaluate the outcomes of using arm veins in infrainguinal revascularisation surgery.

Patients and methods

A total of 27 shunt procedures carried out between 1998 and 2004 were reviewed. Systematic mapping was performed by means of Doppler ultrasound recording. 14 (52%) were primary procedures carried out due to a critical ischaemia of the limb and 13 (48%) were secondary interventions over previous grafts. The receiving vessel was the third part of the popliteal in three cases, the anterior tibial in seven, the posterior tibial in another seven, the peroneal in five, and the dorsalis pedis in five others. Doppler ultrasound recording was used for the follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months prior to discharge from hospital, and then every 6 months. Outcomes were analysed using the life table to calculate the patencies and the limb salvage rate.

Results

Mean follow-up time was 21.3 months. A total of 28 secondary procedures were carried out over a period of 7 years. The accumulated patencies were as follows: primary, at 30 days, 100%; at one year, 45.3%, and at 3 years, 19.2%; assisted primary, at 30 days, 100%; at one year, 87.2%, and at 3 years, 80.2%. Limb salvage rate was 88.8% at 5 years.

Conclusions

Acceptable results can be obtained using arm veins in infrainguinal revascularisation surgery. Close surveillance using Doppler ultrasound recording with suitable secondary procedures makes it possible to obtain good short and medium-term patency and limb salvage rates.

Key words:
Arm veins
Critical ischaemia
Doppler ultrasound
Great saphenous vein
Infrainguinal revascularisation
Patency
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
Wengerter K.R., Veith F.J., Gupta S.K., Goldsmith J., Farrell E., Harris P.L., et al.
Prospective randomized multicenter comparison of in situ and reversed vein infrapopliteal bypasses.
J Vasc Surg, 13 (1991), pp. 189-199
[2.]
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group Investigators.
Comparative evaluation of prosthetic, reversed and in situ vein bypass grafts in distal popliteal and tibial-peroneal revascularization.
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group 141. Arch Surg, 123 (1988), pp. 434-438
[3.]
Taylor L.M., Edwards J.M., Porter J.M..
Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: five-year results of a modern series.
J Vasc Surg, 11 (1990), pp. 193-206
[4.]
Holzenbein T.J., Pomposelli F.B. Jr, Miller A., Contreras M.A., Gibbons G.W., Campbell D.R., et al.
Results of a policy with arm veins used as the first alternative to an unavailable ipsilateral greater saphenous vein for infrainguinal bypass.
J Vasc Surg, 23 (1996), pp. 130-140
[5.]
Taylor L.M., Edwards J.M., Brant B., Phinney E.S., Porter J.M..
Autogenous reversed vein bypass for lower extremity ischemia in patients with absent or inadequate greater saphenous vein.
Am J Surg, 153 (1987), pp. 505-510
[6.]
Londrey G.L., Ramsey D.E., Hodgson K.J., Barkmeier L.D., Sumner D.S..
Infrapopliteal bypass for severe ischemia: comparison of autogenous vein, composite, and prosthetic grafts.
J Vasc Surg, 13 (1991), pp. 631-636
[7.]
Veith F.J., Gupta S.K., Ascer E., White-Flores S., Samson R., Scher L.A., et al.
Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded politetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions.
J Vasc Surg, 3 (1986), pp. 104-114
[8.]
Parsons R.E., Suggs W.D., Veith F.J., Sanchez L.A., Lyon R.T., Marin M.L., et al.
Politetrafluoroetylene bypasses to infrapopliteal arteries without cuffs or patches: a better option than amputation in patients without autologous vein.
J Vasc Surg, 23 (1996), pp. 347-356
[9.]
Donaldson C.M., Whittemore A.D., Mannick J.A..
Further experience with an all-autologous tissue policy for infrainguinal reconstruction.
J Vasc Surg, 18 (1993), pp. 41-48
[10.]
Faries P.L., Subodh A., Pomposelli F.B. Jr, Pulling M.C., Smakowki P., Rohan D.I., et al.
The use of arm vein in lowerextremity revascularization: results of 520 procedures performed in eight years.
J Vasc Surg, 31 (2000), pp. 50-63
[11.]
Faries P.L., LoGerfo F.W., Subodh A., Hook S., Pulling M.C., Akbari C.M., et al.
A comparative study of alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization: all-autogenous conduit versus prosthetic grafts.
J Vasc Surg, 32 (2000), pp. 1080-1090
[12.]
Stonebridge P.A., Tsoukas A.I., Pomposelli F.B. Jr, Gibbons G.W., Campbell D.R., Freeman D.V., et al.
Popliteal-to-distal bypass grafts for limb salvage in diabetics.
Eur J Vasc Surg, 4 (1991), pp. 265-269
[13.]
Cutler S.J., Ederer F..
Maximum utilization of the life-table method in analyzing survival.
J Chron Dis, 8 (1958), pp. 699-712
[14.]
Rutherford R.B., Baker J.D., Ernst C., Johnston K.W., Porter J.M., Ahn S., et al.
Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version.
J Vasc Surg, 26 (1997), pp. 517-538
[15.]
Kakkar V.V..
The cephalic vein as a peripheral vascular graft.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 128 (1969), pp. 551-556
[16.]
Balshi J.D., Cantelmo N.L., Menzoian J.O., LoGerfo F.W..
The use of arm veins for infrainguinal bypass in end-stage peripheral vascular disease.
Arch Surg, 124 (1989), pp. 1078-1081
[17.]
Sesto M.E., Sullivan T.M., Hertser N.R., Krajewski L.P., O'Hara P.J., Beven E.G..
Cephalic vein grafts for lower extremity revascularization.
J Vasc Surg, 15 (1992), pp. 543-549
[18.]
Calligaro K.D., Syrek J.R., Dougherty M.J., Rua I., Raviola C.A., DeLaurentis D.A..
Use of arm and lesser saphenous vein com pared with prosthetic grafts for infrapopliteal arterial bypass: are they worth the effort?.
J Vasc Surg, 26 (1997), pp. 919-927
[19.]
Ascer E., Gennaro M., Pollina R.M., Ivanov M., Yorkovich W.R., Ivanov M., et al.
Complementary distal arteriovenous fistula and deep vein interposition: a five-year experience with a new technique to improve infrapopliteal prosthetic bypass patency.
J Vasc Surg, 24 (1996), pp. 134-143
[20.]
Taylor R.S., Loh A., McFarland R.J., Cox M., Chester F.J..
Improved technique for politetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting: long-term results using anastomotic vein patches.
Br J Surg, 79 (1992), pp. 348-354
[21.]
Chew D.K., Owens C.D., Belkin M., Donaldson M.C., Whittemore A.D., Mannick J.A., et al.
Bypass in the absence of ipsilateral greater saphenous vein: safety and superiority of the contralateral greater saphenous vein.
J Vasc Surg, 35 (2002), pp. 1035-1092
[22.]
Tarry W.C., Walsh D.B., Birdmeyer N.J., Fillinger M.F., Zwolak M.R., Cronenwett J.L..
Fate of the contralateral leg after infrainguinal bypass.
J Vasc Surg, 27 (1998), pp. 1039-1048
[23.]
Armstrong P.A., Bandyck D.F., Wilson J.S., Shames M.L., Johnson B.L., Back M.R..
Optimizing infrainguinal arm vein bypass patency with duplex ultrasound surveillance and endovascular therapy.
J Vasc Surg, 40 (2004), pp. 724-731
Copyright © 2006. SEACV
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos