Article information
Resumen
La evidencia meta-analítica indica que las tasas de reincidencia sexual oscilan entre el 15 y el 20% tras periodos de seguimiento que llegan hasta los veinte años. Se pueden establecer distintos perfiles de agresores sexuales en base a su reincidencia: los agresores especializados no reincidentes, los agresores reincidentes no especializados y los agresores sexuales especializados reincidentes. El grupo de los agresores especializados no reincidentes es el que suscita más preguntas. Este trabajo aborda qué factores psicológicos caracterizan a cada uno de estos perfiles y una posible explicación para las bajas tasas de reincidencia. Se discuten algunas implicaciones prácticas relevantes.
Palabras clave:
Agresor sexual
Abuso sexual
Reincidencia
Metaanálisis
Abstract
Meta-analytic evidence suggests that sexual recidivism rates range between 15% and 20% after follow-up periods of up to twenty years. Sex offender profiles can be differentiated according to their recidivism risk: specialized non-recidivists, versatile recidivists and specialized recidivists. The specialized non-recidivist offender group is the one raising more unanswered questions. This paper summarizes the factors that define the psychological profile of each group and a tentative explanation for the low recidivism rates. Some practical implications are discussed.
Keywords:
Sexual ofender
Sexual abuse
Recidivism
Meta-analysis
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Referencias
[Abracen, 2008]
J. Abracen.
Treatment of sexual offenders with psychopathic traits: Recent research developments and clinical implications.
Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 9 (2008), pp. 144-166
[APA, 2000]
APA.
Manual Diagnóstico Estadístico de los trastornos mentales.
Masson, (2000),
[Botella and Gambara, 2002]
J. Botella, H. Gambara.
Qué es el meta-análisis.
Biblioteca Nueva, (2002),
[Cantor et al., 2005]
J.M. Cantor, R. Blanchard, L.K. Robichaud, B.K. Christensen.
Quantitative reanalysis of aggregate data on IQ in sexual offenders.
Psychological Bulletin, 131 (2005), pp. 555-568
[Cortoni et al., 2010]
F. Cortoni, R.K. Hanson, M.E. Coache.
The recidivism rates of female offenders are low: A meta-analysis.
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22 (2010), pp. 387-401
[Craig et al., 2009]
L.A. Craig, A.R. Beech, L. Harkins.
The predictive accuracy of risk factors and frameworks.
Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders: A handbook,
[Göbbels et al., 2012]
S. Göbbels, T. Ward, G.M. Willis.
An integrative theory of desistance from sex offending.
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17 (2012), pp. 453-462
[Graña et al., 2009]
J.L. Graña, J.M. Andreu, T. Silva.
Evaluación del riesgo de reincidencia delictiva en España.
Ministerio del Interior, (2009),
[Hanson and Bussière, 1998]
K.R. Hanson, M.T. Bussière.
Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66 (1998), pp. 348-362
[Hanson et al., 2002]
R.K. Hanson, A. Gordon, A.J.R. Harris, J.K. Marques, W.D. Murphy, V.L. Quinsey, M.C. Seto.
First report of the collaborative Outcome Data Project on the Effectiveness of Psychological Treatment of Sex Offenders.
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14 (2002), pp. 169-195
[Hanson and Morton-Bourgon, 2005]
K.R. Hanson, K.E. Morton-Bourgon.
The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73 (2005), pp. 1154-1163
[Hanson and Morton-Bourgon, 2009]
K.R. Hanson, K.E. Morton-Bourgon.
The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
Psychological Assessment, 21 (2009), pp. 1-21
[Hare, 2010]
R.D. Hare.
PCL-R: Manual.
TEA, (2010),
[Harris et al., 2011]
D.A. Harris, R.A. Knight, S. Smallbone, S. Dennison.
Post release specialization and versality in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment.
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23 (2011), pp. 243-259
[Heaton et al., in press]
Heaton, K.M., Murphy G.H. (en prensa). Men with intelectual disabilities who have attended sex offender treatment groups: A follow up. Journal of AppliedResearch in IntellectualDisabilities.
[Helmus et al., 2013]
L. Helmus, K.R. Hanson, K.M. Babchishin, R.E. Mann.
Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis.
Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 14 (2013), pp. 34-53
[Kalmus and Beech, 2005]
E. Kalmus, A.R. Beech.
Forensic assessment of sexual interest: A review.
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10 (2005), pp. 193-217
[Kingston et al., 2010]
D.A. Kingston, M.C. Seto, P. Firestone, J.M. Bradford.
Comparing indicators of sexual sadism as predictors of recidivism among adult male sexual offenders.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78 (2010), pp. 574-584
[Knight and Guay, 2006]
R.A.Y. Knight, J.P. Guay.
The Role of Psychopathy in Sexual Coercion against Women.
Handbook of Psychopathy, pp. 512-532
[Kruttschnitt et al., 2000]
C. Kruttschnitt, C. Uggen, K. Shelton.
Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls.
Justice Quarterly, 17 (2000), pp. 61-87
[Lalumière et al., 2005]
M.L. Lalumière, G.T. Harris, V.L. Quinsey, M. Rice.
The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression.
APA, (2005),
[Laws and Ward, 2011]
D.R. Laws, T. Ward.
Desistance from sexual offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys.
Guilford Press, (2011),
[Levenson et al., 2007]
J.S. Levenson, M.S. D’Amora, A.L. Hern.
Megan’ Law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders.
Behavioral Sciences and The Law, 25 (2007), pp. 587-602
[McCann and Lussier, 2008]
K. McCann, P. Lussier.
Antisociality, sexual deviance and sexual reoffending in juvenile sex offenders: A meta-analytical investigation.
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6 (2008), pp. 363-385
[Miller et al., 1996]
T.R. Miller, M.A. Cohen, B. Wiersema.
Victim cost and consequences: A new look.
National Institute of Justice, (1996),
[Moulden et al., 2009]
H.M. Moulden, P. Firestone, D. Kingston, Bradford.
Recidivism in pedophiles: an investigation using different diagnostic methods.
The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20 (2009), pp. 680-701
[Olver et al., 2011]
M.E. Olver, K.C. Stockdale, S.J. Wormith.
A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79 (2011), pp. 6-21
[Olver and Wong, 2009]
M.E. Olver, S. Wong.
Therapeutic responses of psychopathic sexual offenders: Treatment attrition, therapeutic change, and long-term recidivism.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2 (2009), pp. 328-336
[Porter et al., 2009]
S. Porter, L. ten Brinke, K. Wilson.
Crime profiles and conditional reléase performance of psychopathic and non-psychopathic sexual offenders.
Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14 (2009), pp. 109-118
[Rivera et al., 2006]
G. Rivera, M.C. Romero, M. Labrador, J. Serrano.
El control de la agresión sexual: Programa de intervención en el medio penitenciario.
Ministerio del Interior, (2006),
[Roche et al., 2011]
M.J. Roche, N.E. Shoss, A.L. Pincus, K.S. Ménard.
Psychopathy moderates the relationship between time in treatment and levels of empathy in incarcerated male sexual offenders.
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23 (2011), pp. 171-192
[Schmidt et al., in press]
Schmidt, A.F., Mokros, A., Banse, R. (in press). Is pedophilic sexual preference continous? A taxometric analysis based on direct and indirect measures. Psychological Assessment.
[Seto, 2008]
M.C. Seto.
Paedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention.
American Psychological Association, (2008),
[Tharp et al., 2012]
A.T. Tharp, S. DeGue, L.A. Valle, K.A. Brookmeyer, G.M. Massetti, J.L. Matjaso.
A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration.
Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 00 (2012), pp. 1-35
[Ward et al., 2006]
T. Ward, R. Mann, T. Gannon.
The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications.
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12 (2006), pp. 87-107
[Ward et al., 2005]
T. Ward, D.L.L. Polaschek, A.R. Beech.
Theories of sexual offending.
Wiley, (2005),
[Wijkman et al., 2010]
M. Wijkman, C. Bijleveld, J. Hendriks.
Women don’t do such things! Characteristcs of female sex offenders.
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22 (2010), pp. 135-156
[Wijkman et al., 2011]
M. Wijkman, C. Bijlevel, J. Hendriks.
Female sex offenders: Specialist, generalist and once-only offenders.
Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17 (2011), pp. 34-45
Copyright © 2013. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid
