metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española Prótesis de Angelchik: estudio funcional a más de 10 años
Journal Information
Vol. 75. Issue 2.
Pages 72-80 (February 2004)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 75. Issue 2.
Pages 72-80 (February 2004)
Full text access
Prótesis de Angelchik: estudio funcional a más de 10 años
Angelchik prosthesis: Functional results after a ten-year follow-up
Visits
6494
Manuel García-Calvo1,a, Javier Arias-Díaza, Alfonso de la Fuentea, Antonio Ruiz de Leónb, José L. Balibreaa
a Departamento de Cirugía. Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Universidad Complutense. Madrid.
b Departamento de Medicina Interna. Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Universidad Complutense. Madrid. España.
This item has received
Article information
Resumen
Objetivo

Valorar la utilidad de la prótesis de Angelchik en el control del reflujo gastroesofágico y su repercusión en la función del esófago a largo plazo.

Métodos

Se llevó a cabo un seguimiento prospectivo(74-180 meses, mediana 138) de 26 enfermos a los que se implantó la prótesis de Angelchik entre marzo de 1983 y junio de 1988, mediante cuestionario, tránsito, endoscopia y manometría. Agrupamos los resultados en tres períodos: primer año, segundo a tercer año y a partir del sexto año. En la tercera revisión se incorporaron la pH-metría de 24 h y una prueba de aclaramiento isotópico esofágico.

Resultados

Tras la cirugía aumentó la presión espiratoria máxima del esfínter esofágico inferior (11,3 ± 0,8 en la primera; 12, 2 ± 0,8 en la segunda, y 14,3 ± 1,3 mmHg en la tercera revisión postoperatoria [en todos los casos p < 0,01] frente a 4,8 ± 0,5 en el preoperatorio). Asimismo, se incrementaron la longitud total (2,7 ± 0,1 cm en la primera; 2,9 ± 0,1 en la segunda, y 3,1 ± 0,2 en la tercera revisión postoperatoria frente a 2,3 ± 0,1 cm en el preoperatorio; p < 0,05) y abdominal (1,3 ± 0,1 cm en todas las revisiones postoperatorias frente a 0,8 ± 0,1 cm en el preoperatorio; p < 0,05) del esfínter esofágico inferior. En el cuerpo esofágico destaca una disminución de las ondas terciarias en la evaluación más tardía respecto al preoperatorio. De 15 enfermos en que se realizó pH-metría, sólo uno presentaba reflujo.

Conclusiones

La prótesis de Angelchik produce una mejoría estable a largo plazo de la competencia funcional del esfínter esofágico inferior, con escasa repercusión adversa en la dinámica del cuerpo esofágico, y sin afección significativa de la función del esfínter esofágico superior. Igualmente es eficaz en el control del reflujo gastroesofágico.

Palabras clave:
Prótesis de Angelchik
Enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico
Manometría esofágica
Cirugía antirreflujo
Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Angelchik prosthesis in controlling gastroesophageal reflux and its effect on esophageal function in the long term.

Methods

Twenty-six patients who underwent implantation of an Angelchik prosthesis between March 1983 and June 1988 were prospectively followed-up (74-180 months, median 138) by means of a questionnaire, barium contrast, endoscopy, and manometric studies. The results were grouped into three periods: first year, second-third year, and sixth year onwards. In the third follow-up evaluation, 24h-pH-metry and esophageal isotopic clearance test were incorporated.

Results

Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) peak expiratory pressure increased after surgery (11.3±0.8 in the first postoperative evaluation, 12.2 ± 0.8 in the second and 14.3±1.3 in the third vs 4.8 ± 0.5 mmHg before surgery, p < 0.01). Likewise, after surgery there was an increase in total LES length (2.7±0.1 in the first postoperative evaluation, 2.9±0.1 in the second and 3.1±0.2 cm in the third vs 2.3±0.1 cm before surgery, p < 0.05) and abdominal LES length (1.3±0.1 cm in all postoperative evaluations vs 0.8±0.1 cm before surgery, p < 0.05). There was also an improvement in the motility of the esophageal body in the last evaluation compared with preoperative values. Of 15 patients who underwent pH-metry, only one presented reflux.

Conclusions

The Angelchik prosthesis produces a sustained long-term improvement in LES function with few adverse effects on esophageal body dynamics or the upper esophageal sphincter. It is also effective in the control of gastroesophageal reflux.

Key words:
Angelchik prosthesis
Gastroesophageal acid reflux
Esophageal manometry
Antireflux surgery
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
J.P. Angelchik, R. Cohen.
A new surgical procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 148 (1979), pp. 246-248
[2.]
M. Hidalgo Huerta, F. Cabrero, J.M. Obispo.
Tratamiento quirúrgico del reflujo gastroesofágico y hernia hiatal mediante la prótesis de Angelchick (experiencia personal.
Rev Esp Enf Ap Dig, 64 (1983), pp. 255-260
[3.]
A. De la Fuente, M. García-Calvo, A. Ruiz de León, et al.
Cirugía de la esofagitis por reflujo. Estudio manométrico comparativo entre la fundoplicatura tipo Nissen y la prótesis de silicona.
Cir Esp, 42 (1987), pp. 360-364
[4.]
S. Sancho-Fornos, J.A. Pallas, J.A. Botella, G. Rodríguez.
Prótesis de Angelchik. Criterio y experiencia en la cirugía del reflujo gastroesofágico.
Cir Esp, 47 (1990), pp. 680-685
[5.]
C.A. Maxwell-Armstrong, R.J. Steele, S.S. Amar, D. Evans, D.L. Morris, G.E. Foster, et al.
Long-term results of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastroesophageal reflux.
Br J Surg, 84 (1997), pp. 862-864
[6.]
S. Varshney, J.J. Kelly, G. Branagan, S.S. Somers, J.M. Kelly.
Angelchik prosthesis revisited.
World J Surg, 26 (2002), pp. 129-133
[7.]
S. Benjamin, T. Knuff, M. Fink, E. Woods, D.O. Castell.
The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis: effects on the lower esophageal sphincter of primates.
Ann Surg, 197 (1983), pp. 63-67
[8.]
L. Bonavina, T.R. DeMeester, R. Mason, H.J. Stein, H. Feussner, A. Evander.
Mechanical effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on the competency of the gastric cardia: pathophysiologic implications and surgical perspectives.
Dis Esophagus, 10 (1997), pp. 115-118
[9.]
H. Feussner, O.P. Horvath, J.R. Siewert.
Vicryl-scarf-induced scarring around esophagogastric junction as treatment of esophageal reflux disease. An experimental study in the dog.
Digest Dis Sci, 37 (1992), pp. 875-881
[10.]
S.L. Samelson, H.F. Weiser, C.T. Bombeck, J.R. Siewert, F.E. Ludtke, A.R. Hoelscher, et al.
A new concept in the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.
Ann Surg, 197 (1983), pp. 254-259
[11.]
D.L. Morris, J. Jones, D.F. Evans, G. Foster, H. Smart, R. Gregson, et al.
Reflux versus dysphagia: An objective evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
Br J Surg, 72 (1985), pp. 1017-1020
[12.]
M.W.L. Gear, E.W. Gillison, B.L. Dowling.
Randomized prospective trial of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
Br J Surg, 71 (1984), pp. 681-683
[13.]
W.A. Kmiot, R.M. Kirby, D. Akinola, J.G. Temple.
Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchick prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Br J Surg, 78 (1991), pp. 1181-1184
[14.]
R.C. Stuart, K. Dawson, P. Keeling, P.J. Byrne, T.P.J. Hennessy.
A prospective randomized trial of Angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.
Br J Surg, 76 (1989), pp. 86-89
[15.]
I.A. Eyre-Brook, B.W. Codling, M.W.I. Gear.
Results of a prospective randomized trial of the Angelchik prosthesis and of a consecutive series of 119 patients.
Br J Surg, 80 (1993), pp. 602-604
[16.]
Anónimo.
Angelchik revisited: lessons for the introduction of new operations [editorial].
Lancet, 339 (1992), pp. 340
[17.]
I.M.C. Macyntire, I.A. Goulbourne.
Long term results after Nissen fundoplication: a 5-15 years review.
J Coll Surg, 35 (1990), pp. 159-165
[18.]
A.D.K. Hill, T.N. Walsh, C.M. Bolger, P.J. Byrne, T.P.J. Hennessy.
Randomized controlled trial comparing Nissen fundoplication and the Angelchik prosthesis.
Br J Surg, 81 (1994), pp. 72-74
[19.]
R.J. Wale, C.M. Roystan, J.R. Bennett, G.K. Buckton.
Prospective study of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
Br J Surg, 72 (1985), pp. 520-524
[20.]
R.A. Kozarek, C.M. Brayko, R.A. Sanowski, J.L. Grobe, J.E. Phelps, H. Sarles, et al.
Evaluation of Angelchik antireflux prosthesis: long-term results.
Digest Dis Sci, 30 (1985), pp. 723-732
[21.]
C. Ubhi, D.L. Morris.
New complications associated with the Angelchik prosthesis.
Thorax, 41 (1986), pp. 655-656
[22.]
J.P. Angelchik, R. Cohen.
A silicone prosthesis for gastro-esophageal reflux: Long term results.
Contemp Surg, 26 (1985), pp. 29-34
[23.]
J. Johansson, F. Johnsson, B. Joelsson, C.H. Floren, B. Walther.
Outcome 5 years after 360 degree fundoplicatio for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Br J Surg, 80 (1993), pp. 46-49
[24.]
J.R. Lee, J.G. Temple.
The Angelchik prosthesis behaves as a fundoplication.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 75 (1993), pp. 90-93
[25.]
J.G. Hunter, T.L. Trus, G.D. Branun, J.P. Waring, W.C. Wood.
A physiologic appproach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Ann Surg, 223 (1996), pp. 673-687
[26.]
V.L. Wills, D.R. Hunt.
Dysphagia after antireflux surgery.
[27.]
J.H. Peters, T.R. DeMeester, P.F. Crookes, S. Oberg, M. De Vos Shoop, J.A. Hagen, et al.
The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Prospective evaluation of 100 patiens with tipical syntoms.
Ann Surg, 228 (1998), pp. 40-50
[28.]
F.J. Del Pino, S. Sancho Fornos, A. Benages, F. Mora.
Manometric comprobation of esophagocastric junction competence after Nissen fundoplication and its relation to the length of fundic wrap.
World J Surg, 24 (2000), pp. 870-873
[29.]
J. Christensen, B.A. Robison.
Anatomy of the myenteric plexus of the opossum esophagus.
Gastroenterology, 83 (1982), pp. 1033
[30.]
R.J. Baigrie, D.I. Watson, J.C. Myers, G.G. Jamieson.
Outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with disordered preoperative peristalsis.
Gut, 40 (1997), pp. 381-385
[31.]
L. Martínez de Haro, P. Parrilla Paricio, M.A. Ortiz Escandell, G. Morales Cuenca, D. Videla Troncoso, J. Cifuentes Tebar, et al.
Antireflux mechanism of Nissen fundoplication. A manometric study [journal article].
Scand J Gastroenterol, 27 (1992), pp. 417-420
[32.]
C.A. Eriksen, S.A. Sadek, D. Sutton.
Reflux oesophagitis and esophageal transit: evidence for a primary oesophageal motor disorders.
Gut, 29 (1988), pp. 448-452
[33.]
B.E. Joelsson, T.R. DeMeester, D.B. Skinner, E. La Fontaine, P.F. Waters, G.C. O’Sullivan.
The role of the esophageal body in the antireflux mechanism.
Surgery, 92 (1982), pp. 417-424
[34.]
T.R. Eubanks, P. Omelanczuk, C. Richards, D. Pohl, C.A. Pellegrini.
Outcomes of laparoscopic antireflux procedures.
Am J Surg, 179 (2000), pp. 391-395
Copyright © 2004. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos