metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española Reconstrucción mamaria. Experiencia preliminar con colgajos perforantes
Journal Information
Vol. 74. Issue 1.
Pages 23-29 (July 2003)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 74. Issue 1.
Pages 23-29 (July 2003)
Full text access
Reconstrucción mamaria. Experiencia preliminar con colgajos perforantes
Breast reconstruction. Preliminary experience with perforator flaps
Visits
9765
Francisco del Piñala,b,1
Corresponding author
drpinal@ono.com

Correspondencia: Dr. F. del Piñal. Calderón de la Barca, 16, entlo. 39002 Santander. España.
, Francisco José Herreroa,b, Francisco Javier Garcíaa,b, Félix Sáezcc, Leopoldo Pérezcc
a Instituto de Cirugía Plástica y de la Mano. Santander.
b Unidad de Cirugía de la Mano-Muñeca y Plástica. Mutua Montañesa. Santander.
c Servicio de Radioterapia y Oncología. Clínica Mompía. Santander. España.
This item has received
Article information
Resumen

Presentamos nuestra experiencia en 9 pacientes mastectomizadas, seis de ellas radiadas, reconstruidas en fase crónica con colgajos microquirúrgicos de perforante (ocho de la arteria epigástrica inferior y uno de la arteria glútea superior). El seguimiento mínimo tras la reconstrucción ha sido de 12 meses.

Todos los casos sobrevivieron. En uno se produjo una complicación intraoperatoria: la avulsión del pedículo, que se pudo solucionar sin consecuencias. En dos casos hemos observado pequeñas áreas de necrosis grasa que evolucionaron favorablemente con tratamiento conservador. La valoración de los resultados estéticos por parte de las pacientes ha sido muy satisfactoria.

En nuestra opinión, los colgajos de perforante constituyen una excelente opción reconstructora, incluso en pacientes sometidas a radioterapia. Su vascularización y vitalidad permiten reconstruir una mama con un magnífico resultado estético y una mínima morbilidad. No obstante, hay que considerar la complejidad técnica y el mayor riesgo de complicaciones vasculares en casos de radioterapia previa.

Palabras clave:
Reconstrucción mamaria
Microcirugía
Colgajo

We present our experience in nine patients who underwent mastectomy (six also underwent radiation therapy) in whom breast reconstruction was performed in the chronic phase with microsurgical perforator flaps (eight of the inferior epigastric artery and one of the superior gluteal artery). The minimum follow- up after reconstruction was twelve months.

All the flaps remained viable. There was one intraoperative complication, consisting of avulsion of the pedicle, which was resolved without sequela. In two patients, small areas of fat necrosis were observed, which were resolved with conservative treatment. The patients were highly satisfied with the cosmetic results.

In our experience, perforator flaps constitute an excellent option in breast reconstruction, even in patients undergoing radiotherapy. Their vascularization and strength leads to excellent cosmetic results and minimal morbidity. Nevertheless, the technique is complicated and the risk of vascular complications is increased in patients with prior radiotherapy.

Key words:
Breast reconstruction
Microsurgery
Flap
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
J. Bostwick.
Postoperative adjunvant irradiation: Effects on traverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction (discussion).
Plast Reconstr Surg, 106 (2000), pp. 318-320
[2.]
R.J. Allen, P. Treece.
Deep epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.
Ann Plast Surg, 32 (1994), pp. 32-38
[3.]
R.J. Allen, C. Tucker Jr.
Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 95 (1995), pp. 1207-1212
[4.]
A. Feller, T. Galla.
The Deep Inferior artery Perforator flap.
Clin Plast Surg, 25 (1998), pp. 197-206
[5.]
R.J. Allen.
The Superior gluteal artery perforator flap.
Clin Plast Surg, 25 (1998), pp. 293-302
[6.]
P.N. Blondeel.
One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience.
Br J Plast Surg, 52 (1999), pp. 104-111
[7.]
P.N. Blondeel.
The sensate free superior gluteal artery perforator SGAP flap: a valuable alternative in autologus breast reconstruction.
Br J Plast Surg, 52 (1999), pp. 185-193
[8.]
M. Hamdi, E. Weiler-Mithoff, M. Webster.
Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 103 (1999), pp. 86-95
[9.]
L. Hefel, A. Schwabegger, M. Ninkovic, G. Wechselberger, B. Moriggl, P. Waldenberger, et al.
Internal mammary vessels: anatomical and clinical considerations.
Br J Plast Surg, 48 (1995), pp. 527-532
[10.]
Z.M. Arnez, M.P. Valdatta, F. Tyler, M. Planinsêk.
Anatomy of the internal mammary vessels: a reliable recipient system for free flaps in breast reconstruction.
Br J Plast Surg, 48 (1995), pp. 540-545
[11.]
C.L. Dupin, R.J. Allen, C.A. Glass, R. Bunch.
The internal mammary artery and vein as a recipient site for free-flap breast reconstruction: a report of 110 consecutive cases.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 98 (1996), pp. 685-689
[12.]
C.P. Clark, R.J. Rohrich, S. Copit, C.E. Pitman, J. Robinson.
An anatomical study of the internal mammary veins: Clinical implications of free-tissue-transfer breast reconstruction.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 99 (1997), pp. 400-404
[13.]
M.M. Ninckovic, A.H. Schwabegger, H. Anderl.
Internal mammary vessels as a recipients site.
Clin Plast Surg, 25 (1998), pp. 213-221
[14.]
L.A. Lantieri, M. Mitrofanoff, F. Rimareix, E. Gaston, Y. Raulo, J.P. Baruch.
The Use of circunflex scapular vessels as a recipient pedicle for autologous breast reconstruction: a report of 40 consecutive cases.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 103 (1999), pp. 2049-2053
[15.]
S.L. Spear, C.J. Spittler.
Breast reconstruction with implants and expanders.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 107 (2001), pp. 177-187
[16.]
S.L. Spear, C. Onyewu.
Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: Recent trends and therapeutic implication.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 105 (2000), pp. 930-942
[17.]
G.R. arnett, M.P. Gianoutsos.
The latissimus dorsi added fat flap for natural tissue breast reconstruction: Report of 15 cases.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 97 (1996), pp. 63-70
[18.]
V.M. Salinas.
Resurgimiento del colgajo miocutáneo de dorsal ancho en la reconstrucción mamaria autóloga.
Cir Plast Iberolatinoamer, 26 (2001), pp. 277-284
[19.]
C.R. Hartrampf, M. Scheflan, P.W. Black.
Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 69 (1982), pp. 216-225
[20.]
P.N. Bloondel, S.J. Vanderstraeten, S.J. Monstrey, K. Van Landuyt, P. Tonnard, R. Lysens, et al.
The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
Br J Plast Surg, 50 (1997), pp. 322-329
[21.]
E. Vandeweyer, R. Deraemaecker.
Radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction with implants.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 106 (2000), pp. 56-60
[22.]
S.S. Kroll.
Why autologous tissue?.
Clin Plast Surg, 25 (1998), pp. 135-144
[23.]
J.B. Boyd, I. Taylor, R. Corlett.
The vascular territory of the superior epigastric and the deep inferior epigastric system.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 73 (1984), pp. 1-14
[24.]
H.K. Moon, I. Taylor.
The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 82 (1988), pp. 815-829
[25.]
N.V. Tran, D.W. Chang, A. Gupta, S.S. Kroll, G.L. Robb.
Comparition of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 108 (2001), pp. 78-82
Copyright © 2003. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos