metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Contained Laparostomy With a Bogota Bag. Results of Case Series
Journal Information
Vol. 89. Issue 6.
Pages 379-385 (June 2011)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 89. Issue 6.
Pages 379-385 (June 2011)
Full text access
Contained Laparostomy With a Bogota Bag. Results of Case Series
Laparostomía contenida con bolsa de Bogotá. Resultados de una serie de casos
Visits
2595
Carlos Manterolaa,b,
Corresponding author
cmantero@ufro.cl

Corresponding author.
, Javier Moragab, Sebastián Urrutiab
a Grupo MINCIR (Metodología de Investigación en Cirugía), Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
b Departamento de Cirugía y Traumatología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Introduction

The «Bogota bag» (BB) is one of the options for contained laparostomy (CL). The aim of this study was to report the procedure associated hospital morbidity (PAHM) in patients undergoing relaparotomy followed by a laparostomy using the BB.

Material and method

Between 2002 and 2008, a prospective series of patients who underwent relaparotomy at the Hospital Hernán Henríquez, Temuco (Chile) was evaluated. The main end point was “development of PAHM”. Secondary end points were: indications of the CL, time to first change of the BB, type of abdominal wall repair, hospital mortality and development of ventral hernia. Descriptive statistics were used, with the calculations of percentages and measures of central tendency and dispersion.

Results

The BB was used in 86 patients (median age of 53 years, 63% female). The PAHM was 38% (surgical-site infection and enterocutaneous fistula). The most frequent indication of CL was intra-abdominal sepsis (60%). The median time until the first change of the BB, the time period between surgical operations, and the time until removal of the BB were 65 hours, 2 days and 9 days, respectively. Laparostomy was repaired exclusively with skin, fascial closure or dermal-epidermal graft in 50, 39 and 10%, respectively. Inhospital mortality was 12%. Sixty percent of the patients developed a ventral hernia within a 48 month follow-up.

Conclusions

CL with a BB is associated with a high rate of PAHM and delayed complications.

Keywords:
Contained laparostomy
Bogota bag
Relaparotomy
Abdominal surgery
Surgical damage control
Morbidity
Resumen
Introducción

Una opción de laparostomía contenida (LC) es la «bolsa de Bogotá» (BB). El objetivo de este estudio es comunicar los resultados observados en una serie de pacientes relaparotomizados con LC utilizando la BB, en términos de morbilidad hospitalaria asociada al procedimiento (MHAP).

Material y método

Serie de casos prospectiva de pacientes relaparotomizados en el Hospital Hernán Henríquez de Temuco, entre 2002 y 2008. La variable resultado fue «desarrollo de MHAP». Otras variables de interés fueron: indicaciones de la LC, tiempo hasta el primer recambio de la BB, periodicidad de las intervenciones quirúrgicas, tiempo hasta la retirada de la BB, tipo de reparación de la pared abdominal, mortalidad hospitalaria y desarrollo de hernia incisional. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva; con cálculo de porcentajes, medidas de tendencia central y dispersión.

Resultados

En el período de estudio, se utilizó la BB en 86 pacientes (63% eran de género femenino), con una mediana de edad de 53 años. La MHAP fue 38% (infección de sitio operatorio y fístula enterocutánea). La indicación más frecuente de LC fue sepsis intraabdominal (60%). Las medianas del tiempo hasta el primer recambio de la BB, periodicidad de las intervenciones quirúrgicas y tiempo hasta la retirada de la BB fueron 65 horas, 2 días y 9 días, respectivamente. La reparación de la laparostomía fue con cierre de piel exclusivo, cierre aponeurótico o injerto dermoepidérmico en 50, 39 y 10%, respectivamente. La mortalidad hospitalaria fue 12%. Tras un seguimiento de 48 meses se verificó que el 60% de los pacientes desarrollaron hernia incisional.

Conclusiones

La LC con BB se asocia a una frecuencia considerable de MHAP y complicaciones tardías.

Palabras clave:
Laparostomía contenida
Bolsa de Bogotá
Relaparotomía
Sepsis abdominal
Cirugía de control de daños
Morbilidad
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
W. Ertel, A. Oberholzer, A. Platz, R. Stocker, O. Trentz.
Incidence and clinical pattern of the abdominal compartmentsyndrome after «damage-control» laparotomy in 311 patients with severe abdominal and/or pelvic trauma.
Crit Care Med, 28 (2000), pp. 1747-1753
[2.]
T. Hau, C. Ohmann, A. Wolmershäuser, H. Wacha, Q. Yang.
Planned relaparotomy vs relaparotomy on demand in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. The Peritonitis Study Group of the Surgical Infection Society-Europe.
Arch Surg, 130 (1995), pp. 1193-1196
[3.]
M. Kaplan.
Managing the open abdomen.
Ostomy Wound Manage, 50 (2004), pp. 1-8
[4.]
L. Fernández, S. Norwood, R. Roettger, H.E. Wilkins.
Temporary intravenous bag silo closure in severe abdominal trauma.
J Trauma, 40 (1996), pp. 258-260
[5.]
V.J. Fox, J. Miller, A.M. Nix.
Temporary abdominal closure using an i.v. bag silo for severe trauma.
AORN J, 69 (1999), pp. 530-535
[6.]
J.P. Vandenbroucke, E. von Elm, D.G. Altman, P.C. Gøtzsche, C.D. Mulrow, S.J. Pocock, STROBE initiative, et al.
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
Ann Intern Med, 147 (2007), pp. W163-W194
[7.]
STROBE Statement. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology [accessed 2009 Apr 6]. Available from: http://www.strobe-statement.org.
[8.]
O. Van Ruler, C.W. Mahler, K.R. Boer, E.A. Reuland, H.G. Gooszen, B.C. Opmeer, et al.
Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial.
JAMA, 298 (2007), pp. 865-872
[9.]
H. Van Goor.
Interventional management of abdominal sepsis: when and how.
Langenbecks Arch Surg, 387 (2002), pp. 191-200
[10.]
T. Koperna, F. Schulz.
Relaparotomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection.
World J Surg, 24 (2000), pp. 32-37
[11.]
R.R. Hutchins, M.P. Gunning, D.N. Lucas, T.G. Allen-Mersh, N.C. Soni.
Relaparotomy for suspected intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal surgery.
World J Surg, 28 (2004), pp. 137-141
[12.]
K. Emmanuel, H. Weighardt, H. Bartels, J.R. Siewert, B. Holzmann.
Current and future concepts of abdominal sepsis.
World J Surg, 29 (2005), pp. 3-9
[13.]
B. Lamme, M.A. Boermeester, E.J. Belt, J.W. van Till, D.J. Gouma, H. Obertop.
Mortality and morbidity of planned relaparotomy versus relaparotomy on demand for secondary peritonitis.
Br J Surg, 91 (2004), pp. 1046-1054
[14.]
B. Lamme, M.A. Boermeester, J.B. Reitsma, C.W. Mahler, H. Obertop, D.J. Gouma.
Meta-analysis of relaparotomy for secondary peritonitis.
Br J Surg, 89 (2002), pp. 1516-1524
[15.]
P.J. Offner, A.L. de Souza, E.E. Moore, W.L. Biffl, R.J. Franciose, J.L. Johnson, et al.
Avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome in damage-control laparotomy after trauma.
Arch Surg, 136 (2001), pp. 676-681
[16.]
T.K. Bee, M.A. Croce, L.J. Magnotti, B.L. Zarzaur, G.O. Maish, G. Minard, et al.
Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure.
J Trauma, 65 (2008), pp. 337-342
[17.]
D.E. Barker, H.J. Kaufman, L.A. Smith, D.L. Ciraulo, C.L. Richart, R.P. Burns.
Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a 7-year experience with 112 patients.
J Trauma, 48 (2000), pp. 201-206
[18.]
B. Kirshtein, A. Roy-Shapira, L. Lantsberg, S. Mizrahi.
Use of the «Bogota bag» for temporary abdominal closure in patients with secondary peritonitis.
Am Surg, 73 (2007), pp. 249-252
[19.]
T. Koperna, F. Schulz.
Relaparotomy in peritonitis prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intrabdominal sepsis infection.
World J Surg, 24 (2000), pp. 32-37
[20.]
J. Medina, J. Pontet, A. Curbelo, P. Ferra, A. Freire, R. Misa, et al.
Relaparotomía en la sepsis peritoneal. Incidencia, oportunidad y factores pronósticos.
Med Inten, 2 (2001), pp. 53-61
[21.]
H.M. Foy, A.B. Nathens, B. Maser, S. Mathur, G.J. Jurkovich.
Reinforced silicone elastomer sheeting, an improved method of temporary abdominal closure in damage control laparotomy.
Am J Surg, 185 (2003), pp. 498-501
[22.]
T. Hau, C. Ohmann, A. Wolmershäuser, H. Wacha, Q. Yang.
Planned relaparotomy vs. relaparotomy on demand in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. The Peritonitis Study Group of the Surgical Infection Society-Europe.
Arch Surg, 130 (1995), pp. 1193-1196
Copyright © 2011. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos