Article information
Resumen
La parálisis obstétrica del plexo braquial es el traumatismo obstétrico más frecuente después de la fractura de clavícula, y consiste en un traumatismo o lesión por elongación del plexo braquial en el momento del parto.
Summary
The obstetrical paralysis of the brachial plexus is the most frequent obstetric traumatism after the clavicle fracture and it is due to a traumatism or injury caused by elongation of the brachial plexus at the moment of the birth.
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
I. Claret Corominas.
Traumatismos fetales.
Tratado de Obstetricia Dexeus. II. Pa-tología Obstétrica, pp. 745-762
[2.]
M.C. Romaña.
La paralysie obstétricale du plexus brachial.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 29 (2000), pp. 33-35
[3.]
J. Monleón Alegre, J. Monleón Sancho, R. Sánchez Sánchez, L.C. Tejerizo López, A. Teijelo Déiros, J. Mínguez Sanz.
Traumatismos obstétricos.
Manual de asistencia al parto y puerperio patológicos, pp. 453-471
[4.]
H. Martius.
Heridas obstétricas.
Tratado de obstetricia, 4, pp. 620-628
[5.]
H. Ewerbeck.
Situaciones de urgencia por parte del feto. Complicaciones extrauterinas posparto.
Gi-necología y obstetricia (II). Embarazo y parto, pp. 793-822
[6.]
F.G. Cunningham, P.C. MacDonald, N.F. Gant, K.J. Leveno, LC III Gilstrap, G.D.V. Hankins, et al.
Enfermedades y lesiones del feto y el recién nacido.
Williams obstetricia, 20, pp. 901-939
[7.]
I.S. Salonen, R. Uüsitalo.
Birth injuries: incidence and predisposing factors.
Zeitschr für Kinderch, 45 (1990), pp. 133-139
[8.]
W.L. Oppenhein, A. Davis, W.A. Growdon, F.J. Dorey, L.B. Davlin.
Clavicle fracture in the newborn.
Clin Orthop, 250 (1990), pp. 176-181
[9.]
N.Y. Boo, M.S. Lye, M. Kanchanamala, C.L. Ching.
Plexus brachial injuries in Malasyan neonates: Incidence and associate risk factors.
J Trop Pediatr, 37 (1991), pp. 327-332
[10.]
E.S. Tank, R. Davis, F. Holt, G.W. Morley.
Mechanism of trauma during breech delivery.
Obstet Gynecol, 38 (1971), pp. 761-766
[11.]
J.B. De Meeus, M. Deshayes, G. Magnin.
Dystocie par excé de volume fetal.
Encly Méd Chir Obstétrique, pp. 5067-A-10
[12.]
J.Y. Grall, J. Dubois, P.Y. Moquet, P. Poulain, J. Blanchot, M.C. Laurent.
Presentation du siège.
Encly Méd Chir Obs-tétrique, pp. 5049-L-40
[13.]
G. Magnin, F. Pierre.
Dystocie des épaules.
Encycl Méd Chir Gynecologie 5-5067-A-10,
[14.]
R.B. Gherman, J.G. Ouzounian, T.M. Goodwin.
Obstetric maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 178 (1998), pp. 1126-1130
[15.]
K.R. Lipscomb, K. Gregory, K. Shaw.
The outcome of ma-crosomic infants at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles county+ University of Southern California Experience.
Obstet Gynecol, 85 (1995), pp. 558-564
[16.]
G. Berard, P. Dufour, D. Vinatier, D. Subtil, S. Vanderstichele, J.C. Monnier, et al.
Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and ou-tome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases > 4.500 g.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 77 (1998), pp. 51-59
[17.]
D.B. Acker, B.P. Sachs, P.A. Fiedman.
Risk factors for shoulder dystocia.
Obstet Gynecol, 66 (1965), pp. 762-765
[18.]
O. Langer, M.D. Berkys, R.W. Huff, A. Samueloff.
Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighting ≥?4000 g be delivery by cesarean section?.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 165 (1991), pp. 831-837
[19.]
J.J. Nocon, D.K. McKenzie, L.J. Thomas, R.S. Hansell.
Shoulder dystocia: An analysis of risks and obstetric maneuvers.
Am J Obstet Gynecol Obstet, 168 (1993), pp. 1.732-1.733
[20.]
L.B. Kolderup, R.K. Laros, T.J. Lyscu.
Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infants: association with mode of delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 177 (1997), pp. 37-40
[21.]
T.S. Nesbitt, W.M. Gilbert, B. Herrchen.
Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in California.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 179 (1998), pp. 476-480
[22.]
D.R. Bryant, M.R. Leonard, J.B. Landwehr, S.F. Bottoms.
Limited usefulness of fetal weight in preciding neonatal brachial plexus injury.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 179 (1998), pp. 689-699
[23.]
M. Gordon, H. Rich, J. Deutchberger, M. Green.
The immediate and long term outcome of obstetric birth trauma. 1Brachial plexus paralysis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 171 (1971), pp. S1-S5
[24.]
R.H. Allen, B.R. Bankoski, C.A. Butzin, D.A. Nagey.
Comparing clinician applied loads for routine, difficult, and shoulder dystocia deliveries.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 171 (1994), pp. 1621-1627
[25.]
T. Walle, A.L. Hartikainen-Sorri.
Obstetric shoulder injury: Associated risk factors, prediction and prognosis.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 72 (1993), pp. 450-454
[26.]
B.B. Bager.
Perinatally acquired brachial plexus palsy. A persisting challenge.
Acta Paediatr, 86 (1997), pp. 1214-1219
[27.]
F.G. Cunningham, P.C. McDonald, N.F. Gant, K.J. Leveno, LC III Gilstrap, G.D.V. Hankins, et al.
Macrosomía.
Williams obste-tricia, 20, pp. 797-801
[28.]
T.F. Baskett, A.C. Allen.
Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia.
Obstet Gynecol, 86 (1995), pp. 14-17
[29.]
M.H. Beall, C. Spong, J. Makay, M.G. Ross.
Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: A prospective evaluation.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 179 (1998), pp. 934-937
[30.]
H.F. Sadmire.
Whiter ultrasonic prediction of fetal macro-somia?.
Obstet Gynecol, 82 (1993), pp. 860-865
[31.]
W.N. Spellacy, M.S. Miller, A. Winegar, P.Q. Peterson.
Ma-crosomia –maternal characteristics and infant complications.
Obstet Gynecol, 66 (1985), pp. 158-163
[32.]
H. Modanlou, W. Dorchester, A. Thorosian, R. Freeman.
Macrosomia: maternal, fetal and neonatal implications.
Obstet Gynecol, 55 (1980), pp. 240-244
[33.]
B. Cohen, S. Penning, C. Major, D. Ansley, M. Porto, T. Garite.
Sonographic prediction of shoulder dystocia in infants of diabethic mothers.
Obstet Gynecol, 88 (1996), pp. 10-13
[35.]
M. McFarland, M. Hod, J.M. Piper, E.M. Xenakis, O. Langer.
Are labor abnormalities more common in shoulder dysto-cia?.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 173 (1996), pp. 1211-1214
[36.]
D.M. Sherer, M. Menashe, Z. Palti, I. Aviad, M. Ron.
Radiologic evidence for a nuchal arm in the breech-presenting fetus at the onset of labor: an indication for abdominal delivery.
Am J Perinatol, 6 (1989), pp. 353-355
[37.]
J. Dubois.
Aspects actuels des problèmes que pose l’accou-chement en presentation du siége.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 10 (1981), pp. 479-492
[38.]
J. Dubois, E. Fraisse.
Le siège aujourd’hui.
Conc Med, 104 (1982), pp. 7219-7226
[39.]
G.D.V. Hankins, S.L. Clark.
Brachial plexus palsy involving the posterior shoulder at spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Am J Perinatol, 12 (1995), pp. 44-50
[40.]
R.J. Jennett, T.J. Tarby, C.J. Kreinick.
Brachial plexus palsy: An old problem revisited.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 166 (1992), pp. 1673-1687
[41.]
R. Gonen, D. Spiegel, M. Abend.
Is macrosomia predictable and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable?.
Obstet Gynecol, 88 (1996), pp. 526-529
[42.]
F. Goffinet.
Les difficultés de la reconnaissance anténatale de la macrosomie foetale.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol. Reprod, 2 (2000), pp. 13-19
[43.]
H.C. Ong, D.K. Sen.
Clinical estimation of fetal weight.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 112 (1972), pp. 877-880
[44.]
R.M. Patterson.
Estimation of fetal weight during labor.
Obstet Gynecol, 65 (1985), pp. 330-332
[45.]
G.I. Hirata, A.L. Medearis, J. Horenstein, M.B. Bear, L.D. Platt.
Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the clinically macrosomic fetus.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 162 (1990), pp. 238-242
[46.]
S.P. Chauhan, P.M. Lutton, K.J. Bailey, J.P. Guerini, J.C. Morrison.
Intrapartum clinical, sonographic, and parous patients’ estimates of newborn birth weight.
Obstet Gynecol, 79 (1992), pp. 956-958
[47.]
J.P. Elliott, T.J. Garite, R.K. Freeman, D.S. McQuown, J.M. Patel.
Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients.
Obstet Gynecol, 60 (1982), pp. 159-162
[48.]
F.P. Hadlock.
Sonographic estimation of fetal age and weight.
Radiol Clin North Am, 28 (1990), pp. 39-50
[49.]
R.A. McLaren, J.L. Puckett, S.P. Chauhan.
Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.
Obstet Gynecol, 85 (1995), pp. 565-569
[50.]
O.M. Alsulyman, J.G. Ouzonian, S.L. Kjos.
The accuracy of intrapartum ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 177 (1997), pp. 503-506
[51.]
B.R. Benacerraf, R. Gelman, FD Jr. Frigoletto.
Sonographi-cally estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 159 (1988), pp. 1118-1121
[52.]
D.N. Platek, M.Y. Divon, A. Anyaegbunam, J.R. Merkatz.
In-trapartum ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight by the house staff.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 165 (1991), pp. 842-845
[53.]
H.L. Hedriana, T.R. Moore.
A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 170 (1994), pp. 1600-1604
[54.]
N.T. Field, J.M. Piper, O. Langer.
The effect of maternal obesity on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation.
Obstet Gy-necol, 86 (1995), pp. 102-107
[55.]
W.J. Watson, A.P. Soisson, F.E. Harlass.
Estimated weight of the term fetus. Accuracy of ultrasound vs clinical examination.
J Reprod Med, 33 (1988), pp. 369-371
[56.]
S. Raman, R. Urquhart, M. Yusof.
Clinical versus ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.
Aust NZ Obstet Gynae-col, 32 (1992), pp. 196-199
[57.]
S.P. Chauhan, N.W. Hendrix, E.F. Magann, J.C. Morrison, S.P. Kenney, L.D. Devoe.
Limitations of clinical and sono-graphic estimation of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients.
Obstet Gynecol, 91 (1998), pp. 72-77
[58.]
R.B. Smith, C. Lane, J.F. Pearson.
Shoulder dystocia: what happens at the nest delivery?.
Br J Obstet Gynecol, 101 (1994), pp. 713-715
[59.]
M. Geary, P. McParland, H. Johnson, J. Stronge.
Shoulder dystocia –is it predictable?.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduc Biol, 62 (1995), pp. 15-18
[60.]
E. Verspyck, F. Goffinet, M. Hellot, J. Milliez, L. Marplau.
Newborn shoulder width: a prospective study a 2222 consecutive measurements.
Br J Obstet Gynecol, 106 (1999), pp. 589-593
[61.]
A.M. Bahah.
Risk factors and fetal outcome in cases of shoulder dystocia compared with normal deliveries of a similar birthweight.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 103 (1996), pp. 868-872
[62.]
HG Jr. Hopwood.
Shoulder dystocia: fifteen years’s experience in a community hospital.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 144 (1982), pp. 162-166
[63.]
H.N. Winn, W. Holcomb, J.B. Shumway, A. Al-Malt, E. Amon, J.C. Hobbins.
The neonatal bisacromial diameter: a pre-natal sonographic evaluation.
J Perinat Med, 25 (1997), pp. 484-487
[64.]
A. Riska, H. Laine, P. Voutilainen, V. Kariniemi.
Estimation of fetal shoulder width by measurement of the humerospi-nous distance by ultrasound.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 7 (1996), pp. 272-274
[65.]
B. Kastler, A. Gangi, C. Mathelin.
Fetal shoulder measurements with RMI.
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 17 (1993), pp. 777-780
[66.]
F. Bonnel.
Anatomie du plexus brachial chez le nouveau-né et l’adulte (structures macroscopique et histologique.
Monographies du Group d’Étude de la Main, pp. 3-13
[67.]
A. Gilbert, N. Khouri, H. Carlioz.
Exploration chirurgicale du plexus brachial dans la paralysie obstétricale. Constatations anatomiques chez 21 malades opérés.
Rev Chir Ort-hop, 66 (1980), pp. 33-42
[68.]
M. Camus, D. Vauthier, G. Lefebvre, P. Veron, P. Darbois.
Etude rétrospective de 33 paralysies obstétricale du plexus brachial. Gynecol Obstet Biol.
Reprod, 17 (1988), pp. 220-228
[69.]
J.P. Métaizeau.
Les paralysies obstétricales du plexus brachial.
Cahiers d’enseignement de la SOFCOT, 3 (1993), pp. 109-124
[70.]
G. Gentjens, A. Gilbert, K. Helsen.
Obstetric brachial plexus palsy associated with breech delivery.
J Bone Joint Surg, 78 (1996), pp. 303-306
[71.]
R. Elert.
Bases para las indicaciones, técnicas y peligros de los partos operatorios (inducción del parto, cesárea, fór-ceps, vacuoextracción.
Ginecología y obste-tricia (II). Embarazo y parto, pp. 952-996
[72.]
E. Andreres.
Lehrbuch der geburts chilflichen Operationen.
[73.]
H. Stamm, E.N. Florek.
Curso y conducción del parto en las presentaciones atípicas y patológicas.
Gineco-logía y obstetricia (II). Embarazo y parto, pp. 533-538
[74.]
J. Mallafré, X. Serrat.
Distocia de causa fetal.
Tratado de obstetricia Dexeus (II).Patología obstétrica, pp. 533-583
[75.]
S.A. Sunderland.
Classification or peripheral injuries producing loss of function.
Brain, 74 (1951), pp. 491-516
[76.]
I.M. Golditch, K. Kirkman.
The large fetus management and outcome.
Obstet Gynecol, 52 (1978), pp. 26-30
[77.]
C. Ouarda, A. Marzouk, L. Ben Youssef, M. Chelli.
Le pro-nostic neonatal et maternal d’accouchement d’un gros foetus unique à terme. A propos de 497 cas.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 18 (1989), pp. 360-366
[78.]
P. Panel, J.B. De Meeus, B. Yanoulopoulos, M. Deshayes, G. Accouchement du gros enfant. Magnin.
Conduite á tenir et résultats à propos de 198 dossiers.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 20 (1991), pp. 199-204
[79.]
J.M. Ubachs, A.C. Sloof, L.L. Peeters.
Obstetric antecedents of surgically treated obstetric brachial plexus injuries.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 105 (1995), pp. 813-817
[80.]
J.L. Tassin.
Paralyses obstétricales du plexus brachial.Evolution spontanée, resultants des interventions répara-trices précoces.
Thèse doctoral,
[81.]
A. Gilbert, R. Brockman, H. Carlioz.
Surgical treatment of brachial plexus palsy.
Clin Orthop, 264 (1991), pp. 39-47
[82.]
ACJ. Sloof.
Obstetrical brachial plexus lesions and their neurosurgical treatment.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 95 S (1993), pp. 73-77
[83.]
I. Alfonso, O. Papazan, J.A. Grossman.
Clinical presentations, differential diagnosis and management of obstetric palsy.
Rev Neurol, 27 (1998), pp. 258-263
[84.]
V. Forin, C. Romaña.
Paralysie obstétricale du plexus brachial. Kinésitherapie-Rééducation Fonctionelle 26-473-A-10.
Encycl Méd Chir,
[85.]
D.J. Rouse, J. Owen, R.L. Goldenberg, S.P. Cliver.
The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.
JAMA, 276 (1996), pp. 1480-1486
[86.]
E.H. Delpapa, E. Mueller-Euloach.
Pregnancy outcome following ultrasound diagnosis of macrosomia.
Obstet Gyne-col, 78 (1991), pp. 340-343
[87.]
J.W. Weeks, T. Pitman, J.A. Spinnato.
Fetal macrosomia: does antenatal prediction affect delivery route and birth outcome?.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 173 (1995), pp. 1215-1219
[88.]
A.B. Levine, C.J. Lockwood, B. Brown, R. Lapinski, R.L. Berko-witz.
Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: does it make a difference?.
Obstet Gyne-col, 79 (1992), pp. 55-58
[89.]
C.A. Combs, N.B. Singh, J.C. Khoury.
Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
Obstet Gynecol, 81 (1993), pp. 492-496
[90.]
D.L. Conway, O. Langer.
Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 178 (1998), pp. 922-925
[91.]
P. Hope, S. Breslin, L. Lamont.
Fatal shoulder dystocia: a review of 56 cases reported to the Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy.
Br J Obstet Gynecol, 105 (1998), pp. 1256-1261
[92.]
Y. Malinas.
Dystocie des épaules, une minute pour surviv-re.
La practique médical quotidienne, 211 (1985), pp. 8-15
[93.]
C. Wood, K.H. Ng, D. Hounslow, H. Benning.
Time: an important variable in normal delivery.
J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw, 80 (1973), pp. 295-300
[94.]
J.F. Oury, O. Sibony, D. Luton, O. Feran, J.L. Voluménie, P. Blot.
Stratégies obstétricales et conduites d’urgence dans l’accouchement du macrosome.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Re-prod, 29 (2000), pp. 20-24
[95.]
R. Allen, J. Sorat, B. Gonik.
Risk factors for shoulder dystocia: an engineering study of clinician-applied forces.
Obs-tet Gynecol, 77 (1991), pp. 352-356
[96.]
F. Beguin.
La dystocie des épaules: ne tirez pas.
Bull Péri-natol (Géneve), 14 (1990), pp. 2-6
[97.]
J.A. O’Leary, H.B. Leonetti.
Shoulder dystocia: prevention and treatment.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 162 (1990), pp. 5-9
[98.]
G. Magnin.
L’accouchement du gross enfant.
Pratique de l’accouchement, 3, pp. 149-171
[99.]
O. Gregoriou, A. Maragoudakis, K. Papadias, S. Konidaris, P. Zourlas.
La dystocie des épaules.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol. Reprod, 18 (1989), pp. 255-261
[100.]
C. Sureau.
Notions nouevelles sur l’anatomie et la physiologie de l’articulation sacro-iliaque.
Press Med, 23 (1959), pp. 947-948
[101.]
R. Merger, J. Levy, J. Melchior.
Précis d’obstétrique.
[102.]
P. Kamina.
Anatomie gynécologique et obstétricale.
4,
[103.]
J.M. Thoulon, C. Welffen-Ekfra, P. Arnould, P. Andra.
Étude anatomoclinique et radiologique du basin obstetrical.
Encycl Méd Chir Gynécologique/Obstétrique, pp. 5007-5010
[104.]
B. Gonik, R. Allen, J. Sorab.
Objetive evaluation of the shoulder dystocia phenomenon: effect of maternal pelvic orientation on force reduction.
Obstet Gynecol, 74 (1989), pp. 44-84
[105.]
J.P. Schaal, R. Maillet, C. Gay, C. Colette.
La disproportion foetopelvienne.
Mise à jour en Gynécologie et obstétrique,
[106.]
M. Dumont.
La longue et laborieuse naissance de la Symphysétoomie ou de Séverin Pineau à Jean-René Si-gault.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 18 (1989), pp. 11-21
[107.]
J.A. O’Leary.
Cephalic replacement for shoulder dystocia: present status and future role of the Zavanelli maneuver.
Obstet Gynecol, 82 (1993), pp. 847-850
[108.]
M. Van Lierde.
La dystocie des épaules.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 18 (1989), pp. 127-133
[109.]
R.P. Perkins.
Distocias fetales.
Clin Obst Gin. México: Inte-ramericana, 30 (1987), pp. 53-62
[110.]
RW III Naef, JN Jr. Martin.
Tratamiento urgente de la dis-tocia de hombros. Clin Gin Obst. Temas actuales.
México, Interamericana, 22 (1995), pp. 231-242
[111.]
C.L. Cetrulo, L.C. Cetrulo.
Aspectos medicolegales de las distocias. Clin Obst Gin.
México, Interamericana, 30 (1987), pp. 101-107
Copyright © 2001. Elsevier España, S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
