covid
Buscar en
Cuadernos de Economía
Toda la web
Inicio Cuadernos de Economía La diversificación del riesgo en los mercados de deuda pública de la zona euro
Journal Information
Vol. 34. Issue 94.
Pages 1-8 (January - April 2011)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 34. Issue 94.
Pages 1-8 (January - April 2011)
Artículo
Full text access
La diversificación del riesgo en los mercados de deuda pública de la zona euro
Risk diversification in public debt markets in the eurozone
Visits
4386
Juncal Cuñadoa, Marta Gómez-Puigb,
Corresponding author
marta.gomezpuig@ub.edu

Autor para correspondencia.
a Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
b Departamento de Teoría Económica, Universidad de Barcelona y RFA-IREA, España
This item has received
Article information
Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es el análisis del impacto de la unión monetaria en las oportunidades de diversificación del riesgo de las carteras de deuda pública en la zona euro. Para ello, se examina la existencia de tendencias comunes en la evolución de la rentabilidad a diez años de los países de la UE-15 durante el período 1994–2008. A pesar de que se encuentra evidencia a favor de la cointegración múltiple, los resultados apoyan la existencia de más de una tendencia entre las rentabilidades a largo plazo de los países de la UE-15. Además, cuando se centra el análisis en los países de la zona euro, aunque la interdependencia aumenta, se sigue rechazando la existencia de una única tendencia común. Estos resultados tienen importantes implicaciones para los inversores en términos de sus posibilidades de diversificar el riesgo en una contexto de una moneda única.

Palabras clave:
Integración monetaria
Mercados de deuda pública
Diversificación del riesgo
Cointegración
Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the impact that the monetary union has had on risk diversification opportunities in European public debt markets. We examine the common trends in the evolution of daily 10-year yields in EU-15 countries during 1994–2008. Despite finding evidence in favor of multiple cointegration, the results support the existence of more than one trend between long-term EU-15 sovereign yields. Furthermore, when we focus our analysis on the euro zone, although interdependency increases, we can still reject the existence of a single common trend. These results have important implications for investors in terms of their risk diversification possibilities in a single currency context.

Keywords:
Monetary integration
Public debt markets
Risk diversification
Cointegration
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[Abad et al., 2010]
P. Abad, H. Chuliá, M. Gómez-Puig.
EMU and European Government Bond Market Integration.
Journal of Banking and Finance, 34 (2010), pp. 2851-2860
[Adjaouté and Danthine, 2004]
K. Adjaouté, J.P. Danthine.
Portfolio Diversification: Alive and Well in Euro-land !.
Applied Financial Economics, 14 (2004), pp. 1225-1231
[Bank for International Settlements, 2001]
Bank for International Settlements, 2001. The Changing Shape of Fixed Income Markets. BIS Working Papers 104, September.
[Barr and Priestley, 2004]
D.G. Barr, R. Priestley.
Expected Returns, Risk and the Integration of International Bond Markets.
Journal of International Money and Finance, 23 (2004), pp. 71-97
[Bessler and Yang, 2003]
D.A. Bessler, J. Yang.
The Structure of Interdependence in International Stock Markets.
Journal of International Money and Finance, 22 (2003), pp. 261-287
[Cappiello et al., 2003]
L. Cappiello, R.F. Engle, K. Sheppard.
Asymmetric dynamics in the correlations of global equity and bond returns.
European Central Bank Working Paper No, (2003), pp. 204
[Chen and Knez, 1995]
Z. Chen, P. Knez.
Measurement of Market Integration and Arbitrage.
Review of Financial Studies, 8 (1995), pp. 287-325
[Christiansen,2003.Volatility-Spillover Effects in UE-15 Bond Markets., 2003]
Christiansen, C., 2003. Volatility-Spillover Effects in UE-15 Bond Markets. Centre for Analytical Finance. University of Aarhus. Working Paper Series No.162.
[Cifarelli and Paladino, 2006]
G. Cifarelli, G. Paladino.
Volatility Co-Movements Between Emerging Sovereign Bonds: Is There Segmentation Between Geographical Areas.
Global Finance Journal, 16 (2006), pp. 245-263
[Clare et al., 1995]
A.D. Clare, M. Maras, S.H. Thomas.
The Integration and Efficiency of International Bond Markets.
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 22 (1995), pp. 313-322
[Danthine et al., 2001]
J.P. Danthine, F. Giavazzi, E.L. Von Thadden.
UE-15 Financial Markets after EMU: A First Assessment.
The Impact of EMU on Europe and the Developing countries,
[Geyer et al., 2004]
A. Geyer, S. Kossmeier, S. Pichler.
Measuring Systematic Risk in EMU Government Yield Spreads.
Review of Finance, 8 (2004), pp. 171-197
[Gómez-Puig, 2006]
M. Gómez-Puig.
Size Matters for Liquidity: Evidence from EMU Sovereign Yield Spreads.
Economics Letters, 90 (2006), pp. 156-162
[Gómez-Puig, 2008]
M. Gómez-Puig.
Monetary Integration and the Cost of Borrowing.
Journal of International Money and Finance, 27 (2008), pp. 455-479
[Gómez-Puig, 2009a]
M. Gómez-Puig.
The Immediate Effect of Monetary Union on UE-15’s Sovereign Debt Yield Spreads.
Applied Economics, 41 (2009), pp. 929-939
[Gómez-Puig, 2009b]
M. Gómez-Puig.
Systemic and Idiosyncratic Risk in UE-15 Sovereign Yield Spreads After Seven Years of Monetary Union.
European Financial Management, 15 (2009), pp. 971-1000
[Hardouvelis et al., 2006]
G.A. Hardouvelis, D. Malliaropulos, R. Priestley.
EMU and European Stock Market Integration.
Journal of Business, 79 (2006), pp. 365-392
[Hardouvelis et al., 2007]
G.A. Hardouvelis, D. Malliaropulos, R. Priestley.
The Impact of EMU on the Equity Cost of Capital.
Journal of International Money and Finance, 26 (2007), pp. 305-327
[Ilmanen, 1995]
A. Ilmanen.
Time-Varying Expected Returns in International Bond Markets.
The Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), pp. 481-506
[Johansen and Juselius, 1990]
S. Johansen, K. Juselius.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference of Cointegration with Application to the Demand for Money.
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52 (1990), pp. 169-209
[Kwiatkowski et al., 1992]
D. Kwiatkowski, P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, Y. Shin.
Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationary Against the Alternative of a Unit Root.
Journal of Econometrics, 54 (1992), pp. 159-178
[Laopodis, 2008]
N.T. Laopodis.
Government Bond Market Integration within UE-15 Union.
International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 19 (2008), pp. 56-76
[MacKinnon et al., 1999]
J.G. MacKinnon, A. Haug, L. Michelis.
Numerical Distribution Functions of Likelihood Ratio Tests for Cointegration.
Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14 (1999), pp. 563-577
[Ng, 2001]
S. Ng, Perron.
Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit - Root Tests with Good Size and Power.
Econometrica, 69 (2001), pp. 1519-1554
[Pagano et al., 2004]
M. Pagano, Von, E.L. Thadden.
The UE-15 Bond Markets under EMU.
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, (2004), pp. 20
[Phillips and Perron, 1988]
P.C.B. Phillips, P. Perron.
Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regressions.
Biometrica, 75 (1988), pp. 335-346
[Skintzi and Refenes, 2006]
V.D. Skintzi, A.N. Refenes.
Volatility Spillovers and Dynamic Correlation in European Bond Markets.
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 16 (2006), pp. 23-40
[Solnik, 1974]
B. Solnik.
Why Not Diversify Internationally Rather than Domestically?.
Financial Analysts Journal, 30 (1974), pp. 48-54
Copyright © 2011. Asociación Cuadernos de Economía
Article options