covid
Buscar en
Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa CEDE
Toda la web
Inicio Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa CEDE Medida de los factores claves del éxito de la I+D: el constructo y sus dimensio...
Journal Information
Vol. 10. Issue 32.
Pages 15-47 (September 2007)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 10. Issue 32.
Pages 15-47 (September 2007)
Open Access
Medida de los factores claves del éxito de la I+D: el constructo y sus dimensiones
Visits
2505
T. García Valderrama
, E. Mulero Mendigorri**
* Universidad de Cádiz. Facultad de ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa. Universidad de Cádiz. Glorieta Carlos Cano s/n. 11002 Cádiz. Teléfono: 956015437/956015433. Fax: 956015386
** Universidad de Cádiz. Facultad de ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa. Universidad de Cádiz. Glorieta Carlos Cano s/n. 11002 Cádiz.Teléfono: 956015437/956015433. Fax: 956015386
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es la propuesta de medida del constructo «Factores claves del éxito de la I+D» basándonos en la Teoría de Recursos y Capacidades (TRC). Según esta teoría, el éxito de la I+D puede definirse como el incremento de ventajas competitivas para las empresas a través de la generación de valor de sus actividades de I+D. Partiendo de esta definición, desarrollaremos el constructo y sus dimensiones, determinado las variables predictoras de generación de valor y de rentas para la empresas basándonos en los recursos y capacidades de la I+D. La metodología empleada en el trabajo se ha basado en el análisis de la validez de contenido de constructo, dentro del marco de análisis de la validación de escalas o constructos. El resultado ha sido el diseño de un instrumento que permitirá a las empresas predecir la generación de ventajas competitivas en el futuro en el marco de sus políticas de I+D.

Palabras claves:
Éxito I+D
Recursos
Capacidades
Constructo
Abstract

The aim of this work is to propose the measurement of the construct «Key factors of the R & D sucess», basing us in the Resources and Capabalities Theory. This theory explains the value generation between business considering the generation of the advantages competitives. The construct proposed in this work is based in the differents predictors variables of this theory. The methodology used is soported in the completed scale validation methodology. The result has been the development of a tool for predincting the competitives advantages generation in the future R & D policy planning.

Keywords:
R&D Success
Resources
Capabilities
Construct
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Referencias bibliográficas
[Abdel-Kader and Dugdale, 1998]
M.G. Abdel-Kader, D. Dugdale.
Investment in Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A study of Practice in large U.K. Companies.
Management Accounting Research, 9 (1998), pp. 261-284
[Amit and Schoemaker, 1993]
R. Amit, P. Schoemaker.
Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent.
Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1993), pp. 33-46
[Autio and Laamanen, 1995]
E. Autio, T. Laamanen.
Measurement and evaluation of technology tranfer: review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators.
International Journal of Technology Management, 10 (1995), pp. 643-664
[Balkin and Gómez-Mejía, 1984]
D.B. Balkin, L.R. Gómez-Mejía.
Determinants of R and D Compensation Strategies in the High Tech Industry.
Personnel Psychology, 37 (1984), pp. 635-650
[Barney, 1991]
J.B. Barney.
Firm Resources adn Sustained Competitive Advantage.
Journal of Management, 17 (1991), pp. 99-110
[Branch, 1974]
B. Branch.
Research and development activity and profitability: A distributed lag analysis.
Journal of Political Economy, 82 (1974), pp. 999-1011
[Brooking and Motta, 1996]
A. Brooking, E. Motta.
A Taxonomy of Intellectual Capital and a Methodology for Auditing it.
Paper presentado a la 17TH Annual National Business Conference at McMaster,
[Brown and Svenson, 1998]
M.G. Brown, R.A. Svenson.
Measuring R&D productivity.
Research Technology Management, 41 (1998), pp. 30-35
[Cañibano et al., 1999]
L. Cañibano, M. García-Ayuso, P. Sánchez, C. Chaminade, M. Olea, C.G. Escobar.
Medición de Intangibles. Discusión de los Indicadores seleccionados. Estudio de un caso español.
Comunicación presentada al X Congreso de la Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas,
[Christenses, 2002]
J.F. Christenses.
Incongruities as a source of organizational renewal in corporate management of R&D.
Research Policy, 31 (2002), pp. 1.317-1.332
[Chryssochoidis and Wong, 2000]
G.M. Chryssochoidis, V. Wong.
Customization of product technology and international new product success: Mediating effects of new product development and rollout timeliness.
The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17 (2000), pp. 268-285
[Clark and Fujimoto, 1991]
K.B. Clark, T. Fujimoto.
Product development performance.
Harvard Business School Press, (1991),
[Clark et al., 1987]
K.B. Clark, W.B. Chew, T. Fujimoto.
Product development in the world auto industry.
Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, (1987), pp. 729-771
[Coccia, 2001]
M. Coccia.
A basic model for evaluating R&D performance: Theory and Application in Italy.
R&D Management, 31 (2001), pp. 453-464
[Cohen, 1995]
W. Cohen.
Empirical studies of innovative activity.
Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change,
[Collins and Montgomery, 1995]
D.J. Collins, C.A. Montgomery.
Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s.
Harvard Business Review, 73 (1995), pp. 118-128
[Collinson, 2001]
S. Collinson.
Knowledge management capabilities in R&D: A UK—Japan company comparison.
R&DManagement, 31/3 (2001), pp. 355
[Coombs and Gómez-Mejía, 1991]
G. Coombs Jr., L.R. Gómez-Mejía.
Cross-functional Pay Strategies in High-Technology Firms.
Compensation and Benefits Review, 23 (1991), pp. 40-48
[Coombs et al., 1996]
R. Coombs, P. Naradrenm, A. Richards.
A literature-based innovation output indicator.
Research Policy, 25 (1996), pp. 403-413
[Del Monte and Papagni, 2003]
A. Del Monte, E. Papagni.
R&D and the growth of firms: empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 1003-1014
[Demirag, 1998]
I.S. Demirag.
Corporate Governance, Accountability, and Pressures to Perform : An international Study.
Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 8 (1998),
[Di Benedetto, 1999]
C.A. Di Benedetto.
Identifying the key success factors in new product launch.
Journal of product innovation management, 16 (1999), pp. 530-544
[Dunegan et al., 1992]
K.J. Dunegan, P. Tierney, D. Duchon.
Perceptions of an innovate climate: Examining the role of divisional affiliation, work group interaction and leader/subordinate exchange.
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39 (1992), pp. 227-236
[Ernst, 2001]
H. Ernst.
Patent applications and subsequent changes on performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level.
Research Policy, 30 (2001), pp. 143-157
[Flynn et al., 1994]
B.B. Flynn, R.G. Schroeder, S. Sakakibara.
A Framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument.
Journal of Operations Research, 1 (1994), pp. 339-366
[Galende Del Canto and Suárez González, 1998]
J. Galende Del Canto, I. Suárez González.
Los Factores Determinantes de las Inversiones Empresariales en I+D.
Economía Industrial, 319 (1998), pp. 63-76
[Gassmann and Vonzedwitz, 1999]
O. Gassmann, M. Vonzedwitz.
New concepts and trends in international R&D organization.
Research Policy, 28 (1999), pp. 231-250
[Geisler and Rubinstein, 1987]
E. Geisler, A. Rubinstein.
The Succesful Implementation of Application Software in New Production Systems.
Interfaces, 7 (1987), pp. 18-25
[Gesmer and Leender, 2001]
G. Gesmer, M.A.A.M. Leender.
How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance.
The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18 (2001), pp. 28-38
[Gómez-Mejía and Balkin, 1989]
L.R. Gómez-Mejía, D.B. Balkin.
Effectiveness of Individual and Aggregate Compensation Strategies.
Industrial Relations, 28 (1989), pp. 431-445
[Grant, 1991]
R.M. Grant.
The Resources-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategic Formulation.
Calfornia Management Review, 33 (1991), pp. 114-135
[Haanes and Lowendahl, 1997]
K. Haanes, B. Lowendahl, et al.
The Unit of Activity: Towards an Alternative to the Theories of the Firm. Strategy. Structure and Style,
[Hagedoorn and Cloodt, 2003]
J. Hagedoorn, M. Cloodt.
Measuring innovative Performance: Is there and Advantage in using multiple Indicators?.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 1365-1379
[Hall, 1987]
B. Hall.
The relationchip between firm size and firm growth in the US Manufacturing sector.
Journal of Industrial Economics, 35 (1987), pp. 583-606
[Halliday et al., 1997]
R.G. Halliday, A.L. Drasdo, C.E. Lumley, S.R. Walker.
The allocation of resources for R&D in the world's leading pharmaceutical companies.
R&D Management, 27 (1997), pp. 63-77
[Halls, 1992]
R. Halls.
The Strategic Analysis of Intangibles Resources.
Strategic Management Journal, 12 (1992), pp. 135-144
[Hambleton and Rovinelli, 1986]
R.K. Hambleton, R.J. Rovinelli.
Assessing the dimensionality of a set of test items.
Applied Psychological Measurement, 10 (1986), pp. 287-302
[Heidenberger et al., 2003]
K. Heidenberger, A. Schillinger, C. Stummer.
Budgeting for research and development: a dynamic financial simulation approach.
Socio-economic planning sciences, 37 (2003), pp. 15-27
[Hirons et al., 1998]
E. Hirons, A. Simon, C. Simon.
External customer satisfaction as a performance measure of the management of the research and development department.
International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 15 (1998), pp. 969-987
[Hoytt and Gerloff, 2000]
J. Hoytt, E.A. Gerloff.
Organizatinal enviroment, changing economic conditions, and the effective supervisión of technical personnel: a management challenge.
The journal of high technology management research, 10 (2000), pp. 275-293
[Iansiti, 1997]
M. Iansiti.
From technological potential to product performance: an empirical analysis.
Research Policy, 26 (1997), pp. 345-365
[Instituto Nacional De Estadística, 1999]
Instituto Nacional De Estadística.
Encuesta sobre innovación tecnológica en las empresas..
INE, (1999),
[Lee et al., 1996]
M. Lee, B. Son, H. Lee.
Measuring R&D Effectiveness in Korean Companies.
Research Technology Management, 39 (1996), pp. 28-32
[Leenders and Wierenga, 2002]
M. Leenders, B. Wierenga.
The effectiveness of diferent mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D.
The journal of product innovation management, 19 (2002), pp. 305-317
[Lippman and Rumelt, 1982]
S.A. Lippman, R.P. Rumelt.
Uncertain Imitability. An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition.
Bell Journal of Economics, 13 (1982), pp. 418-438
[Ma. et al., 2001]
E. Ma Tz, W. Souder, A. Kumar.
Influencing R&D/Marketing Integration and the use of market information by R&D managers: Intended and Unintended Effects of managerial actions.
Journal of Business Research, 52 (2001), pp. 69-82
[Ministerio, 1991]
Ministerio.
De Industria y EnergíaEncuesta sobre estrategias empresariales (ESEE).
Ministerio de Industria y Energía, (1991),
[Ministerio De Industria y Energía, 1994]
Ministerio De Industria y Energía.
Encuesta sobre estrategias empresariales.
Ministerio de Industria y Energía, (1994),
[Molleman and Timmerman, 2003]
E. Molleman, H. Timmerman.
Performance management when innovation and learning become critical performance indicators.
Personnel Review, 32 (2003), pp. 93-113
[Muhlemeyer, 1992]
P. Muhlemeyer.
R&D-personnel management by incentive management: results of empirical survey in research & development.
Personnel Review, 21 (1992), pp. 27-36
[Myers, 1996]
R. Myers.
Getting a Grip on Intangibles.
CFO, (1996),
[Nolan et al., 1980]
M.P. Nolan, C. Oppenheim, K.A. Witheis.
Patenting profitability and marketing charasteristics of the pharmaceutical industry.
World Patent Information, 2 (1980), pp. 169-172
[O’leary-Kelly and Vokurka, 1998]
S.W. O’leary-Kelly, R.J. Vokurka.
The empirical assessment of construct validity.
Journal of Operations Management, 16 (1998), pp. 386-405
[Ocde, 1991]
Ocde (1991): OCDE Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Oslo Manual), DSTI/STII/IND/STO (91)3, París.
[Ocde, 1994]
Ocde (1994): Main definitions and conventions for the measurement of research and experimental development. A summary of the Frascati manual 1993. OCDE/GD(94)84, París.
[Patel and Pavitt, 1995]
P. Patel, K. Pavitt.
Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation.
Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change,
[Pedhazur and Schmelkin, 1991]
E.J. Pedhazur, L.P. Schmelkin.
Measurement, Design and Analysis: An integrated Approach.
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdales, (1991),
[Peteraf, 1993]
M.A. Peteraf.
The Comerstone of Competitive Advantages: A resourcebased view.
Startegic Management Journal, 14 (1993), pp. 179-191
[Petrash, 1998]
G. Petrash.
Generating and Levering Intellectual Assets for Greater Value.
Paper presented at the Motorola Knowledge collaboration Symposium 1 in Schaumberg,
[Presley and Liles, 2000]
A. Presley, D. Liles.
R&D validation planning: a methodology to link technical validations to benefits measurement.
R&D management, 30 (2000), pp. 55-65
[Randle, 1997]
K. Randle.
Rewarding failure: operating a performance-related pay system in pharmaceutical research.
Personnel Review, 26 (1997), pp. 187-200
[Roos and Roos, 1997]
R. Roos, J. Roos.
Measuring your Company's Intellectual Performance.
Long Range Planning, 30 (1997), pp. 413-426
[Sakakibara et al., 1993]
S. Sakakibara, B.B. Flynn, R.G. Scroeder.
A framework and measurement instrument for just-in-time manufacturing.
Production and Operations Management, 2 (1993), pp. 177-194
[Saraph et al., 1989]
J.V. Saraph, P.G. Benson, R.G. Scroeder.
An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management.
Decision Sciences, 20 (1989), pp. 810-829
[Schwab, 1980]
D.P. Schwab.
Construct Validity in Organizational Behavior.
Organizational Behavio, 2 (1980), pp. 3-43
[Sherman et al., 2000]
J.D. Sherman, W.E. Souder, S.A. Jenssen.
Differential effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time.
The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17 (2000), pp. 257-267
[Shoenecker et al., 1995]
T. Shoenecker, U. Daellenbach, A.M. Mccarthy.
Factors affecting a firm's commitment to innovation.
Academy of Management Journal. Best papers proceedings, pp. 52-56
[Small and Yasin, 1997]
M.H. Small, M.M. Yasin.
Advanced manufacturing technology: Implementation policy and performance.
Journal of Operations Management, 15 (1997), pp. 349-370
[Souitaris, 2002]
V. Souitaris.
Firm-specific competencies determining technological innovation: a survey in Greece.
R&D Management, 32 (2002), pp. 61-77
[Stojilkovic, 1998]
M. Stojilkovic.
Measuring and Reporting Intangibles in a Management Control.
Master Thesis. Stockholm University, (1998),
[The Conference Board, 1997]
The Conference Board.
Communicating Corporate Performance: A Delicate Balance.
Special Report 97-1, (1997),
[Tracey and Vonderembse, 1999]
M. Tracey, M. Vonderembse, J.S. Lim.
Manufacturing Technology and Strategy Formulation: Keys to Enhancing Competitiveness and Improving Performance.
Journal of Operations Management, 17 (1999), pp. 411-428
[Urraca Ruiz, 1998]
A. Urraca Ruiz.
I+D y Recursos Alternativos a la Innovación en la Industria Española.
Economía Industrial, 319 (1998), pp. 91-104
[Ward et al., 1994]
P.T. Ward, G.K. Leong, K.K. Boyer.
Manufacturing proactiveness and performance.
Decision Science, 25 (1994), pp. 337-358
[West and Iansiti, 2003]
J. West, M. Iansiti.
Experience, Experimentation and the accumulation of Knowledge: The evolution of R&D in he semiconductor Industry.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 809-825
[Young, 1997]
S.M. Young.
Implementing management innovations successfully: Principles for lasting change.
Journal of Cost Management, 11 (1997), pp. 16-20

Esta investigación ha sido financiada por el proyecto SEJ2004-01330/ECON de la Dirección General de Investigación del Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.

Copyright © 2007. ACEDE
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos