metricas
covid
Buscar en
Gastroenterología y Hepatología
Toda la web
Inicio Gastroenterología y Hepatología Estado actual de la CPRE. ¿Cómo se refleja la introducción de la colangiorres...
Journal Information
Vol. 24. Issue 10.
Pages 483-488 (January 2001)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 24. Issue 10.
Pages 483-488 (January 2001)
Full text access
Estado actual de la CPRE. ¿Cómo se refleja la introducción de la colangiorresonancia magnética?
Current Status Of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. What Is The Effect Of The Introduction Of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography?
Visits
4287
R. Rueda Castañóna, M. Gutiérrez Ariasa, F. Jorquera Plazaa
a Sección de Aparato Digestivo aRadiodiagnóstico. Hospital de León
P. Linares Torres
,1
, S. Vivas Alegre1, J. Espinel Díez1, F. Muñoz Núñez1, A.B. Domínguez Carbajo1, C. Rodríguez Morejón1, A. Herrera Abian1, M.J. Fernández Gundín1, R. Villanueva Pavón1, J.L. Olcoz Goñi1
1 Sección de Aparato Digestivo Hospital de León
This item has received
Article information
Objetivo

Conocer la situación actual de la colangiopancreatografía retrógada endoscópica (CPRE) y la repercusión que la introducción de la colangiorresonancia magnética (CRM) ha tenido sobre esta. Evaluar el rendimiento diagnóstico de la CRM desde su inicio en la patología biliar obstructiva.

Material Y Métodos

Análisis retrospectivo de las CPRE realizadas desde enero de 1998 a diciembre de 2000, y las CRM realizadas por sospecha de enfermedad biliar obstructiva desde mayo de 1999 hasta diciembre de 2000. Cuando se realizaron ambas técnicas, se evaluó el rendimiento diagnóstico de la CRM.

Resultados

Se realizaron 927 CPRE (45,3% varones), con una edad media ± desviación estándar de 69,2 ± 14,6 años. Se realizó terapéutica en 688 ocasiones (77%), fundamentalmente esfinterotomía (69,9%) y colocación de prótesis de polietileno (21,8%) y autoexpandibles (9,9%). El número de CPRE por año fue de 261, 330 y 336 en 1998, 1999 y 2000, respectivamente, de las que un 76,6, un 80 y un 76,9% fueron CPRE con actuación terapéutica.

La CRM se practicó en 63 pacientes por sospecha de enfermedad biliar. La CRM no fue seguida de CPRE en 27 de 59 (45,8%) pacientes, siendo suficiente para el diagnóstico y evitando la realización de una CPRE. En los 35 pacientes a quienes realizaron ambas técnicas (CRM y CPRE), el rendimiento diagnóstico de la CRM frente a la CPRE fue: sensibilidad del 100%, especificidad del 50%, valor predictivo positivo del 87,1%, valor predictivo negativo del 100% y valor global del 89%. Se analizaron los casos responsables de la baja especificidad (todos por coledocolitiasis) y se encontró un desfase de tiempo importante entre la realización de CRM y de CPRE (límites, 7-35 días) en el que probablemente se solucionó la coledocolitiasis de forma espontánea.

Conclusiones

a) En contra de lo que cabría esperar, el número total de CPRE parece aumentar, con un elevado porcentaje de terapéutica endoscópica; b) la elevada sensibilidad diagnóstica de la CRM hace que sea la técnica ideal para evitar la CPRE diagnóstica y permitir así un mayor desarrollo de la vertiente terapéutica de la CPRE.

Aim

To determine the current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and the effects of the introduction of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) on ERCP and to evaluate the diagnostic yield of MRC since its introduction in obstructive biliary disease.

Material and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of the ERCP carried out between January 1998 and December 2000 and of the MRC performed for suspected obstructive biliary disease from May 1999 to December 2000. When both techniques were performed, the diagnostic yield of MRC was evaluated.

Results

We performed 927 ERCP. A total of 45.3% of the patients were men. Mean age was 69.2 ± 14.6 years. Treatment was performed on 688 occasions (77%), mainly sphincterotomy (69.9%) and placement of polyethylene (21.8%) or self-expanding (9.9%) prostheses. The number of ERCP performed each year was 261, 330 and 336 in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively; of these 76.6%, 80% and 76.9% were therapeutic. MRC was performed in 63 patients with suspected biliary disease. In 27 of 59 patients (45.8%) MRC was sufficient for diagnosis, avoiding the need for ERCP. In the 35 patients in whom both techniques (MRC and ERCP) were performed, the diagnostic yield of MRC compared with that of ERCP was: sensitivity 100%, specificity 50%, positive predictive value 87.1%, negative predictive value 100% and overall value 89%. The cases responsible for the low specificity (all due to choledocholithiases) were analyzed and a significant time lapse was found between the performance of MRC and ERCP (range: 7-35 days) during which choledocholithiasis probably resolved spontaneously.

Conclusions

a) Contrary to what could be expected, the number of ERCP seems to be increasing with a high percentage of endoscopic treatment; b) Because of its diagnostic sensitivity, MRC is the ideal technique for eliminating the need for diagnostic ERCP, thus allowing greater development of the therapeutic aspect of ERCP.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Biblografía
[1.]
M.L. Freeman, D.B. Nelson, S. Sherman, G.B. Haber, M.E. Herman, P.J. Dorsheer, et al.
Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.
N Engl J Med, 335 (1996), pp. 909-918
[2.]
P.B. Cotton, G. Lehman, J.A. Vennes, J.E. Geenen, R.C. Russell, W.C. Meyers, et al.
Endoscopic sphinctererotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.
Gastrointest Endosc, 37 (1991), pp. 383-393
[3.]
G.K. Johnson, J.E. Geenen, J.F. Johanson, S. Sherman, W.J. Hogan, O. Cass.
Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis: potential causes noted during controlled study Group.
Gastrointest Endosc, 46 (1997), pp. 217-222
[4.]
S. Loperfido, G. Angelini, G. Benedetti, F. Chilovi, F. Costan, F. De Berardinis, et al.
Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.
Gastrointest Endosc, 48 (1998), pp. 1-10
[5.]
M.A. Barish, E.K. Yucel, J.A. Soto, R. Chuttani, J.T. Ferrucci.
MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique.
[6.]
C. Reinhold, P.M. Bret.
Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography.
AJR, 166 (1996), pp. 1285-1295
[7.]
J.A. Soto, M.A. Barish, E.K. Yucel, D. Siegenberg, J.J. Ferrucci, R. Chuttani.
Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrogade cholangiopancreatography.
Gastroenterology, 110 (1996), pp. 589-597
[8.]
F. Regan, D. Smith, R. Khazan, M. Bohkman, H. Shultze-Haakh, J. Campion, et al.
MR cholangiography in biliary obstruction using half-Fourier acquisition.
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 20 (1996), pp. 627-632
[9.]
S.H. Zidi, F. Prat, F. Le Guen, Y. Rondeau, L. Rocher, J. Fritsch, et al.
Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method.
Gut, 44 (1999), pp. 118-122
[10.]
R.E. Hintze, A. Alder, W. Veltzke, H. Abou-Rebyeh, R. Hammerstingl, T. Volgl, et al.
Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrogade cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Endoscopy, 29 (1997), pp. 182-187
[11.]
Y.L. Chan, A.C. Chan, W.W. Lam, D.W. Lee, S.S. Chung, J.J. Sung, et al.
Choledocholithiasis: Comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrogade cholangiography.
[12.]
J. Devière, C. Matos, H. Cremer.
The impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on ERCP.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 50 (1999), pp. 136-140
[13.]
Y. Takehara.
Can MRCP replace ERCP?.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 8 (1998), pp. 517-534
[14.]
P. Pasanen, K. Partanen, P. Pikkarainen, E. Alhava, A. Pirinen, E. Janatuinen.
Ultrasonography, CT, and ERCP in the diagnosis of choledochal stones.
Acta Radiol, 33 (1992), pp. 53-56
[15.]
D. Fleischmann, H. Ringl, R. Schofl, R. Potzi, M. Kontrus, C. Henk, et al.
Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with endoscopic retrogade cholangiography.
Radiology, 198 (1996), pp. 861-868
[16.]
F.C. Ramírez, B. Dennert, R.A. Sanowski.
Success of repeat ERCP by the same endoscopist.
Gastrointest Endosc, 49 (1999), pp. 58-61
[17.]
P. Amouyal, G. Amouyal, P. Levy, S. Tuzet, L. Palazzo, V. Vilgrain, et al.
Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasonography.
Gastroenterology, 106 (1994), pp. 1062-1067
[18.]
F. Prat, G. Amouyal, P. Amouyal, G. Pelletier, J. Fritsch, A.D. Choury, et al.
Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrogade cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis.
Lancet, 347 (1996), pp. 75-79
[19.]
M.K. Bilbao, C.T. Dotter, T.G. Lee, R.M. Katon.
Complications of endoscopic retrogade cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10,000 cases.
Gastroenterology, 70 (1976), pp. 314-320
[20.]
R. Rieger, W. Wayand.
Yield of prospective, noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective ERCP/sphincterotomy in 1390 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.
Gastrointest Endosc, 42 (1995), pp. 6-12
Copyright © 2001. Elsevier España, S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos