metricas
covid
Buscar en
Medicina Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Medicina Clínica IgG4-related disease: Effectiveness evaluation through Umehara–Okazaki 2011 an...
Journal Information
Vol. 163. Issue 5.
Pages 217-223 (September 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
7
Vol. 163. Issue 5.
Pages 217-223 (September 2024)
Original article
IgG4-related disease: Effectiveness evaluation through Umehara–Okazaki 2011 and ACR/EULAR 2019 diagnostic criteria
Enfermedad relacionada con IgG4: evaluación de la eficacia mediante los criterios diagnósticos de Umehara-Okazaki 2011 y ACR/EULAR 2019
Visits
7
Pablo Martínez Calabuiga,b,
Corresponding author
pablomc96@hotmail.es

Corresponding author.
, Jorge Juan Fragío Gila,b, Roxana González Mazaríoa,b, Fernando López Gutiérrezc, Javier Loricera Garcíac,d, Ricardo Blanco Alonsoc,d, Cristina Campos Fernándeza,b
a Servicio de Reumatología y Metabolismo Óseo, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain
b Escuela de Doctorado, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir (UCV), Valencia, Spain
c Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
d IDIVAL, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Tables (4)
Table 1. The Umehara–Okazaki 2011 comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related disease.10
Table 2. Adapted criteria from The 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD).3
Table 3. Main characteristics of the IgG4-related disease clinical diagnosis and Highly diagnosis of IgG4-related disease.
Table 4. Comparison of the Umehara–Okazaki 201110 and ACR/EULAR 20193 criteria.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Background

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a rare, systemic immune-mediated fibro-inflammatory condition with an unclear etiology and pathophysiology, potentially affecting multiple organs. It presents with common clinical, radiological, and serological characteristics. This study aims to compare the latest two IgG4-RD classification and diagnostic criteria: Umehara–Okazaki 2011 and ACR/EULAR 2019.

Material and methods

In a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted across two centers from January 2010 to July 2023, we included patients suspected of having IgG4-RD from various hospital departments. Patients finally diagnosed with other pathologies were excluded. The remaining suspected IgG4-RD cases were evaluated using both Umehara–Okazaki 2011 and ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria.

Results

Out of 34 patients with a clinical diagnosis of IgG4-RD, the Umehara–Okazaki 2011 classified 20 patients: 5 as definitive, 7 as probable, and 8 as possible cases. Applying the ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria to the same cohort resulted in the diagnosis of 9 patients. Notably, retroperitoneal fibrosis and aortitis were the most prevalent form of presentation, accounting for 25% and 22.2% of cases classified under the 2011 and 2019 criteria, respectively.

Discussion

The more recent and stringent ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria focus on histopathology, various forms of presentation, and analytical data, allow for a more accurate classification of patients.

Keywords:
IgG4-RD
Classification criteria
Resumen
Fundamento

La enfermedad relacionada con la IgG4 (ER-IgG4) es una enfermedad fibroinflamatoria inmunomediada sistémica rara, con una etiología y fisiopatología desconocida, que puede afectar a múltiples órganos. Se presenta con características clínicas, radiológicas y serológicas comunes. Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar los dos últimos criterios de clasificación y diagnóstico de IgG4-RD: Umehara-Okazaki 2011 y ACR/EULAR 2019.

Material y método

Estudio transversal retrospectivo realizado en dos centros desde enero de 2010 hasta julio de 2023, donde incluimos pacientes sospechosos de tener ER-IgG4 de varios departamentos hospitalarios. Se excluyeron los pacientes que finalmente fueron diagnosticados de otras patologías. Los casos sospechosos de ER-IgG4 restantes fueron evaluados utilizando tanto los criterios de Umehara-Okazaki 2011 como los de ACR/EULAR 2019.

Resultados

De los 34 pacientes con un diagnóstico clínico de ER-IgG4, los criterios de Umehara-Okazaki 2011 clasificaban a 20 pacientes: 5 como casos definitivos, 7 como probables y 8 como posibles. La aplicación de los criterios ACR/EULAR 2019 a la misma cohorte resultó en el diagnóstico de 9 pacientes. La fibrosis retroperitoneal y la aortitis fueron las formas más prevalentes de presentación, representando el 25% y el 22.2% de los casos clasificados bajo los criterios de 2011 y 2019, respectivamente.

Conclusiones

Los recientes criterios ACR/EULAR 2019, que se centran en la histopatología, diversas formas de presentación y datos analíticos, permiten una clasificación más precisa de los pacientes.

Palabras clave:
ER-IgG4
Criterios de clasificación

Article

These are the options to access the full texts of the publication Medicina Clínica
Subscriber
Subscriber

If you already have your login data, please click here .

If you have forgotten your password you can you can recover it by clicking here and selecting the option “I have forgotten my password”
Subscribe
Subscribe to

Medicina Clínica

Purchase
Purchase article

Purchasing article the PDF version will be downloaded

Price 19.34 €

Purchase now
Contact
Phone for subscriptions and reporting of errors
From Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. (GMT + 1) except for the months of July and August which will be from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Calls from Spain
932 415 960
Calls from outside Spain
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos