covid
Buscar en
Revista de Administração e Inovação
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Administração e Inovação Compreendendo o processo de inovação como uma estrutura complexa de regras mul...
Journal Information
Vol. 11. Issue 4.
Pages 235-259 (October - December 2014)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 11. Issue 4.
Pages 235-259 (October - December 2014)
Open Access
Compreendendo o processo de inovação como uma estrutura complexa de regras multiníveis
Understanding the Process of Innovation as a Complex Structure of Multilevel Rules
Visits
519
Marcelo Fernandes Pacheco Dias
Doutor em Agronegócios pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS, Professor da Universidade Federal de Pelotas – UFPEL, (Brasil)
Eugenio Avila Pedrozo
Doutor em Genie Industrielle no Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, França, Professor da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS, (Brasil)
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
RESUMO

O framework Micro-meso-macro multinível se propõe a descrever o processo de inovação com base na complexidade e nas regras. Neste framework adota-se o conceito de regra como um conceito analítico, que possibilita estabelecer uma ligação entre as teorias de inovação. Entretanto, duas lacunas foram identificadas: a primeira está ligada à simplicidade com que a complexidade é tratada; e a segunda refere-se à ausência de um foco nas regras associadas às teorias da inovação. O objetivo deste ensaio teórico é propor um framework multinível, com base nas regras e nos princípios de complexidade para analisar o processo de inovação. Neste novo framework as regras e as interações são detalhadas e baseadas em princípios de complexidade.

Palavras-chave:
Processo de inovação
Complexidade
Micro-meso-macro
Inovação
Regras
ABSTRACT

The multilevel framework Micro-meso-macro proposes to describe the innovation process based on the complexity and rules. In this framework adopt the rule as an analytical concept which is used to establish a bridge between the theories employed. Two gaps were identified in the innovation processes: the first is connected to the simplicity with which complexity is generally treated; and the second refers to the lack of a focus on the rules embedded in the theories used in innovation. The goal in this theoretical essay is to propose a multilevel framework, based on the rules and principles of complexity to analyze the innovation process. In this new framework the rules and the interactions are detailed and based on principles of complexity.

Keywords:
Process innovation
Complexity
Micro-meso-macro
Innovation
Rules
Full text is only aviable in PDF
REFERÊNCIAS
[Black and Boal, 1994]
J.A. Black, K.B. Boal.
Strategic resources: traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage.
Strategic Management Journal, 15 (1994), pp. 131-148
[Bongsug, 2012]
C. Bongsug.
An evolutionary framework for service innovation: insights of complexity theory for service science.
International Journal of Production Economics, 135 (2012), pp. 813-822
[Boston Consulting Group, 2009]
Boston Consulting Group.
Innovation: making hard decisions in the downturn, Author, (2009),
[Crossan and Apaydin, 2010]
M.M. Crossan, M. Apaydin.
A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature.
Journal of Management Studies, 47 (2010), pp. 1154-1191
[Cruz et al., 2006]
L.B. Cruz, E.A. Pedrozo, V.D.F.B. Estivalete.
Towards sustainable development strategies: a complex view following the contribution of Edgar Morin.
Management Decision, 44 (2006), pp. 871-891
[Davis et al., 2009]
J.P. Davis, K.M. Eisenhardt, C.B. Bingham.
Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 54 (2009), pp. 413-452
[Delery and Doty, 1996]
J.E. Delery, D.H. Doty.
Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions.
Academy of Management Journal, 39 (1996), pp. 802-835
[Dopfer, 2005]
K. Dopfer.
The evolutionary foundation of economics, Cambridge University Press, (2005),
[Dopfer, 2012]
K. Dopfer.
The origins of meso economics.
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22 (2012), pp. 133-160
[Dopfer et al., 2004]
K. Dopfer, J. Foster, J. Potts.
Micro-meso-macro.
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14 (2004), pp. 263-279
[Dopfer and Potts, 2008]
K. Dopfer, J. Potts.
The general theory of economic evolution, Routledge, (2008),
[Dopfer and Potts, 2009]
K. Dopfer, J. Potts.
On the theory of economic evolution.
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 6 (2009), pp. 23-44
[Dopfer and Potts, 2010]
K. Dopfer, J. Potts.
Why evolutionary realism underpins evolutionary economic analysis and theory: a reply to Runde’s critique.
Journal of Institutional Economics, 6 (2010), pp. 401-413
[Dougherty and Hardy, 1996a]
D. Dougherty, C. Hardy.
Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: overcoming innovation-to-organization problems.
The Academy of Management Journal, 39 (1996), pp. 1120-1153
[Easterby-Smith and Prieto, 2007]
M. Easterby-Smith, I.M. Prieto.
Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: an integrative role for learning?.
British Journal of Management, 19 (2007), pp. 235-249
[Foster, 1993]
J. Foster.
Economics and the self-organisation approach: Alfred Marshall revisited?.
The Economic Journal, 103 (1993), pp. 975-991
[Garud et al., 2011]
R. Garud, J. Gehman, A. Kumaraswamy.
Complexity arrangements for sustained innovation: lessons from 3M Corporation.
Organization Studies, 32 (2011), pp. 737-767
[Hanusch and Pyka, 2007]
H. Hanusch, A. Pyka.
Principles of neo-schumpeterian economics.
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31 (2007), pp. 275-289
[Katz and Gartner, 1988]
J. Katz, W.B. Gartner.
Properties of emerging organizations.
Academy of Management Review, 13 (1988), pp. 429-441
[Meyer et al., 1993]
A.D. Meyer, A.S. Tsui, C.R. Hinings.
Configurational approaches to organizational analysis.
Academy of Management Journal, 36 (1993), pp. 1175-1195
[Miller and Friesen, 1980]
D. Miller, P. Friesen.
Archetypes of organizational transition.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 (1980), pp. 268-299
[Miller and Floricel, 2007]
R. Miller, S. Floricel.
Games of Innovation: a new theoretical perspective.
Internacional Journal of Innovation Management, 11 (2007), pp. 1-35
[Miller et al., 2008]
R. Miller, X. Olleros, L. Molinie.
Innovation games: a new approach to the competitive challenge.
Long Range Planning, 41 (2008), pp. 378-394
[Mohr, 1982]
L.B. Mohr.
Explaining organizational behavior: the limits and possibilities of theory and research, Jossey-Bass, (1982),
[Morin, 2000]
E. Morin.
O pensamento complexo, um pensamento que pensa.
A inteligência da complexidade, pp. 196-213
[Morin, 2003]
E. Morin.
A organização: do objeto ao sistema.
O método 1: a natureza da natureza, pp. 122-194
[Morin, 2008a]
E. Morin.
O método 2: a vida da vida, Sulina, (2008),
[Morin, 2008b]
E. Morin.
O método 1: a natureza da natureza, Sulina, (2008),
[Morin, 2008c]
E. Morin.
O método 3: o conhecimento do conhecimento, Sulina, (2008),
[Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995]
I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi.
The knowledge creating company, Oxford University Press, (1995),
[Nonaka and Takeuchi, 2008]
I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi.
Gestão do conhecimento, Bookmann, (2008),
[Pavlou and Sawy, 2011]
P.A. Pavlou, O.A.E. Sawy.
Understanding the elusive “black box” of dynamic capabilities.
Decision Sciences Journal, 42 (2011), pp. 239-273
[Pedrozo et al., 2012]
E.A. Pedrozo, M.F.P. Dias, M.C.S. Abreu.
MultitTheoretical analysis in organizational and strategic configurational changes: using mixed methods with multilevel rules for innovation.
West meets east: toward methodological exchange, pp. 265-305
[Perez, 2010]
C. Perez.
Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms.
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34 (2010), pp. 185-202
[Schumpeter, 1934]
J.A. Schumpeter.
The theory of economic development, Harvard Univ. Press, (1934),
[Slappendel, 1996]
C. Slappendel.
Perspectives on innovation in organizations.
Organization Studies, 17 (1996), pp. 107-129
[Teece, 2007c]
D.J. Teece.
Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.
Strategic Management Journal, 28 (2007), pp. 1319-1350
[Teece and Pisano, 1994]
D. Teece, G. Pisano.
The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction.
Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (1994), pp. 537-556
[Thomas and D’Aveni, 2009]
L.G. Thomas, R. D’Aveni.
The changing nature of competition in the US manufacturing sector, 1950-2002.
Strategic Organization, 7 (2009), pp. 387-431
[Van de Ven et al., 2007]
A.H. Van de Ven, D.E. Polley, R. Garud, S. Venkataraman.
The innovation journey, Oxford University Press, (2007),
[Van de Ven and Rodgers, 1988]
A.H. Van de Ven, E.M. Rodgers.
Innovations and organizations: critical perspectives.
Communication Research, 15 (1988), pp. 632-651
[Winter, 2003]
S.G. Winter.
Understanding dynamic capabilities.
Strategic Management Journal, 24 (2003), pp. 991-995
[Witt, 2008]
U. Witt.
What is specific about evolutionary economics?.
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18 (2008), pp. 547-575
[Zahra and George, 2002]
S.A. Zahra, G. George.
Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension.
Academy of Management Review, 27 (2002), pp. 185-203
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltda. on behalf of Departamento de Administração Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade Universidade de São Paulo ¿ FEA/USP
Article options