covid
Buscar en
Revista de Administração e Inovação
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Administração e Inovação The Governance Structure of Cooperative Networks – The Genolyptus Case
Journal Information
Vol. 11. Issue 3.
Pages 7-29 (July - September 2014)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 11. Issue 3.
Pages 7-29 (July - September 2014)
Open Access
The Governance Structure of Cooperative Networks – The Genolyptus Case
A Estrutura de Governança de Redes de Cooperação – O Caso Genolyptus
Visits
471
Rosileia Milagres
Doutora em Economia pelo Instituto de Economia- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ, Professora da Fundação Dom Cabral – FDC, (Brasil)
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract

Cooperative networks constitute a critical unit of analysis in the context of innovation. Despite this, networks are complex to manage successfully. Some of the difficulties pointed out by authors are associated with the lack of specific management tools, problems related to governance, as well as asymmetries in terms of objectives. The present case study seeks to contribute to this debate by examining the governance and the tools used by the Genolyptus Network. The study demonstrates the importance of this structure and the need for regular investments in its development. The analysis shows that the governance structure is influenced by, the partners’ experience, the types of knowledge and the context where the network is inserted. The case highlights the importance of learning during the process, but, although present, it can be negatively influenced by the context and the possibility of future partnerships.

Keywords:
Network
Governance
Network structure
Network management
Knowledge transfer
Resumo

Redes cooperativas constituem uma unidade crítica para a análise da inovação. Apesar disso, redes são estruturas complexas no que se refere à sua gestão. Algumas dificuldades, de acordo com a literatura, estão associadas à ausência de instrumentos específicos de gestão, problemas relacionados à governança, assim como as assimetrias relacionadas aos objetivos estabelecidos. O estudo de caso apresentado procura contribuir com este debate ao examinar a estrutura de governança e os instrumentos utilizados pela Rede Genolyptus. A pesquisa demonstra a importância dessa estrutura e a necessidade de investimentos regulares em seu desenvolvimento. A análise mostrou também que a estrutura de governança foi influenciada pela experiência dos parceiros, pelos tipos de conhecimento utilizados e pelo contexto em que a rede se desenvolveu. Além desses aspectos, o caso destaca a importância do aprendizado durante o processo, mas salienta que esse aprendizado pode ser negativamente influenciado pelo contexto e pela possibilidade de futuras parcerias.

Palavras-chave:
Redes de colaboração
Governança
Gestão de redes
Transferência de conhecimento
Full text is only aviable in PDF
REFERENCES
[Anand and Khanna, 2000]
B. Anand, T. Khanna.
Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances.
Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2000, March), pp. 295-315
[Britto, 1999]
J.N.P. Britto.
Características estruturais e modus-operandi das redes de firmas em condições de diversidade tecnológica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, (1999),
[Breschi and Malerba, 1997]
S. Breschi, F. Malerba.
Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries.
Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations, pp. 130-156
[Doz, 1996]
Y. Doz.
The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes?.
Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1996, Summer), pp. 55-83
[Dyer and Singh, 1998]
J.H. Dyer, H. Singh.
The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage.
The Academy of Management Review, 23 (1998, October), pp. 660-679
[Dyer et al., 2004, July/August]
J.H. Dyer, P. Kale, H. Singh.
When to ally and when to acquire.
Harvard Business Review, 82 (2004, July/August), pp. 109-115
[Dyer and Hatch, 2006]
J. Dyer, N. Hatch.
Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships.
Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2006, August), pp. 701-719
[Easterby-Smith et al., 2008]
M. Easterby-Smith, M.A. Lyles, E.W.K. Tsang.
Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: current themes and future prospects.
Journal of Management Studies, 4 (2008, June), pp. 677-690
[Gilsing et al., 2007]
V.A. Gilsing, C.E.A.V. Lemmens, G. Duysters.
Strategic alliance networks and innovation: a deterministic and voluntaristic view combined.
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19 (2007, March), pp. 227-249
[Giuri et al., 2002]
P. Giuri, J. Hagedoorn, M. Mariani.
Technological diversification and strategic alliances [Working Paper Series 2002/04].
Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM)Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, (2002, February),
[Granovetter, 1985]
M. Granovetter.
Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness.
The American Journal of Sociology, 91 (1985, November), pp. 481-510
[Gulati, 1995]
R. Gulati.
Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances.
Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1995, February), pp. 85-112
[Gulati, 1999]
R. Gulati.
Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation.
Strategic Management Journal, 20 (1999, May), pp. 397-420
[Gulati, 2007]
R. Gulati.
Managing network resources: alliances, affiliations, and other relational assets, Oxford University Press, (2007),
[Hagedoorn and Hesen, 2007]
J. Hagedoorn, G. Hesen.
Contract law and the governance on inter-firm technology partnerships – an analysis of different modes of partnering and their contractual implications.
Journal of Management Studies, 44 (2007, May), pp. 343-366
[Harryson et al., 2008]
S. Harryson, R. Dudkowski, A. Stern.
Transforming networks in innovation alliances – the development of Volvo C70.
Journal of Management Studies, 45 (2008, June), pp. 746-773
[Heimeriks et al., 2009]
K. Heimeriks, E. Klijn, J. Reuer.
Building capabilities for alliance portfolio.
Long Range Planning, 42 (2009, February), pp. 96-114
[Heimeriks and Duysters, 2007]
K. Heimeriks, G. Duysters.
Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: an empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process.
Journal of Management Studies, 44 (2007, January), pp. 25-49
[Heimeriks et al., 2007]
K.H. Heimeriks, G. Duysters, W. Vanhaverbeke.
Learning mechanisms and differential performance in alliance portfolios.
Strategic Organization, 5 (2007, November), pp. 373-408
[Hughes and Weiss, 2007]
J. Hughes, J. Weiss.
Simple rules for making alliances work.
Harvard Business Review, 85 (2007, November), pp. 122-131
[Inpken and Dinur, 1998]
A. Inpken, A. Dinur.
Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures.
Organization Science, 9 (1998, July/August), pp. 454-468
[Kale and Singh, 2007]
P. Kale, H. Singh.
Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success.
Strategic Management Journal, 28 (2007, October), pp. 981-1000
[Knudsen and Nielsen, 2009]
L. Knudsen, B. Nielsen.
Antecedents of procedural governance in knowledge - sharing alliances.
Annals of Information Systems, pp. 145-161
[Kogut and Zander, 1992]
B. Kogut, U. Zander.
Knowledge of the firm, combinative, capabilities, and the replication of technology.
Organization Science, 3 (1992, August), pp. 383-397
[Larson, 1992]
A. Larson.
Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (1992, March), pp. 76-104
[Lee, 2007]
G.K. Lee.
The significance of network resources in the race to enter emerging product markets: the convergence of telephony communications and computer networking, 1989-2001.
Strategic Management Journal, 28 (2007, January), pp. 17-37
[Lubatkin et al., 1998, Nov./Dec]
M. Lubatkin, R. Calori, P. Very, J.F. Veiga.
Management mergers across borders: a two-nation exploration of a nationally bound administrative heritage.
Organization Science, 9 (1998, Nov./Dec.), pp. 670-684
[Mahnke, 2000]
V. Mahnke.
Limits to outsourcing and the evolutionary perspective on firm boundaries. [Working Paper].
Department Business School, Copenhagen Business School, (2000, October),
[Malerba, 1992]
F. Malerba.
Learning by firms and incremental technical change.
Economic Journal, 102 (1992, July), pp. 845-859
[Malerba, 2002]
F. Malerba.
Sectoral systems of innovation: concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe, Cambridge University, (2002),
[Milagres, 2011, Jan./Jun]
R. Milagres.
Rotinas: uma revisão teórica.
Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 10 (2011, Jan./Jun.), pp. 161-196
[Möller et al., 2005]
K. Möller, A. Rajala, S. Svahn.
Strategic business net – their type and management.
Journal of Business Research, 58 (2005, September), pp. 1274-1284
[Möller and Rajala, 2007]
K. Möller, A. Rajala.
Rise of strategic nets – new models of value creation.
Industrial Marketing Management, 36 (2007, October), pp. 895-908
[Nelson and Winter, 1985]
R. Nelson, S.G. Winter.
An evolutionary theory of economic change, Harvard University Press, (1985),
[Ness, 2009]
H. Ness.
Governance, negotiations, and alliance dynamics: explaining the evolution of relational practice.
Journal of Management Studies, 46 (2009, May), pp. 451-480
[Nielsen, 2010]
B. Nielsen.
Strategic fit, contractual, and procedural governance in alliances.
Journal of Business Research, 63 (2010, July), pp. 682-689
[Nooteboom et al., 1997]
B. Nooteboom, H. Berger, N.G. Noorderhaven.
Effects of trust and governance on relational risk.
Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1997, April), pp. 308-338
[Parkhe, 1993]
A. Parkhe.
Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation.
Academy of Management Journal, 36 (1993, August), pp. 794-829
[Powell et al., 1996]
W.W. Powell, K.W. Koput, L. Smith-Doerr.
Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning biotechnology.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1996, March), pp. 116-145
[Reuer and Ariño, 2007]
J. Reuer, A. Ariño.
Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity.
Strategic Management Journal, 28 (2007, March), pp. 313-330
[Ring and Van de Ven, 1994]
P. Ring, A. Van de Ven.
Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships.
Academy of Management Review, 19 (1994, January), pp. 90-118
[Ring et al., 2005]
P.S. Ring, Y.L. Doz, P.M. Olk.
Managing formation processes in R&D consortia.
California Management Review, 47 (2005, Summer), pp. 137-156
[Rothaermel and Deeds, 2006]
F.T. Rothaermel, D.L. Deeds.
Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures.
Journal of Business Venturing, 21 (2006, July), pp. 429-460
[Simonin, 1997]
B.L. Simonin.
The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization.
Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1997, October), pp. 1150-1174
[Sluyts et al., 2008]
K. Sluyts, R. Martens, P. Matthyssens.
Towards a dynamic concept of alliance capability. [Working Paper, 2008019].
University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics, (2008, June),
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltda. on behalf of Departamento de Administração Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade Universidade de São Paulo ¿ FEA/USP
Article options