covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología Anestesia combinada epidural-general ligera: una alternativa en cirugía plásti...
Journal Information
Vol. 37. Issue 3.
Pages 225-234 (August - October 2009)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 37. Issue 3.
Pages 225-234 (August - October 2009)
INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TECNOLÓGICA
Open Access
Anestesia combinada epidural-general ligera: una alternativa en cirugía plástica
Combined epidural-light general anaesthesia:
Visits
6981
Henry Medina
, Alejandro Londoño**, Iván Fernando Quintero***
* Anestesiólogo. Clínica Rostrum y Corpus, Cali. Docente del Departamento de Anestesiología. Universidad del Valle. Miembro del grupo de investigación en Anestesiología y Reanimación. Univalle
** Anestesiólogo. Universidad del Valle.
*** Residente de Anestesiología. Universidad del Valle. Miembro del grupo de investigación en Anestesiología y Reanimación. Univalle.
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
RESUMEN
Introducción

La cirugía plástica estética implica usualmente la realización de dos o más eventos quirúrgicos, siendo las técnicas anestésicas más usadas la general o epidural; una alternativa muy interesante es la utilización de anestesia combinada epidural general ligera, tratando de obtener los beneficios de cada técnica y de disminuir los inconvenientes inherentes a cada una de ellas.

Objetivo

Describir el uso de la técnica anestésica combinada epidural-general ligera en pacientes de cirugía estética.

Métodos

Estudio descriptivo tipo serie de casos en el cual se recolectaron datos de 67 pacientes de cirugía plástica realizados en la Clínica Corpus y Rostrum de la ciudad de Cali, a quienes se les administró anestesia combinada epidural-general ligera en el periodo comprendido entre enero y junio de 2008. Fueron incluidos pacientes con dos o más eventos anatomo-quirúrgicos durante el mismo procedimiento anestésico, o cirugías con requerimiento anestésico en dermatomas superiores a T4 y lumbares o sacros al mismo tiempo

Resultados

Los volúmenes y concentraciones de anestésico local fueron bajos, igualmente los requerimientos de anestésicos generales. El efecto secundario más frecuente fue la hipotensión, fácilmente manejado con vasopresores. No se presentaron casos de recuerdo intraoperatorio.

Conclusiones

La anestesia general-epidural constituye una alternativa atractiva para la realización de cirugías estéticas.

Key words:
combined anesthetics epidural
general
anesthesia
surgery
plastic (source: MeSH NLM)
Palabras clave:
anestésicos combinados
anestesia epidural
anestesia general
cirugía plástica (fuente: DeCS Bireme)
ABSTRACT
Introduction

Aesthetic plastic surgery usually involves two or more surgical events taking place during the same anaesthetic procedure; the most widely used anaesthetic techniques are general and epidural anaesthesia. A very interesting alternative is the use of combined epidural and light general anaesthesia, attempting to obtain the benefits of each technique and reduce the disadvantages inherent in each one.

Objective

Describing the use of the combined epidural-light general anaesthesia technique in aesthetic surgery patients.

Methods

This was a descriptive case series in which data were collected from 67 patients having plastic surgery performed at the Corpus and Rostrum Clinic in Cali, who received combined epidural-light general anaesthesia between January and June 2008. Patients undergoing two or more anatomo-surgical events during the same anaesthetic procedure were included, as were those undergoing surgery with an anaesthetic requirement involving dermatomes over T4 and lumbar or sacral dermatomes at the same time.

Results

Local anaesthetic volume and concentration were low as were general anaesthetic requirements. The most common side-effect was hypotension which was easily managed with vasopressors. There were no cases of intraoperative recall.

Conclusions

The light general-epidural anaesthesia technique is an attractive option for cosmetic surgery.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
REFERENCES
[1.]
A. Shono, Y. Saito, S. Sakura, K. Doi, N. Yokokawa.
Sevoflurane requirements to suppress responses to transcutaneous electrical stimulation during epidural anesthesia with 0.5- 1 5 lidocaine.
Anesth Analg, 97 (2003), pp. 1168-1172
[2.]
M. Dauri, F. Costa, S. Servetti, T. Sidiropoulou, E. Fabbi, A.F. Sabato.
Combined general and epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine for renal transplantation.
Minerva Anestesiol., 69 (2003 Dec), pp. 873-884
[3.]
A. Agarwal, R. Pandey, S. Dhiraaj, P.K. Singh, M. Raza, C.K. Pandey, et al.
The effect of epidural bupivacaine on induction and maintenance doses of propofol and maintenance doses of fentanyl and vecuronium.
Anesth Analg., 99 (2004), pp. 1684-1688
[4.]
P.K. Sinha, K.P. Unnikrishnan.
Reduction in requirement of propofol during combined epidural and general anesthesia guided by bispectral index.
Anesth Analg., 101 (2005), pp. 613-614
[5.]
J. Zhang, W. Zhang.
The effects of epidural anesthesia with different concentrations of ropivacaine on sevoflurane requirements.
Anesth Analg., 104 (2007), pp. 984-986
[6.]
L. Casati, S. Fernández-Galinski, E. Barrera, O. Pol, M.M. Puig.
Isoflurane requirements during combined epidural/general anesthesia for major abdominal surgery.
Anesth Analg., 94 (2002), pp. 1331-1337
[7.]
M. Koo, A. Sabaté, A. Dalmau, I. Camprubi.
Sevoflurane requirements during coloproctologic surgery difference between two different epidural regimens.
J Clin Anesth., 15 (2003), pp. 97-102
[8.]
Kwo Jean.
Anestesia en la cirugía abdominal.
Massachusetts General Hospital. Anestesia, Translated, 6th ed., pp. 311-312
[9.]
F. Dunet, Ch. Pfister, M. Deghmani, Y. Meunier, G. Demeilliers-Pfister, P. Grise.
Clinical results of combined epidural and general anesthesia procedure in radical prostatectomy management.
Can J Urol., 11 (2004), pp. 2200-2204
[10.]
P.J. O'Connor, J. Hanson, B.T. Finucane.
Induced hypotension with epidural/general anesthesia reduces transfusion in radical prostate surgery.
Can J Anesth., 53 (2006), pp. 873-880
[11.]
Y. Li, S. Zhu, M. Yan.
Combined general/ epidural anesthesia (0.375% ropivacaine) versus general anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery.
Anesth Analg, 106 (2008), pp. 1562-1565
[12.]
V. Von Dossow, M. Welte, U. Zaune, E. Martin, M. Walter, J. Rückert, et al.
Thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia: the preferred anesthesia technique for thoracic surgery.
Anesth Anal., 92 (2001), pp. 848-854
[13.]
K.T. Delis, A.L. Knaggs, P. Mason, K.G. Macleod.
Effects of epidural and general anesthesia combined versus general anesthesia alone on the venous hemodynamics of the lower limb.
A randomized study. Thromb Haemost., 92 (2004), pp. 1003-1011
[14.]
K. Takakura, M. Nagaya, M. Mori, H. Koga, S. Yoshitake, T. Noguchi.
Refractory hypotension during combined general and epidural anesthesia in a patient on tryciclic antidepressants.
Anaesth Intensive care., 34 (2006), pp. 111-114
[15.]
M. Bernards Christopher.
Epidural and spinal anesthesia.
Clinical anesthesia, 5th ed, pp. 700-707
[16.]
J. Zhang, W. Zhang, B. Li.
The effect of epidural anesthesia with different concentrations of ropivacaine on sevoflurane requirements.
Anesth Analg, 104 (2007), pp. 984-986
[17.]
A. Shono, S. Sakura, Y. Saito, K. Doi, T. Nakatani.
Comparison of 1% and 2% lidocaine epidural anaesthesia combined with sevoflurane general anaesthesia utilizing a constant bispectral index.
Br J Anaesth., 91 (2003), pp. 825-829
[18.]
A. Pandazi, A. Bourlioti, G. Kostopanagiotou.
Bispectral index monitoring in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery: experience in 23 patients.
Obesity surgery., 15 (2005), pp. 58-62
[19.]
G. Fanelli, A. Casati, M. Berti, L. Rossignoli.
Incidence of hypotension and bradycardia during integrated epidural/general anesthesia. An epidemiologic observational study on 1,200 consecutive patients.
Minerva Anestesiol, 64 (1998), pp. 313-319
[20.]
T. Ishiyama, T. Oguchi, T. Iijima, T. Matsukawa, S. Kashimoto, T. Kumazawa.
Ephedrine but not phenylephrine increases bispectral index values during combined general and epidural anesthesia.
Anesth Analg., 97 (2003), pp. 780-784
[21.]
K.A. Gendall, R.R. Kennedy, A.J. Watson, F.A. Frizelle.
The effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative outcome after colorectal surgery.
Colorectal Dis., 9 (2007), pp. 584-598
[22.]
D.M. Pöpping, N. Elia, E. Marret, C. Remy, M.R. Tramer.
Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis.
Arch Surg., 143 (2008), pp. 990-999
[23.]
E. Ozyuvaci, A. Altan, T. Karadeniz, M. Topsakal, A. Besisik, M. Yucel.
General anesthesia versus epidural and general anesthesia in radical cistectomy.
Urol Int., 74 (2005), pp. 62-67
[24.]
P. Roderick, G. Ferris, K. Wilson, H. Halls, D. Jackson, R. Collins, et al.
Towards evidence based guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic reviews of mechanical methods, oral anticoagulation, dextran and regional anaesthesia as thromboprophylatics.
Heath Technol Assess., 9 (2005), pp. 1-78
Copyright © 2009. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología
Article options