metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría Aproximación crítica a los trastornos somatomorfos en niños
Journal Information
Vol. 41. Issue 4.
Pages 900-909 (December 2012)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 41. Issue 4.
Pages 900-909 (December 2012)
Artículos originales
Full text access
Aproximación crítica a los trastornos somatomorfos en niños
Critical Approach to Somatomorphic Disorders in Children
Visits
1597
Juan David Ramos Guevara1,
Corresponding author
jdramosg@unal.edu.co

Correspondencia: Juan David Ramos Guevara, Fundación Hospital de la Misericordia, Avenida Caracas N.° 1-13 piso 4, Bogotá, Colombia
, Rafael Vásquez2
1 Residente Neuropediatría IV año, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
2 Psiquiatra Infantil, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
This item has received
Article information
Resumen

Los trastornos somatomorfos tienen en común manifestaciones somáticas que no tienen explicación médica y que pueden producir una alteración de la vida diaria. En niños, existen dificultades de evaluación por el reporte u observación de síntomas debido a su edad, a la influencia parental y a los factores asociados. El objetivo de este trabajo es reconocer las dificultades diagnósticas y las herramientas clínicas que permitan la aproximación a los trastornos somatomorfos en niños. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la información publicada en los últimos diez años sobre el tema. La evolución histórica del concepto de somatización ha generado dificultades en su abordaje. Algunas signos pueden hacer sospechar un trastorno somatomorfo; sin embargo, existen muy pocas herramientas de evaluación en niños. Actualmente, dichas herramientas se basan solamente en listas de síntomas y no responden por completo a todos los interrogantes. Los trastornos somatomorfos o síntomas somáticos en niños son un campo con un vacío aún por llenar.

Palabras clave:
Trastorno somatomorfo
pediatría
diagnóstico
Abstract

Somatomorphic disorders have common somatic manifestations without medical explanation, that can affect daily life. There are evaluation difficulties regarding symptom report or observation in children due to their age, parental influence and associated factors. The aim of this work is to acknowledge diagnosis difficulties and clinic tools to approach somatomorphic disorders in children. A systematic search in the information published for the last ten years was carried out. Historical evolution of the concept of somatization has generated difficulties to approach this issue. Some signs could indicate a somatomorphic disorder; however, there are very little evaluating tools for children. Currently, said tools are only based on lists of symptoms without fully answering to all questions. Somatomorphic disorders or somatic symptoms in children are still a gap to be closed.

Key words:
Somatoform disorders
pediatrics
diagnosis
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Referencias
[1]
American Psychiatric Association (APA).
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), APA, (2004),
[2]
IE Schulte, F Petermann.
Somatoform disorders: 30 years of debate about criteria! What about children and adolescents?.
J Psychos Res, 70 (2011), pp. 218-228
[3]
PM Leary.
Conversion disorder in childhood, diagnosed too late, investigated too much?.
J R Soc Med, 96 (2003), pp. 436-438
[4]
K Voigt, A Nagel.
Towards positive diagnostic criteria: A systematic review of somatoform disorder diagnoses and suggestions for future classification.
J Psychos Res, 68 (2010), pp. 403-414
[5]
M Allin, A Streeruwitz.
Progress in understanding conversion disorder.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 1 (2005), pp. 205-209
[6]
S Harvey, B Stanton.
Conversion disorder: towards a neurobiological understanding.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2 (2006), pp. 13-20
[7]
A Lazare.
Current concepts in psychiatry. Conversion symptoms.
New Engl J Med, 305 (1981), pp. 745-748
[8]
A Gaedicke, J González.
Somatización y trastorno conversivo: clínica, fisiopatología, evaluación y tratamiento.
Rev Memoriz, 6 (2010), pp. 1-14
[9]
K Kroenke, P Sharpe.
Revising the classification of somatoform disorders: key questions and preliminary recommendations.
Psychosomatics, 48 (2007), pp. 277-285
[10]
J Dimsdale.
The proposed diagnosis of somatic symptom disorders in DSM-V to replace somatoform disorders in DSM-IV a preliminary report.
J Psychosom Res, 66 (2009), pp. 473-476
[11]
American Psychiatric Association (APA).
DSM V: the future manual [internet]. 2012 [citado: 30 de Julio de 2012].
[12]
M Browning, P Fletcher, M Sharpe.
Can neuroimaging help us to understand and classify somatoform disorders? A systematic and critical review.
Psychosom Med, 73 (2011), pp. 173-184
[13]
J Bisht, N Sankhyan.
Clinical profile of pediatric somatoform disorders.
Indian Pediatr, 45 (2007), pp. 111-115
[14]
T Silber.
Somatization disorders: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.
Pediatr Rev, 32 (2011), pp. 56-63
[15]
J Garber, L Walker, J Zeman.
Somatization symptoms in a community sample of children and adolescents: further validation of the children's somatization inventory.
J Consult Clin Psychol, 3 (1991), pp. 588-595
[16]
EL Peckham, M Hallet.
Psychogenic movement disorders.
Neurol Clin, 27 (2009), pp. 801-819
[17]
M Hallett.
Physiology of psychogenic movement disorders.
J Clin Neurosci, 17 (2010), pp. 959-965
[18]
J Iriarte, J Parra, E Urrestarazu, et al.
Controversies in the diagnosis and management of psychogenic pseudoseizures.
Epilepsy Behav, 4 (2003), pp. 354-359
[19]
MI Forcadas.
Tipos de crisis epilépticas y pseudocrisis.
Gac Med Bilbao, 100 (2003), pp. 105-107
[20]
R Lieb, P Zimmermann.
The natural course of DSM-IV somatoform disorders and syndromes among adolescents and young adults: a prospective-longitudinal community study.
Eur Psychiatry, 17 (2002), pp. 321-331
[21]
K Roelofs.
Childhood abuse in patients with conversion disorder.
Am J Psychiatry, 159 (2002), pp. 1908-1913
[22]
G Akyuz, N Kugu.
Dissociation and childhood abuse history in epileptic and pseudoseizure patients.
Epileptic Disord, 6 (2004), pp. 187-192
[23]
S Vincentiis, K Valente.
Risk factors for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in children and adolescents with epilepsy.
Epilepsy Behav, 8 (2006), pp. 294-298
[24]
E. Wyllie, J Glazer.
Psychiatric features of children and adolescents with pseudoseizures.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 153 (1999), pp. 244-248
[25]
K Roelofs, P Spinhoven.
Trauma and medically unexplained symptoms towards an integration of cognitive and neuro-biological accounts.
Clin Rsychol Rev, 27 (2007), pp. 798-820
[26]
B Rehlivanturk, F Unal.
Conversion disorder in children and adolescents: A four-year follow-up study.
J Psychosom Res, 52 (2002), pp. 187-191
[27]
S Groben, C Hausteiner.
Somatoform disorders and causal attributions in patients with suspected allergies: Do somatic causal attributions matter?.
J Psychosom Res, 70 (2011), pp. 229-238
[28]
IE Schulte, F Petermann.
Familial risk factors for the development of somatoform symptoms and disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev, 42 (2011), pp. 569-583
[29]
K Kroenke.
Physical symptom disorder: A simpler diagnostic category for somatization-spectrum conditions.
J Psychosom Res, 60 (2006), pp. 335-339
[30]
J Weinman.
The illness perception questionnaire: a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness.
Psychol Health, 11 (1996), pp. 431-445
[31]
C Ulrikka, M Fjord.
The soma assessment interview: new parent interview on functional somatic symptoms in children.
J Psychosom Res, 66 (2009), pp. 455-464

Conflictos de interés: Los autores manifiestan que no tienen conflictos de interés en este artículo.

Copyright © 2012. Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría
Download PDF
Article options