metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría Desarrollo y validación de la versión II de la escala EMUN
Journal Information
Vol. 40. Issue 4.
Pages 647-659 (December 2011)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 40. Issue 4.
Pages 647-659 (December 2011)
Artículos originales
Full text access
Desarrollo y validación de la versión II de la escala EMUN
Development and Validation of the EMUN-II Scale
Visits
969
Ricardo Sánchez1,
Corresponding author
rsanchezpe@unal.edu.co

Correspondencia: Ricardo Sánchez, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria, Carrera 45 No. 26-85, Oficina 202, Bogotá, Colombia
, Álvaro Navarro2, Germán Eduardo Rueda-Jaimes3, Carlos Gómez-Restrepo4
1 Médico psiquiatra. Profesor titular, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia
2 Médico psiquiatra. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
3 Médico psiquiatra. Profesor asociado, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Colombia
4 Médico psiquiatra. Profesor del Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, y director del Departamento de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadística, de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia
This item has received
Article information
Resumen
Introducción

La escala EMUN se desarrolló para medir síntomas psiquiátricos en pacientes con trastorno afectivo bipolar. Aunque ha mostrado adecuadas propiedades psicométricas, varios estudios han reportado que la labilidad afectiva, la agresividad y la impulsividad (síntomas no incluidos en la escala) son características importantes del trastorno.

Objetivo

Determinar las propiedades psicométricas de la EMUN al adicionar tres ítems: labilidad afectiva, agresividad e impulsividad.

Métodos

Los datos para el estudio fueron recolectados en 223 pacientes con diagnóstico de episodio maniaco, hipomaniaco o mixto, utilizando una versión modificada de la escala EMUN (EMUN-II), que incluye tres ítems adicionales. Se usó el alfa de Cronbach para evaluar consistencia interna. El contenido se validó usando métodos factoriales y modelamiento con ecuaciones estructurales.

Resultados

Una solución de cuatro factores (activación general, agresividad, activación cognoscitiva y depresión) da cuenta del 96% de la varianza total. Los coeficientes de correlación-concordancia de Lin revelaron valores adecuados para la confiabilidad test-retest. La escala detectó una diferencia significativa entre las medias antes del tratamiento farmacológico y después de este.

Conclusión

La inclusión de tres ítems adicionales mejoró la validez de contenido de la escala EMUN y conservó un instrumento con adecuadas propiedades psicométricas.

Palabras clave:
escalas de valoración psiquiátrica
trastorno bipolar
psicometría
Abstract
Introduction

The EMUN scale has been developed as a psychiatric rating scale for measuring manic symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder. Although the instrument has shown adequate psychometric properties, additional symptoms not included in the scale such as mood lability, aggressiveness, and impulsivity have been reported as important clinical characteristics in several studies.

Objectives

To determine the psychometric properties of the EMUN scale when items measuring mood lability, aggressiveness, and impulsivity are included in the instrument.

Method

Study data was collected from 223 patients with manic, hypomanic or mixed episodes using a modified version of the EMUN scale that includes three additional items (EMUN-II). The CARS-M scale was applied simultaneously to measure concurrent validity. Reliability and sensitivity to change were determined using a repeated measures design.

Results

A four-factors solution (general activation, aggressiveness, cognitive activation, and depression) accounts for 96% of the total variance of the scale. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient revealed adequate scores for test-retest reliability. The scale detected a significant difference between the means before and after pharmacological treatment.

Conclusion

When three additional items are included content validity of the EMUN scale improves. All of the psychometric properties of the original instrument are preserved.

Key words:
Psychiatric status rating scales
bipolar disorder
psychometrics
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Referencias
[1]
R Sánchez, L Jaramillo, C Gómez.
Desarrollo y validación de una escala para medir síntomas maníacos: Escala para Manía de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia (EMUN).
Rev Col Psiqui, 37 (2008), pp. 516-537
[2]
American Psychiatric Association (APA).
Electronic DSM-IV-TR plus, APA, (2000),
[3]
World Health Organization (WHO).
International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 10th revision, 2nd edition, WHO, (2004),
[4]
A Romero, R Sánchez.
Análisis factorial confirmatorio de síntomas en el síndrome maníaco a partir de la aplicación de la escala EMUN.
Rev Col Psiqui, 38 (2009), pp. 304-315
[5]
O Rangel, R Sánchez.
Estudio de la estructura latente del síndrome maníaco mediante técnicas de escalamiento multidimensional.
Rev Col Psiqui, 39 (2010), pp. 240-250
[6]
AC Swann, PL Janicak, JR Calabrese, et al.
Structure of mania: depressive, irritable, and psychotic clusters with different retrospectively-assessed course patterns of illness in randomized clinical trial participants.
J Affect Disord, 67 (2001), pp. 123-132
[7]
F Cassidy, BJ Carroll.
Frequencies of signs and symptoms in mixed and pure episodes of mania: implications for the study of manic episodes.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 25 (2001), pp. 659-665
[8]
R Sánchez, O Rangel, LE Jaramillo.
Evaluación de la labilidad afectiva como síntoma del síndrome maníaco.
Rev Col Psiqui, 39 (2010), pp. 654-664
[9]
D Axelson, BJ Birmaher, D Brent, et al.
A preliminary study of the Kiddie Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children mania rating scale for children and adolescents.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol, 13 (2003), pp. 463-470
[10]
EG Altman, D Hedeker, JL Peterson, et al.
The Altman self-rating mania scale.
Biol Psychiatry, 42 (1997), pp. 948-955
[11]
R Abrams, MA Taylor, P Gaztanaga.
Manic-depressive illness and paranoid schizophrenia. A phenomenologic, family history, and treatment-response study.
Arch Gen Psychiatry, 31 (1974), pp. 640-642
[12]
B Birmaher, M Ehmann, DA Axelson, et al.
Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children (K-SADS-PL) for the assessment of preschool children-a preliminary psychometric study.
J Psychiatr Res, 43 (2009), pp. 680-686
[13]
JA Vilela, JA Crippa, CM Del-Ben, et al.
Reliability and validity of a Portuguese version of the young mania rating scale.
Braz J Med Biol Res, 38 (2005), pp. 1429-1439
[14]
F Cassidy, K Forest, E Murry, et al.
A factor analysis of the signs and symptoms of mania.
Arch Gen Psychiatry, 55 (1998), pp. 27-32
[15]
EA Youngstrom, CK Danielson, RL Findling, et al.
Factor structure of the young mania rating scale for use with youths ages 5 to 17 years.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 31 (2002), pp. 567-572
[16]
MN Pavuluri, DB Henry, B Devineni, et al.
Child mania rating scale: development, reliability, and validity.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 45 (2006), pp. 550-560
[17]
MA Taylor, R Abrams.
Catatonia. Prevalence and importance in the manic phase of manic-depressive illness.
Arch Gen Psychiatry, 34 (1977), pp. 1223-1225
[18]
DL Streiner, GR Norman.
Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, (2008),
[19]
T Raykov, GA Marcoulides.
A first course in structural equation modeling, 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, (2006),
[20]
LI Lin.
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.
Biometrics, 45 (1989), pp. 255-268
[21]
JM Bland, DG Altman.
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.
Stat Methods Med Res, 8 (1999), pp. 135-160
[22]
JM Bland, DG Altman.
Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual.
J Biopharm Stat, 17 (2007), pp. 571-582
[23]
MA Pett, NR Lackey, JJ Sullivan.
Making0 sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research, Sage Pub., (2003),
[24]
FA Kozel.
Identifying phronotypes in psychiatry.
Front Psychiatry, 1 (2010), pp. 141
[25]
RH Perlis, MJ Ostacher, JK Patel, et al.
Predictors of recurrence in bipolar disorder: primary outcomes from the systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder (STEP-BD).
Am J Psychiatry, 163 (2006), pp. 217-224
[26]
HS Akiskal, JM Azorin, EG Hantouche.
Proposed multidimensional structure of mania: beyond the euphoric-dysphoric dichotomy.
J Affect Disord, 73 (2003), pp. 7-18
[27]
A Koukopoulos, MJ Albert, G Sani, et al.
Mixed depressive states: nosologic and therapeutic issues.
Int Rev Psychiatry, 17 (2005), pp. 21-37
[28]
F Benazzi, A Koukopoulos, HS Akiskal.
Toward a validation of a new definition of agitated depression as a bipolar mixed state (mixed depression).
Eur Psychiatry, 19 (2004), pp. 85-90
[29]
A Koukopoulos, G Sani, AE Koukopoulos, et al.
Melancholia agitata and mixed depression.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl, (2007), pp. 50-57

Conflictos de interés: Los autores manifiestan que no tienen conflictos de interés en este artículo.

Copyright © 2011. Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría
Article options