metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English Edition) Public data in epidemiological surveillance systems
Journal Information
Vol. 52. Issue 1.
Pages 9-10 (January - March 2023)
Vol. 52. Issue 1.
Pages 9-10 (January - March 2023)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Public data in epidemiological surveillance systems
Datos públicos en los sistemas de vigilancia epidemiológica
Visits
234
Edwin Herazoa, Alex Antonio Angulo-Lunab, Adalberto Campo-Ariasb,
Corresponding author
acampoa@unimagdalena.edu.co

Corresponding author.
a Instituto de Investigación del Comportamiento Humano, Bogotá, Colombia
b Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text
Dear Editor,

The annual reports from national organisations on some health indicators are usually limited to basic descriptive analyses and, in most cases, presentations stratified by some variable, generally sex. This implies an under-use of systematically collected data1. The Colombian National Department of Statistics (Departamento Nacional de Estadística) and the National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences (Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses) have been collecting information on death by suicide in Colombia for several decades. More recently, the National Institute of Health (Instituto Nacional de Salud) included the mandatory notification of suicide attempts treated in the National Health System (Sistema Nacional de Salud) in the Epidemiological Surveillance System (Sistema de Vigilancia Epidemiológica; Sivigila). In public mental health, the number of cases or the annual number of suicide attempts and deaths by suicide are frequently used as indicators of the psychological well-being of the population2.

It is necessary to carry out more advanced analyses of public health information regularly collected by district, municipal, departmental or national public institutions. Castro Moreno et al.3 —affiliated with the National Institute of Health— presented a very interesting survival analysis based on the suicide attempt surveillance system and the unique registry of deaths during 2016 and 2017. It is very relevant to observe that half of those who died by suicide made a suicide attempt in approximately the previous two years. Likewise, death by suicide was three times more likely for men and twice as likely for adults older than 29 years, residents of rural areas, those with chronic illness or a history of depressive disorder. However, a number of ethical issues related to the research need to be considered. On the one hand, is the privileged use of public information. And on the other is the publication of a complementary analysis outside the Colombian National Institute of Health's media.

Similar or more advanced analyses than the one commented on would be possible with better management of the different records of relevant health information. However, the privileged use of public information is clearer if the following situation is analysed. Recently, the database of suicide attempts registered in Colombia in 2018 was downloaded from Sivigila, the only one available until 5 June 2021. This report form for suicide attempts has two pages; the first for basic data and the second for identification of the case, triggering factors, risk factors, mechanism and if there was referral to mental health. For 2018, 26,815 cases of attempted suicide were reported in Colombia; with ages from five to 100 (mean, 25.0±12.4) years. On the date of consultation of the web page of the National Institute of Health, it was only possible to consult the information on the first page of the report form, that is, the entire second page, which includes information that may have clinical and epidemiological relevance, is omitted. The database was downloaded to explore some variables associated with hospitalisation for attempted suicide. Fifty-six point two percent (n=16,088) of those who attempted suicide were hospitalised. However, the first page of the file does not specify whether the hospitalisation was to treat the physical problems resulting from the attempt or any associated or underlying mental disorder.

More analysis like that presented by Castro Moreno et al.3 would be possible if public mental health information was available to national researchers in a timely and complete manner, with the necessary ethical considerations such as the omission of data that allows the identification of citizens4,5, and not just available in a privileged manner to employees of public institutions6. It is important to bear in mind the public nature of this information, given that the agencies in charge of managing these systems are financed with taxes from citizens7.

Greater accessibility of public data would make it possible to complement the descriptive reports that are usually presented by national and international health organisations. These investigations resulting from secondary analyses should be a required input for administrative and legislative decision-making in Colombian public health8–10. In addition, these analyses would help with the greater construction, dissemination and social adoption of knowledge11,12.

Funding

Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, and the Human Behaviour Research Institute (Instituto de Investigación del Comportamiento Humano), Bogotá, Colombia.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this investigation.

References
[1]
R.J. Rodrigues, C.H. Gattini.
National health information systems and health observatories.
Global health informatics, pp. 14-49
[2]
Suicide prevention: A global imperative.
World Health Organization, (2014),
[3]
L.S. Castro Moreno, L.F. Fuertes Valiente, O.E. Pacheco García, C.M. Muñoz Lozada.
Factores de riesgo relacionados con Intento de suicidio como predictores de suicidio, Colombia 2016-2017.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr, (2021),
[4]
P. Fernández.
El delito de revelación y divulgación de secretos en el ámbito sanitario.
El delito de revelación y divulgación de secretos en el ámbito sanitario, pp. 289-321
[5]
L.E. Benhumea-González.
Proteger los datos personales sobre la salud es un derecho: Redimensionar su importancia, una necesidad.
Convergencia, 20 (2013), pp. 261-268
[6]
E.I. Domínguez, C. Paladines, C.H. Flores.
Ética y seguridad informática en el sector de la salud pública en el siglo XXI.
Dominio de las Ciencias, 3 (2017), pp. 403-413
[7]
J.L. Cervera-Ferri.
El seguimiento de los objetivos de desarrollo del milenio: oportunidades y retos para los Sistemas Nacionales de Estadística.
CEPAL, (2005),
[8]
A. Campo-Arias.
Usos de los resultados de investigación en salud en Colombia.
Duazary, 7 (2010), pp. 179-180
[9]
H. Elliot, J. Popay.
How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilization and local NHS policy making.
J Epidemiol Community Health, 54 (2000), pp. 461-468
[10]
A. Hernández-Bello, R. Vega-Romero.
Más allá de la diseminación: lecciones de la interacción entre investigadores y tomadores de decisiones en un proyecto de investigación en Bogotá, Colombia.
Cad Saude Publica, 22 (2006), pp. S77-85
[11]
A. Díaz, G.A. Ceballos.
La producción de artículos científicos como competencia a desarrollar en las nuevas generaciones académicas en Colombia.
Duazary, 7 (2010), pp. 7-8
[12]
R. Smith.
Measuring the social impact of research: difficult but necessary.
Br J Med, 323 (2001), pp. 528
Copyright © 2021. Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría
Download PDF
Article options
Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.rcpeng.2022.04.002
No mostrar más