was read the article
array:22 [ "pii" => "S1888441524000729" "issn" => "18884415" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2024.03.010" "estado" => "S200" "fechaPublicacion" => "2024-04-12" "aid" => "1387" "copyright" => "SECOT" "copyrightAnyo" => "2024" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "fla" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "itemSiguiente" => array:17 [ "pii" => "S1888441524000651" "issn" => "18884415" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2024.03.003" "estado" => "S200" "fechaPublicacion" => "2024-04-15" "aid" => "1380" "copyright" => "SECOT" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "fla" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "es" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">ORIGINAL</span>" "titulo" => "Proyecto AVIP (Amigo VIrtual Protésico): estudio de resultados clínico-funcionales y de satisfacción con una aplicación móvil en el manejo perioperatorio y seguimiento de implantes protésicos de cadera" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "AVIP Project (Prosthetic Virtual Friend): Study of clinical-functional outcomes and satisfaction with a mobile application in the perioperative management and follow-up of hip arthroplasty" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figura 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 3335 "Ancho" => 1675 "Tamanyo" => 229582 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Interfaz de la Aplicación AVIP. Pantalla principal con las secciones principales.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "J. Diranzo-García, V. Estrems-Díaz, J.F. Garrido-Ferrer, L. Castillo-Ruipérez, V.M. Zarzuela-Sánchez, L. Hernández-Ferrando" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Diranzo-García" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "V." "apellidos" => "Estrems-Díaz" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.F." "apellidos" => "Garrido-Ferrer" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L." "apellidos" => "Castillo-Ruipérez" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "V.M." "apellidos" => "Zarzuela-Sánchez" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L." "apellidos" => "Hernández-Ferrando" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441524000651?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/18884415/unassign/S1888441524000651/v2_202404190446/es/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S1888441517301480" "issn" => "18884415" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2017.09.006" "estado" => "S200" "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-11-15" "aid" => "699" "copyright" => "SECOT" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "ret" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 119 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 10 "HTML" => 32 "PDF" => 77 ] ] "es" => array:8 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "titulo" => "WITHDRAWN: Análisis de un programa de atención integral en pacientes con fractura de cadera mayores de 65 años" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => 0 "tieneResumen" => "es" "contieneResumen" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "J. Franch Parella" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Franch Parella" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1988885617300962" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recote.2017.09.002" "estado" => "S200" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1988885617300962?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441517301480?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/18884415/unassign/S1888441517301480/v2_201712300531/es/main.assets" ] "en" => array:18 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Paper</span>" "titulo" => "Retrospective survival analysis of the use of uncemented modular tapered stems for revision in periprosthetic Vancouver B-type fractures. Is instability a threat to survival?" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "J. Lixa, P. Vieira, P. Pereira, A. Pinho, M. Seara, A. Sousa, L. Vieira" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Lixa" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "joaolixa93@gmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Vieira" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Pereira" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Pinho" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Seara" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Sousa" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L." "apellidos" => "Vieira" ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "entidad" => "Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, São João University Hospital Centre, Porto, Portugal" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Análisis retrospectivo de supervivencia del uso de vástagos modulares cónicos no cementados para la revisión en fracturas periprotésicas tipo B de Vancouver. ¿Es la inestabilidad una amenaza para la supervivencia?" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1498 "Ancho" => 1258 "Tamanyo" => 103449 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Anteroposterior radiographic view of a periprosthetic Vancouver B2 type fracture.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hip arthroplasty remains as one of the most successful surgeries, with great clinical results.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,2</span></a> With the increase in global life expectancy and expanding indications in younger patients, the number of active patients with hip arthroplasties is rapidly rising.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3,4</span></a> Consequently, periprosthetic hip fractures (PHF) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>) emerge as a burden<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0195"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> for health care services and patients as they represent significant morbidity and mortality.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0200"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Abdel et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> in a review of 32<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>644 primary total hip arthroplasties, found a 3% incidence rate of intra-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures in uncemented stems, 14 times more often than in cemented ones. In the same study, the cumulative probability of fracture at 20 years was 7.7% for uncemented and 2.1% for cemented stems. In revision surgery, the frequency is significantly greater, around 6%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Patients’ characteristics, surgical technique and type of stem fixation are known factors that influence the incidence of this complication. Older age and presence of osteoporosis are identified demographic risk factors.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0205"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a></p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">PHF around the stem can be treated according to the stem stability status with osteosynthesis in a well-fixed stem (Vancouver classification<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0210"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> type B1) or with stem revision in loose stems (B2 or B3).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0200"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> Osteosynthesis in loose stems may be reserved for patients with significant comorbidities although with higher revision rates, according to some authors.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0200"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,9</span></a> There are multiple revision stems available, ranging from cemented to uncemented stems, fully coated monoblock systems or modular tapered stems.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0200"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,10,11</span></a> Survivorship of revision arthroplasty using uncemented modular tapered stems in the context PHF has not been completely studied. This remains a complex surgery requiring specially trained surgeons and is still linked to high morbidity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0230"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12,13</span></a></p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival of an uncemented modular tapered stem in the treatment of periprosthetic Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures. A secondary goal was to review the main complications and factors associated with decreased survival.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Materials and methods</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We conducted a retrospective study of patients submitted to revision arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic femoral stem fractures. We reviewed all patients admitted at our Institution between 2010 and 2020 with periprosthetic Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures and included all patients treated with revision arthroplasty with an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>). Patients with less than a year of follow-up or submitted to osteosynthesis were excluded. Patients treated with simultaneous acetabular revision were also excluded. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our centre. As this was a retrospective observational study, exemption from informed consent was obtained.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Patients</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Demographic data like gender, age, cause for primary hip arthroplasty, type of stem fixation in the primary setting and time from primary arthroplasty to fracture were reported. The reoperation rate and causes, the number of instability episodes (defined as arthroplasty dislocation) and the infection rate were also registered. This study included 39 patients with a mean age of 73.5 years, with 55.3% of the female sex, and a mean follow-up period of 62 months (range 12–180 months) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Surgical technique and post operative period</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All cases were revised using a posterolateral approach in lateral decubitus, recurring to a transfemoral approach (extended trochanteric osteotomy) for stem or cement removal when needed.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In cases in which femoral stem was considered fixed intra-operatively (Vancouver B1 instead of B2), fracture osteosynthesis was performed instead of revision arthroplasty.</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The stem used for revision was the MRP-Titan (Peter Brehm, Weisendorf, Germany). This is an uncemented modular tapered stem which consists of a distally fixed stem with variable lengths available, a metaphyseal section for limb length adjustment and a neck portion with normal and lateralized options that permits 360° of version adjustment for higher versatility. The titanium stem has longitudinal ribs that promotes bone ingrowth, preservation of bone stock and immediate rotational stability. The stem-neck coupling is made using a morse taper junction in conjunction with a torque-specific bolt.</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In cases of where great trochanter (GT) fracture was present, plate or cables osteosynthesis was added according to the surgeon's decision.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the immediate post operative, it was allowed immediate toe touch weight bearing with progressive progression to partial weight bearing as tolerated. Radiographic control was performed immediately post operatively during the hospital stay, at the two weeks consultation, at three, six and twelve months.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Radiographic analysis</span><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The preoperative, immediate post operative and at the last follow-up visit radiographs were reviewed by the authors. The Vancouver classification and the Dorr classification were applied, leg length discrepancy (LLD), centre of rotation offset (COR offset), fracture union, presence GT fracture and presence of signs of stem loosening prior to fracture were also noted. LLD was measured using the method described by Ranawat<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> as the vertical distance between the inter-teardrop line and the apex of the lesser trochanter; COR offset was measured as the perpendicular distance from the centre of rotation of the femoral head and a line bisecting the femoral diaphysis. Stem subsidence was calculated as Parry et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> by subtracting the distance from the tip of the stem to a fixed point on the femur (like the nearest cable) between the last follow-up radiograph and the immediate post operative. Stem subsidence was considered significant when the difference was >5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15–17</span></a> The distance the stem bypassed the fracture was also determined by measuring in the immediate post operative radiograph the distance of tip of the stem to the most distal part of the fracture and calculating a ratio by dividing it by the diameter of the femur in the zone of the fracture.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> No acetabular component analysis was performed.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Statistical analysis</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Chi-square analysis was used for determination of differences between nominal variables and parametric tests for continuous variables with normal distribution. Paired <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span> test analysis was used for paired continuous variables with normal distribution and non-parametric tests were used for variables with non-normal distribution.</p><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The survival rate (free of reoperation) was calculated at 2- and 5-years using the Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis, and log-rank and Wilcoxon tests were performed to determine significant difference in implant survivorship between groups. All tests used a significance level of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">α</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0.1.</p></span></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Results</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The overall cumulative proportion of arthroplasty survivorship (free of reoperation) was 73.7%% at 2 years and 67.5% at 5 years (mean 8.4 years; standard error (SE) 0.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), range 6.7–10.2). In the patients with episodes of instability the cumulative proportion of survivorship was 20% at 5 years (mean 2.5 years; (SE) 1.5; 95% (CI), range 0–5.42), significantly inferior to patients without episodes of instability (log-rank test and Wilcoxon (p<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001)) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0215" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">At the end of the follow-up period, the consolidation rate was 90.6%.</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The mean time from primary arthroplasty to fracture was 347 months and the primary diagnosis was femoral neck fracture in 24.1% of the cases and primary hip osteoarthritis in 72.4%. In 68.4% of the cases the stem was uncemented. At the time of PHF, most of the femurs were classified as Dorr B. Previous signs of loosening were present in 42.9% of the cases. According to the Vancouver classification, 71.1% of the fractures were B2 (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>).</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Stem subsidence >5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm occurred in 43.4% of the patients (mean 2.4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm), without difference for the studied variables (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>). Limb length discrepancy was 2.18<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm. The mean COR offset was inferior (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001) in the operated hip (32.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>8.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm) comparing to the contralateral hip (40.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6.8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm), but COR offset was not significant for instability risk.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The revision rate for all causes was 28.9%. Twenty six percent of the patients had at least one episode of instability and the infection rate was 5.3%. In the subgroup of patients with an episode of dislocation (n<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10), 6 patients (60%) had a 32-mm size head or lower, and 2 patients (20%) had a 36-mm head, 2 patients (20%) had no information regarding femoral head size.</p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Seventy one percent of the patients with GT fracture had at least one episode of instability (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.008) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0020">Table 4</a> and <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>). Whether the GT fracture was fixed or not, as well as the type of fixation in those fixed, revealed no differences in instability rate (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0020"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The mortality rate was 23.7%. Death occurred at a mean of 25 months since the fracture. In the group of patients that died in the period of the study, 55.6% were submitted to at least one revision surgery (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.044).</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Discussion</span><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The treatment of periprosthetic Vancouver B-type fractures remains a demanding task for the orthopaedic surgeon. The distinction between a well-fixed and a loose stem is challenging and sometimes only possible intra-operatively but influences the best treatment strategy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0200"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> In Vancouver B2 and B3-types, several implants are available to revise the loose stem, with the aim to bypass the fracture and provide stability distally. Tapered fluted stems were initially introduced by Wagner<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0260"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18,19</span></a> in 1980s in a monoblock version. They allow axial stability by pressing the stem mainly in the diaphysis and isthmus after successive reaming and allow immediate rotational stability by the presence of flutes. Modularity of the diaphyseal–metaphyseal–neck junction was later introduced, adding versatility to the system.</p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The literature reports good survival of the uncemented modular fluted tapered stems, with survivorship reaching 90% at five years in some studies.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0270"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20,21</span></a> Parry et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> found an 89% survival rate at five years in their series and Wirtz et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0280"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> even reported 97% survival rate at 10 years and 85% after 15 years. Survivorship free of reoperation for any cause in our study was significantly lower, with 67.5% at 5 years. Stem design may be a contributing factor for survival, but further studies comparing different stems designs are needed.</p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our revision rate for all causes was 28.9%. Lindahl et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a> reported a reoperation rate of 16.2%. This may be partially explained by the high dislocation rate encountered in our series, reaching 26.3% which significantly reduced survivorship (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001).</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Instability was higher than the reported in other studies, with values between 8% and 21%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24,25</span></a> Lindahl et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a> in their series of 425 patients treated with uncemented modular stems for femur periprosthetic fracture, reported a hip dislocation rate of 5.4%. Abdel et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a> reported instability as the most common complication in their series of 44 patients, with a rate of 11%. The metaphyseal–neck junction with 360° of version adjustment of this stem has been proposed to improve versatility and stability, but higher instability rates suggest that this feature may not be sufficient to prevent dislocation.</p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">They suggested using larger femoral head diameters, noting that dislocations occurred in patients with 28<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm and 32<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm. This study reported similar findings, in which 60% of the patients with instability had a femoral head size 32<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm or lower. In fact, bigger size femoral heads are described in the literature as offering more stability, by increasing the jump distance<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0300"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a> at the expense of increased polyethylene wear. Recent studies reported good results with the use of dual mobility cups for increasing stability in high-risk patients like in the setting of revision arthroplasty,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0305"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27,28</span></a> although specific studies for revision for periprosthetic fracture are lacking. In fact, dual mobility cups have been linked to increased incidence of periprosthetic fracture in primary hip arthroplasties.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a></p><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The presence of great trochanter fracture was a key variable in instability, with 71.4% of the patients with GT fracture having at least one episode of instability (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.008). Interestingly, performing GT osteosynthesis and the various types of osteosynthesis used revealed no differences in the instability risk (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05). Despite the GT fracture being a well-established risk factor for instability,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11,30</span></a> this finding brings further ominous significance to this lesion (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Fig. 4</a>). GT fracture osteosynthesis is often difficult due to fracture displacement by the pull of the gluteal muscles<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> and poor bone stock, as these fractures are frequently associated with osteolysis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Acetabular cup revision was not performed at the index surgery, which may further explain higher instability rates. Polyethylene eccentric wear is associated with osteolysis and aseptic loosening<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> and may contribute to instability. Acetabular component position was also not corrected.</p><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Stem subsidence occurred in 43.4% of the patients, but we found no differences in the factors studied. Parry et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> found higher amounts of subsidence in Dorr C femurs and in patients with use of strut grafts, proxies for host bone stock deficiency. In this study, proposed risk factors for subsidence like female gender, fracture classification, stem diameter or length, or fracture bypass ratio did not reach statistically significance. Abdel et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> in their study observed a trend for higher subsidence in patients with greater femoral bone loss, in patients submitted to aseptic loosening revision. In fact, stem subsidence risk factors are still not well-established in the literature. Furthermore, its clinical significance remains not clearly defined. In our study, although almost half of the patients registered stem subsidence >5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm, no association with instability or limb length discrepancy was found (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05).</p><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">COR offset restoration is a critical step in hip arthroplasty, with the aim to preserve hip abductors and external rotators’ function and limb length. We found an inferior COR offset (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001) in the revised operated hip comparing to the contralateral hip. Although this may be expected because in revision setting the COR offset preservation is a difficult task, this fact may contribute for decrease survival and higher instability (although without reaching statistical significance).</p><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The union rate of this type of fracture is reported in the literature to be around 90–100%,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0330"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32–34</span></a><span class="elsevierStyleSup">,35</span> like what was found in this study.</p><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A significant finding in our study was the association between revision surgery and increased mortality. The mortality rate found in our series was 23.7% at 2 years. In fact, various studies report the mortality of PHF patients to be similar of those with native proximal femur fracture. The demographic characteristics of these two groups are similar, with mean ages above 70 years old, mostly females and with comorbidities. In fact, patients’ characteristics in our series are similar with the reported in most literature,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3,4,6,7</span></a> a predominantly female sample with a mean age of 73.5 years with uncemented primary femoral stems. Most of the patients who died during the study (55.6%) sustained at least one revision surgery, with significantly superior mortality in this group (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.044). Although the causes for death were not recorded due to lack of data, the revision surgery appears as an important risk factor for mortality.</p><p id="par0165" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This study presents some limitations. The retrospective design limits the amount and quality of data that could be evaluated. Functional outcomes were not taken in consideration as a clinical evaluation was not performed, only the data extracted from the clinical files. The short follow-up period was due to loss of follow-up or death but precludes conclusions beyond 5 years.</p><p id="par0170" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The lack of acetabular component revision and radiographic analysis is another limitation, as this also contributes to instability and revision survivorship.</p><p id="par0175" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Further studies with longer follow-up and clinical outcomes evaluation are in need for additional knowledge in treating such injuries.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Conclusion</span><p id="par0180" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Survivorship of this design of uncemented modular stem in revision for PHF is significantly reduced by episodes of instability. PHF treatment with this stem present good union but high instability rates. The use of higher diameter femoral heads and preservation of the greater trochanter may improve results.</p><p id="par0185" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Complications and mortality rate are still high and treating these fractures remains a complex task that should be reserved for experienced multidisciplinary teams.</p></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Level of evidence</span><p id="par0190" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Level of evidence II.</p></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Ethical approval</span><p id="par0195" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our centre.</p></span><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Informed consent</span><p id="par0200" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As this was a retrospective observational study, exemption from informed consent was obtained.</p></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0125">Funding</span><p id="par0205" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p></span><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0130">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0210" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">None declared.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:15 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres2128586" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction and objectives" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Materials and methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1807848" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres2128587" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Introducción y objetivos" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1807849" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Materials and methods" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Patients" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Surgical technique and post operative period" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Radiographic analysis" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Statistical analysis" ] ] ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Level of evidence" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Ethical approval" ] 11 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "Informed consent" ] 12 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Funding" ] 13 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 14 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2024-01-10" "fechaAceptado" => "2024-03-15" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1807848" "palabras" => array:5 [ 0 => "Periprosthetic fracture" 1 => "Uncemented modular stem" 2 => "Instability" 3 => "Revision arthroplasty" 4 => "Survivorship analysis" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1807849" "palabras" => array:5 [ 0 => "Fractura periprotésica" 1 => "Vástago modular no cementado" 2 => "Inestabilidad" 3 => "Artroplastia de revisión" 4 => "Análisis de supervivencia" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Introduction and objectives</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Periprosthetic hip fractures show increasing incidence and complexity, representing a challenge for the surgeon. We aimed to evaluate the survival of uncemented modular tapered stems in the treatment of periprosthetic Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures and review the main complications and factors associated with decreased survival.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Materials and methods</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">We performed a retrospective study of patients submitted to revision arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic femoral stem Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures with an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (MRP-Titan). Demographic and radiographic parameters were analyzed. The survival rate (free of reoperation) was calculated at 2- and 5-years using the Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Thirty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 73.5 years and a mean follow-up of 5 years. Arthroplasty survivorship at 2 years was 73.7% and at 5 years was 67.5% (mean 8.4 years; range 6.7–10.2). Survivorship was inferior in the patients with episodes of instability (mean 2.5 years; range 0–5.42) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001). At least one episode of instability occurred in 26.3% of patients and 60% of these patients had a femoral head size 32<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm or lower. At least one episode of instability occurred in 71.4% of patients with a greater trochanter fracture (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.008). The consolidation rate was 90.6% and the mortality rate was 23.7%. In the group of patients that died, 55.6% were submitted to at least one revision surgery (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.044).</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusion</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Survivorship of an uncemented modular stem (MRP-Titan) in revision for PHF is significantly reduced by episodes of instability.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction and objectives" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Materials and methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Introducción y objetivos</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Las fracturas periprotésicas de cadera muestran una incidencia creciente. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la supervivencia de los vástagos modulares cónicos no cementados en el tratamiento de las fracturas periprotésicas tipo Vancouver B2-B3 y revisar factores asociados a una menor supervivencia.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Métodos</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes sometidos a artroplastia de revisión para el tratamiento de fracturas tipo Vancouver B2-B3 con vástago cónico estriado modular no cementado (MRP-Titan). Se analizaron parámetros demográficos y radiográficos. La tasa de supervivencia (libre de reoperación) se calculó a los 2 y 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>años mediante el análisis de supervivencia de Kaplan-Meier.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se incluyeron 39 pacientes con una edad media de 73,5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>años y un seguimiento medio de 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>años. La supervivencia a los 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>años fue del 73,7%, y a los 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>años, del 67,5% (media 8,4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>años; rango 6,7-10,2). El 26,3% de los pacientes tuvieron al menos un episodio de inestabilidad y su supervivencia fue inferior (p<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,001) (media 2,5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>años; rango 0-5,42). De estos pacientes, el 60% tenían un tamaño de la cabeza femoral de 32<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm o inferior. El 71,4% de los pacientes con fractura del trocánter mayor presentaron al menos un episodio de inestabilidad (p<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,008). La tasa de consolidación fue del 90,6% y la tasa de mortalidad fue del 23,7%. En el grupo de pacientes que fallecieron, el 55,6% fueron sometidos al menos a una cirugía de revisión (p<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,044).</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La supervivencia de un vástago modular no cementado (MRP-Titan) en revisión por FPH se reduce significativamente por episodios de inestabilidad.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Introducción y objetivos" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:8 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1498 "Ancho" => 1258 "Tamanyo" => 103449 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Anteroposterior radiographic view of a periprosthetic Vancouver B2 type fracture.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1389 "Ancho" => 2341 "Tamanyo" => 140754 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Anteroposterior and side view radiograph of a periprosthetic fracture treated with an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 1212 "Ancho" => 1258 "Tamanyo" => 94373 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Anteroposterior radiographic view of a revision stem with greater trochanter fracture submitted to plate and screws osteosynthesis.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1275 "Ancho" => 2508 "Tamanyo" => 201928 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Anteroposterior radiographic view of a dislocated revision stem with greater trochanter fracture and subsequent closed reduction.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Age</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">73.55 (11.82)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005">*</a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Gender</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Female \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">55.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Male \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">44.7% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Cause of primary arthroplasty</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Femoral neck fracture \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">24.1% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Primary hip osteoarthritis \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">72.4% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Secondary hip osteoarthritis \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3.4% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Fixation method of primary stem</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Uncemented \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">68.4% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Cemented \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">31.6% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Previous loosening \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">42.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Vancouver classification</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>B2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">71.1% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>B3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">28.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Dorr classification</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>A \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">21.1% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>B \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">42.1% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>C \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">36.8% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3509383.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0005" "etiqueta" => "*" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">The values are given as the mean and the standard deviation in years.</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Demographic characteristics and preoperative assessment.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at2" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Arthroplasty survivorship \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span>-Value \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">At 2 years</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">73.7% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="3" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">At 5 years</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">67.5% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>With instability episode(s) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">20% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " rowspan="2" align="left" valign="middle"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Without instability episode(s) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">82.2% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3509385.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis.</p>" ] ] 6 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0015" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at3" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Subsidence</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.4 (2.8)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010">*</a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>>5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">43.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Post-operative complications</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Instability \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">26.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Infection \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Revision rate</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>For all causes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">28.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>For instability \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">23.7% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>For infection \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Limb length discrepancy</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.18 (1.2)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010">*</a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Fracture union rate</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">90.6% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Mortality rate</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">23.7% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Submitted to revision surgery \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">55.6% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.044) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3509382.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0010" "etiqueta" => "*" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0010">The values are given as the mean and the standard deviation in centimetres.</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Postoperative radiographic assessment and complications analysis.</p>" ] ] 7 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0020" "etiqueta" => "Table 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at4" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Greater trochanter fracture \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Instability episode(s) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span>-Value \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Total</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (21.1%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">71.4% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.008 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="4" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="4" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Osteosynthesis</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>None \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.809 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Plate \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Wires/cables \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.526 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3509384.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0080" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Greater trochanter fracture and instability analysis.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0015" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:34 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Advances and innovations in total hip arthroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Fontalis" 1 => "J.A. Epinette" 2 => "M. Thaler" 3 => "L. Zagra" 4 => "V. Khanduja" 5 => "F.S. Haddad" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1051/sicotj/2021025" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "SICOT J" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "26" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33843582" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The operation of the century: total hip replacement" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "I.D. Learmonth" 1 => "C. Young" 2 => "C. Rorabeck" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Lancet" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "370" "paginaInicial" => "1508" "paginaFinal" => "1519" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17964352" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0185" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M.P. Abdel" 1 => "C.D. Watts" 2 => "M.T. Houdek" 3 => "D.G. Lewallen" 4 => "D.J. Berry" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Bone Joint J" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "98B" "paginaInicial" => "461" "paginaFinal" => "467" ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0190" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Periprosthetic femoral fractures and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "H. Lindahl" 1 => "H. Malchau" 2 => "P. Herberts" 3 => "G. Garellick" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.001" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplasty" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "857" "paginaFinal" => "865" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16230235" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0195" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "H. Lindahl" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Injury" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "38" "paginaInicial" => "651" "paginaFinal" => "654" ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0200" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Periprosthetic hip fractures: an update into their management and clinical outcomes" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "N. Patsiogiannis" 1 => "N.K. Kanakaris" 2 => "P.V. Giannoudis" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1302/2058-5241.6.200050" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "EFORT Open Rev" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "75" "paginaFinal" => "92" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532088" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0205" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Mortality following periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures versus native hip fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.R. Boylan" 1 => "A.M. Riesgo" 2 => "C.B. Paulino" 3 => "J.D. Slover" 4 => "J.D. Zuckerman" 5 => "K.A. Egol" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.2106/JBJS.17.00539" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg Am" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "100" "paginaInicial" => "578" "paginaFinal" => "585" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29613927" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0210" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Time to surgery and 30-day morbidity and mortality of periprosthetic hip fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "E.J. Griffiths" 1 => "D.J.W. Cash" 2 => "S. Kalra" 3 => "P.J. Hopgood" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.injury.2013.03.008" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Injury" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "44" "paginaInicial" => "1949" "paginaFinal" => "1952" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23639824" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0215" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Does time to surgery affect outcomes for periprosthetic femur fractures?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.E. Sellan" 1 => "B.A. Lanting" 2 => "E.H. Schemitsch" 3 => "S.J. MacDonald" 4 => "E.M. Vasarhelyi" 5 => "J.L. Howard" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.045" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplasty" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "33" "paginaInicial" => "878" "paginaFinal" => "881" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29174404" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0220" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J. Franklin" 1 => "H. Malchau" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.049" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Injury" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "38" "paginaInicial" => "655" "paginaFinal" => "660" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17467710" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0225" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Periprosthetic femur fractures around a loose femoral stem" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J.C. Rozell" 1 => "D.J. Donegan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/BOT.0000000000001568" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Orthop Trauma" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "33" "paginaInicial" => "S10" "paginaFinal" => "S13" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404038" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0230" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Classification of the hip" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "O.H. Brady" 1 => "D.S. Garbuz" 2 => "B.A. Masri" 3 => "C.P. Duncan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70076-6" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Orthop Clin North Am" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "215" "paginaFinal" => "220" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10196423" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0235" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Distal fixation stems for revision of total hip replacement" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "F. Lopreite" 1 => "L. Perez Alamino" 2 => "H. Simesen de Bielke" 3 => "G. Garabano" 4 => "H. Del Sel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.031" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Orthop" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "24" "paginaInicial" => "151" "paginaFinal" => "156" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33716420" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0240" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Periprosthetic fracture management of the proximal femur" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L.G. Padilla-Rojas" 1 => "D.E. Garín-Zertuche" 2 => "L. López-Almejo" 3 => "G. Garabano" 4 => "C.Á. Pesciallo" 5 => "J.A. Leal" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/OI9.0000000000000246" "Revista" => array:4 [ "tituloSerie" => "OTA Int" "fecha" => "2023" "volumen" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "e246" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0245" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Risk factors for subsidence of modular fluted tapered stems used during revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J.A. Parry" 1 => "N.M. Hernandez" 2 => "D.J. Berry" 3 => "M.P. Abdel" 4 => "B.J. Yuan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.006" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplasty" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "33" "paginaInicial" => "2967" "paginaFinal" => "2970" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859724" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0250" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Modular fluted tapered stems in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.P. Abdel" 1 => "U. Cottino" 2 => "D.R. Larson" 3 => "A.D. Hanssen" 4 => "D.G. Lewallen" 5 => "D.J. Berry" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.2106/JBJS.16.00423" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg Am" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "99" "paginaInicial" => "873" "paginaFinal" => "881" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28509828" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0255" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Stem subsidence after total hip revision: 183 cases at 5.9 years follow-up" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J. Girard" 1 => "O. Roche" 2 => "G. Wavreille" 3 => "F. Canovas" 4 => "P. Le Béguec" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Orthop Traumatol Surg Res" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "97" "paginaInicial" => "121" "paginaFinal" => "126" ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0260" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk bei schwerem Knochenverlust" "tituloTraducido" => "Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "H. Wagner" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Orthopade" "fecha" => "1987" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "295" "paginaFinal" => "300" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3658412" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0265" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk" "tituloTraducido" => "A revision prosthesis for the hip joint" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "H. Wagner" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Orthopade" "fecha" => "1989" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "438" "paginaFinal" => "453" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2812776" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0270" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Comparison of modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. Feng" 1 => "Y. Zhang" 2 => "Y.H. Bao" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1038/s41598-020-70626-6" "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Sci Rep" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "10" ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0275" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "J.T. Munro" 1 => "D.S. Garbuz" 2 => "B.A. Masri" 3 => "C.P. Duncan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s11999-013-3087-3" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Orthop Relat Res" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "472" "paginaInicial" => "590" "paginaFinal" => "598" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23719963" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0280" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "D.C. Wirtz" 1 => "S. Gravius" 2 => "R. Ascherl" 3 => "M. Thorweihe" 4 => "R. Forst" 5 => "U. Noeth" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3109/17453674.2014.958809" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Acta Orthop" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "85" "paginaInicial" => "562" "paginaFinal" => "569" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25175667" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0285" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Surgical treatment of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "G. Chatziagorou" 1 => "H. Lindahl" 2 => "J. Kärrholm" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Bone Joint J" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "101B" "paginaInicial" => "1447" "paginaFinal" => "1458" ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0290" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Periprosthetic femur fractures treated with modular fluted, tapered stems" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.P. Abdel" 1 => "D.G. Lewallen" 2 => "D.J. Berry" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:6 [ "titulo" => "Clinical orthopaedics and related research" "fecha" => "2014" "paginaInicial" => "599" "paginaFinal" => "603" "editorial" => "Springer LLC" "editorialLocalizacion" => "New York" ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0295" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Factors influencing results and complications in proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study at 1- to 8-year follow-up" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C. Concina" 1 => "M. Crucil" 2 => "F. Gherlinzoni" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.23750/abm.v92iS3.11734" "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Acta Biomed" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "92" ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0300" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Large diameter femoral heads" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "H.J. Cooper" 1 => "C.J. Della Valle" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Bone Joint J" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "96B" "paginaInicial" => "23" "paginaFinal" => "26" ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0305" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review and metanalysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "P. Giacomo" 1 => "B. Giulia" 2 => "P. Valerio" 3 => "S. Vincenzo" 4 => "A. Pierluigi" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1051/sicotj/2021015" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "SICOT J" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "18" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33749588" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0310" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Modular dual mobility articulation in primary and revision hip arthroplasty: lights and shadows" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Moghnie" 1 => "D. Tigani" 2 => "A. Consoli" 3 => "E. Castiello" 4 => "M. Ganci" 5 => "L. Amendola" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:4 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Orthop Surg Res" "fecha" => "2023" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "278" ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0315" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A comparative study about the incidence of dislocation and peri-prosthetic fracture between dual mobility versus standard cups after primary total hip arthroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "E. Sappey-Marinier" 1 => "A. Viste" 2 => "Y. Blangero" 3 => "R. Desmarchelier" 4 => "M.H. Fessy" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00264-018-4279-y" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int Orthop" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "43" "paginaInicial" => "2691" "paginaFinal" => "2695" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30612171" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0320" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Outcomes of osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures of the greater trochanter with an anatomic claw plate" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "B. Fink" 1 => "A. Ahmadian" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102123" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Orthop Trauma" "fecha" => "2023" "volumen" => "38" "paginaInicial" => "102123" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846072" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0325" "etiqueta" => "31" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femur fractures with a fluted tapered stem" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "D.J. Berry" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Orthop Relat Res" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "417" "paginaInicial" => "224" "paginaFinal" => "231" ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0330" "etiqueta" => "32" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Management of types B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures by a tapered, fluted, and distally fixed stem" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "S. Mulay" 1 => "T. Hassan" 2 => "S. Birtwistle" 3 => "R. Power" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.arth.2004.11.020" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplasty" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "751" "paginaFinal" => "756" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16139712" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0335" "etiqueta" => "33" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Management of periprosthetic femur fractures treated with distal fixation using a modular femoral stem using an anterolateral approach" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M.S. Park" 1 => "Y.J. Lim" 2 => "W.C. Chung" 3 => "D.H. Ham" 4 => "S.H. Lee" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.013" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplasty" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "24" "paginaInicial" => "1270" "paginaFinal" => "1276" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19729278" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 33 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0340" "etiqueta" => "34" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D. Neumann" 1 => "C. Thaler" 2 => "U. Dorn" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00264-011-1371-y" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int Orthop" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "36" "paginaInicial" => "1045" "paginaFinal" => "1050" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21983940" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/18884415/unassign/S1888441524000729/v1_202404120431/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => null "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/18884415/unassign/S1888441524000729/v1_202404120431/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441524000729?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 November | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2024 October | 18 | 3 | 21 |
2024 September | 18 | 16 | 34 |
2024 August | 19 | 16 | 35 |
2024 July | 24 | 16 | 40 |
2024 June | 31 | 4 | 35 |
2024 May | 36 | 14 | 50 |
2024 April | 63 | 15 | 78 |
2024 March | 25 | 28 | 53 |