was read the article
array:23 [ "pii" => "S1888441524001383" "issn" => "18884415" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2024.08.003" "estado" => "S200" "fechaPublicacion" => "2024-09-17" "aid" => "1440" "copyright" => "SECOT" "copyrightAnyo" => "2024" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "fla" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "itemSiguiente" => array:17 [ "pii" => "S1888441524001474" "issn" => "18884415" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2024.09.001" "estado" => "S200" "fechaPublicacion" => "2024-09-23" "aid" => "1447" "copyright" => "SECOT" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "crp" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "es" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Nota clínica</span>" "titulo" => "Parestesias en la cara lateral del antebrazo: una lesión nerviosa difícilmente reconocible" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Paresthesias on the lateral face of the forearm: A nervous injury that is difficult to recognize" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figura 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 2141 "Ancho" => 1625 "Tamanyo" => 159399 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Áreas de afectación sensitiva descritas por nuestros pacientes. Proporción de pacientes que muestran cada patrón.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "S. Parra Escorihuela, A.D. Ghinea, Á. Montero Sánchez, J. Orenga Orenga" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "S." "apellidos" => "Parra Escorihuela" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A.D." "apellidos" => "Ghinea" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Á." "apellidos" => "Montero Sánchez" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Orenga Orenga" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441524001474?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/18884415/unassign/S1888441524001474/v1_202409230436/es/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S1888441517301480" "issn" => "18884415" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2017.09.006" "estado" => "S200" "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-11-15" "aid" => "699" "copyright" => "SECOT" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "ret" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 119 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 10 "HTML" => 32 "PDF" => 77 ] ] "es" => array:8 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "titulo" => "WITHDRAWN: Análisis de un programa de atención integral en pacientes con fractura de cadera mayores de 65 años" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => 0 "tieneResumen" => "es" "contieneResumen" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "J. Franch Parella" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Franch Parella" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1988885617300962" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recote.2017.09.002" "estado" => "S200" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1988885617300962?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441517301480?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/18884415/unassign/S1888441517301480/v2_201712300531/es/main.assets" ] "asociados" => array:1 [ 0 => array:17 [ "pii" => "S1888441524000663" "issn" => "18884415" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2024.03.004" "estado" => "S200" "fechaPublicacion" => "2024-05-07" "aid" => "1381" "copyright" => "SECOT" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "fla" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "es" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Monográfico columna</span>" "titulo" => "Fracturas vertebrales osteoporóticas: historia natural e impacto" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: Natural history and impact" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figura 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 3142 "Ancho" => 3334 "Tamanyo" => 708394 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Varón, de 71 años, que sufrió una caída desde su propia altura en enero de 2023. Desde entonces presenta dolor dorsolumbar. Las imágenes A y B muestran una telerradiografía donde se aprecia el importante disbalance sagital provocado por las múltiples fracturas vertebrales, que suponen una hipercifosis.</p> <p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Las imágenes C y D muestran la primera radiografía postoperatoria. Se le practicó una instrumentación posterior larga, con técnicas mínimamente invasivas y suplementación con cemento de los tornillos más craneales y más caudales.</p> <p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Las imágenes E y F muestran la primera telerradiografía postoperatoria, al mes, donde llama la atención el restablecimiento del balance sagital.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "P. Checa-Betegón, R. Luque-Pérez, D. Oñate-Martínez-Olascoaga, J.L. Pérez-González, I. Domínguez-Esteban" "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Checa-Betegón" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Luque-Pérez" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "D." "apellidos" => "Oñate-Martínez-Olascoaga" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.L." "apellidos" => "Pérez-González" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "I." "apellidos" => "Domínguez-Esteban" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441524000663?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/18884415/unassign/S1888441524000663/v1_202405070448/es/main.assets" ] ] "en" => array:18 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Monograph Column</span>" "titulo" => " Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: Natural history and impact" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "P. Checa-Betegón, R. Luque-Pérez, D. Oñate-Martínez-Olascoaga, J.L. Pérez-González, I. Domínguez-Esteban" "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Checa-Betegón" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "pachebet@gmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Luque-Pérez" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "D." "apellidos" => "Oñate-Martínez-Olascoaga" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.L." "apellidos" => "Pérez-González" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "I." "apellidos" => "Domínguez-Esteban" ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "entidad" => "Unidad de Columna, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Fracturas vertebrales osteoporóticas: historia natural e impacto" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 751 "Ancho" => 1000 "Tamanyo" => 58137 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Showing a case of a patient with a vertebral insufficiency fracture, managed orthopaedically. Note the progression of kyphosis and consequent sagittal imbalance.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Bone fragility fractures can result from a fall from standing height or be diagnosed without a history of trauma. In this group, we distinguish low energy fractures (falls on level ground or similar) as fractures with an osteoporotic profile which occur in people over 50 years of age, excluding other bone pathologies which cause bone fragility.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0220"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> This type of fracture is caused by ‘normal’ loads on a bone with low bone strength. Osteoporotic bones under specific loading conditions subjected to a ‘physiological’ force fail biomechanically.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0220"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Vertebral fractures are one of the most frequent skeletal fractures, usually due to bone fragility.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> However, unlike other fractures, between two thirds and three quarters of these fractures go unnoticed clinically,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,3</span></a> in most cases the diagnosis being made later by imaging.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0235"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> Therefore epidemiological studies of these fractures are complicated to conduct. Biological studies of vertebral fractures have focused mainly on symptomatic vertebral fractures which, as is well known, are the least frequent of the fractures.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Epidemiology</span><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disease in the world, this is especially due to the increase in life expectancy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5–8</span></a> The WHO estimates that osteoporosis affects 3.5 million people in Spain.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> The consequences of osteoporotic fractures not only affect health, per se, but also quality of life.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,7</span></a></p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the United States, an estimated 1.5 million people with osteoporosis will suffer a fracture, 50% of which are vertebral fractures, twice as many as hip fractures.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0255"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,9</span></a> The incidence of these injuries is expected to continue to rise, due to the ageing population and increased survival.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a></p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The osteoporotic vertebral fracture, as the most frequent of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">all</span> osteoporotic fractures—although many cases, being oligosymptomatic, go unnoticed<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,7,10</span></a>—, has an incidence estimated by the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study at 1,400,000<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>fractures/year, equivalent to 20–25% of postmenopausal women over 50 years of age.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> Its prevalence in Europe is between 18% and 26%, generally in older women.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a></p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Vertebral fractures in people under 50 years of age are more frequent in men. However, from the age of 60 years and especially from the age of 70 years onwards, the risk of fracture is higher in women.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,5,11</span></a> The incidence of new vertebral fractures in people over 50 years of age is 10.7/1000 population in women and 5.7/1000 in men, respectively.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,6</span></a> The prevalence increases from 3% in women under 60 years of age to 20% in those over 70 years of age, and from 7.5% to 20% in men in the same age range.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5–7</span></a> Overall, the prevalence of vertebral fracture increases with age with no distinction in terms of race or sex in the population studied.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Furthermore, the presence of a vertebral fracture is compatible with a diagnosis of osteoporosis, even in the absence of bone densitometry, and therefore indicates pharmacological treatment.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,5,10</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Pathogenesis</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A distinction must be made between the variables of bone quantity and bone quality. While the quantity of bone depends directly on its mineral density (BMD), its quality depends on variables such as the chemical composition of the organic and inorganic materials that make up its matrix and how the spatial structuring of these materials occurs, all of which are dependent on bone remodelling.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0275"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a> A normal biomechanical pattern is characterised by normal BMD, by normal structural and material quality and, above all, by bone strength that is adequate for the mechanical function that the bone has to perform. Alterations in these variables increase the risk of fragility fractures.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone remodelling is accelerated leading to a decrease in BMD and an alteration in the structural and material quality of the bone.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0280"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> This phenomenon is also present, but with a different intensity, in healthy elderly people: the older they get, the lower the bone resistance and the greater the risk of fracture. As age increases, the intensity of trauma required to produce a fracture decreases.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,14</span></a> Other factors, such as female sex, diabetes, smoking, or use of corticoids further increase this risk.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a></p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Low-energy trauma is the most common cause of fracture. Fracture occurs when the energy applied exceeds the elastic and plastic modulus of the bone and, therefore, its capacity for deformation.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,16</span></a> This energy is generally provided by an external agent, but in the case of vertebral fractures, just the weight of the body or a muscle contraction is sufficient,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0300"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> and on other occasions it is related to a banal fall. Falls from standing height are responsible for 90% of fragility fractures in the elderly.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0305"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a></p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The vertebrae, as well as being bones with an important load-bearing component, are greatly compromised by osteoporosis, which reduces the thickness of their cortices and reduces the number of bone trabeculae,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,19</span></a> increasing fragility. These fractures occur most frequently between levels D4-L5, but particularly those levels around the thoracolumbar hinge which transitions between the thoracic spine (more rigid) and the lumbar spine (more mobile).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> In patients with osteoporotic bones, these vertebrae can fracture simply by gestures involving a slight increase in axial load,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> especially in the lumbar spine. However, at the thoracic level, they are usually seen in the D7–D9 vertebrae, because they tend to have the greatest thoracic kyphosis, and are therefore the region with the greatest axial load.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There is a correlation between the standard deviation (SD) of BMD on DEXA and the odds ratio (OR) of fracture incidence at the lumbar level, which changes between 1.4 and 2.1 for each SD, while it is lower in other locations, such as the femoral neck or calcaneus (1.6–1.9), or the forearm (1.4–1.6).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Diagnosis</span><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The definition of vertebral fracture should be based on morphometric criteria. A vertebral fracture is considered when a decrease in vertebral height of more than 20% is identified,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20,21</span></a> or a decrease of 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm from a previous baseline X-ray. There are many morphometric assessment methods; most are based on measurements of the height of the suspected fractured vertebra in its anterior, middle, and posterior portions compared to adjacent healthy vertebrae. “Wedge”, “biconcave”, or “pancake” shapes are classically recognised as radiological signs of osteoporosis. In the dorsal area, the subsidence usually occurs in the anterior part of the vertebral body, while in the lumbar area, which supports more load, there may be wedging in the anterior and posterior part. It is rare for the posterior wall to be affected, which is typical of other processes, and rarer still for neurological symptoms to be caused, although there are documented cases.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22–24</span></a></p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">These fractures generally occur in the spinal segment between D4 and L5 and, more frequently, in the most biomechanically compromised regions D11 and L1.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0340"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25,26</span></a> It is rare for them to occur at higher dorsal levels, and therefore if they do, an aetiology other than osteoporotic must be considered.</p><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Different imaging tests must be conducted to make the diagnosis and then to assist in making therapeutic decisions.</p><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Two-plane radiography is the first line technique, the cheapest and simplest to detect these fractures,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,10,27</span></a> but it has its limitations; poor obliquity, for example, could create false images or a mild fracture could go undetected. Retrospective studies of lateral chest X-rays report a detection rate of only 50%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,6</span></a> Furthermore, taking X-rays in a standing position or teleradiography<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10,28</span></a> would provide much more information because, as well as being useful for diagnosing the fracture, this could flag up sagittal or coronal profile imbalances which could determine the choice of treatment.</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Vertebral morphometry (vertebral fracture assessment) has proved to be a cost-effective technique, with a sensitivity of 70–93% and a specificity of 95% in the diagnosis of moderate-severe fractures, especially of D4-L4. Vertebral morphometry allows us to diagnose 94% of grade 2 and 3 fractures.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a></p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Computed tomography should not be widely used as a first diagnostic test. Some studies show that many mild vertebral fractures were not diagnosed by radiologists when performing chest and abdominal CT scans<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> although they could be of interest after diagnosis for surgical planning or to assess retropulsion to the spinal canal.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a></p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">MRI and bone scan can be useful in the initial stages, especially in the case of fractures that are not visible on X-rays.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,10</span></a> They make it possible to estimate progression time, especially when there is no associated blunt trauma.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> MRI is the technique that shows the earliest changes,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,10</span></a> while bone scan can take up to 7 days to show changes.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> MRI also provides more information if occupancy of the spinal is suspected.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0350"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a></p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">FDG-PET can help to differentiate between insufficiency fractures and pathological fractures, due to the high uptake of FDG in the latter.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,27</span></a></p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In addition to those mentioned above, DEXA densitometry and the FRAX tools can help determine the risk of new fractures<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,19</span></a> so that pharmacological treatment can be initiated to prevent them.</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">These tests, undoubtedly, in addition to diagnosis, will allow us to classify these lesions morphometrically.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,10,27–29</span></a> The Genant classification<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,27</span></a> is based on the morphology of the fracture and the degree of height loss (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>). The classification of vertebral fractures proposed more recently by the German Society<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10,28,29</span></a> takes into account the morphology of the injury and the causative mechanism, the oedema in tests such as magnetic resonance imaging, and also provides guidance on the treatment approach (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Natural history and impact</span><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The natural history of a patient experiencing a fragility fracture, vertebral or not, is to suffer further fractures, including the dreaded hip fracture.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,5,6,10,30–35</span></a> All patients with this type of fracture have low bone density by definition. A vertebral fracture quadruples the risk of a new vertebral fracture, and doubles it for a hip fracture.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,5,19</span></a> The risk of new fractures is 7–10% in the first year and up to 18% in the first 2 years.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> If the patient is over 75 years of age, the 2-year risk increases to 25%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,14</span></a> Other factors, such as female sex, diabetes, smoking, or corticosteroid use further increase this risk.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a></p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is the obligatory task of the traumatologist, and the multidisciplinary teams dealing with these injuries, to initiate treatment for osteoporosis with the aim of preventing new insufficiency fractures<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,5,6,10,19,27,30–34</span></a> and to rule out other underlying endocrine disorders, such as hyperparathyroidism.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0395"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">36</span></a> There are various algorithms for the management of bone fragility and prevention of fractures, with various different pharmacological alternatives, depending on bone density and analytical parameters, such as calcium, renal function, or vitamin D.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0310"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> It is not the purpose of this review to describe in detail the pharmacological treatment options.</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">However, the sagittal profile of these patients is compromised, to a greater extent the more vertebral compression fractures they suffer or the more severe they are,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,7,10</span></a> which will have a negative impact on their quality of life and survival. The hyperkyphosis caused by the fractures, especially in the thoracic segment, alters sagittal balance, reduces the space between the ribs and the iliac blades, which leads to reduced respiratory capacity, deterioration of pulmonary function with volumetric restriction, imbalance, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, a tendency to depression, limits quality of life, and predisposes to falls. Taken together, these changes result in increased mortality from these fractures.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,6,7,10</span></a></p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The main objective of any treatment should be the rapid mobilisation of the patient, as well as optimal pain control.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> Other aspects to consider would be the restoration of stability, correction of the kyphotic deformity, and decompression of the neural canal.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0360"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> In 2018, the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> defined the treatment of choice for osteoporotic compression fractures based on OF classification, BMD, radiographic progression (preferably X-rays taken in standing position), pain, presence or absence of neurological deficits, mobilisation, and general health status, according to the ASA anaesthetic risk. Thus, a decision algorithm was established that has subsequently been used by other studies, such as Burguet Girona et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0360"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> in 2021. A score of less than 5 points indicated conservative treatment, while radiographic progression, or a score of more than 6, recommended surgical treatment.</p><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The proposed score is shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Orthopaedic treatment brings together a wide range of therapeutic alternatives which, according to the literature, could include initial bed rest, analgesic medication, physiotherapy and rehabilitation, and immobilisation with bracing.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0255"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,10,27,29,32,35,37</span></a></p><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is recommended that bedrest should be as short as possible.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> Regarding bracing, there is controversy as to which brace would be the most appropriate or whether or not it is strictly necessary.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10,28,34</span></a> In fact, the 2010 AAOS guidelines<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0390"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">35</span></a> cannot establish sufficient evidence for or against the use of bracing in patients with compression fractures treated conservatively. If used, it would be recommended for about 6–8 weeks, until pain has resolved.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> Zileli et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0395"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">36</span></a> suggest that all patients would notice analgesic improvement with the conservative approach within 3 months. However, at the end of the first year of treatment, up to 40% of them would still be in pain.</p><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Surgical treatment, however, should be indicated to improve gait biomechanics, when pain is refractory to medical management, when there is great retropulsion of the fragments, when there is neurological deficit, and to reconstruct the sagittal and coronal profile,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28,36</span></a> when these are altered, generally with a kyphotic tendency and a positive sagittal imbalance. To that end, the German Society<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> recommends X-rays, preferably in standing position to obtain more mechanical information on the spine and to be able to define the surgical indication. It is important to specify that these injuries in patients with these characteristics of fragility require a specialist multidisciplinary team. The characteristics of bone fragility in these patients often make it necessary to use augmentation techniques on the screws, such as cementing<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28,31,38,39</span></a> to increase the pull-out strength of the screw, which in some series is estimated at 278%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0365"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> The delicate medical situation of these patients, who usually have different comorbidities, has resulted in increasing use of percutaneous fixation techniques, which is expected to continue in the coming years as they are managing to reduce morbidity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0360"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a></p><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">However, if the sagittal profile is satisfactory, or shows little alteration, and we only want to manage refractory pain, simple cementation techniques such as vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty are valid alternatives, although not free of complications.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0360"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29,40</span></a> The AAOS,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0390"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">35</span></a> on the other hand, gives a strong recommendation against vertebroplasty and a weak recommendation in favour of kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures. Nevertheless, there are subsequent studies, albeit with less power, which do recommend these procedures, contradicting the above.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0400"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">37</span></a></p><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The therapeutic decision will undoubtedly influence the results in the short and medium term and may have consequences for the impact and sequelae in the long term. It should be borne in mind that patients with fractures with stability parameters such as to consider orthopaedic treatment can undergo cementing techniques for pain control<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0350"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27,37,40</span></a>; while complex fractures, which require surgery, may have to be treated with less aggressive procedures if the patient's circumstances do not allow for them to be managed differently.</p><p id="par0165" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There is unequivocal consensus in all the studies reviewed that vertebral compression fractures increase morbidity and mortality,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,5,6,10,19,32,35</span></a> regardless of the therapeutic approach taken. Schousboe in 2015 concluded that vertebral fractures can have as much morbidity as hip fractures, although between 25% and 30% are not diagnosed at the acute moment.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,5</span></a> Schousboe<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> states that a vertebral fracture increases the risk of mortality 2–8-fold, the greater the number of fractures. The highest mortality is recorded at the acute moment, and then gradually decreases over the first 2 years. The greatest immediate increase is associated with the fracture per se, while in the long term it is linked to the patient's previous morbidities. This mortality appears to be higher in men than in women.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p><p id="par0170" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Some studies<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0375"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> state that fracture patients who undergo some type of surgical procedure presented lower mortality in the long term than those managed orthopaedically. Authors such as Burget Girona et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0360"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> conclude that surgical management, compared to conservative management, seems to provide better correction of the residual deformity and offer better long-term results, although they do not assess quality of life scales. Others, such as Imamudeen et al. in 2021,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0310"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> note that kyphoplasty, in addition to the evident pain relief, reduces mortality by up to 22% at 10 years versus patients with fractures managed conservatively.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Functionality, pain, and quality of life</span><p id="par0175" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Schousboe<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> in 2015 estimated that the average time of disability after a fracture is 158 days for lumbar fractures and 74 days for thoracic fractures, compared to 101 days for a hip fracture. He did not specify whether these times varied according to the treatment used.</p><p id="par0180" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The improvement in pain occurs mainly during the first 3 months, although it can last up to 6 months. However, even when the fracture consolidates satisfactorily, some of these patients may end up with chronic pain,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,9,36</span></a> some studies such as that by Zileli et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0395"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">36</span></a> put this at 40%.</p><p id="par0185" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A 2016 meta-analysis by Mattie et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0260"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> demonstrated not only the superiority of kyphoplasty over conservative treatment in pain management, but also reported that this difference is most pronounced during the first 2 weeks after the procedure and is maintained throughout the first year. Other studies seem to support these results.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0420"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">41</span></a> Some, such as Wen et al. in 2021,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0410"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">39</span></a> even claim that kyphoplasty is superior to percutaneous fixation in pain control and functional recovery in the immediate postoperative period, probably because of the magnitude of the surgical procedure. Other percutaneous techniques, such as vertebroplasty, appear equal to kyphoplasty in pain control and, although they involve shorter operating time, achieve less radiographic improvement and have more complications such as cement leakage.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0400"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">37</span></a></p><p id="par0190" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Although not always specifically mentioned, the literature concludes that these injuries have a long-term negative impact on the patient's quality of life.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,7,31</span></a> Having one or more of these fractures reduces spinal mobility, leading to disturbances in gait mechanics, a predisposition to falls, and an increased tendency to depression.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,7</span></a> In general terms, it is estimated that these fractures compromise quality of life in more than 20% of patients over the age of 70.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0370"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Sagittal profile, surgery, and complications arising from surgery</span><p id="par0195" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Surgery is indicated when pain is refractory to analgesic medication, when there is great retropulsion of the fragments and/or neurological symptoms, and when gait biomechanics are abnormal and there is coronal and sagittal imbalance.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28,36</span></a></p><p id="par0200" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The very fact of ageing deteriorates sagittal balance, increasing thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, which is undoubtedly accentuated in the presence of vertebral compression fractures.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> When the spine is affected by kyphosis, to compensate for sagittal balance, gluteal contracture and pelvic retroversion occur, which eventually prove to be insufficient. The subsequent compensatory mechanisms would involve flexion of the knees, shortening of the hamstrings, and dorsal flexion of the ankles. All of this would result in impaired gait mechanics.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a></p><p id="par0205" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Conservative treatment of a compression fracture is a significant contributor to sagittal imbalance.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> In this regard, surgical treatment leads to an improvement in radiographic parameters compared to orthopaedic treatment.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0375"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32,39,41</span></a></p><p id="par0210" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a> shows the case of an insufficiency fracture, managed orthopaedically, which progresses to sagittal imbalance.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0215" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">However, surgical treatment is also highly variable. Thus, in our therapeutic arsenal, we could use cementing techniques alone, whose main function is not so much stabilisation or improvement of the profile as pain control. Mechanically stable fractures could undergo cementation for analgesic control, if required by the patient.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0350"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27,37,40</span></a> At the same time, a mechanically unstable fracture located in the thoracolumbar hinge region may require instrumentation (open or percutaneous) to stabilise the segment and restore kyphosis. The number of levels to be instrumented will depend on the location of the injury, the profile, and other parameters suggestive of instability.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7,29–31,38</span></a> In this regard, the German Society<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> suggests a treatment algorithm according to the fracture pattern, which can serve as a decision guide for the reader.</p><p id="par0220" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A retrospective study from 2023<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0375"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> and another study from 2021<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0410"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">39</span></a> report that surgery using vertebral instrumentation offers better results in terms of restoring vertebral height, regional kyphosis angle, and sagittal balance than kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. In turn, kyphoplasty improves vertebral height and local kyphosis angle compared to conservative treatment.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0420"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">41</span></a> In the case of vertebroplasty, although it may offer symptomatic relief compared to conservative treatment, it does not differ in terms of recovery of vertebral height.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0375"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a></p><p id="par0225" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Fig. 4</a> shows a clinical case of MIS instrumentation of a patient with sagittal imbalance due to vertebral fractures. Note the cement augmentation of the screws to increase screw strength.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0230" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In cases with fractures requiring surgical treatment, the development of minimally invasive techniques assisted by navigation or robotic systems<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0425"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">42</span></a> can increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. In addition, there are technologies based on artificial intelligence or augmented reality with which it is possible to improve the classic surgical result by intraoperative measurement of the deformity and moulding of the rod to correct the fracture.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0430"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">43</span></a></p><p id="par0235" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0025">Fig. 5</a> shows the application of new technologies to these procedures.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0025"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0240" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">While surgery undoubtedly improves radiographic parameters and, in the long term, also survival, it is not without risk. Appropriate preoperative selection is required of patients suffering from these fractures, who often have significant morbidities.</p><p id="par0245" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There are several possible complications, such as neurological injuries, cement leakage, cement embolisation in the venous drainage systems, perforation of the anterior part of the vertebral body and injury to visceral structures, haematomas, contrast leakage, etc.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a></p><p id="par0250" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is well known that in poor quality trabecular bone, screw loosening and implant failure is significantly higher.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0405"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">38,39</span></a></p><p id="par0255" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The fragile bone characteristics of these patients often make it necessary to use screw augmentation techniques, such as cementing<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28,31,38,39</span></a> to increase the pull-out strength of the screw, which in some series is estimated to be as high as 278%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0365"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> However, one of the most reported complications, also present in isolated augmentation techniques, is cement leakage, which in this osteoporotic bone can be as high as 21.8% (6–43.1%),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0260"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9,29–31,37,41</span></a> and is greater the more cement used.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0405"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">38</span></a> In techniques without instrumentation, vertebroplasty is associated with greater cement leakage than kyphoplasty.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0400"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">37</span></a> Fortunately, most of these cement leaks are asymptomatic.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0370"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> Zhang et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> found symptoms from leakage in only 1.2% (.2–1.9%).</p><p id="par0260" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Pulmonary embolism when using cement techniques is reported in 3% (.5–6.8%), while symptoms from them, or long-term sequelae, occur in only .8% (.2–1.5%).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0365"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a></p><p id="par0265" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Another possible long-term negative impact of cementation is fracture of adjacent vertebral segments, which remains a controversial issue to this day.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0310"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> Some studies highlight an increased risk of fracture at adjacent levels<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,14,29</span></a> while others state the opposite.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">33</span></a></p><p id="par0270" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The delicate medical situation of these patients, who usually have different comorbidities, has increased the use of percutaneous fixation techniques, which is expected to continue in the coming years, as they manage to reduce morbidity<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0360"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> by reducing bleeding, the need for transfusion, operating times, and hospital stay without altering the functional results.</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Economic impact</span><p id="par0275" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Finally, although it is not the main objective of this work, these fragility fractures and osteoporosis clearly carry a significant economic burden for society and are a real public health problem.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> The AAOS<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0390"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">35</span></a> states that in 2005, the economic impact of osteoporotic fractures was estimated at 17,000 million USD. In the USA, the annual expenditure directly related to vertebral fractures amounts to 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>billion dollars,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0350"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> accounting for up to 5% of all economic expenditure attributed to osteoporosis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p><p id="par0280" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Vertebral fractures, unlike hip fractures, do not always require hospitalisation, and are therefore less costly to the system, accounting for 30–50% of the economic expenditure that could be attributed to them.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> It is estimated that around 40% of patients who suffer vertebral fractures will require some form of hospitalisation or residential care.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> Schousboe<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> states that a vertebral fracture increases health expenditure for the 5 years following onset.</p><p id="par0285" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In 2021, Wen et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0410"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">39</span></a> concluded in a cost-effectiveness analysis that kyphoplasty is the best treatment for osteoporotic compression fractures.</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Conclusions</span><p id="par0290" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Vertebral compression fractures have a severe impact on all spheres, including a significant economic burden on healthcare systems. As sequelae, patients may experience chronic pain, sagittal imbalance, gait disturbance, and increased mortality. Furthermore, suffering one fragility fracture predisposes to more.</p><p id="par0295" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Surgical techniques appear to improve survival, quality of life, and sagittal balance in these patients, although multidisciplinary approaches are required because they are not without complications.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Level of evidence</span><p id="par0300" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Level of evidence <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">iii</span>.</p></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Ethical considerations</span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Protection of humans and animals</span><p id="par0305" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">N/A. The authors declare that no experiments on humans or animals were performed for this research.</p></span><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Data confidentiality</span><p id="par0310" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">N/A. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.</p></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Right to privacy and informed consent</span><p id="par0315" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">N/A. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.</p></span></span><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Funding</span><p id="par0320" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they had no funding or relationship that may have influenced the results reported in this scientific paper.</p></span><span id="sec0080" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0325" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:18 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres2244469" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1877080" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres2244470" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusión" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1877079" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Epidemiology" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Pathogenesis" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Diagnosis" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Natural history and impact" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Functionality, pain, and quality of life" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Sagittal profile, surgery, and complications arising from surgery" ] 11 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Economic impact" ] 12 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] 13 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Level of evidence" ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Ethical considerations" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Protection of humans and animals" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "Data confidentiality" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Right to privacy and informed consent" ] ] ] 15 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Funding" ] 16 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0080" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 17 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2023-12-21" "fechaAceptado" => "2024-03-09" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1877080" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Osteoporotic vertebral fractures" 1 => "Compression farctures" 2 => "Kyphoplasty" 3 => "Vertebroplasty" 4 => "Morbimortality" 5 => "Osteoporosis" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1877079" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Fracturas vertebrales osteoporóticas" 1 => "Fracturas por compresión" 2 => "Cifoplastia" 3 => "Vertebroplastia" 4 => "Morbimortalidad" 5 => "Osteoporosis" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Osteoporosis, and the consequences derived from it, such as fragility fractures, constitute a growing public health problem. Suffering from a fracture of this nature is the main risk factor for suffering a new fracture.</p><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">It is documented that vertebral compression fractures lead to significant morbidity and mortality, in the short and long term, as well as other complications, such as sagittal imbalance and hyperkyphosis of the segment. However, we have not found documentation that analyzes the medium and long-term consequences of these injuries, assessing the type of treatment used, and the economic impact they represent.</p><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The purpose of this review is to analyse the main recent literature on the subject and make a breakdown of the consequences of these fractures in various spheres, such as economic, quality of life, sagittal balance and radiographic parameters, pain or mortality; as well as a brief analysis of epidemiology and natural history.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Conclusion</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Osteoporotic fractures constitute an emerging problem, both in the medical and economic fields. The consequences and sequelae on the patient are multiple and although surgical options offer good long-term results, it is necessary to properly select the patient, through multidisciplinary teams, to try to minimise potential complications.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La osteoporosis, y las consecuencias derivadas de la misma, como las fracturas por fragilidad, constituyen un problema creciente de salud pública. Padecer una fractura de esta índole es el principal factor de riesgo para sufrir una nueva fractura.</p><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Está documentado que las fracturas vertebrales por compresión conllevan una importante morbimortalidad, a corto y largo plazo, así como otras complicaciones, como un disbalance sagital y una hipercifosis del segmento. Sin embargo, no hemos encontrado documentación que analice las consecuencias a medio y largo plazo de estas lesiones, valorando el tipo de tratamiento empleado, y el impacto económico que suponen.</p><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">El objeto de esta revisión es analizar la principal literatura reciente sobre el tema y hacer un desglose de las consecuencias de estas fracturas en varias esferas, como la económica, la calidad de vida, el balance sagital y los parámetros radiográficos, el dolor o la mortalidad; así como un breve análisis de la epidemiología y la historia natural.</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Conclusión</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Las fracturas osteoporóticas constituyen un problema emergente, tanto en el ámbito médico como económico. Las consecuencias y secuelas sobre el paciente son múltiples y aunque las opciones quirúrgicas plantean buenos resultados a largo plazo, es necesario seleccionar adecuadamente al paciente, mediante equipos multidisciplinares, para tratar de minimizar las potenciales complicaciones.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusión" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:6 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 830 "Ancho" => 1275 "Tamanyo" => 107211 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The Genant classification of osteoporotic fractures.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a></p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1741 "Ancho" => 2800 "Tamanyo" => 229263 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Classification of osteoporotic fractures proposed by the DGOU.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0355"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a></p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 751 "Ancho" => 1000 "Tamanyo" => 58137 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Showing a case of a patient with a vertebral insufficiency fracture, managed orthopaedically. Note the progression of kyphosis and consequent sagittal imbalance.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 3142 "Ancho" => 3334 "Tamanyo" => 708450 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Male, 71 years old, who suffered a fall from standing height in January 2023. Since then, he has presented with dorsolumbar pain. Images A and B show a teleradiograph showing the significant sagittal imbalance caused by multiple vertebral fractures, resulting in hyperkyphosis. Images C and D show the first postoperative X-ray. Long posterior instrumentation was performed, with minimally invasive techniques and cement augmentation of the most cranial and caudal screws. Images E and F show the first postoperative teleradiograph, at one month, where the restoration of sagittal balance is evident.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0025" "etiqueta" => "Figure 5" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr5.jpeg" "Alto" => 1048 "Ancho" => 1600 "Tamanyo" => 308108 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Application of new technologies, such as robotic assistance or navigation, in spine surgery.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">ASA: American Society of Anaesthesiologists Risk Classification; BMI: body mass index; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale.</p><p id="spar0080" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">0–5 points<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>conservative; 6 points<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>surgical or not; >6 points<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>surgical.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Parameter \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Grade \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Score \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Fracture classification (OF 1–5) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1–5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2–10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Bone mineral density \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">T</span>-score<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Current fracture \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes; no \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1; −1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Pain (despite analgesia) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">VAS<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≥<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4; <4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1; −1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Neurological deficit \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Mobilisation (with analgesia) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No; yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1; −1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Health status \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ASA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3; Dementia; BMI<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>kg/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>; anticoagulation; dependency; anticoagulation \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Each −1; Maximum −2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3657224.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma score.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0015" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:43 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0220" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Recomendaciones de manejo clínico del paciente mayor de 50 años con fractura osteoporótica" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "Grupo de Expertos en Osteoporosis de la SECOT" "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "A. Herrera" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "REEMO" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "12" "paginaInicial" => "125" "paginaFinal" => "128" ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0225" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Epidemiology of vertebral fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "J.T. Schousboe" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jocd.2015.08.004" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Densitom" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "19" "paginaInicial" => "8" "paginaFinal" => "22" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26349789" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0230" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The epidemiology of vertebral fractures. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C. Cooper" 1 => "T. O’Neill" 2 => "A. Silman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/8756-3282(93)90358-h" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Bone" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "14" "numero" => "Suppl. 1" "paginaInicial" => "S89" "paginaFinal" => "S97" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8110529" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0235" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "What proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities is clinically diagnosed and vice versa?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "H.A. Fink" 1 => "D.L. Milavetz" 2 => "L. Palermo" 3 => "M.C. Nevitt" 4 => "J.A. Cauley" 5 => "H.K. Genant" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Miner Res" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "1216e" "paginaFinal" => "1222e" ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0240" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a diagnostic challenge in the 21st century" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Capdevila-Reniu" 1 => "M. Navarro-López" 2 => "A. López-Soto" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.rceng.2019.09.013" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Clin Esp" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "221" "paginaInicial" => "118" "paginaFinal" => "124" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33998487" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0245" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Vertebral compression fractures: still an unpredictable aspect of osteoporosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "F.Y. Kutsal" 1 => "G.O. Ergın Erganı" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3906/sag-2005-315" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Turk J Med Sci" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "51" "paginaInicial" => "393" "paginaFinal" => "399" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32967415" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0250" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The influence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on global sagittal alignment in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "E. Najjar" 1 => "D. Pasku" 2 => "A. Mardashti" 3 => "M. Meshneb" 4 => "S. Komaitis" 5 => "K.M. Salem" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Spin J" "fecha" => "2023" "volumen" => "32" "paginaInicial" => "2580" "paginaFinal" => "2587" ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0255" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: current concepts of conservative care" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "U.G. Longo" 1 => "M. Loppini" 2 => "L. Denaro" 3 => "N. Maffulli" 4 => "V. Denaro" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/bmb/ldr048" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br Med Bull" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "102" "paginaInicial" => "171" "paginaFinal" => "189" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22130906" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0260" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty and conservative therapy for treating osteoporotic compression fractures in the thoracic and lumbar spine a systematic review and meta-analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "R. Mattie" 1 => "K. Laimi" 2 => "S. Yu" 3 => "M. Saltychev" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg Am" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "98" "paginaInicial" => "1041" "paginaFinal" => "1051" ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0265" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Originalarbeit: osteoporotische frakturen der brust- und lendenwirbelkörper: diagnostik und konservative therapie" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "U. Spiegl" 1 => "H. Bork" 2 => "S. Grüninger" 3 => "U. Maus" 4 => "G. Osterhoff" 5 => "M.J. Scheyerer" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Deutsch Arztebl Int" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "118" "paginaInicial" => "670" "paginaFinal" => "677" ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0270" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Population-based prospective study on the incidence of osteoporosis-associated fractures in a German population of 200,413 inhabitants" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "K. Bassgen" 1 => "T. Westphal" 2 => "P. Haar" 3 => "G. Kundt" 4 => "T. Mittlmeier" 5 => "H.C. Schober" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Public Health (Oxf)" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "35" "paginaInicial" => "255e" "paginaFinal" => "261e" ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0275" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Factores determinantes de la resistencia ósea" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J.R. Caeiro" 1 => "S. Dapía" 2 => "E. Vaquero" 3 => "L. Roca Ruiz" 4 => "M.A. Blanco Ramos" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "REEMO" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "14" "paginaInicial" => "67" "paginaFinal" => "74" ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0280" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Bone quality" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "E. Seeman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Adv Osteop Fract Manage" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "2" "paginaFinal" => "8" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0285" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Risk factors for new vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "Z.L. Zhang" 1 => "J.S. Yang" 2 => "D.J. Hao" 3 => "T.J. Liu" 4 => "Q.M. Jing" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.2147/CIA.S312623" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Interv Aging" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "1193" "paginaFinal" => "1200" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188462" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0290" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Biomechanics of age related fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "M.L. Bouxsein" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:6 [ "editores" => "R.Marcus, J.Kelsey, D.Feldman" "titulo" => "Osteoporosis" "paginaInicial" => "509" "paginaFinal" => "534" "edicion" => "2nd ed." "serieFecha" => "2001" ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0295" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Biomechanics of bone: determinants of skeletal fragility and bone quality" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "C.H. Turner" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s001980200000" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Osteoporos Int" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "13" "paginaInicial" => "97" "paginaFinal" => "104" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11905527" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0300" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Biomecánica de la fractura" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J. Sánchez Sotelo" 1 => "L. Munuera" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:5 [ "editores" => "L.Munuera" "titulo" => "Osteoporosis y fracturas" "paginaInicial" => "53" "paginaFinal" => "62" "serieFecha" => "2000" ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0305" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Hip fractures in elderly patients: perspectives towards the future" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "S. Shabat" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1080/09638280500056659" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Disabil Rehabil" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "27" "paginaInicial" => "1039" "paginaFinal" => "1040" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16278172" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0310" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Management of osteoporosis and spinal fractures: contemporary guidelines and evolving paradigms" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "N. Imamudeen" 1 => "A. Basheer" 2 => "A.M. Iqbal" 3 => "N. Manjila" 4 => "N.N. Haroon" 5 => "S. Manjila" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3121/cmr.2021.1612" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Med Res" "fecha" => "2022" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "95" "paginaFinal" => "106" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478096" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0315" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Assessing vertebral fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "Natural Osteoporosis Foundation Working Group on Vertebral Fractures" "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "D. Kiel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/jbmr.5650100403" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Miner Res" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "10" "paginaInicial" => "518" "paginaFinal" => "523" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7610921" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0320" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. The study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "D.M. Black" 1 => "L. Palermo" 2 => "M.C. Nevitt" 3 => "H.K. Genant" 4 => "L. Christensen" 5 => "S.R. Cummings" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.1.90" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Miner Res" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "14" "paginaInicial" => "90" "paginaFinal" => "101" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9893070" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0325" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "N.A. Manson" 1 => "F.M. Phillips" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg A" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "88" "paginaInicial" => "1862" "paginaFinal" => "1872" ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0330" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Vertebral augmentation: vertebroplasty an kiphoplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J.A. Carrino" 1 => "R. Chan" 2 => "A.R. Caccaro" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.ro.2003.10.012" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Semin Roentgenol" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "39" "paginaInicial" => "68" "paginaFinal" => "84" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14976838" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0335" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Indications and contraindications for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M. Röllinghoff" 1 => "K. Zarghooni" 2 => "K. Schlüter-Brust" 3 => "R. Sobottke" 4 => "U. Schlegel" 5 => "P. Eysel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00402-010-1083-6" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arch Orthop Trauma Surg" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "130" "paginaInicial" => "765" "paginaFinal" => "774" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20221618" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0340" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Percutaneus vertebroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "A. Pérez-Higueras" 1 => "L. Alvarez Galovich" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:4 [ "fecha" => "2003" "paginaInicial" => "298" "editorial" => "Edit Panamericana" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Madrid" ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0345" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Predictors of outcomes of percutaneus vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. Alvarez" 1 => "A. Pérez-Higueras" 2 => "J.J. Granizo" 3 => "I. de Miguel" 4 => "D. Quiñones" 5 => "R.E. Rossi" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/00007632-200501010-00016" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Spine" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "87" "paginaFinal" => "92" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15626987" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0350" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Vertebral fractures: clinical importance and management" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "D.L. Kendler" 1 => "D.C. Bauer" 2 => "K.S. Davison" 3 => "L. Dian" 4 => "D.A. Hanley" 5 => "S.T. Harris" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Med" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "129" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0355" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Nonsurgical and surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures: recommendations of the spine section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "T.R. Blattert" 1 => "K.J. Schnake" 2 => "O. Gonschorek" 3 => "E. Gercek" 4 => "F. Hartmann" 5 => "S. Katscher" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Global Spine J" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "8" "numero" => "2_Suppl." "paginaInicial" => "50S" "paginaFinal" => "55S" ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0360" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Opciones de tratamiento quirúrgico mínimamente invasivo en las fracturas vertebrales osteoporóticas OF4" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. Burguet Girona" 1 => "E. Ferrando Meseguer" 2 => "J.I. Maruenda Paulino" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2021.07.009" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol" "fecha" => "2022" "volumen" => "66" "paginaInicial" => "86" "paginaFinal" => "94" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35404795" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0365" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A meta-analysis of complications associated with the use of cement-augmented pedicle screws in osteoporosis of spine" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J. Zhang" 1 => "G. Wang" 2 => "N. Zhang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Orthop Traumatol Surg Res" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "107" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "11" ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0370" "etiqueta" => "31" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Application of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw in treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fracture (AO type A): a retrospective study of 28 cases" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "Z. Rong" 1 => "F. Zhang" 2 => "J. Xiao" 3 => "Z. Wang" 4 => "F. Luo" 5 => "Z. Zhang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.045" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "World Neurosurg" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "120" "paginaInicial" => "e247" "paginaFinal" => "e258" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30149154" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0375" "etiqueta" => "32" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical outcomes and safety comparison of vertebroplasty, balloon kyphoplasty, and vertebral implant for treatment of vertebral compression fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "T. Li" 1 => "S. Pang" 2 => "R. England" 3 => "A. Gong" 4 => "D. Botros" 5 => "S. Manupipatpong" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Neuroradiol" "fecha" => "2023" "volumen" => "44" "paginaInicial" => "1345" "paginaFinal" => "1351" ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0380" "etiqueta" => "33" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Systematic review does percutaneous vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures increase the incidence of new vertebral fractures? A meta-analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "H. Zhang" 1 => "C. Xu" 2 => "T. Zhang" 3 => "Z. Gao" 4 => "T. Zhang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Pain Physician" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "13" "paginaFinal" => "28" ] ] ] ] ] ] 33 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0385" "etiqueta" => "34" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Similarities and differences in the management of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and those with rebound-associated vertebral fractures following discontinuation of denosumab" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.D. Anastasilakis" 1 => "P. Makras" 2 => "J. Paccou" 3 => "I. Bisbinas" 4 => "S.A. Polyzos" 5 => "S.E. Papapoulos" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3390/jcm12185874" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Med" "fecha" => "2023" "volumen" => "12" "paginaInicial" => "5874" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762815" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 34 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0390" "etiqueta" => "35" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "The treatment of symptomatic osteoporotic spinal compression fractures guideline and evidence report. Adopted by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Directors. 2010." ] ] ] 35 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0395" "etiqueta" => "36" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: WFNS spine committee recommendations" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "M. Zileli" 1 => "M. Fornari" 2 => "J. Parthiban" 3 => "S. Sharif" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Neurosurg Sci" "fecha" => "2022" "volumen" => "66" "paginaInicial" => "279" "paginaFinal" => "281" ] ] ] ] ] ] 36 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0400" "etiqueta" => "37" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "X. Chang" 1 => "Y.F. Lv" 2 => "B. Chen" 3 => "H. Li" 4 => "X. Han" 5 => "K. Yang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00264-014-2525-5" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int Orthop" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "39" "paginaInicial" => "491" "paginaFinal" => "500" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260399" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 37 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0405" "etiqueta" => "38" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Minimally invasive spinal fixation in an aging population with osteoporosis: clinical and radiological outcomes and safety of expandable screws versus fenestrated screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "R. Gazzeri" 1 => "K. Panagiotopoulos" 2 => "M. Galarza" 3 => "A. Bolognini" 4 => "G. Callovini" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Neurosurg Focus" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "49" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "9" ] ] ] ] ] ] 38 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0410" "etiqueta" => "39" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Comparison of percutaneous kyphoplasty and pedicle screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with kyphosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "Z. Wen" 1 => "X. Mo" 2 => "S. Zhao" 3 => "W. Lin" 4 => "Z. Chen" 5 => "Z. Huang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.030" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "World Neurosurg" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "152" "paginaInicial" => "e589" "paginaFinal" => "e596" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129986" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 39 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0415" "etiqueta" => "40" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A randomized controlled trial of vertebral body decompression procedure versus conservative treatment for painful vertebral compression fracture" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "S. Lee" 1 => "H. Zheng" 2 => "S.M. Park" 3 => "H.J. Kim" 4 => "J.S. Yeom" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3390/medicina59101848" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Medicina (Kaunas)" "fecha" => "2023" "volumen" => "59" "paginaInicial" => "1848" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893566" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 40 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0420" "etiqueta" => "41" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Radiological and clinical outcomes of balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J. Guo" 1 => "W. Zhai" 2 => "L. Wei" 3 => "J. Zhang" 4 => "L. Jin" 5 => "H. Yan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:4 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Orthop Surg Res" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "435" ] ] ] ] ] ] 41 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0425" "etiqueta" => "42" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pedicle screw accuracy assessment in ExcelsiusGPS® robotic spine surgery: evaluation of deviation from pre-planned trajectory" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "B. Jiang" 1 => "A. Karim Ahmed" 2 => "C.C. Zygourakis" 3 => "S. Kalb" 4 => "A.M. Zhu" 5 => "J. Godzik" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/s41016-018-0131-x" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Chin Neurosurg J" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "23" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32922884" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 42 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0430" "etiqueta" => "43" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Augmented reality in spine surgery: current state of the art" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A.J. Rush 3rd" 1 => "N. Shepard" 2 => "M. Nolte" 3 => "K. Siemionow" 4 => "F. Phillips" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.14444/8273" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int J Spine Surg" "fecha" => "2022" "volumen" => "16" "numero" => "S2" "paginaInicial" => "S22" "paginaFinal" => "S27" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266050" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/18884415/unassign/S1888441524001383/v1_202409170427/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => null "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/18884415/unassign/S1888441524001383/v1_202409170427/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441524001383?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 November | 4 | 0 | 4 |
2024 October | 32 | 10 | 42 |
2024 September | 56 | 15 | 71 |
2024 August | 23 | 30 | 53 |