metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología Consideraciones de los desgastes del polietileno aplicados a prótesis totales d...
Journal Information
Vol. 47. Issue 3.
Pages 175-181 (January 2003)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 47. Issue 3.
Pages 175-181 (January 2003)
Full text access
Consideraciones de los desgastes del polietileno aplicados a prótesis totales de cadera
Considerations regarding polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty
Visits
7569
H. Fahandezh-Saddi Díaz
Corresponding author
homid@navegalia.com

Correspondencia: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. C/ Dr. Esquerdo, 46. 28007 Madrid.
, A. Villa García, A. Ríos Luna, J. Vaquero Martín
Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Madrid
This item has received
Article information

El desgaste del polietileno es un problema que ha preocupado desde que se utilizó por primera vez en el reemplazo articular. Son numerosas las causas que influyen en su desgaste, interviniendo factores biológicos como la edad, factores de diseño de los componentes, así como factores técnicos, que junto con los anteriores dan lugar a una alteración del polietileno más o menos precoz. Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de las cirugías de revisión secundarias a alteraciones del polietileno, en las que se utilizó de forma primaria un cotilo poroso impactado y un vástago femoral AML® (Depuy), en el período de tiempo comprendido entre 1988 y 1990. Encontramos que, con un seguimiento superior a 10 años (rango 120 a 132 meses), en un 11,1% se precisó reintervención por esta causa, y valoramos cuales son las principales causas que influyen en el desgaste.

En nuestra serie los factores determinantes han sido: utilización de un núcleo de polietileno de baja resistencia, uso de cabezas de 32 mm, así como la colocación del cotilo con un ángulo de inclinación acetabular inadecuado.

Palabras clave:
polietileno
osteólisis
desgaste

Polyethylene wear is a problem that has concerned us since this material was first used in joint replacement. Many factors influence wear, including biological factors like age, component design, and technical factors that, combined with the others, can lead sooner or later to polyethylene wear. A retrospective study was made of revision interventions for polyethylene wear carried out between 1988 and 1990, in which the primary prosthesis was an impacted porous cup and an AML® (Depuy) femoral stem. After a follow-up period of more than 10 years (range 120 to 132 months), reinterventions were required for polyethylene wear in 11.1%. We evaluated the main causes of wear.

In our series, the determinant factors were the use of a lowresistance polyethylene core, 32 mm heads, and cup implantation at an incorrect acetabular angle.

Key words:
polyethylene
osteolysis
wear
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
C.A. Engh.
Porous coated total hip arthoplasty in the young.
Clin Orthop, 2 (1998), pp. 953-957
[2.]
J. Charnley, Z. Cupic.
The nine and ten years results of the low friction artroplasty of the hip.
Clin Orthop, 9 (1973), pp. 9-25
[3.]
J. Charnley, D.K. Halley.
Direction and rate of socket wear in Charnley low friction arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 67B (1985), pp. 757-761
[4.]
A.B. Bankston, E.M. Keating, C.S. Ranawat, P.M. Faris, M. Ritter.
Comparison of polyethilene wear in machined versus moulded polyethilene.
Clin Orthop, 317 (1995), pp. 37-43
[5.]
D.L. Bartel, V.L. Bicknell, T.M. Wright.
The effect of conformity, thickness and material on stresses in ultra-high molecualr weight components for total joint replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 68 (1986), pp. 1041-1051
[6.]
J.M. Kabo, J.S. Gebhard, G. Loren, H. Amstutz.
In vivo wear of polyethylene acetabular components.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75B (1993), pp. 254-258
[7.]
J.P. McAuley, D. Moore, W. Culpepper, C.A. Engh.
Total hip arthroplasty with porous coated prostheses fixed without cement in patients who are sixty five years of age or older.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 80A (1998), pp. 1648-1659
[8.]
R.L. Barrack.
Factors influencing polyethylene wear in total joint artroplasty.
Orthopaedics, 21 (1998), pp. 937-941
[9.]
J.M. Cuckler, J. Bearcroft, C.M. Asgian.
Femoral head technologies to reduce polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop, 317 (1995), pp. 57-63
[10.]
J. Livermore, D. Ilstrup, B. Morrey.
Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 72A (1990), pp. 518-528
[11.]
H.A. McKellop, P. Campbell, S.H. Park, T.P. Schmalzried, P. Grigoris, H. Amstutz, et al.
The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop, 311 (1995), pp. 3-20
[12.]
B.F. Morrey, D.M. Ilstrup.
Size of the femoral head and acetabular revision in Total-Hip replacement arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 71A (1989), pp. 50-54
[13.]
D. Lawrence, M.D. Dorr, R. Schon.
Total hip arthroplasty with the use of the metasul metal-on-metal articulation.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89A (2000), pp. 789-800
[14.]
P.A. Devane, R.B. Bourne, C.H. Rorabeck, R.M. Hardie, J.G. Horne.
Measuraments of polyethylene wear in metal-backed acetabular cups.
Clin Orthop, 319 (1995), pp. 303-316
[15.]
J. Vaquero, C. Vidal, J. Roca, F. Quemada, N. Escudero.
Resultados a largo plazo de la prótesis porosa AML como artroplastia total de cadera primaria.
Rev Ortop Traumatol, 46 (2002), pp. 20-26
[16.]
R.B. Treacy.
Pelvis y acetábulo.
Medición de los Resultados en Traumatología, pp. 253-257
[17.]
C.A. Engh.
Measurament of polyethilene wear in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 79A (1997), pp. 361-366
[18.]
M.J. Griffit, M.K. Seidenstein, D. Williams, J. Charnley.
Socket wear in Charnley low friction arthroplasty of the hip.
Clin Orthop, 137 (1978), pp. 37-47
[19.]
M. Schenk, M. Dalinka.
Radiologic evaluation.
Revision Total Hip arthroplasty, pp. 121-140
[20.]
L.P. Brady, J.W. McCutchen.
A ten years follow up study of 170 Charnley total hip arthoplasties.
Clin Orthop, 211 (1986), pp. 51-54
[21.]
H.S. Dobbs.
Survivorship of total hip replacements.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 62B (1980), pp. 168-173
[22.]
H.E. Cates, P.M. Faris, E.M. Keating, M.A. Ritter.
Polyethylene wear in cementd metal-backed acetabular cups.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75B (1993), pp. 249-253
[23.]
C.A. Engh, W.J. Culpepper, C.A. Engh.
Long term results of use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 79A (1997), pp. 177-184
[24.]
K.S. Keisu, F. Orozco, P. Sharkey, R.H. Rothman, F.X. McGuigon.
Primary cementless total hipoarthroplasty in octagenarians: two to eleven year follow up.
J Bone Joint Surgery Am, 83A (2001), pp. 359-363
[25.]
A.E. Grass, W. Dusl.
Acute polyethilene fracture in an uncemented cup.
Can Surgery, 40 (1997), pp. 310-314
[26.]
B.M. Wroblewski.
Direction and rate of socket wear in Charnley low friction arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 67B (1985), pp. 757-760
[27.]
J. Vaquero Martín.
Conceptos sobre la fijación de las prótesis totales de cadera. En: Curso Básico Fundación.
pp. 265-276
[28.]
J.S. Xenos, W.J. Hopkinson, J.J. Callaghan, R.D. Heekin, C.G. Savory.
Osteolysis around and uncementd cobalt chrome total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop, 317 (1995), pp. 29-36
[29.]
W.H. Harris, A.L. Schiller, J. Scholler, R. Freiberg, R. Scott.
The nine and ten year results of the low friction extensive localised bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 58A (1976), pp. 612-618
Copyright © 2003. Sociedad Española de Cirugia Ortopédica y Traumatología (SECOT)
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos