metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología Prótesis de hombro «KIMS». Estudio experimental
Journal Information
Vol. 50. Issue 5.
Pages 390-397 (January 2006)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 50. Issue 5.
Pages 390-397 (January 2006)
Full text access
Prótesis de hombro «KIMS». Estudio experimental
KIMS shoulder prosthesis: an experimental study
Visits
6139
E. Galindo-Martensa,
Corresponding author
enrique@artroscopia.org

Correspondencia: IMTRA. Instituto Madrileño de Traumatología. C/ de La Explanada 16. 28040 Madrid.
, E. Galindo-Andujara, E.C. Rodríguez-Merchánb
a Instituto Madrileño de Traumatología. Madrid
b Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid
This item has received
Article information
Objetivo

Analizar las ventajas y estudiar el comportamiento biomecánico de una nueva prótesis de hombro con una original articulación intrínseca bipolar inversa, y demostrar que cumple con lo especificado en la normativa.

Material y método

La articulación con bipolaridad inversa de la KIMS (Kinetic Inverse Movement Shoulder) proporciona una biomecánica peculiar e innovadora. Está realizada en una aleación de cromo-cobalto-molibdeno, lo que la confiere una adecuada dureza. Se la ha dotado de un recubrimiento poroso con plasma-spray para facilitar su anclaje y el crecimiento óseo en caso de no cementar. Al ser una prótesis modular, nos permite escoger entre distintos tamaños de vástago, cuerpo y cabeza.

Se realizaron ensayos de carga máxima, fatiga, luxación y movilidad. Para analizar los resultados contamos con la ayuda del IBV (Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia).

Resultados

La prótesis KIMS supera en movilidad y estabilidad a las prótesis Atlas y Neer II (gold-standard). La articulación bipolar inversa aumenta el off-set y confiere a la KIMS un factor protector del manguito rotador, de forma similar a la prótesis invertida de P. Gramond, pero sin necesidad de implantar un componente glenoideo. A su vez, supera ampliamente lo establecido por la norma para la resistencia mecánica o a la fatiga del material.

Conclusiones

La prótesis KIMS busca disminuir las principales complicaciones de las artroplastias de hombro como son el aflojamiento aséptico, la migración proximal con destrucción del manguito rotador y la limitación de la movilidad. Los resultados biomecánicos y de los primeros implantes son esperanzadores y nos acercan al fin pretendido.

Palabras clave:
prótesis de hombro
artroplastia de hombro
prótesis bipolar
Purpose

To analyze the advantages and study the biomechanical behavior of a new shoulder prosthesis with an original reverse bipolar intrinsic articulation and demonstrate that it compiles with specified standards.

Materials and methods

The reverse bipolar articulation of the KIMS (Kinetic Inverse Movement Shoulder) prosthesis provides innovative and particular biomechanical possibilities. Made of a chrome-cobalt-molybdenum alloy it is of adequate solidity. It has plasma-spray porous coating to improve anchorage and bone growth if it is not cemented. It is a modular implant and therefore it is possible to choose different sized stems, bodies and heads. Evaluations were performed of maximum load, fatigue, dislocation and mobility. The Valencia Biomechanical Institute (Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia) helped analyze the results.

Results

The KIMS prosthesis provides greater mobility and stability than Atlas or Neer II (the gold-standard). The reverse bipolar articulation increases offset and allows KIMS to exert a protective effect on the rotator cuff, similar to that seen with the P. Gramond reverse prosthesis, but without the need of a glenoid implant. The mechanical and fatigue strength of this prosthesis are also much above standard.

Conclusions

The aim of using the KIMS prosthesis is to decrease the main complications of shoulder arthroplasties such as non-septic loosening, proximal migration with destruction of the rotator cuff and limitation of mobility. Outcomes seen with these first implants and their biomechanical results are so far hopeful.

Key words:
shoulder prosthesis
shoulder arthroplasty
bipolar prosthesis
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
T. Lugli.
Artificial shoulder joint by Pean (1893): the facts of an exceptional intervention and the prosthetic method.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 133 (1978), pp. 215-218
[2.]
F. König.
Über die Implantation von Elfenbein zum Ersatz von Knochen und Gelenkenden.
Bruns Beitr Klin Chir, 85 (1914), pp. 613
[3.]
C.S. Neer, T.H. Brown Jr, H.L. McLaughlin.
Fracture of the neck of the humerus with dislocation of the head fragment.
Am J Surg, 85 (1953), pp. 252-258
[4.]
Neer CS 2d.
Replacement arthrosplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 56A (1974), pp. 1-13
[5.]
R.H. Cofield, R.N. Stauffer.
The Bickel glenohumeral arthroplasty. Joint replacement in the upper limb.
pp. 15-19
[6.]
Lettin AWF.
The Stanmore total shoulder replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 64B (1982), pp. 47-51
[7.]
P. Grammont, P. Trouilloud, J.P. Laffay, X. Deries.
Etude et réalisation d'une nouvelle prothèse d'épaule.
Rheumatologie, 39 (1987), pp. 407-418
[8.]
P. Grammont, E. Baulot.
Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture.
Orthopedics, 16 (1993), pp. 65-68
[9.]
P. Grammont, E. Baulot.
La prothèse d'épaule dans les ruptures irréparables de la coiffe des rotateurs. En: Pathologie de la coiffe des rotateurs de l'épaule.
pp. 336-341
[10.]
P. Boileau, G. Walch.
The three-dimensional Geometry of the proximal humerus: Implications fot Surgical Technique and Prosthetic Design.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75B (1997), pp. 857-865
[11.]
I.I.I. Figgie HE, A.E. Inglis, V.M. Golberg, C.S. Ranawat, M.P. Figgie, J.M. Wile.
An analysis of factors affecting the long term results of total shoulder arthroplasty in inflamatory arthritis.
J Arthroplasty, 3 (1998), pp. 123-130
[12.]
C.S. Neer.
Glenohumeral arthroplasty design. Shoulder reconstruction 1st ed.
pp. 146-160
[13.]
P.S. Walker.
Human joints and their artificial replacements, (Editado por Thomas, Ch. T.).
pp. 182
[14.]
G. Bergmann.
Biomechanics and pathomechanics of the shoulder joint with reference to prosthetic joint replacement.
Shoulder replacement,
[15.]
B.F. Morrey, K.N. An.
Biomechanics of the shoulder.
Shoulder,
[16.]
d.e.r. Van, F.C. Helm.
Analysis of the kinematic and dynamic behavior of the shoulder mechanism.
J Biomech, 27 (1994), pp. 527-550
[17.]
J.C. Otis, C.C. Jiang, T.L. Wickiewicz, M.G. Peterson, R.F. Warren, T.J. Santner.
Changes in the moment arms of the rotatorcuff and deltoid muscle with abduction and rotation. J.
Bone Joint Surg Am, 76A (1994), pp. 667-676
[18.]
J.C. Otis, R.F. Warren, S.I. Backus, T.J. Santner, J.D. Mabrey.
Torque production in the shoulder of the normal young adult male. The interaction of function, dominance, joint angle, and angular velocity.
Am J Sports Med, 18 (1990), pp. 119-123
[19.]
N.K. Popen, P.S. Walker.
Normal and abnormal motion of the soulder.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 58A (1976), pp. 165-170
[20.]
N.K. Poppen, P.S. Walker.
Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction.
Clin Orthop, 135 (1978), pp. 165-170
[21.]
J.r. Boyd AD, P. Aliabadi, T.S. Thornhill.
Postoperative proximal migration in total shoulder arthroplasty: Incidence and significance.
J Arthroplasty, 6 (1991), pp. 31-37
[22.]
R. Pollock, E. Deliz, S. MclLveen, E. Flatow, L. Bigliani.
Prosthetic replacement in rotator cuff deficient shoulders.
J Shoulder Elbow surg, 1 (1992), pp. 173-186
[23.]
R.H. Cofield, W. Chang, J.W. Sperling.
Complications of shoulder arthroplasty.
Disorders of the shoulder: diagnosis and management, pp. 571-593
[24.]
S. Lippitt, F. Matsen.
Mechanisms of glenohumeral joint stability.
Clin Orthop, 291 (1993), pp. 20-28
[25.]
M. Frankle, S. Siegal, D. Pupello.
The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87A (2005), pp. 1697-1705
Copyright © 2006. Sociedad Española de Cirugia Ortopédica y Traumatología (SECOT)
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos