Research
Anatomical repair of distal biceps brachial tendon lesions using double-incision surgical approach
Reparación anatómica de las lesiones del tendón distal del bíceps braquial utilizando la técnica quirúrgica de doble incisión
Read
1878
Timeswas read the article
384
Total PDF
1494
Total HTML
Share statistics
array:25 [ "pii" => "S1988885621000407" "issn" => "19888856" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recote.2021.04.006" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-07-01" "aid" => "926" "copyright" => "The Author(s)" "copyrightAnyo" => "2021" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2021;65:305-11" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:20 [ "pii" => "S1888441521000059" "issn" => "18884415" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2020.10.005" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-07-01" "aid" => "926" "copyright" => "The Author(s)" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2021;65:305-11" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "es" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">INVESTIGACIÓN</span>" "titulo" => "Reparación anatómica de las lesiones del tendón distal del bíceps braquial utilizando la técnica quirúrgica de doble incisión" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "305" "paginaFinal" => "311" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Anatomical repair of distal biceps brachial tendon lesions using double-incision surgical approach" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figura 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1130 "Ancho" => 1505 "Tamanyo" => 228868 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A) Preparación y aislamiento del tendón distal. B) Abordaje lateral y exposición de la tuberosidad radial. C) Anclaje del tendón. D) Sutura final.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "E. Ibáñez, E. Araiza, E. Rodríguez-Iñigo, P. Guillén-García, J.M. López-Alcorocho" "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "E." "apellidos" => "Ibáñez" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "E." "apellidos" => "Araiza" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "E." "apellidos" => "Rodríguez-Iñigo" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Guillén-García" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.M." "apellidos" => "López-Alcorocho" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1988885621000407" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recote.2021.04.006" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1988885621000407?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441521000059?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/18884415/0000006500000004/v1_202107020652/S1888441521000059/v1_202107020652/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:20 [ "pii" => "S1988885621000377" "issn" => "19888856" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recote.2021.04.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-07-01" "aid" => "919" "copyright" => "SECOT" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "cor" "cita" => "Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2021;65:312-3" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Letter to the Editor</span>" "titulo" => "Medico-legal recommendations for the safe use of medical photography in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "312" "paginaFinal" => "313" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Recomendaciones médico-legales para el uso seguro de la fotografía médica en cirugía ortopédica y traumatología" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "C. Martin-Fumadó, E.L. Gómez-Durán, J. de Caso, J. Arimany-Manso" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Martin-Fumadó" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "E.L." "apellidos" => "Gómez-Durán" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "de Caso" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Arimany-Manso" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1888441520301673" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2020.06.015" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441520301673?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1988885621000377?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/19888856/0000006500000004/v1_202106080544/S1988885621000377/v1_202106080544/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:20 [ "pii" => "S1988885621000456" "issn" => "19888856" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recote.2021.04.011" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-07-01" "aid" => "933" "copyright" => "The Author(s)" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2021;65:294-304" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Development and implementation of a perioperative management guide for patients with hip fracture: Health management and clinical impact" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "294" "paginaFinal" => "304" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Desarrollo e implementación de una guía de manejo perioperatorio de pacientes con fractura de cadera: gestión sanitaria e impacto clínico" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1585 "Ancho" => 3000 "Tamanyo" => 488433 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Physiological changes of ageing.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "L. Hormaechea Bolado, J.R. Ortiz Gómez, I. Fornet Ruiz, A. Guijarro Valdueña, S. del Valle Quintans, A. Álvarez Bartolomé, A. del Campo Mur" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L." "apellidos" => "Hormaechea Bolado" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.R." "apellidos" => "Ortiz Gómez" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "I." "apellidos" => "Fornet Ruiz" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Guijarro Valdueña" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "S." "apellidos" => "del Valle Quintans" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Álvarez Bartolomé" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "del Campo Mur" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1888441521000126" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2020.10.008" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441521000126?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1988885621000456?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/19888856/0000006500000004/v1_202106080544/S1988885621000456/v1_202106080544/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:21 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Research</span>" "titulo" => "Anatomical repair of distal biceps brachial tendon lesions using double-incision surgical approach" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "305" "paginaFinal" => "311" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "E. Ibáñez, E. Araiza, E. Rodríguez-Iñigo, P. Guillén-García, J.M. López-Alcorocho" "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "E." "apellidos" => "Ibáñez" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "E." "apellidos" => "Araiza" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "E." "apellidos" => "Rodríguez-Iñigo" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Guillén-García" "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 4 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "J.M." "apellidos" => "López-Alcorocho" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "jm.lopez@amplicel.com" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "*" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Departamento de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Unidad de Investigación, Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Reparación anatómica de las lesiones del tendón distal del bíceps braquial utilizando la técnica quirúrgica de doble incisión" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1059 "Ancho" => 2512 "Tamanyo" => 112844 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0020" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Range of motion at one year follow-up shown in a box plot. (A) Degrees of extension. (B) Degrees of flexion.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Biceps brachii tendon rupture is a rare injury that accounts for about 3% of all biceps tears.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,2</span></a> It mainly occurs in middle-aged men (40–50 years), with pre-existing degenerative changes that predispose to this injury,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3–7</span></a> predominating in the dominant arm.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Previous studies suggest that the mechanism of injury may be excessive concentric contraction in arm flexion and supination.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> Sudden pain followed by functional impotence is a constant in these injuries and is occasionally accompanied by bruising or ecchymosis on the anteromedial facet of the arm. Due to proximal retraction of the muscle, an aesthetic deformity often appears, which may go unnoticed in patients with little muscle or a degree of obesity. O’Driscoll et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> described the hook test, which shows high sensitivity and specificity, as well as the squeeze test, for the diagnosis of complete distal biceps brachii rupture.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Chronic injuries lead to loss of arm strength in flexion and supination, combined with asymmetry with respect to the contralateral arm. Irritation of the lateral cutaneous nerve may cause pain: surgical reconstruction is advisable in these patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3,11</span></a> Boyd and Anderson<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0060"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a> first described the two-incision approach to avoid the risk of posterior interosseous nerve injury. Morrey et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> published a modification of this double approach technique with the aim of reducing any potential heterotopic calcification after incising the musculature of the external aspect of the olecranon.</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In this paper we assess the return to sports and clinical outcome of patients with biceps brachii tendon rupture who underwent surgical reconstruction of the tendon using our own modified double-approach technique.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Materials and methods</span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Patients</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This is a retrospective study conducted in 20 patients, with 21 cases of biceps brachii tendon rupture (one patient had rupture in both arms), treated in our unit from 2008 to 2017. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles approved in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, revised in 2013. The study was approved by the institution's ethics committee and patients signed their informed consent to participate. At the time of injury, the patients had a mean age of 44.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6.6 years (mean<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SD). The injury was in the right arm in 14 cases (66.7%) and the in the left in the other 7 (33.3%). All the patients practised sports and the injury occurred during sports.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Surgical procedure</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The surgical technique consisted of a series of modifications to existing surgical procedures. Locoregional anaesthesia of the limb is used with the patient in the supine position and with the aid of a hand table. A tourniquet is used on the arm and the surgical field is prepared.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A limited transverse incision of 2–3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm is made just above the ulnar crease; the avulsed tendon is sought and located with blunt dissection; we carry out a thorough inspection of the avulsed tendon and the last 5–6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm of the degenerated tendon is resected. We then place 2 two non-absorbable number 5 Ethibond Bunnell sutures in the avulsed tendon. This suture allows us to traction the tendon in its entirety up to its bony insertion (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>A).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We then palpate the radial tuberosity and make a second incision in the radial tuberosity, transmuscularly, separating the common and supinator extensor muscle, with the forearm in maximum pronation. We never expose the ulna. We prepare the bed of the radial tuberosity with high-speed burs in a trench 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm wide and several millimetres deep and leave a bone anchor with the threads, which will be used to anchor the tendon (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>B).</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We pass a curved, blunt haemostasis forceps from the forearm towards the arm, sliding it under the radial tuberosity and advancing proximally, between the radius and ulna, using flexion-extension manoeuvres until we reach the arm: the blunt tip of the forceps emerges from the transverse incision.</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We insert the Ethibond threads into the tip of the forceps and pull it distally until the threads pass into the forearm. Once the threads have been passed, we pull on them using flexion-extension manoeuvres until the avulsed tendon is completely extracted through the distal incision of the forearm; we remove the Ethibond suture and re-suture the tendon with Bunnell type stitches with the threads belonging to the transosseous anchor that has been previously placed in the radial tuberosity, knot and tightly tension the suture until the avulsed tendon is completely attached to the radial tuberosity with the arm in a neutral position.</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We then check for full elbow motion, in supination-pronation, flexion and full extension, free and without anomalies throughout the range of motion.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We close in layers, release the tourniquet for adequate haemostasis, leave no drain and place a splint with a compressive bandage in 90° elbow flexion with the forearm in a neutral position.</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">To minimise any ectopic calcifications, we avoid passing the dissecting forceps between the ulna and the anconeus or between the anconeus and the ECU (Kocher's interval). As a fixation system we used a transosseous suture using a non-absorbable, 5.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm Healix anchor (DePuy Synthes, Madrid, Spain) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>C). After suturing (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>D), patients are immobilised for 4 weeks in a splint and sling and then follow a 6-week rehabilitation programme.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Evaluation of clinical progress</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">One year after surgery, the functional progression of the injured arm was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0065"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> Muscle strength was assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) questionnaire.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0070"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Range of motion (ROM) was determined by measuring degrees of extension and flexion.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Statistical analysis</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The data were analysed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics, version 22 (New York, USA). Qualitative variables were expressed in counts or percentages. Relationships between these variables were studied using contingency tables and analysed using Pearson's <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">χ</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> test. Quantitative variables were expressed with the mean or median as a measure of central tendency and the standard deviation or minimum and maximum values as a measure of dispersion. The mean and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the mean were estimated for ROM. Normality was analysed with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The distribution of quantitative variables within the different categories of qualitative variables was tested using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">U</span> (2 categories) or Kruskal–Wallis (more than 2 categories) test. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to identify possible relationships between variables. All statistical comparisons were bilateral, with a significance level of 5%.</p></span></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Results</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The median time until the patients underwent biceps brachii tendon reattachment was 7 days (minimum: 1 day; maximum: 30 days). After surgery, one patient developed neuroapraxia, which resolved spontaneously. After surgery, the mean recovery time (time between surgery and discharge) was 4.43<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.21 months. All patients returned to their previous level of sporting activity.</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">One year after surgery, the patient's clinical and functional progression was assessed. The median pain measured using the VAS scale was 1.90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.89 (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>A) and the median MEPS scale was 90 (80–100) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>B). Muscle power evaluated using the MRC scale is shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>. The results of the MRC scale assessment showed the maximum score (score 5) in 16 cases (76.2%) while in the remaining 5 cases (23.8%) the score was 4+. Regarding assessment of ROM one year after surgery, patients had 136.67° mean extension (mean 95% CI 134.14–139.19) and −7.38° mean flexion (mean 95% CI: −10.04 to −4.72) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Fig. 4</a>). As expected, flexion and extension degrees were highly correlated (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">ϱ</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−.726; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001). Likewise, a statistically significant correlation was found between degrees of flexion and the MEPS scale (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">ϱ</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.470; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.032) and the MRC score (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">ϱ</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.581; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.006).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a> shows the epidemiological factors that could influence the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment. Eight patients had a medical history of interest, including severe allergies, asthma, hepatitis C virus infection, hypertension, thalassaemia minor, dyslipidaemia, or psoriasis. Of these, 6 patients with a medical history were under pharmacological treatment; 4 patients had undergone surgery for trauma, such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, disc herniation, knee prosthesis or frontal bone reconstruction (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>). A statistically significant relationship was only found between the MEPS scale and pharmacological treatment in those with a medical history of interest. Thus, the median MEPS in the patients without treatment was 100 (80–100), significantly higher than in the patients with treatment, whose median MEPS was 90 (80–90) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.010).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Discussion</span><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The present study evaluated the benefits of an anatomical repair technique for distal biceps brachial tendon rupture using a double-incision surgical approach. The results were evaluated in terms of clinical outcome and the patients’ return to their previous level of physical activity. Distal biceps brachial tendon rupture is a relatively rare injury affecting 1.2 per 100,000 patients,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> primarily middle-aged men aged 40–50 years. Our results are in line with the literature.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4,15</span></a> Thus, the patients included in the present study were all men with a mean age of 44.5 years and practised high-intensity sport. We found one bilateral case in a patient who trained with weights and simultaneously ruptured both distal biceps brachii tendons. In this regard, there are publications that indicate that the risk of rupture of the biceps brachii tendon in the contralateral arm may be increased by 8%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> The injury was in the dominant arm in the other patients and occurred while practising a medium- or high-intensity sporting activity, in competition or training.</p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There was only one complication in our series of patients, a neuroapraxia probably caused by the placement of intraoperative spacers and which resolved spontaneously. According to our results, there are clear advantages in terms of few postoperative complications and the athlete's full recovery. They were able to return to physical activity at the same level as before the injury. In this regard, Lang et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> conclude, in a retrospective study of 47 patients, that a double incision approach in the hands of an experienced surgeon is a simple and inexpensive method with satisfactory clinical results.</p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In our technique, we used a 5.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm “Healix” anchor, and found no cases of radioulnar synostosis. In addition, surgical exposure using our double incision technique allows excellent visualisation of the anatomical areas. This proves it to be a very convenient technique. Once the tendon is anchored, we perform all possible movements of the elbow to check for full range of motion.</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">One year after surgery, the mean pain score on the VAS scale was almost 2. Similar results have been published by other authors using other methods.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> However, we found that assessing pain to evaluate the benefits of this technique is irrelevant, since the patients presented hardly any pain, including the patient with a posterior interosseous injury, who, despite presenting neuroapraxia, had no pain. We find that other parameters are more useful to evaluate this surgical procedure. Indeed, pain, along with motion, stability, and function, was assessed with the MEPS scale. The patients included in this study showed a median score of 90 out of 100 at 12 months, which we consider an excellent result and in line with that published by other authors.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> We observed a statistically significant difference in MEPS score between the patients who had received some form of treatment for another medical reason and those who had received no treatment at all; the MEPS score was lower in the former than in the latter. Although we have no clear explanation for this, one could speculate that drug treatments might influence patients’ ability to heal or their own perception of their ability to heal, which could be reflected in the MEPS score. We believe that the MRC scale is another useful parameter to assess the benefits of this technique, used to measure muscle strength after surgery. The results obtained with respect to the MRC scale showed that most of the patients (73.9%) had full motion against resistance (score 5) and the rest (26.1%) had almost full motion against gravity and against resistance compared to the healthy contralateral side at 12 months after surgical treatment. These results demonstrate that after surgery the patients had regained their muscle function and were able to return to sport and reach the same sporting levels as before the injury. Finally, ROM was measured to evaluate the patient's progress. Here, we found that 12 months after surgery, the patients presented almost normal levels of motion (137.17° mean extension and −6.96° average flexion, considering that 145° and 0°, respectively, are the normal ROM of the elbow). These results show that our technique can restore full arm function, which helps patients return to sport.</p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A major advantage of the two-incision approach is that it allows more anatomical reinsertion of the avulsed distal biceps brachii tendon over its insertion in the radial tuberosity compared to the single anterior incision. Rollo et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a> using their own modification of the two-incision approach, conclude that the technique gives very good results because the anatomical structures are preserved. Tarallo et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> in a study of the advantages and disadvantages of anatomical repair using the two-incision technique in 63 patients, concluded that, although the most serious complications that can occur are nerve palsy and reduced motion, the technique is a valid treatment option, especially in young active patients, in whom flexion and supination strength are restored thanks to the anatomical reinsertion.</p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Although there are studies and series that speak of the benefits of early mobilisation of the reinserted tendon,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18,21</span></a> we agree with Prof. Bernard F. Morrey<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> that, when reinsertion is performed using suture anchors, we doubt that it is strong enough to allow early mobilisation. In our series we had no cases of stiffness and mobilisation in all the cases treated was satisfactory. Therefore, for our own peace of mind we opt for joint mobilisation and starting rehabilitation treatment after 4 weeks of immobilisation if we have used the two-incision approach for reconstruction.</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This study's main limitation is its retrospective design. In its favour is that all the patients followed the same treatment and follow-up protocol. Another limitation of the study is its small sample size. However, considering the very low incidence of this type of injury and the consistency of the results, this relatively small number of patients included should not be a serious limitation of the study. The main strength of the study is the consistency of the results obtained. Indeed, the small degree of variation found among the patients included in the study strongly supports the conclusions of the paper.</p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In conclusion, the double incision surgical approach for anatomical repair of distal biceps brachii tendon rupture is safe, provides good clinical results and allows patients to return to sport at pre-injury levels.</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Level of evidence</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Level of evidence IV<span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">.</span></p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Funding</span><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This work was funded by the <span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs0000">Fundación Dr. Pedro Guillén</span>.</p></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Conflict of interests</span><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:13 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1522377" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Background" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Patients" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1380386" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1522378" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Antecedentes y objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Pacientes" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1380387" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Materials and methods" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Patients" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Surgical procedure" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Evaluation of clinical progress" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Statistical analysis" ] ] ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Level of evidence" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Funding" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Conflict of interests" ] 11 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xack534688" "titulo" => "Acknowledgements" ] 12 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2019-09-02" "fechaAceptado" => "2020-10-31" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1380386" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Biceps brachii tendon" 1 => "Distal brachial tendon rupture" 2 => "Double-incision surgical procedure" 3 => "Anatomical repair" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1380387" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Tendón del bíceps braquial" 1 => "Rotura del tendón distal del bíceps braquial" 2 => "Procedimiento quirúrgico de la doble incisión" 3 => "Reparación anatómica" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Background</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">and objective The aim of this work was to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with biceps brachii tendon rupture who underwent a surgical tendon reconstruction using our own modified double approach technique.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Patients</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The study was performed in 20 patients (21 cases) with biceps brachii tendon rupture. Patients were treated with our own double-approach surgical technique consisting of 2 minimum incisions. After one year follow-up, functional evaluation was assessed using the mayo Elbow Performance Score, muscle strength was estimated with the Medical Research Council questionnaire and pain was evaluated with the Visual Analogic Scale. Range of motion was determined by measuring extension and flexion.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">One year after surgery all patients had returned to sports at the same level they had previously. Visual Analogic Scale was 1.90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.89 (mean<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>standard deviation) and median Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 90 (minimum–maximum: 80–100). Of them, 16 patients (76.2%) showed the highest Medical Research Council score, score 5, while 6 cases (26.1%) still scored 4+. Patients had a mean of 136.67° flexion (95% CI: 134.14°–139.19°) and −7.38° extension (95% CI: −10.04° to −4.72°).</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusions</span><p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Double-incision surgical approach for distal biceps brachial tendon rupture anatomical repair is a safe technique, providing results that allow patients muscle recovery and return to sports.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Background" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Patients" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Antecedentes y objetivo</span><p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">En este trabajo se estudió la evolución clínica de pacientes con rotura de tendón del bíceps braquial tratados mediante reconstrucción quirúrgica según nuestra propia técnica de doble incisión.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Pacientes</span><p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se incluyó a 20 pacientes (21 casos) de rotura de tendón del bíceps braquial tratados mediante nuestra propia técnica quirúrgica de doble abordaje modificada, consistente en 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>incisiones mínimas. La evaluación funcional se determinó mediante la escala <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Mayo Elbow Performance Score</span>, la fuerza muscular se determinó con el cuestionario <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Medical Research Council</span> y el dolor mediante la Escala Analógica Visual a los 12 meses de seguimiento. Se determinó el rango de movilidad midiendo los grados de flexión y extensión.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Un año después de la cirugía todos los pacientes habían vuelto al deporte al mismo nivel que tenían previamente. La puntuación de Escala Analógica Visual fue de 1,90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,89 (media<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>desviación estándar) y la mediana de la escala <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Mayo Elbow Performance Score</span> de 90 (mínimo-máximo: 80-100). Del total, 16 (76,2%) presentaron la máxima puntuación en la escala <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Medical Research Council</span> (puntuación 5), mientras que 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>casos (23,81%) tuvieron una puntación de 4+. La media de extensión fue de 136,67° (IC 95%: 134,14°-139,19°) y −7,38° de flexión (IC 95%: [−10,04°]-[−4,72°]).</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">El abordaje quirúrgico de la doble incisión para la reparación anatómica de las roturas de tendón distal del bíceps braquial es seguro y proporciona resultados que permiten la recuperación muscular y la vuelta al deporte de los pacientes.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Antecedentes y objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Pacientes" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Ibáñez E, Araiza E, Rodríguez-Iñigo E, Guillén-García P, López-Alcorocho JM. Reparación anatómica de las lesiones del tendón distal del bíceps braquial utilizando la técnica quirúrgica de doble incisión. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2021;65:305–311.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:5 [ 0 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1130 "Ancho" => 1505 "Tamanyo" => 228868 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">(A) Preparation and isolation of the distal tendon. (B) Lateral approach and exposure of the radial tuberosity. (C) Tendon anchoring. (D) Final suturing.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1070 "Ancho" => 2508 "Tamanyo" => 107152 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0010" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Box plot one year after the intervention. (A) Showing pain measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). (B) Functional assessment of the injured arm measured using the MEPS (Mayo Evaluation Performance Scale).</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 837 "Ancho" => 1412 "Tamanyo" => 52996 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0015" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Number of patients with scores 4+ and 5 on the MRC (Medical Research Council) scale.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1059 "Ancho" => 2512 "Tamanyo" => 112844 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0020" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Range of motion at one year follow-up shown in a box plot. (A) Degrees of extension. (B) Degrees of flexion.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0025" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Data in number and percentage.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Medical history \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">12 (60.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (40.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Pharmacological treatment for ongoing diseases \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">14 (70.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 (30.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Previous surgeries \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">16 (80.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4 (20.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Smoker \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">16 (80.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4 (20.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2616307.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Epidemiological factors of the patients included in the study.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:21 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Distal biceps tendon rupture: current concepts" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P. Sarda" 1 => "A. Qaddori" 2 => "F. Nauschutz" 3 => "L. Boulton" 4 => "R. Nanda" 5 => "N. Bayliss" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.029" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Injury" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "44" "paginaInicial" => "417" "paginaFinal" => "420" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23199755" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii: a biomechanical study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "B.F. Morrey" 1 => "L.J. Askew" 2 => "K.N. An" 3 => "J.H. Dobyns" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg (Am)" "fecha" => "1985" "volumen" => "67A" "paginaInicial" => "418" "paginaFinal" => "421" "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0002937813002251" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00029378" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii: operative versus non-operative treatment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "B.E. Baker" 1 => "D. Bierwagen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg (Am)" "fecha" => "1985" "volumen" => "67" "paginaInicial" => "414" "paginaFinal" => "417" "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0002937815000976" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00029378" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Distal biceps tendon ruptures: incidence, demographics and the effect of smoking" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M.R. Safran" 1 => "S.M. Graham" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Orthop Rel Res" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "404" "paginaInicial" => "275" "paginaFinal" => "283" ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Tendon ruptures with secondary hyperparathyroidism: a case report" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R.J. Cirincione" 1 => "B.E. Baker" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg (Am)" "fecha" => "1975" "volumen" => "57-A" "paginaInicial" => "852" "paginaFinal" => "853" "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0002937817307603" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00029378" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Tears of major tendons in chronic acidosis with elastosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "K.J. Murphy" 1 => "I. McPhee" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg (Am)" "fecha" => "1965" "volumen" => "47A" "paginaInicial" => "1253" "paginaFinal" => "1265" ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Simultaneous bilateral rupture of the patella tendon and quadriceps expansions in systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J.A. Wener" 1 => "A.J. Schein" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg (Am)" "fecha" => "1974" "volumen" => "56-A" "paginaInicial" => "823" "paginaFinal" => "824" ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The distal biceps tendon" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C.C. Schmidt" 1 => "C.D. Jarrett" 2 => "B.T. Brown" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Hand Surg" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "38" "paginaInicial" => "811" "paginaFinal" => "821" ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The hook test for distal biceps tendon avulsion" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "O.S. Driscoll" 1 => "L.B. Gonsalves" 2 => "P. Dietz" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1177/0363546507305016" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Sports Med" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "35" "paginaInicial" => "1865" "paginaFinal" => "1869" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17687121" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0050" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The biceps squeeze test for diagnosis of distal biceps tendon ruptures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "R.T. Ruland" 1 => "R.P. Dunbar" 2 => "J.D. Bowen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Orthop Relat Res" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "437" "paginaInicial" => "128" "paginaFinal" => "131" ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0055" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Roturas del tendón distal del bíceps braquial. Revisión de 40 casos" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "F.J. Santos" 1 => "S. Navarro" 2 => "M. Contreras" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Patolología del Aparato Locomotor" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "16" "paginaFinal" => "23" "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0002937815012673" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00029378" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0060" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A method for reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "H.B. Boyd" 1 => "L.D. Anderson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg (Am)" "fecha" => "1961" "volumen" => "43-A" "paginaInicial" => "1041" "paginaFinal" => "1043" ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0065" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "U.G. Longo" 1 => "F. Franceschi" 2 => "M. Loppini" 3 => "N. Maffulli" 4 => "V. Denaro" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/bmb/ldn023" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br Med Bull" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "87" "paginaInicial" => "131" "paginaFinal" => "161" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18539627" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0070" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Grading of muscle power: comparison of MRC and analogue scales by physiotherapists. Medical Research Council" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "J. John" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:4 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int J Rehabil Res" "fecha" => "1984" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "173e81" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0075" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Retrospective evaluation of surgical anatomical repair of distal biceps brachii tendon rupture using suture anchor fixation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "J. Witkowski" 1 => "A. Królikowska" 2 => "A. Czamara" 3 => "P. Reichert" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.12659/msm.903723" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Med Sci Monit" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "23" "paginaInicial" => "4961" "paginaFinal" => "4972" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040248" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0080" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Bilateral distal biceps tendon ruptures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J.B. Green" 1 => "T.L. Skaife" 2 => "B.M. Leslie" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.09.043" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Hand Surg Am" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "37" "paginaInicial" => "120" "paginaFinal" => "123" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22119598" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0085" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Treatment of primary total distal biceps tendon rupture using cortical button, transosseus fixation and suture anchor: a single center experience" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "N.W. Lang" 1 => "A. Bukaty" 2 => "G.D. Sturz" 3 => "P. Platzer" 4 => "J. Joestl" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.otsr.2018.05.013" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Orthop Traumatol Surg Res" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "104" "paginaInicial" => "859" "paginaFinal" => "863" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30036722" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Double incision repair technique with immediate mobilization for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures provides good results after 2 years in active patients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "H. Barret" 1 => "M. Winter" 2 => "O. Gastaud" 3 => "D.J. Saliken" 4 => "M.O. Gauci" 5 => "N. Bronsard" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.otsr.2018.10.012" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Orthop Traumatol Surg Res" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "105" "paginaInicial" => "323" "paginaFinal" => "328" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30528138" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Distal biceps tendon rupture: advantages and drawbacks of the anatomical reinsertion with a modified double incision approach" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "L. Tarallo" 1 => "M. Lombardi" 2 => "F. Zambianchi" 3 => "A. Giorgini" 4 => "F. Catani" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/s12891-018-2278-1" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "BMC Musculoskelet Disord" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "19" "paginaInicial" => "364" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305070" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0002937817301825" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00029378" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Efficacy of the «Salento technique», a modified two-incision approach in distal biceps brachii tendon repair. Surgical description and outcomes analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "G. Rollo" 1 => "L. Meccariello" 2 => "R. Rotini" 3 => "P. Pichierri" 4 => "M. Bisaccia" 5 => "M. Fortina" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jcot.2019.02.006" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Orthop Trauma" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "10" "paginaInicial" => "959" "paginaFinal" => "964" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31528075" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Does immediate elbow mobilization after distal biceps tendon repair carry the risk of wound breakdown, failure of repair, or patient dissatisfaction?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J.R. Smith" 1 => "R. Amirfeyz" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.066" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Shoulder Elbow Surg" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "25" "paginaInicial" => "810" "paginaFinal" => "815" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26897313" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "agradecimientos" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "identificador" => "xack534688" "titulo" => "Acknowledgements" "texto" => "<p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We would like to thank Mario Wensell for the critical review of the manuscript.</p>" "vista" => "all" ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/19888856/0000006500000004/v1_202106080544/S1988885621000407/v1_202106080544/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "7579" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Review article" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/19888856/0000006500000004/v1_202106080544/S1988885621000407/v1_202106080544/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1988885621000407?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
| Year/Month | Html | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 November | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 October | 29 | 8 | 37 |
| 2024 September | 53 | 10 | 63 |
| 2024 August | 46 | 11 | 57 |
| 2024 July | 29 | 5 | 34 |
| 2024 June | 35 | 2 | 37 |
| 2024 May | 19 | 4 | 23 |
| 2024 April | 25 | 5 | 30 |
| 2024 March | 60 | 6 | 66 |
| 2024 February | 72 | 8 | 80 |
| 2024 January | 70 | 14 | 84 |
| 2023 December | 67 | 16 | 83 |
| 2023 November | 65 | 11 | 76 |
| 2023 October | 84 | 15 | 99 |
| 2023 September | 63 | 8 | 71 |
| 2023 August | 52 | 10 | 62 |
| 2023 July | 55 | 4 | 59 |
| 2023 June | 47 | 1 | 48 |
| 2023 May | 55 | 3 | 58 |
| 2023 April | 32 | 2 | 34 |
| 2023 March | 108 | 27 | 135 |
| 2023 February | 13 | 4 | 17 |
| 2023 January | 10 | 5 | 15 |
| 2022 December | 23 | 30 | 53 |
| 2022 November | 21 | 4 | 25 |
| 2022 October | 21 | 8 | 29 |
| 2022 September | 24 | 9 | 33 |
| 2022 August | 28 | 15 | 43 |
| 2022 July | 18 | 16 | 34 |
| 2022 June | 17 | 18 | 35 |
| 2022 May | 22 | 7 | 29 |
| 2022 April | 25 | 10 | 35 |
| 2022 March | 19 | 7 | 26 |
| 2022 February | 13 | 6 | 19 |
| 2022 January | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| 2021 December | 16 | 8 | 24 |
| 2021 November | 21 | 9 | 30 |
| 2021 October | 21 | 11 | 32 |
| 2021 September | 18 | 10 | 28 |
| 2021 August | 27 | 9 | 36 |
| 2021 July | 43 | 12 | 55 |
| 2021 June | 11 | 5 | 16 |
| 2021 May | 3 | 4 | 7 |
Show all
