metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition) Validation of the Spanish Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) in outpati...
Journal Information
Vol. 4. Issue 1.
Pages 9-18 (January 2011)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 4. Issue 1.
Pages 9-18 (January 2011)
Full text access
Validation of the Spanish Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) in outpatients with stable and unstable schizophrenia
Validación de la versión española de la escala de Funcionamiento Personal y Social en pacientes ambulatorios con esquizofrenia estable o inestable
Visits
1756
María Paz Garcia-Portillaa,
Corresponding author
albert@uniovi.es

Corresponding author.
, Pilar Alejandra Saiza, Manuel Bousoñoa, María Teresa Bascarana, Carlos Guzmán-Quilob, Julio Bobesa, on behalf of Spanish PSP scale validation group
a Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Oviedo, Spain
b Departamento Médico, Janssen-Cilag SA, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Introduction

The main long-term therapeutic goals of schizophrenia should go beyond the symptoms and include the improvement of patients’ psychosocial functioning and quality of life. The aim of this study was to validate the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale in Spanish outpatients with schizophrenia.

Materials and methods

Naturalistic, 6-month follow-up, multicentre study. 244 patients and 76 controls were evaluated using the PSP, the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), and the Clinical Global Impression–Severity (CGI-S) and Change (CGI-C) scales.

Results

Internal reliability = 0.87. Test-retest reliability = 0.98. Construct validity = 1 component that explained 73.2% of the variance. Convergent validity: Pearson correlation coefficient between PSP and SOFAS= 0.95 (p<0.0001), between PSP and CGI-S=−0.88 (p<0.0001). Discriminant validity: the PSP discriminates between patients and controls [50.3 versus 91.9, p<0.0001] and among patients with mild, moderate, and severe schizophrenia according to CGI-S scores [73 versus 56.6 versus 37.5, p<0.0001]. Area under the curve = 0.986. A cut-off point of 79 on the PSP scale provided good sensitivity (94.3%) and specificity (96.1%) for identifying patients and controls according to their level of functioning. At month 6 significant improvements (p<0.0001) were seen in PSP, SOFAS, and CGI-C scores. The PSP was sensitive to improvement; a score of very much improved in the CGI-C corresponds to a improvement of 34 points in the PSP.

Conclusion

The Spanish PSP is a reliable, valid and sensitive instrument for measuring functioning in outpatients with schizophrenia. As a brief, clinician-rated instrument, the PSP scale seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a mean of identifying and monitoring changes in patient's functioning.

Keywords:
PSP
Social functioning
Personalfunctioning
Schizophrenia
Psychometric properties
Resumen
Introducción

Uno de los objetivos terapéuticos principales a largo plazo en la esquizofrenia incluye la mejoría en el funcionamiento psicosocial y la calidad de vida del paciente. El objetivo de este estudio fue validar la versión española de la escala de Funcionamiento Personal y Social (PSP, del inglés Personal and Social Performance) en pacientes ambulatorios con esquizofrenia.

Material y métodos

Estudio naturalístico, de 6 meses de seguimiento, multicéntrico, en el que se evaluó a 244 pacientes ambulatorios y 76 controles con la PSP, la Escala de Evaluación del Funcionamiento Social y Ocupacional (SOFAS, del inglés Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale) y la Escala de Evaluación de Gravedad de la Enfermedad (ICG-G, en sus siglas en inglés)/Impresión Clínica Global del Cambio (ICG-C).

Resultados

La consistencia interna fue de 0,87, la fiabilidad test-retest, de 0,98, y la validez de constructo, 1, componente que explicaba el 73,2% de la varianza. Validez convergente: coeficiente de correlación entre las puntuaciones PSP y SOFAS = 0,95 (p <0,0001), y entre PSP e ICG-G = –0,88 (p < 0,0001). Validez discriminante: la PSP diferenció entre pacientes y controles (50,3 frente a 91,9; p < 0,0001), y entre pacientes con esquizofrenia leve, moderada y grave en función de la puntuación en la ICG-G (73 frente a 56,6 frente a 37,5; p < 0,0001). El área bajo la curva fue de 0,986. Para un punto de corte de 79, la PSP identificó a pacientes y controles según su nivel de funcionamiento con una sensibilidad del 94,3% y una especificidad del 96,1% En el sexto mes se observaron mejorías significativas (p < 0,0001) en las puntuaciones PSP, SOFAS e ICG-C. La PSP demostró ser sensible a los cambios; una puntuación de mucha mejoría en la ICG-C correspondía a una mejoría de 34 puntos en la PSP.

Conclusión

La versión española de la PSP es un instrumento fiable, válido y sensible para medir el funcionamiento de los pacientes ambulatorios con esquizofrenia. Dada su brevedad, es un instrumento apropiado para ser utilizado en la práctica clínica cotidiana para cuantificar y controlar el funcionamiento de los pacientes.

Palabras clave:
PSP
Funcionamiento social
Funcionamiento personal
Esquizofrenia
Propiedades psicométricas
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
J.P. Lindenmayer.
Increasing awareness of patient functional impairment in schizophrenia and its measurement.
Primary Psychiatry, 15 (2008), pp. 89-93
[2.]
J. Rymaszewska, J. Jarosz-Nowak, A. Kiejna, T. Lallert, M. Schützwohl, S. Priebe, et al.
Social disability in different mental disorders.
Eur Psychiat, 22 (2007), pp. 160-166
[3.]
L. San, A. Ciudad, E. Álvarez, J. Bobes, I. Gilaberte.
Symptomatic remission and social/vocational functioning in outpatients with schizophrenia: prevalence and associations in a cross-sectional study.
Eur Psychiat, 22 (2007), pp. 490-498
[4.]
J. Bobes, M.P. Garcia-Portilla, M.T. Bascaran, P.A. Saiz, M. Bousoño.
Quality of life in schizophrenic patients.
Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 9 (2007), pp. 215-226
[5.]
P. Falkai, T. Wobrock, J. Lieberman, B. Glenthoj, W.F. Gattaz, H.-J. Möller.
WFSBP Task Force on Treatment Guidelines for Schizophrenia. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia Part 1: Acute treatment of schizophrenia.
The World J Biol Psychiatry, 6 (2005), pp. 132-191
[6.]
G. Juckel, D. Schaub, N. Fuchs, U. Naumann, I. Uhl, H. Witthaus, et al.
Validation of the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale in a German sample of acutely ill patients with schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res, 104 (2008), pp. 287-293
[7.]
J.P. McEvoy.
Functional outcomes in schizophrenia.
J Clin Psychiatry, 69 (2008), pp. 20-24
[8.]
H.A. Nasrallah, R. Lasser.
Improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia: Achieving remission.
J Psychopharmacol, 20 (2006), pp. 57-61
[9.]
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Industry: Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
[10.]
J. van Os, T. Burns, R. Cavallaro, S. Leucht, J. Peuskens, L. Helldin, M. Bernardo, C. Arango, W. Fleischhacker, B. Lachaux, J.M. Kane.
Standardized remission criteria in schizophrenia.
Acta Psychiatr Scand, 113 (2006), pp. 91-95
[11.]
T. Burns.
Evolution of outcome measures in schizophrenia.
Br J Psychiatry, 191 (2007), pp. s1-s6
[12.]
K.T. Mueser.
Cognitive functioning, social adjustment and long term outcome in schizophrenia.
Cognition in Schizophrenia: Impairments, Importance and Treatment Strategies, pp. 157-177
[13.]
American Psychiatric Association.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
third ed, American Psychiatric Association, (1987),
[14.]
H.H. Goldman, A.E. Skodol, T.R. Lave.
Revising axis V for DSM-IV: A review of measures of social functioning.
Am J Psychiatry, 149 (1992), pp. 1148-1156
[15.]
P.L. Morosini, L. Magliano, L. Brambilla, S. Ugolini, R. Pioli.
Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning.
Acta Psychiatr Scand, 101 (2000), pp. 323-329
[16.]
L. Kleinman, J. Lieberman, S. Dube, R. Mohs, Y. Zhao, B. Kinon, et al.
Development and psychometric performance of the schizophrenia objective functioning instrument: An interviewer administered measure of function.
Schizophr Res, 107 (2009), pp. 275-285
[17.]
P.M. Llorca, C. Lancon, S. Lancrenon, F.J. Bayle, H. Caci, F. Rouillon, et al.
The “Functional Remission of General Schizophrenia” (FROGS) scale: Development and validation of a new questionnaire.
Schizophr Res, 113 (2009), pp. 218-225
[18.]
R. Apiquian, R.E. Ulloa, M. Herrera-Estrella, A. Moreno-Gomez, S. Erosa, V. Contreras, et al.
Validity of the Spanish version of the Personal and Social Performance scale in schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res, 112 (2009), pp. 181-186
[19.]
G. Juckel, P.L. Morosini.
The new approach: psychosocial functioning as a necessary outcome criterion for therapeutic success in schizophrenia.
Curr Opin Psychiatry, 21 (2008), pp. 630-639
[20.]
D.L. Patrick, T. Burns, P.L. Morosini, M. Rothman, D.D. Gagnon, D. Wild, et al.
Reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the clinician-rated Personal and Social Performance scale in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia.
Curr Med Res Opi, 25 (2009), pp. 325-338
[21.]
A.K. Kawata, D.A. Revicki.
Psychometric properties of the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) among individuals with schizophrenia living in the community.
Qual Life Res, 17 (2008), pp. 1247-1256
[22.]
H. Nasrallah, P.L. Morosini, D.D. Gagnon.
Reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the Personal and Social Performance scale in patients with stable schizophrenia.
Psychiatr Res, 161 (2008), pp. 213-224
[23.]
R. Emsley, J. Berwaerts, M. Eerdekens, M. Kramer, R. Lane, P. Lim, et al.
Efficacy and safety of oral paliperidone extendedrelease tablets in the treatment of acute schizophrenia: pooled data from three 52-week open-label studies.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 23 (2008), pp. 343-356
[24.]
D.L. Patrick, T. Burns, P.L. Morosini, D.D. Gagnon, M. Rothman, I. Adriaenssen.
Measuring social functioning with the Personal and Social Performance scale in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia: Interpretation of results of a pooled analysis of three phase III trials of Paliperidone Extended-Release tablets.
Clin Therapeut, 32 (2010), pp. 275-292
[25.]
American Psychiatric Association.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
fourth ed, American Psychiatric Association, (1994),
[26.]
M.J. Hilsenroth, S.J. Ackerman, M.D. Blagys, B.D. Baumann, M.R. Baity, S.R. Smith, et al.
Reliability and validity of DSM-IV Axis V.
Am J Psychiatry, 157 (2000), pp. 1858-1863
[27.]
W. Guy.
Early Clinical Drug Evaluation (ECDEU)Assessment Manual.
National Institute of Mental Health, (1976),
[28.]
European Medicines Agency. Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products. 2004. http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/13939104en.pdf
Copyright © 2011. SEP y SEPB
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos