metricas
covid
Buscar en
Vacunas (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Vacunas (English Edition) Compulsory or recommended vaccination: Dimensions from the legal perspective
Journal Information

Statistics

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

Review article
Compulsory or recommended vaccination: Dimensions from the legal perspective
Vacunación obligatoria o recomendada: acotaciones desde el Derecho
C. Cierco Seira
Área de Derecho Administrativo, Universidad de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
Read
2
Times
was read the article
1
Total PDF
1
Total HTML
Share statistics
 array:23 [
  "pii" => "S2445146020300078"
  "issn" => "24451460"
  "doi" => "10.1016/j.vacune.2020.05.002"
  "estado" => "S300"
  "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-01-01"
  "aid" => "146"
  "copyrightAnyo" => "2020"
  "documento" => "article"
  "crossmark" => 1
  "subdocumento" => "rev"
  "cita" => "Vacunas. 2020;21:50-6"
  "abierto" => array:3 [
    "ES" => false
    "ES2" => false
    "LATM" => false
  ]
  "gratuito" => false
  "lecturas" => array:1 [
    "total" => 0
  ]
  "Traduccion" => array:1 [
    "es" => array:19 [
      "pii" => "S1576988720300066"
      "issn" => "15769887"
      "doi" => "10.1016/j.vacun.2020.03.003"
      "estado" => "S300"
      "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-01-01"
      "aid" => "146"
      "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U."
      "documento" => "article"
      "crossmark" => 1
      "subdocumento" => "rev"
      "cita" => "Vacunas. 2020;21:50-6"
      "abierto" => array:3 [
        "ES" => false
        "ES2" => false
        "LATM" => false
      ]
      "gratuito" => false
      "lecturas" => array:1 [
        "total" => 0
      ]
      "es" => array:12 [
        "idiomaDefecto" => true
        "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Revisi&#243;n</span>"
        "titulo" => "Vacunaci&#243;n obligatoria o recomendada&#58; acotaciones desde el Derecho"
        "tienePdf" => "es"
        "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es"
        "tieneResumen" => array:2 [
          0 => "es"
          1 => "en"
        ]
        "paginas" => array:1 [
          0 => array:2 [
            "paginaInicial" => "50"
            "paginaFinal" => "56"
          ]
        ]
        "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
          "en" => array:1 [
            "titulo" => "Compulsory or recommended vaccination&#58; dimensions from the legal perspective"
          ]
        ]
        "contieneResumen" => array:2 [
          "es" => true
          "en" => true
        ]
        "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [
          "es" => true
        ]
        "contienePdf" => array:1 [
          "es" => true
        ]
        "autores" => array:1 [
          0 => array:2 [
            "autoresLista" => "C&#46; Cierco Seira"
            "autores" => array:1 [
              0 => array:2 [
                "nombre" => "C&#46;"
                "apellidos" => "Cierco Seira"
              ]
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
      "idiomaDefecto" => "es"
      "Traduccion" => array:1 [
        "en" => array:9 [
          "pii" => "S2445146020300078"
          "doi" => "10.1016/j.vacune.2020.05.002"
          "estado" => "S300"
          "subdocumento" => ""
          "abierto" => array:3 [
            "ES" => false
            "ES2" => false
            "LATM" => false
          ]
          "gratuito" => false
          "lecturas" => array:1 [
            "total" => 0
          ]
          "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
          "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2445146020300078?idApp=UINPBA00004N"
        ]
      ]
      "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1576988720300066?idApp=UINPBA00004N"
      "url" => "/15769887/0000002100000001/v2_202007040738/S1576988720300066/v2_202007040738/es/main.assets"
    ]
  ]
  "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [
    "pii" => "S2445146020300029"
    "issn" => "24451460"
    "doi" => "10.1016/j.vacune.2019.07.001"
    "estado" => "S300"
    "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-01-01"
    "aid" => "140"
    "documento" => "article"
    "crossmark" => 1
    "subdocumento" => "fla"
    "cita" => "Vacunas. 2020;21:57-63"
    "abierto" => array:3 [
      "ES" => false
      "ES2" => false
      "LATM" => false
    ]
    "gratuito" => false
    "lecturas" => array:1 [
      "total" => 0
    ]
    "en" => array:12 [
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
      "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Special article</span>"
      "titulo" => "Vaccine bioethics and public health"
      "tienePdf" => "en"
      "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en"
      "tieneResumen" => array:2 [
        0 => "en"
        1 => "es"
      ]
      "paginas" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "paginaInicial" => "57"
          "paginaFinal" => "63"
        ]
      ]
      "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
        "es" => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "Bio&#233;tica de vacunaciones y salud p&#250;blica"
        ]
      ]
      "contieneResumen" => array:2 [
        "en" => true
        "es" => true
      ]
      "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "contienePdf" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "autores" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "autoresLista" => "A&#46; Varo Baena"
          "autores" => array:1 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "A&#46;"
              "apellidos" => "Varo Baena"
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
    "Traduccion" => array:1 [
      "es" => array:9 [
        "pii" => "S1576988719301487"
        "doi" => "10.1016/j.vacun.2019.10.002"
        "estado" => "S300"
        "subdocumento" => ""
        "abierto" => array:3 [
          "ES" => false
          "ES2" => false
          "LATM" => false
        ]
        "gratuito" => false
        "lecturas" => array:1 [
          "total" => 0
        ]
        "idiomaDefecto" => "es"
        "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1576988719301487?idApp=UINPBA00004N"
      ]
    ]
    "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2445146020300029?idApp=UINPBA00004N"
    "url" => "/24451460/0000002100000001/v4_202105130819/S2445146020300029/v4_202105130819/en/main.assets"
  ]
  "itemAnterior" => array:18 [
    "pii" => "S244514602030008X"
    "issn" => "24451460"
    "doi" => "10.1016/j.vacune.2020.05.003"
    "estado" => "S300"
    "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-01-01"
    "aid" => "147"
    "documento" => "article"
    "crossmark" => 1
    "subdocumento" => "rev"
    "cita" => "Vacunas. 2020;21:41-9"
    "abierto" => array:3 [
      "ES" => false
      "ES2" => false
      "LATM" => false
    ]
    "gratuito" => false
    "lecturas" => array:1 [
      "total" => 0
    ]
    "en" => array:13 [
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
      "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review</span>"
      "titulo" => "Measles&#46; Re-emergence on its path to eradication"
      "tienePdf" => "en"
      "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en"
      "tieneResumen" => array:2 [
        0 => "en"
        1 => "es"
      ]
      "paginas" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "paginaInicial" => "41"
          "paginaFinal" => "49"
        ]
      ]
      "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
        "es" => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "Sarampi&#243;n&#46; Reemergencia en el camino de la erradicaci&#243;n"
        ]
      ]
      "contieneResumen" => array:2 [
        "en" => true
        "es" => true
      ]
      "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "contienePdf" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [
        "original" => 0
        "multimedia" => array:8 [
          "identificador" => "fig0010"
          "etiqueta" => "Fig&#46; 2"
          "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA"
          "mostrarFloat" => true
          "mostrarDisplay" => false
          "figura" => array:1 [
            0 => array:4 [
              "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg"
              "Alto" => 851
              "Ancho" => 1501
              "Tamanyo" => 129734
            ]
          ]
          "detalles" => array:1 [
            0 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "at0010"
              "detalle" => "Fig&#46; "
              "rol" => "short"
            ]
          ]
          "descripcion" => array:1 [
            "en" => "<p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Measles&#46; A&#46; Measles facies &#40;conjunctivitis&#44; rhinitis and stomatitis&#41;&#46; B&#46; Characteristic maculopapular exanthema&#46;</p>"
          ]
        ]
      ]
      "autores" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "autoresLista" => "F&#46;A&#46; Moraga-Llop"
          "autores" => array:1 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "F&#46;A&#46;"
              "apellidos" => "Moraga-Llop"
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
    "Traduccion" => array:1 [
      "es" => array:9 [
        "pii" => "S1576988720300078"
        "doi" => "10.1016/j.vacun.2020.04.001"
        "estado" => "S300"
        "subdocumento" => ""
        "abierto" => array:3 [
          "ES" => false
          "ES2" => false
          "LATM" => false
        ]
        "gratuito" => false
        "lecturas" => array:1 [
          "total" => 0
        ]
        "idiomaDefecto" => "es"
        "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1576988720300078?idApp=UINPBA00004N"
      ]
    ]
    "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S244514602030008X?idApp=UINPBA00004N"
    "url" => "/24451460/0000002100000001/v4_202105130819/S244514602030008X/v4_202105130819/en/main.assets"
  ]
  "en" => array:18 [
    "idiomaDefecto" => true
    "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review article</span>"
    "titulo" => "Compulsory or recommended vaccination&#58; Dimensions from the legal perspective"
    "tieneTextoCompleto" => true
    "paginas" => array:1 [
      0 => array:2 [
        "paginaInicial" => "50"
        "paginaFinal" => "56"
      ]
    ]
    "autores" => array:1 [
      0 => array:3 [
        "autoresLista" => "C&#46; Cierco Seira"
        "autores" => array:1 [
          0 => array:3 [
            "nombre" => "C&#46;"
            "apellidos" => "Cierco Seira"
            "email" => array:1 [
              0 => "cesar.cierco@udl.cat"
            ]
          ]
        ]
        "afiliaciones" => array:1 [
          0 => array:2 [
            "entidad" => "&#193;rea de Derecho Administrativo&#44; Universidad de Lleida&#44; Lleida&#44; Spain"
            "identificador" => "aff0005"
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
      "es" => array:1 [
        "titulo" => "Vacunaci&#243;n obligatoria o recomendada&#58; acotaciones desde el Derecho"
      ]
    ]
    "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">The importance of regulating vaccination without succumbing to simple disjunctives</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Vaccination is suffering the consequences of three aberrations that&#44; unfortunately&#44; have taken over thought and analysis about more than a few matters in our time&#58; over-simplification&#44; disinformation and Manichaeism&#46; If we refer specifically to Spain&#44; it is true that questioning vaccination is neither a major tendency here nor one that has much impact&#46; This does not mean that it can be ignored or even less that we can lower our guard against what is occurring abroad&#46; The World Health Organisation has expressed serious concern about the backward step in vaccination in many parts of the world&#44; including developed countries which until recently enjoyed optimum vaccination rates&#46; Some countries as close to Spain as France and Italy have also experienced serious difficulties in this field&#44; and these problems are more than sufficient reasons for thought&#46; On the other hand&#44; it is also a fact that signs of the influence of certain anti-vaccination currents of thought and positions have emerged here&#46; It is even more worrying that signs of weakness in the social image of vaccines and in citizen trust of systematic vaccination programs are emerging&#46; Anti-vaccine phenomena and above all vaccine-hesitance are not therefore new to us&#46;</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The real influence <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">hic et nunc</span> of anti-vaccination currents cannot therefore be ignored&#46; It is also necessary to pay attention to certain social indicators which emerge from sociological studies on citizens&#8217; opinions of vaccination&#46; For example&#44; the European Commission report in the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Special Eurobarometer 488 on Europeans&#8217; attitudes towards vaccination</span> &#40;March&#8211;April 2019&#41;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> found that although the vast majority of Spaniards vaccinate&#44; we feel a certain degree of insecurity about the meaning and efficacy of vaccination&#46; A surprising finding here is that only 8 per cent of those surveyed believe the health authorities are the most reliable source of information about vaccination&#46; Although findings like this are striking&#44; they do not show anything that is really new&#46; Other previous studies had already indicated the presence of a certain distrust and feeling of a lack of information among citizens&#46; The <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Medical Barometer</span> &#40;2016&#41; of the Sociological Research Centre or the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Survey of Social Perception of Science</span> &#40;2018&#41; by the Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology contain relevant findings here&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2&#44;3</span></a> Among other specific points about how our vaccination system is perceived&#44; these documents warn that even though vaccination rates in Spain are within an optimum band&#44; a significant percentage of the vaccinated population visited the doctor because of advice by their paediatrician or other medical professional rather than any deep conviction&#46; This&#44; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">grosso modo</span>&#44; could be described as &#8220;inertia&#8221;&#44; and it largely depends on the trustworthy image of medical services and professionals regarding their quality and competence&#44; respectively&#46; Thus even though the current model is not in danger of losing momentum&#44; there are clouds on the horizon&#46; This is why it is highly important to deliberate and try to detect the inputs about vaccination citizens receive&#44; together with their resulting patterns of behaviour&#46; We also have to accept that the success of our model is currently based on the strength of the public health service and the commitment and work of medical professionals&#46; That is the positive side&#59; the negative side is that these professionals are heavily burdened with work and generally have very little time to spend on persuasion and finding new ways of combating disinformation&#46;</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It would be very hard to regulate vaccinations by simply drawing a line&#46; The search for answers to the challenges arising from planning and implementing a modern vaccination program demands subtle solutions and a complex mechanism with many parts&#46; These have to be arranged precisely&#44; so that it balance the interests involved&#46; Likewise&#44; it is fundamental that the legal debate about the role of the law and how it will function in this unique context takes place without artificial distractions&#44; distortions and even disinformation arising from over simplification&#44; falsehoods and Manichaeism above all&#46;</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I believe that one of these distortions may arise when selecting a vaccination model is presented as the choice between two opposing possibilities&#58; obligatory vaccination <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">versus</span> recommended vaccination&#46; I will try to refute this disjunctive argument by defending two ideas&#58;</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Firstly</span>&#58; that substantially less separates obligatory and recommended vaccination systems than is usually supposed or assumed&#46; However&#44; to see this it will be necessary to go into the details of the regulation&#44; placing it in context and comparing it with practice&#46;</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Secondly</span>&#58; the legal coverage of vaccination&#44; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">i&#46;e&#46;</span>&#44; its regulation&#44; which aims to be complete&#44; is necessary in both models&#44; even though the system is based on the voluntary adherence of citizens&#46;</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">The obligatory and recommended vaccination systems have the same purpose&#44; and there is a risk of rushed evaluation of the harshness and clarity of these strategies</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The first idea leads us to consider the existence of a substantial similarity between obligatory and recommended vaccination systems&#46; This similarity is based on their purpose&#44; which in both cases is fight disease by creating widespread individual immunity and the resulting herd immunity&#46; There is therefore no essential difference between the obligatory and recommended vaccination systems in terms of their aim&#46;</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The difference between obligation and recommendation therefore consists&#44; and this should be underlined as many times as may be necessary&#44; of an <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">instrumental choice</span> of how best to achieve a single aim&#46; It is the strategy that changes&#58; some people may believe it is better to ensure widespread vaccination by establishing a legal duty which applies equally to all citizens&#59; nevertheless&#44; other may consider it preferable to trust their voluntary actions&#44; based on their good educational level and the convincing information they have received on the individual&#44; social and mutual benefits of vaccination&#46; It is true that from a theoretical viewpoint and thinking of the public health ideal and deepest sense of human rights&#44; achievements attained by voluntary collaboration are better&#46; That is so&#46; However&#44; it is important to remember that this premise does not invalidate the legitimacy of the obligatory alternative&#46; The latter fits equally well within the parameters of public health science and respect for human rights&#46;</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Obligatory vaccination is based on a long and solid legal history&#46; The duty to vaccinate has been accepted by many constitutional guarantees&#44; and it is still accepted as valid&#46; There is therefore a solid jurisprudential <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">corpus</span> which supports the restriction of individual rights in favour of systematic vaccination programs&#46; This jurisprudential corpus has deep roots&#46; The historical United States&#8217; Supreme Court cases of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Jacobson vs&#46; Massachusetts</span> &#40;1905&#41; and <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Zucht vs&#46; King</span> &#40;1922&#41; are usually mentioned here&#46; Nevertheless&#44; I insist&#44; that the constitutional validity of the duty to vaccinate has been supported in many states and not only in the past&#44; but also in recent times&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> Thus to return to the European continent and our own times&#44; decisions by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic &#40;27 January 2015&#41; can be cited&#44; together with others by France &#40;20 March 2015&#41;&#59; Serbia &#40;26 October 2017&#41;&#59; Italy &#40;18 January 2018&#41;&#59; or Moldavia &#40;30 October 2018&#41;&#46;<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">These systems basically consist of a selection of strategy&#44; so it is clear that they will depend on the circumstances of each time and place&#46; This means that although one system or the other may be defended more strongly in conceptual terms&#44; both should be taken into account given that one of them will eventually be used&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> Discourse that is hostile to obligatory vaccination usually refers to the experience of countries which achieve excellent rates of coverage without needing to create a duty&#46; Spain is usually included among these countries&#46; The aim of this is to question whether obligation is excessive&#44; given that gentler means are equally effective and proven in preserving herd immunity&#46; Although this argument is solid in theory&#44; it is less consistent in practice&#46; And practical circumstances are&#44; as has been underlined here&#44; extremely important in vaccination&#46; Thus obligatory vaccination has to be judged in the light of the policy of each country&#44; in the light of its own circumstances&#46; This requires knowledge of the current epidemiological situation as well as the social image of vaccination&#44; together with the capacity of the public health service&#46; The same requirements apply when evaluating the success of a system based on recommendation&#46; Not everything can be attributed to the supposedly ideal adhesion of citizens to the cause of collective immunisation&#46; Perhaps everything can be explained by the quality and trustworthiness of the medical system and the training of the medical professionals who work in it&#46;</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I therefore do not agree that either model should be categorically rejected&#46; Rather than this&#44; I believe that rather than seeing them as antagonists&#44; pragmatism should lead to their being considered complementary&#44; thereby leaving the door open to gradual approaches and hybrid formulas&#46;</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The option of recommended vaccination cannot radically annul the need to use obligatory vaccination&#46; This is because a health emergency may occur which requires a forceful response &#8211; vaccination <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">extra ordinem</span>&#44; and it is also advisable to have a &#8220;plan B&#8221; in case recommendation proves unable to maintain optimum vaccination rates&#8212;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">ratione temporis</span>&#8212;or has to be reinforced&#8212;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">ratione materiae</span> for certain diseases&#44; or&#8212;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">ratione personae</span> for certain groups or professionals&#46; The history of vaccination policy in France has left us the following valuable reflections on this point&#46; In January 2016 the French Minister of Health implemented an action plan to renew vaccination policy&#46; One of the core requirements of this plan was the identification of why the social image of vaccination had deteriorated in France&#46; To this end the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Comit&#233; d&#8217;orientation de la concertation citoyenne sur la vaccination</span> was created&#44; resulting in the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Rapport sur la vaccination</span>&#44; of 30 November 2016&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> This report concluded that it was advisable to emphasise obligatory vaccination for a certain time&#44; supported by a highly ambitious vaccination plan and with an exemption clause due to personal convictions&#59; this would be an intermediate step before reaching the ideal vaccination scenario&#44; based on voluntary social compliance&#46;</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the same way&#44; the option of obligatory vaccination cannot stand alone&#44; without education and information to stimulate voluntary compliance with the duty of vaccination&#46; The reaction to incompliance will not be simple to manage&#44; so that simply invoking a legal mandate for a goal which requires the mass obedience of citizens will not ensure a serene and clear outcome&#46; Italy is like France a European country that is important in this field&#46; The difficulties that it has undergone in recent years perfectly illustrate the above point&#46; In 2017 these difficulties led to the adoption of an obligatory vaccination system&#44; even though it came with a multitude of conditions to make it less harsh and reduce conflict&#46; Thus for example&#44; if incompliance were detected then the first response was to call the parents or tutors for a &#8220;colloquio al fine di fornire ulteriori informazioni sulle vaccinazioni e di sollecitarne l&#8217;effettuazione&#8221;&#59; the desire to persuade was therefore not completely eliminated by the fact of obligation<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a></p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It must not therefore be forgotten that between these two hypothetical poles there is a rich range of intermediate colours and eclectic options&#44; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">i&#46;e&#46;</span>&#44; that it is possible to simultaneously combine obligation and recommendation&#44; most of all while taking into account the fact that the current catalogue of vaccines is plural and heterogeneous&#46;</p><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">On the other hand&#44; the strategies of obligation or recommendation do not always take the same form&#46; There is no single model of obligatory vaccination in the world&#44; and nor is there one for recommended vaccination&#46; There are no predefined patterns to be selected for use as if they books in a library&#46; A simple glance at Comparative Law is enough to see that the labels of obligatory or recommended vaccination each cover a very wide range of options&#46;</p><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The specific nature of the strategy in each case therefore has to be examined without preconceptions&#46; I will start by looking at one of the most widespread of the latter&#58; the one that takes it for granted that obligation is a <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">harsher</span> option than recommendation&#46;</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The fact is that it isn&#8217;t always so&#46; Depending on the form it takes&#44; obligation may in fact be a milder option than recommendation&#46; I shall try to explain this&#46;</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The legal duty to vaccinate yourself represents&#44; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">in abstracto</span>&#44; a harsher option because it imposes a restriction on the exercise of basic rights &#8211; and this connects with the ethical viewpoint&#44; too&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> What happens is that&#44; depending on the specific form that it takes&#44; its degree of rigour may be wide ranging and therefore condition each individual&#39;s freedom in a very different way&#46; This may be seen in two aspects&#46;</p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Firstly&#58; the consequences of incompliance&#46; The response to a personal failure to obey the duty to vaccinate often involves punishment rather than compulsion&#46; The harshness of the system will therefore ultimately depend on the nature and configuration of the said penal or administrative punishment and its content&#46; If it consists of the payment of a small fine&#44; for example&#44; it is clear that freedom may be affected&#44; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">in concreto</span>&#44; very slightly&#44; given that its impact will depend on the economic capacity of the individual in question&#46; We can add a second aspect to this&#58; the legal duty to vaccinate yourself is sometimes accompanied by a series of exception or exemptions that may take many forms&#46; When this occurs&#44; the harshness of the duty will also depend on the breadth of the exempting condition&#58; if&#44; for example&#44; it is possible to object to vaccination due to personal convictions&#44; this largely overcomes the initial severity&#46; The actual degree of interest in persecuting incompliance should therefore not be forgotten&#46; The degree of leniency demanded in compliance with the duty to vaccinate has to be taken into account&#44; given that there may be a gap between what the regulations state and the tolerance displayed by the authorities respecting incompliance&#44; especially when community coverage rates are not at stake&#46; Due to all of these considerations&#44; the comparative study of obligatory vaccination systems around the world has shown that there is no single universal model&#46; Rather than this&#44; there are major differences in their design&#44; which in turn lead to the appearance of a &#8220;harshness scale&#8221;&#46; An interesting essay which attempts to isolate elements or signs of harshness and thereby classify obligatory systems may be seen in MacDonald et al&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a></p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">A priori</span>&#44; on the other hand&#44; recommended vaccination systems are considered to be softer options&#46; Nevertheless&#44; it may happen that recommendation is incentivised by stimuli such as family aid&#44; and that access to this aid is an economically important reason that determines the behaviour of the whole population or those with fewer resources&#46; Could it be said that the impossibility of accessing aid amounting to <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">x</span> Euros is a softer option than having to pay a penalty of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">y</span> Euros&#63; It is evident that the answer will depend on the amounts involved in <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">x</span> and <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">y</span>&#46;</p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The severity of the obligation is not the only preconception&#46; Another common assumption refers to <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">clarity</span>&#46; It is taken for granted that the obligatory model will offer a board showing beforehand how all of the different pieces can move&#59; this makes it easy for everyone to behave as they wish because the rules of the game are clear&#46; This is not the case with the recommendation model&#44; as it inherently permits a wide range of citizen reactions&#44; hindering the offer of uniform responses and guidelines&#46;</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I agree that lack of definition is the Achilles heel of recommendation&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> The fact is that we lack a doctrinal definition of this figure and how it fits in the different ways the administration can act&#58; what does it mean to &#8220;recommend&#8221;&#63; How is recommendation applicable&#63; Are all recommendations the same&#44; or can they be classified according to their intensity&#63; What responsibilities would derive from making an incorrect recommendation&#63; Or responsibilities due to not obeying a recommendation when it leads to preventable harm&#63; There are many questions such as these&#44; with no clear answer in legal terms&#46; Due to all of these considerations&#44; it seems to me that the legal duty of vaccination is&#44; in itself&#44; a synonym of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">lex certa</span>&#46;</p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It should therefore be pointed out that countries which we often include in the obligatory model lack a clause of direct obligation&#59; this is deduced indirectly from the prerequisites which make vaccination a condition <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">sine qua non</span> for access to public or community services&#46; And not only this&#46; It has already been said that the legal duty to vaccinate may be accompanied by some type of exception that moderates or curbs the obligation&#46; This may be based on ideological or religious reasons&#58; I leave exception for medical reasons to one side&#44; as these connect <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">in via recta</span> with human dignity and are therefore indispensible&#46; These exceptions involve the need to adjust the scope of obligation and adjust the seriousness of the purpose to how it is put into practice&#44; which&#44; it has to be said&#44; may cause friction and eventually become a source of uncertainties&#46;</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">The juridification of vaccination as a complex and multiple act&#44; over and above obligation and&#47;or recommendation</span><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The second idea which supports my opinion is that the difference between obligatory and recommended vaccination systems does not consist of the advisable &#8220;amount&#8221; of law&#46;</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There is a quite widespread idea that the obligatory system will by definition be one that is severely and deeply governed by law&#46; Contrasting with this&#44; the recommendation system will be less formally controlled and will be less legal&#46; I disagree&#44; as I pointed out above&#44; with this formulation&#46;</p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is true that acceptance of the advisability of the law is simpler to assimilate when it is obligatory&#46; When a legal duty to vaccinate is established this constitutes a restriction on freedom&#44; and this may only occur due to a law&#44; according to the classical doctrine of fundamental rights&#46; As this is so&#44; and given the need for legislators to act&#44; it is naturally accepted that the corresponding legal text&#44; as well as establishing the duty to vaccinate&#44; also regulates other types of associated questions&#46; These questions may include the preparation of the vaccination calendar or compensation for vaccination prejudice&#46; Due to this&#44; countries with an obligatory vaccination system usually have more detailed regulations governing the same&#46; We could say that the hypothesis of freedom as an area protected from the law may tend to facilitate the juridification of vaccination through the inertia of the need to compose a legal text&#46;</p><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Things are different&#44; however&#44; where recommendation rules&#46; The tendency here is&#44; on the contrary&#44; to consider that vaccination does not need a detailed legal channel because it rests&#44; basically&#44; on voluntary adhesion by citizens&#46; Juridification may even be thought to be counterproductive because it is usually considered to have a dissuasive effect&#44; even if <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">sottovoce</span>&#8212;or because the law interferes with other non-juridical disciplines&#46;</p><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It should be explained that&#44; wearing jurist glasses&#44; this discourse is based on what is unfortunately a very common distorted and stereotyped view of the law&#46; But that is not all&#46; Stating that recommended vaccination requires no legal attention may lead to serious dysfunctions&#46; I will restrict myself to the five conflicts which seem to me to be the most strident&#46;</p><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Lack of definition of the roles of the different agents in vaccination and&#44; decidedly&#44; of the promoter function of the health authorities</span><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Relegating the law to a secondary level hinders clarification of the roles of the different agents who intervene in vaccination&#46; These include Civil Servants&#44; sometimes giving rise to the impression that the state of the system should simply be looked at from outside&#44; without interfering&#46; In other words&#44; that voluntary vaccination necessitates a sort of neutrality on the part of public authorities&#44; and this is clearly and flatly false&#46; Acceptance of the social function of community immunisation involves the public authorities adopting a position in favour of vaccination&#46; Firstly&#44; because vaccination requires the organisation of a public service to provide access to vaccines&#46; This access should ideally be universal&#44; equal and free&#44; so that the administration should ensure that this is so in a way that defines all public services&#44; with regularity and adaptation&#44; removing any obstacles to equal access&#46; Without a strong vaccination service&#44; without free public vaccines or a body of medical professionals committed to immunisation&#44; it would be hard for a vaccination system that was not obligatory to be successful&#46; But that is not all&#46; Given the social function of vaccination in preserving the general interest by preventing the spread of infectious diseases&#44; the authorities have to promote it&#46; Thus the authorities cannot play a passive role in recommended vaccination systems&#59; their role is to promote and encourage public vaccination&#46;<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span></p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Gaps in the regulation of significant aspects of vaccination</span><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It tends to be forgotten that vaccination regulations are not solely about establishing a clause making it obligatory&#44; or not&#46; Many questions other than the legal obligation to vaccinate have to be answered&#46; The risk is precisely that these other questions will be left to one side&#44; without a clear legal framework and at the mercy of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Soft Law</span>&#44; jurisprudence or&#44; in other words&#44; improvisation&#46; As no formal law has to be passed to create the duty to vaccinate&#44; there is no need to legislate for this&#46; This opinion explains why it is that in Spain&#44; without looking farther afield&#44; we lack a basic legal regulation of the nature&#44; contents and preparatory procedure for a vaccination calendar&#46; These questions&#44; among others&#44; as it is easy to imagine&#44; are not minor ones and even less so are they restricted to the obligatory system&#46; At the end of the day&#44; whether by obligation or agreement&#44; it is necessary to have a vaccination calendar&#46; It is therefore also necessary to take decisions in this respect&#44; some as important as deciding which vaccines are to be made available&#44;<span class="elsevierStyleSup">d</span> and&#44; as a result of this&#44; have to be included in the corresponding healthcare portfolio&#46; Only if we accept the depth of vaccination in our time as a public service will we be able to gain an idea of the number of questions which will arise about its design&#58; Which vaccines will be acquired&#63; What procedure will be used&#63; Who will pay for them&#63; Which professionals will be able to administer them&#63; Where and how&#63; Who will record the data&#63; And so on&#46;</p><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Some important aspects are not expressly regulated and create vacuums that are not always filled with the help of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Soft Law</span> or jurisprudence&#46; This creates areas of uncertainty and feeds certain attitudes that take advantage of disorder to attack vaccination as a whole&#46; These attitudes centre on lack of transparency and eventual contradictions in the heart of the legal system&#46; It is of interest to note that the de facto regulation of vaccination&#44; if properly done&#44; may bring about a strengthening of the institution through the effect of the principles of good government demanded now by Law when approving norms&#46; This applies not only to those that connect with the background of the regulation &#8211; as is the case with proportionality &#8211; but also with those aspects connected with the preparatory procedure&#44; including participation and transparency&#46; Transparency is&#44; simply&#44; crucial in the management of vaccination policies&#46; Often&#44; countries which have experienced a crisis in the latter had suffered an episode of lesions or adverse effects&#44; and informing the public of this had not been managed properly&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9&#44;10</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Lack of attention to counterweights and&#44; decidedly&#44; the introduction of an objective system of liability for severe vaccination accidents</span><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Although positive factors are undoubtedly more important&#44; it is indisputable that vaccination programs in general have a negative side&#44; and this brings together a range of interests&#46; The most visible negative side is composed of severe vaccination accidents&#59; even though this phenomenon is extremely rare&#44; it could hardly be eliminated from the equation&#58; like any other medications&#44; vaccines are not innocuous&#44; and nor is it possible to demand that vaccination services be infallible&#46; The fact is that when vaccination is obligatory&#44; it is easier to understand the need to compensate for lesions of this type based on an objective sum calculated according to the redistribution of social costs&#46; It is true that the actual form this postulate takes may admit many versions&#44; each one with its pros and its contras&#46; Nevertheless&#44; objective compensation is desired in all cases as a <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">correlato naturaliter</span> for the obligation to vaccinate&#46; Although this is so theoretically&#44; in practice&#44; as was shown by the recent study by Attwell et al&#46;&#44;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> not all countries with an obligatory vaccination system have a legal regime that meets their objective responsibility&#46;</p><p id="par0165" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Unfortunately&#44; the same is not true of recommendation&#46; This is unfortunate because the reasons justifying the application of objective compensation are exactly the same&#58; the social utility of the individual act of vaccinating is not reduced by the fact that it was voluntary&#46; Few doubts arise in theoretical terms about whether compensation for injuries caused in the context of a systematic vaccination program should apply an objective canon of responsibility&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a> All of the presuppositions demanded by the theory of equitable redistribution for public costs are applicable&#46; It is also no coincidence that this situation is used as the perfect example of a situation in which the Administration is objectively liable&#46; The work by Rodr&#237;guez Fern&#225;ndez is very graphic in this respect&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13&#44;14</span></a> The question is that this doctrinal agreement lacks any specific regulatory expression in Spain&#44; so that it is currently based on jurisprudence&#46; The leading case here is the STS of 9 October 2012 &#40;appeal 6878&#47;2010&#41;&#46; As I have said in another place&#44; this is not just any loose end&#59; determining the compensatory regime for vaccination accidents must&#44; in my opinion&#44; be one of the bases of the vaccination system&#46; It must also&#44; due to its importance and the need for clarity &#40;which is so important in this context&#41; be supplied with a legal space&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14&#44;15</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Lack of connection between the different sectors involved in vaccination</span><p id="par0170" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The lack of a legal text which has the core purpose of regulating vaccination leads to different treatment of different aspects of the same in sectors where the vaccination variable has sufficient intrinsic weight&#58; medication&#44; medical professions&#44; international health&#44; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">etc&#46;</span> The risks of this dispersion may be intuited easily&#44; although the most worrying of all lies&#44; I believe&#44; in the absence of a single shared concept of vaccination&#44; the general interest they serve and the basic principles that lead to comprehension of it&#46; However&#44; it is possible to offer an image of vaccination that does not completely coincide in the different branches of juridical classification&#46;</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Slipping towards a purely regulatory approach to vaccination</span><p id="par0175" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Given its technical and everyday nature&#44; vaccination in Spain and many other countries has historically been considered suitable for regulation in a way that is both convenient and adaptable&#46; This is so the degree that&#44; in my opinion&#44; an idea has entered that is both slippery and still present&#44; and which does not correspond to the importance of vaccination&#58; that it is something to be dealt with in the context of administrative regulations in the strict sense&#44; regulations that we identify with bureaucratic matters without sufficient substance to be covered by law&#46; The risk of this tendency is clear&#44; and it consists of ignoring that&#44; even in systems governed by recommendation&#44; there are elements and processes able to cause severe disruptions and frictions with individual freedoms&#59; all of these contingencies may only be clarified without leaving the regulatory framework in a very artificial way&#44; and which would be improved&#44; for this reason alone&#44; by the presence of express legal constraints&#46;</p><p id="par0180" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Proof of the above is shown by what is happening with kindergartens in Spain&#44; where children have to be certified as vaccinated to enrol&#46; This instrumentalisation of vaccination is not being applied by means of formal legislation&#46; At the most it is established as a regulation and&#44; in any case&#44; very discretely as it is not considered to be a qualified requisite that requires particular conditions&#44; but rather just one more demand to be satisfied for enrolment&#46; The situation in Galicia is an example&#46; Making access to infant schools conditional on previous accreditation of being up-to-date with paediatric vaccination is based on an Order<span class="elsevierStyleSup">e</span> &#40;which uses the following terms&#58;</p><p id="par0185" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">&#8220;Compliance with the Galician Program of Vaccination Calendar as well as the formalisation of enrolment is indispensible for confirmation of a place&#46; If this is not fulfilled then the application by the interested party will be rejected&#8221; &#40;art&#46; 12&#46;2 <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">in fine</span>&#41;&#46;</p><p id="par0190" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Then it can be seen that the matter is dealt with in terms of purely procedural regulations&#46;</p><p id="par0195" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The result of this is that the relationship between vaccination and pre-school education &#8211; even though this is of maximum importance &#8211; is resolved in Spain in a commonplace way&#46;</p><p id="par0200" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I am not criticising the basis of demanding vaccination in this context&#46; The courts&#44; in fact&#44; have supported this conditionality on the basis of considering that it seeks to preserve a legitimate end&#44; which is herd immunity&#44; together with the health of those children who are the most exposed to the risk of infection&#46; Lastly&#44; and without going any further&#44; there is the sentence of the case brought against the State in Court No&#46; 16&#44; Barcelona&#44; 445&#47;2018&#44; of 28 December&#44; confirming the legality of the resolution of a Town Hall that had rejected the inscription of an unvaccinated child in a municipal kindergarten&#46; It is of interest&#44; and that is why it is described here&#44; to check that the requisite of vaccination had been established by a Regulation of the internal Regime&#46; The sentence does not question the range that would be necessary to set a limitation of this type&#46;</p><p id="par0205" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Nevertheless&#44; I do wish to call attention to the formal side of this&#46; It seems to me that a measure of this type is sufficiently relevant to demand a certain degree of cohesion at a national level&#44; given that it affects the bases of vaccination and may conflict with the exercise of parental responsibilities&#46; These arguments advise <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">interpositio legislatoris</span> without an offence&#46;</p></span></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Conclusion</span><p id="par0210" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">After all of the above&#44; it is not my intention to advocate the need for regulation for regulation&#39;s sake&#44; and far less to suggest that the quality of a vaccination system is measured by the weight of its norms&#46; However&#44; it seems to me to be indisputable that vaccination&#44; due to its intrinsic importance and dimensions&#44; requires a legislative body of sufficient density to offer predictability&#44; at the least&#44; in cardinal questions&#46; It is therefore advisable&#44; I believe&#44; to have a vaccination law that&#44; emphasising the positive points of our recommended model and its strengths&#44; is able to compensate for the deficits which I have just described to bolster our system against current and future threats&#46;</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Conflict of interests</span><p id="par0215" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The author has no conflict of interests to declare&#46;</p><p id="par0220" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span> In locating the statements mentioned below I found it highly useful to consult the constitutional jurisprudence data base of the Venice Commission of the European Council&#46;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p><p id="par0225" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span> See art&#46; 1&#46;4 of the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Decreto-legge</span>&#44; of 7 June 2017&#44; n&#46; 73&#44; and its conversion into law&#44; with modifications&#44; by the Recante disposizioni urgenti in materia di prevenzione vaccinale&#46; Legge of 31 July 2017&#44; n&#46; 119&#46; A measure which&#44; moreover&#44; was considered positive as it justifies the rationality of the reform of the vaccination system undertaken &#40;8&#46;2&#46;4 of the Sentenza Corte Costituzionale 5&#47;2018&#44; of 18 January&#41;&#46;</p><p id="par0230" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span> Thus instead of the syntagm &#8220;voluntary vaccination&#8221;&#44; it would be preferable to use &#8220;recommended vaccination&#8221;&#44; which I believe is semantically more inclusive&#46;</p><p id="par0235" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">d</span> &#8220;Publificar&#8221;&#58; in law this means having some public responsibility&#46;</p><p id="par0240" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">e</span> Order of the Conselleria de Pol&#237;tica Social of 8 March 2019&#44; convoking and establishing the procedure for awarding places in the children&#39;s education service for boys and girls aged from 0 to 3 years old in privately owned 0&#8211;3 kindergartens for the 2019&#47;20 school year&#46;</p><p id="par0245" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a href="https://www.xunta.gal/dog/Publicados/2019/20190315/AnuncioG0425-080319-0002_es.pdf">https&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;xunta&#46;gal&#47;dog&#47;Publicados&#47;2019&#47;20190315&#47;AnuncioG0425-080319-0002&#95;es&#46;pdf</a></p></span></span>"
    "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [
      "secciones" => array:10 [
        0 => array:3 [
          "identificador" => "xres1510437"
          "titulo" => "Abstract"
          "secciones" => array:1 [
            0 => array:1 [
              "identificador" => "abst0005"
            ]
          ]
        ]
        1 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1370090"
          "titulo" => "Keywords"
        ]
        2 => array:3 [
          "identificador" => "xres1510436"
          "titulo" => "Resumen"
          "secciones" => array:1 [
            0 => array:1 [
              "identificador" => "abst0010"
            ]
          ]
        ]
        3 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1370091"
          "titulo" => "Palabras clave"
        ]
        4 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "sec0005"
          "titulo" => "The importance of regulating vaccination without succumbing to simple disjunctives"
        ]
        5 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "sec0010"
          "titulo" => "The obligatory and recommended vaccination systems have the same purpose&#44; and there is a risk of rushed evaluation of the harshness and clarity of these strategies"
        ]
        6 => array:3 [
          "identificador" => "sec0015"
          "titulo" => "The juridification of vaccination as a complex and multiple act&#44; over and above obligation and&#47;or recommendation"
          "secciones" => array:5 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "identificador" => "sec0020"
              "titulo" => "Lack of definition of the roles of the different agents in vaccination and&#44; decidedly&#44; of the promoter function of the health authorities"
            ]
            1 => array:2 [
              "identificador" => "sec0025"
              "titulo" => "Gaps in the regulation of significant aspects of vaccination"
            ]
            2 => array:2 [
              "identificador" => "sec0030"
              "titulo" => "Lack of attention to counterweights and&#44; decidedly&#44; the introduction of an objective system of liability for severe vaccination accidents"
            ]
            3 => array:2 [
              "identificador" => "sec0035"
              "titulo" => "Lack of connection between the different sectors involved in vaccination"
            ]
            4 => array:2 [
              "identificador" => "sec0040"
              "titulo" => "Slipping towards a purely regulatory approach to vaccination"
            ]
          ]
        ]
        7 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "sec0045"
          "titulo" => "Conclusion"
        ]
        8 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "sec0050"
          "titulo" => "Conflict of interests"
        ]
        9 => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "References"
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf"
    "tienePdf" => true
    "fechaRecibido" => "2020-02-18"
    "fechaAceptado" => "2020-03-19"
    "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [
      "en" => array:1 [
        0 => array:4 [
          "clase" => "keyword"
          "titulo" => "Keywords"
          "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1370090"
          "palabras" => array:5 [
            0 => "Vaccination"
            1 => "Mandatory vaccination"
            2 => "Recommended vaccination"
            3 => "Individual freedoms"
            4 => "Public health"
          ]
        ]
      ]
      "es" => array:1 [
        0 => array:4 [
          "clase" => "keyword"
          "titulo" => "Palabras clave"
          "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1370091"
          "palabras" => array:5 [
            0 => "Vacunaci&#243;n"
            1 => "Vacunaci&#243;n obligatoria"
            2 => "Vacunaci&#243;n recomendada"
            3 => "Libertades individuales"
            4 => "Salud p&#250;blica"
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "tieneResumen" => true
    "resumen" => array:2 [
      "en" => array:2 [
        "titulo" => "Abstract"
        "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Law is intended to play a relevant role concerning vaccination&#46; This paper defends the importance of taking into consideration the advantages of increasing the regulation of this matter&#46; The increase in regulation&#44; ideally through the approval of a specific vaccination act&#44; should be made avoiding the superficiality of the treatment&#44; going in depth of the keys&#44; strengths and weaknesses of the different regulatory options&#46;</p></span>"
      ]
      "es" => array:2 [
        "titulo" => "Resumen"
        "resumen" => "<span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">El Derecho debe desempe&#241;ar un papel relevante en el hecho de la vacunaci&#243;n&#46; En este trabajo se defiende la importancia de interiorizar las ventajas de densificar la juridificaci&#243;n de esta materia&#46; Eso s&#237;&#44; dicha juridificaci&#243;n&#44; idealmente mediante la aprobaci&#243;n de una ley de vacunaci&#243;n&#44; debe llevarse a t&#233;rmino huyendo de simplismos y apriorismos&#44; profundizando en las claves y sopesando las fortalezas y debilidades de las distintas opciones regulatorias&#46;</p></span>"
      ]
    ]
    "NotaPie" => array:1 [
      0 => array:2 [
        "etiqueta" => "&#9734;"
        "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as&#58; Cierco Seira C&#46; Vacunaci&#243;n obligatoria o recomendada&#58; acotaciones desde el Derecho&#46; Vacunas&#46; 2020&#59;21&#58;53&#8211;59&#46;</p>"
      ]
    ]
    "bibliografia" => array:2 [
      "titulo" => "References"
      "seccion" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "bibs0015"
          "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:15 [
            0 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0080"
              "etiqueta" => "1"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "European attitudes towards vaccination &#91;Internet&#93;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "European Commission"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Libro" => array:1 [
                        "fecha" => "2019"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            1 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0085"
              "etiqueta" => "2"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "BAR&#211;METRO SANITARIO &#40;Total Oleadas&#41; Estudio no 8816 &#91;Internet&#93;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "Ministerio de Sanidad SS e ID general de SP"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Libro" => array:1 [
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            2 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0090"
              "etiqueta" => "3"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Percepci&#243;n social de la Ciencia y la Tecnolog&#237;a 2018 &#91;Internet&#93;&#46; Madrid"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "Fundaci&#243;n Espa&#241;ola para la Ciencia y la Tecnolog&#237;a F&#46;"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Libro" => array:1 [
                        "fecha" => "2019"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            3 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0095"
              "etiqueta" => "4"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Constitutional case &#8211; law of the Venice Commission"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "Counsel of Europe"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Libro" => array:1 [
                        "fecha" => "2020"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            4 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0100"
              "etiqueta" => "5"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Concertation citoyenne sur la vaccination &#91;Internet&#93;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "Mnist&#232;re de la Sant&#233; et des Affaires Sociales"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Libro" => array:1 [
                        "fecha" => "2020"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            5 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0105"
              "etiqueta" => "6"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "titulo" => "Piano nazionale prevenzione vaccinale 2017-2019 &#91;Internet&#93;"
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Libro" => array:1 [
                        "fecha" => "2017"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            6 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0110"
              "etiqueta" => "7"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Bio&#233;tica de vacunaciones y salud p&#250;blica"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "A&#46; Varo Baena"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:2 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Vacunas &#91;Internet&#93;"
                        "fecha" => "2020"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            7 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0115"
              "etiqueta" => "8"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Mandatory infant &#38; childhood immunization&#58; rationales&#44; issues and knowledge gaps"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "N&#46;E&#46; MacDonald"
                            1 => "S&#46; Harmon"
                            2 => "E&#46; Dube"
                            3 => "A&#46; Steenbeek"
                            4 => "N&#46; Crowcroft"
                            5 => "D&#46;J&#46; Opel"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Vaccine &#91;Internet&#93;"
                        "fecha" => "2018"
                        "volumen" => "36"
                        "paginaInicial" => "5811"
                        "paginaFinal" => "5818"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            8 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0120"
              "etiqueta" => "9"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "False beliefs about vaccines"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "A&#46; Dom&#237;nguez"
                            1 => "J&#46; Astray"
                            2 => "J&#46; Castilla"
                            3 => "P&#46; Godoy"
                            4 => "J&#46; Tuells"
                            5 => "I&#46; Barrabeig"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1016/j.aprim.2018 05.004"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Aten Primaria &#91;Internet&#93;"
                        "fecha" => "2019"
                        "volumen" => "51"
                        "paginaInicial" => "40"
                        "paginaFinal" => "46"
                        "itemHostRev" => array:3 [
                          "pii" => "S1130239917300044"
                          "estado" => "S300"
                          "issn" => "11302399"
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            9 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0125"
              "etiqueta" => "10"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "&#91;Primary health care professionals attitudes towards influenza immunzation in Catalonia&#93;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "N&#46; Torner"
                            1 => "P&#46; Godoy"
                            2 => "N&#46; Soldevila"
                            3 => "D&#46; Toledo"
                            4 => "C&#46; Rius"
                            5 => "A&#46; Dom&#237;nguez"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Aten Primaria &#91;Internet&#93;"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "48"
                        "paginaInicial" => "192"
                        "paginaFinal" => "199"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            10 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0130"
              "etiqueta" => "11"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Mandatory vaccination and no fault vaccine injury compensation schemes&#58; an identification of country-level policies"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "K&#46; Attwell"
                            1 => "S&#46; Drislane"
                            2 => "J&#46; Leask"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Vaccine &#91;Internet&#93;"
                        "fecha" => "2019"
                        "volumen" => "37"
                        "paginaInicial" => "2843"
                        "paginaFinal" => "2848"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            11 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0135"
              "etiqueta" => "12"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Seguridad&#44; riesgos y efectos adversos en materia de vacunaci&#243;n Jurisprudencia sobre responsabilidad administrativa&#46; Y reflexi&#243;n&#58; &#191;Es necesario o conveniente un fondo espec&#237;fico de compensaci&#243;n por da&#241;os vacunales&#63;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "N&#46;M&#46; Garrido Cuenca"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:4 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Der Adm Red"
                        "fecha" => "2018"
                        "paginaInicial" => "129"
                        "paginaFinal" => "172"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            12 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0140"
              "etiqueta" => "13"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "La responsabilidad objetiva de la administraci&#243;n p&#250;blica y la equidistribuci&#243;n del coste del bien com&#250;n"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "I&#46; Fern&#225;ndez-Rodr&#237;guez"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:4 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Der Adm Red"
                        "fecha" => "2018"
                        "paginaInicial" => "155"
                        "paginaFinal" => "192"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            13 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0145"
              "etiqueta" => "14"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Las vicisitudes del calendario &#250;nico de vacunaci&#243;n"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "C&#46; Cierco Seira"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Derec Sal &#91;Internet&#93;"
                        "fecha" => "2019"
                        "volumen" => "29"
                        "paginaInicial" => "154"
                        "paginaFinal" => "168"
                        "itemHostRev" => array:3 [
                          "pii" => "S0883944114000896"
                          "estado" => "S300"
                          "issn" => "08839441"
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            14 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0150"
              "etiqueta" => "15"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:2 [
                            0 => "C&#46; Cierco Seira"
                            1 => "Vacunaci&#243;n"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "LibroEditado" => array:3 [
                        "editores" => "M&#46;Pons"
                        "titulo" => "Libertades individuales y Derecho p&#250;blico"
                        "serieFecha" => "2018"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
  ]
  "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
  "url" => "/24451460/0000002100000001/v4_202105130819/S2445146020300078/v4_202105130819/en/main.assets"
  "Apartado" => array:4 [
    "identificador" => "85161"
    "tipo" => "SECCION"
    "en" => array:2 [
      "titulo" => "Review Articles"
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
  ]
  "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/24451460/0000002100000001/v4_202105130819/S2445146020300078/v4_202105130819/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/"
  "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2445146020300078?idApp=UINPBA00004N"
]
Article information
ISSN: 24451460
Original language: English
The statistics are updated each day
Year/Month Html Pdf Total
2023 March 1 1 2

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos