metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española Multicentricidad y neoplasia primaria secundaria en pacientes con tumor carcinoi...
Información de la revista
Vol. 64. Núm. 4.
Páginas 368-370 (octubre 1998)
Compartir
Compartir
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 64. Núm. 4.
Páginas 368-370 (octubre 1998)
Acceso a texto completo
Multicentricidad y neoplasia primaria secundaria en pacientes con tumor carcinoide
Diagnostic error and acute appendicitis in women: advantages of laparoscopy in a specific age group
Visitas
1619
M. Irazustaa, F. Martíneza, J. González Uriartea, JI. Alberdia, R. Rezola Solaunb, Y. Saraleguia, J. Querejetaa, J. Murilloa
a Servicios de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo (Dr. F. Martínez). Hospital Santa María de la Asunción. Tolosa. Guipúzcoa
b Anatomía Patológica. Hospital Santa María de la Asunción. Tolosa. Guipúzcoa
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Se presenta un caso de tumor rectal de colisión ­el adenocarcinoma adyacente a tumor carcinoide­ junto con un tumor carcinoide sincrónico en el intestino delgado. La multicentricidad y el riesgo elevado de presentar una segunda neoplasia maligna se asocian al tumor carcinoide.
Se analizan las posibles implicaciones terapéuticas de dichas características a través de un estudio retrospectivo de nuestra serie de tumores carcinoides, así como de la bibliografía existente.
Palabras clave:
Tumor carcinoide multicéntrico
Neoplasia primaria secundaria
Objective. To determine, in the interests of quality control, the correlation between the clinical and pathological diagnosis in women subjected to appendectomy.
Patients and methods. In our center, 60.3% of all emergency laparotomies performed in women in 1995 were carried out to treat acute appendicitis. Patient age and level of experience of the surgeon (resident or specialist) were recorded as objective parameters that can lead to erroneous diagnoses. The agreement between the preoperative and pathologic diagnoses was analyzed by the proportion test, where a p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Results. Microscopic study confirmed 90 cases (70.8%) of acute appendicitis and 37 (29.1%) in which no changes were observed. There were no appreciable differences in the parameters analyzed in terms of the surgeon in charge of diagnosis and treatment. The distribution according to age groups showed a significantly greater error (p = 0.01) and a high incidence of gynecological pathology as the cause of the clinical picture during the third decade of life.
Conclusions.. The rate of diagnostic error associated with appendectomy is accepted by the majority of authors to be 15% to 20%, reaching 30% to 50% in young women according to some series. We observe a significantly greater error in patients aged 21 to 30 years (48% versus 29%, p = 0.01) which points out the need for a protocol for more thorough clinical assessment involving gynecologists and radiologists. These findings also support the systematic use of ultrasound and the performance of laparoscopy as possible approaches in this group of patients
Keywords:
Diagnostic error
Acute appendicitis in women
Ultrasonography
Laparoscopy
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos