Información del artículo
Abstract
There are different designs of prosthesis for use in the repair of incisional hernia, and it is often difficult to choose the most appropriate. The biological behaviour of the material must be a key part in the selection, although this behaviour will vary depending on what materials are available. A proper understanding of the relationship of the material with the abdominal wall dynamics is another important factor in this selection. Finally we need a stable repair without long term side effects. This paper analyses the prostheses more commonly available for incisional hernia surgery in the non-emergency situation.
Keywords:
Incisional hernia
Prosthesis
Abdominal wall
Elective surgery
Resumen
Diferentes y numerosas prótesis han sido diseñadas para facilitar la reparación de las eventraciones y es de esperar que se diseñen más en el futuro. En este contexto es difícil escoger la más adecuada. El comportamiento biológico del material debe ser una parte fundamental en la selección, aunque este comportamiento variará en función de las características de las diferentes prótesis de que se dispone. Un adecuado conocimiento de la relación del material con la dinámica de la pared abdominal es otro elemento importante a la hora de seleccionar. Finalmente, se ha de tener una idea de lo que se puede esperar de las prótesis para una reparación estable y sin efectos secundarios a largo plazo. En este trabajo se analiza el panorama protésico más comúnmente disponible para la cirugía de las eventraciones en situación no urgente.
Palabras clave:
Eventración
Prótesis
Pared abdominal
Cirugía electiva
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[1.]
R. Penttinen, J.M. Grönross.
Mesh repair of common abdominal hernias: a review on experimental and clinical studies.
Hernia, 12 (2008), pp. 337-344
[2.]
Regan MC, Barbul A. The cellular biology of wound Ealing. In:Wound healing, editor. G Schlag and H Redl: Springer-Verlag; 1994. p. 3-7.
[3.]
J.D. Andrade, V. Hlady.
Plasma protein adsorption: the big twelve.
Ann NY Acad Sci, 516 (1987), pp. 158-172
[4.]
L. Vroman.
Methods of investigating protein interaction on artificial and natural surfaces.
Ann NY Acad Sci, 516 (1987), pp. 300-305
[5.]
R.K. Ito, M.S. Rosenblatt, M.A. Contreras, C.M. Brophy, F.W. LoGerfo.
Monitoring platelet interactions with prosthetic graft implants in a canine model.
ASAIO Trans, 36 (1990), pp. M175-M178
[6.]
J.M. Lackie, D. DeBono.
Interactions of neutrophil granulocytes and endotelium in vitro.
Microvasc Res, 13 (1977), pp. 107-112
[7.]
H.P. Greisler, J.W. Dennis, E.D. Endean, J. Ellinger, R. Friesel, W. Burgess.
Macrophage/biomaterial interactions: the stimulation of endothelialization.
J Vasc Surg, 9 (1989), pp. 588-593
[8.]
N.T. Bennett, G.S. Schultz.
Growth factors and wound healing: biochemical properties of growth factors and their receptors.
Am J Surg, 165 (1993), pp. 728-737
[9.]
A. Baird, P. Mormede, P. Böhlen.
Immunoreactive fibroblast growth factor in cells of peritoneal exudate suggests its identity with macrophage-derived growth factor.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 126 (1985), pp. 358-364
[10.]
H.P. Greisler, J. Ellinger, H.C. Henderson.
The effects o fan atherogenic dieto n macrophage/biomaterial interaction.
J Vasc Surg, 14 (1991), pp. 10
[11.]
D. Petsikas, D.L. Cziperle, T.M. Lam.
Dacron-induced TGF-b release from macrophages: effects on graft healing.
Surg Forum, 42 (1991), pp. 326-328
[12.]
M. Grant, J. Jerden, T.J. Merimee.
Insulin-like growth factor-I modulates endotelial cell chemotaxis.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 65 (1987), pp. 370-371
[13.]
K. Pesonen, L. Viinikka, G. Myllylä, J. Kiuru, J. Perheentupa.
Characterization of material with epidermal growth factor immunoreactivity in human serum and platelets.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 68 (1989), pp. 486-491
[14.]
G.L. Brown, L. Curtinger III, J.R. Brightwell.
Enhancement of epidermal regeneration by biosynthetic epidermal growth factor.
J Exp Med, 163 (1986), pp. 1319-1324
[15.]
J.M. Bellon, J. Bujan, L. Contreras, A. Hernando.
Integrations of biomaterials implanted into abdominal wall: process of Scar formation and macrophage response.
Biomaterials, 16 (1995), pp. 381-387
[16.]
J.M. Bellon, J. Bujan, L. Contreras, A. Hernando, F. Jurado.
Macrophage response to experimental implantation of polypropylene protheses.
Eur Surg Res, 26 (1994), pp. 46-53
[17.]
A.R. Murch, A.D. Grounds, C.A. Marshall, J.M. Papadimitriou.
Direct evidence that inflammatory multinucleate giant cells form by fusion.
J Pathol, 137 (1982), pp. 177-180
[18.]
S.K. Woloson, H.P. Greisler, et al.
Biochemistry, immunology, and tissue response to prosthetic material.
Abdominal wall hernias. Principles and management, pp. 201-207
[19.]
S. Bachman, B. Ramshaw.
Prosthetic material in ventral hernia repair: how do I chose?.
Surg Clin N Am, 88 (2008), pp. 101-112
[20.]
N. Kossovy, C.J. Freiman, D. Howarth, et al.
Biomaterials pathology.
Abdominal wall hernias. Principles and management, pp. 225
[21.]
C.R. Costello, S.L. Bachman, S.A. Grant, D.S. Cleveland, T.S. Loy, B.J. Ramshaw.
Characterization of heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene prosthetic mesh explants from a single patient.
Surg Inn, 14 (2007), pp. 168-176
[22.]
Y.W. Novitsky, A.G. Harrell, W.W. Hope, K.W. Kercher, B.T. Heniford.
Meshes in hernia repair.
Surg Technol Int, 16 (2007), pp. 123-127
[23.]
M.R. Langenbeck, J. Schmidt, H. Zirngibi.
Comparison of biomaterials in the aerly postoperative period: polypropylene meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
Surg Endosc, 17 (2003), pp. 1105-1109
[24.]
J.M. Bellín, M. Rodríguez, N. García-Honduvilla, G. Pascual, V. Gómez Gil, J. Buján.
Peritoneal effects of prosthetic meshes use to repair abdominal wall defects: monitoring adhesions by sequential laparoscopy.
J Laparoend Tech, 17 (2007), pp. 160-166
[25.]
G.E. Leber, J.L. Garb, A.I. Alexander, W.P. Reed.
Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias.
Arch Surg, 133 (1998), pp. 378-382
[26.]
W.S. Cobb, K.W. Kercher, B.T. Heniford.
The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair.
Surg Innov, 12 (2005), pp. 63-69
[27.]
S.J. Bussitil, C. Drumm, E.F. Plow.
In vivo comparison of the inflammatory response induced by different vascular biomaterials.
Vascular, 13 (2005), pp. 230-235
[28.]
J. Zieren, H. Neuss, J. Muller.
Introduction of polyethylene terephthalate mesh (KoSahochfest) for abdominal hernia repair: an animal experimental study.
BioMed Mater Eng, 14 (2004), pp. 127-132
[29.]
K.Z. Gumargalieva, V. Mosieev Yu, T.T. Daurova, O.S. Voronkova.
Effect of infections on the degradation of polyethylene terephthalate implants.
Biomaterials, 3 (1982), pp. 177-180
[30.]
D.B. Earle, L.A. Mark.
Prosthetic material in inguinal hernia repair: how do I choose?.
Surg Clin N Am, 88 (2008), pp. 179-201
[31.]
M.P. Elliot, G.L. Juler.
Comparison of Marlex® and micropporous Teflon® sheets when used for hernia repair in the experimental animal.
Am J Surg, 137 (1979), pp. 342-344
[32.]
J. Bujan, L.A. Contreras, A. Carrera-San Martin, J.M. Bellón.
The behavior of different types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prostheses in the reparative scarring process of abdominal wall defects.
Histol Histopatol, 12 (1997), pp. 683-690
[33.]
J.J. McGinty, N.J. Hogle, H.A. McCarthy, D.L. Fowler.
Comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh.
Surg Endosc, 19 (2005), pp. 786-790
[34.]
Y.W. Novitsky, A.G. Harrell, J.A. Cristiano, B.L. Paton, H.J. Norton, R.D. Peindl, et al.
Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.
J Surg Res, 140 (2007), pp. 6-11
[35.]
J.M. Bellon, N. Garcia-Honduvilla, N. Serrano, M. Rodriguez, G. Pascual, J. Bujan.
Composite prostheses for the repair of abdominal wall defects: effect of the structure of the adhesion barrier component.
Hernia, 9 (2005), pp. 338-343
[36.]
H.A. Kayaoglu, N. Ozkan, S.M. Hazinedaroglu, O.F. Ersoy, A.B. Erkek, R.D. Koseoglu.
Comparison of adhesive properties of five different prosthetic materials used in hernioplasty.
J Invest Surg, 18 (2005), pp. 89-95
[37.]
J.M. Bellón, M. Serrano, M. Rodríguez, N. García Honduvilla, G. Pascual, J. Buján.
Composite prostheses used to repair abdominal wall defects: physical or chemical adhesion barriers?.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 74 (2005), pp. 718-724
[38.]
J.M. Bellón, N. Serrano, M. Rodriguez, N. García-Honduvilla, G. Pascual, J. Buján.
Composite prostheses for the repair of abdominal wall defects: comparative study of physical and/or chemical barriers.
Cir Esp, 77 (2005), pp. 351-356
[39.]
R.H. Koehler, D. Begos, D. Berger, S. Carey, K. LeBlanc, A. Park, et al.
Minimal adhesions to ePTFE. mesh after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: reoperative findings in 65 cases.
JSLS, 7 (2003), pp. 335-340
[40.]
U. Klinge, B. Klosterhalfen, J. Conze, W. Limberg, B. Obolenski, A.P. Ottinger, et al.
Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.
Eur J Surg, 164 (1998), pp. 951-960
[41.]
B. Klosterhalfen, K. Junge, U. Klinge.
The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair.
Expert Rev Med Devices, 2 (2005), pp. 103-117
[42.]
K. Junge, U. Klinge, R. Rosch, B. Klosterhalfen, V. Schumpelick.
Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair.
World J Surg, 26 (2002), pp. 1472-1480
[43.]
J.M. Bellon, M. Rodriguez, N. Garcia-Honduvilla, G. Pascual, J. Buján.
Partially absorbable meshes for hernia repair offer advantages over nonabsorbable meshes.
Am J Surg, 194 (2007), pp. 68-74
[44.]
P.J. O’Dwyer, A. Kingsnorth, R.G. Molloy, P.K. Small, B. Lammers, G. Horeyseck.
Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.
Br J Surg, 92 (2005), pp. 166-170
[45.]
D.R. Flum, K. Horvath, T. Koepsel.
Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time?. A population-based análisis.
Ann Surg, 237 (2003), pp. 129-135
[46.]
K. Junge, U. Klinge, A. Prescher, P. Giboni, M. Niewiera, V. Shumpelick.
Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants.
Hernia, 5 (2001), pp. 113-118
[47.]
W.S. Cobb, J.M. Burns, K.W. Kercher, B.D. Matthews, H. James Norton, B. Todd Heniford.
Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults.
J Surg Res, 129 (2005), pp. 231-235
[48.]
G. Welly, U. Klinge, B. Klosterhalfen, R. Kasperk, V. Schumpelick.
Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes.
Hernia, 5 (2001), pp. 142-147
[49.]
M. Binnebosel, R. Rosch, K. Junge, T.C. Flanagan, R. Schwab, V. Schumpelick, et al.
Biomechanical analyses of overlap and mesh dislocation in an incisional hernia model in vitro.
Surgery, 142 (2007), pp. 365-371
[50.]
W.S. Cobb, J.M. Burns, R.D. Peindl, A.L. Carbonell, B.D. Mathews, K.W. Kercher, et al.
Textile analysis of heavy weight, midweight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model.
J Surg Res, 136 (2006), pp. 1-7
[51.]
S.H. Gray, M.T. Hawn, K.M.F. Itani.
Surgical progress in inguinal and ventral incisional hernia repair.
Surg Clin N Am, 88 (2008), pp. 17-26
[52.]
J.M. Bellon.
Implicaciones de los nuevos diseños protésicos de baja densidad en la mejora de la reparación de defectos herniarios.
Cir Esp, 85 (2009), pp. 268-273
[53.]
A. Kingsnorth.
The management of incisional hernia.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 88 (2006), pp. 252-260
Copyright © 2010. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
