metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Ventral rectal sacropexy (colpo-perineal) in the treatment of rectal and rectoge...
Información de la revista
Vol. 86. Núm. 5.
Páginas 283-289 (octubre 2009)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 86. Núm. 5.
Páginas 283-289 (octubre 2009)
Acceso a texto completo
Ventral rectal sacropexy (colpo-perineal) in the treatment of rectal and rectogenital prolapse
Recto (colpo, perineo) sacropexia ventral en el tratamiento del prolapso rectal y rectogenital
Visitas
2024
José M. Enríquez-Navascuésa,
Autor para correspondencia
, José L. Elóseguia, Francisco J. Apezteguib, Carlos Placera, Nerea Bordaa, Martín Irazustaa, José A. Múgicaa, Javier Murgoitioa
a Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Sección de Cirugía Colorrectal, Unidad de Suelo Pélvico, Hospital Donostia, Donostia, Spain
b Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Unidad de Suelo Pélvico, Hospital Donostia, Donostia, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Abstract
Introduction

Ventral sacral-rectopexy with mesh corrects rectal prolapse and minimises rectal dissection. Subsequent colpopexy corrects apical and posterior prolapses of the vagina. The combination of both procedures can lead to the simultaneous correction of pelvic organ prolapses (POP).

Objective

To present the results of a patient series with several types of POP treated using the same approach and operation.

Material and method

A total of 57 patients diagnosed with any type of POP were operated on between January 2005 and August 2008 using ventral rectal-colpo-sacropexy, who were grouped into 3 types: A, total rectal prolapse isolated or combined with a hysterocele or colpocele (11 patients); B, rectoenterocele with internal rectal invagination and/or descending perineum (4 patients); and C, middle and posterior genital compartment prolapse (42 patients). The laparoscopic approach was used in the 15 patients of groups A and B and 11 from group C. A biological mesh was used in 41 patients and a macroporous synthetic one in the rest.

Results

The mean age of the patients in the series was 66 (19–81) years, with 55 females and 2 males. The median follow up was 25 (4–48) months. There were no major post-surgical complications. A recurrence of prolapse was recorded in one patient in group A (1/11); the 7 patients who suffered from incontinence improved after the surgery, no case of de novo constipation being recorded and an improvement in 8 of the 9 patients from groups A and B with obstructive defecation. There were 9 (21%) recurrences detected in group C, but only 4 (9%) required reintervention. In all the recurrences a biological mesh had been used.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic ventral rectal-colpo-pexy is an effective technique to correct POP. Although safe and innocuous, the results with biological meshes did not last as long.

Keywords:
Rectal prolapse
Ventral rectopexy
Genital prolapse
Colpopexy
Resumen
Introducción

La sacrorrectopexia ventral con malla permite la corrección del prolapso rectal minimizando la disección del recto. La colpopexia posterior corrige los prolapsos apicales y posteriores de la vagina. La combinación de ambos procedimientos permite la corrección simultánea de los prolapsos de los órganos pelvianos (POP).

Objetivo

Presentar los resultados de una serie de pacientes con distintos tipos de POP tratados mediante la misma técnica quirúrgica.

Material y método

Entre enero de 2005 y agosto de 2008 intervinimos mediante una recto(colpo)sacropexia ventral a 57 pacientes diagnosticados de alguna forma de POP, que dividimos en tres grupos: grupo A, prolapso rectal total aislado o combinado con histerocele o colpocele (11 pacientes); grupo B, rectoenterocele con invaginación rectal interna y/o periné descendente (4 pacientes), y grupo C, prolapso genital del compartimento medioposterior (42 pacientes). Se intervino por vía laparoscópica a los 15 pacientes de los grupos A y B y a 11 del grupo C. En 41 casos se empleó una malla biológica, y en los demás, una sintética macroporosa.

Resultados

La media de edad de la serie era 66 (19–81) años; 55 eran mujeres y 2, varones; la mediana de seguimiento fue 25 (4–48) meses). No hubo complicaciones postoperatorias mayores. En el grupo A registramos una recurrencia del prolapso (1/11); los 7 pacientes que presentaban incontinencia mejoraron tras la intervención; no se registró ningún caso de estreñimiento de novo y 8 de los 9 pacientes de los grupos A y B, con defecación obstructiva, mejoraron. En el grupo C se detectaron 9 (21%) recurrencias de alguno de los compartimentos vaginales, pero sólo 4 (9%) requirieron reintervención. En todas las recurrencias se había utilizado una malla biológica.

Conclusiones

La recto(colpo)pexia ventral laparoscópica es una técnica efectiva para corregir los POP. Con las mallas biológicas, aunque seguras e inocuas, obtuvimos resultados menos duraderos.

Palabras clave:
Prolapso rectal
Rectopexia ventral
Prolapso genital
Colpopexia
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[1.]
S. Tou, S.R. Brown, A.I. Malik, R.L. Nelson.
Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults.
The Cochrane Library, (2008),
[2.]
C. Maher, K. Baessler, C.M.A. Glazener, et al.
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
The Cochran Library, (2005),
[3.]
D. Altman, J. Zetterstrom, I. Schultz, et al.
Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in women with surgically managed rectal prolapsed: a population-based case-control study.
Dis Colon Rectum, 49 (2006), pp. 28-35
[4.]
F.X. González-Argente, A. Jain, J.J. Nogueras, et al.
Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence and rectal prolapsed.
Dis Colom Rectum, 44 (2001), pp. 929-936
[5.]
J.O. DeLancey.
Anatomics aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 166 (1992), pp. 1717-1724
[6.]
R.C. Bump, A. Mattiasson, K. Bo, et al.
The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapsed and pelvic floor dysfunction.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 175 (1996), pp. 10-17
[7.]
P. Hernández, E.M. Targarona, C. Balagué, et al.
Tratamiento laparoscópico del prolapso rectal.
Cir Esp, 84 (2008), pp. 318-322
[8.]
M.J. Salomon, C.J. Young, A.A. Eyers, et al.
Randomized trial of laproscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapsed.
[9.]
A. D’Hoore, R. Cadoni, F. Penninckx.
Long term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse.
Br J Surg, 91 (2004), pp. 1500-1505
[10.]
A. D’Hoore, F. Penninckx.
Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)- pexy for rectal prolapsed: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients.
Surg Endosc, 20 (2006), pp. 1919-1923
[11.]
R.E. Karulf, R.D. Madoff, S.M. Goldberg.
Rectal prolapse.
Curr Probl Surg, 38 (2002), pp. 762-823
[12.]
J.R. Novell, M.J. Osborne, M.C. Winslet, et al.
Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full thickness rectal prolapsed.
Br J Surg, 81 (1994), pp. 904-906
[13.]
A. D’Hoore, D. Vanbeckevoort, F. Penninckx.
Clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of rectovaginal septum reinforcement with mesh for complex rectocele.
Br J Surg, 95 (2008), pp. 1264-1272
[14.]
S. Slawik, R. Soulsby, H. Carter, et al.
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpo- pexy for the treatment of rectogenital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction.
Colorectal Dis, 10 (2008), pp. 138-143
[15.]
C. Collinson, C. Cunningham, H. D’Costa, et al.
Rectal intussusception and unexplained faecal incontinence finding of proctographic study.
Colorectal Dis, 11 (2009), pp. 77-83
[16.]
D. Altman, J. Zetterström, A. Mellgren, et al.
A three-year prospective assessment of rectocele repair using porcine xenograft.
Obstet Gynecol, 107 (2006), pp. 59-65
[17.]
C.C.G. Chen, B. Ridgeway, M.F. Paraiso.
Biological grafts and synthetic meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 50 (2007), pp. 383-411
[18.]
K.A. Blanchrd, R. Vanlangendonck, J.C. Winters.
Recurrent pelvic floor defects after abdominal sacral colpopexy.
J Urol, 175 (2006), pp. 1010-1013
[19.]
I.E. Nygaard, R. McCreery, L. Brubaker, A.M. Connolly, G. Cundiff, A.M. Weber, et al.
Abdominal sacrocilpopexy: A comprehensive review.
Obstet Gynecol, 104 (2004), pp. 805-823
[20.]
L. Brubaker, G.W. Cundiff, P. Fine, I. Nygaard, H. Richter, A.G. Visco, et al.
Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch coloposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
N Engl J Med, 354 (2006), pp. 1557-1566
Copyright © 2009. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos