metricas
covid
Buscar en
Clinics
Toda la web
Inicio Clinics Malignant and Tuberculous Pleural Effusions: Immunophenotypic Cellular Character...
Información de la revista
Vol. 63. Núm. 5.
Páginas 637-644 (octubre 2008)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
1053
Vol. 63. Núm. 5.
Páginas 637-644 (octubre 2008)
Research
Open Access
Malignant and Tuberculous Pleural Effusions: Immunophenotypic Cellular Characterization
Visitas
1053
Lucia Maria Zanatta de Aguiar, Leila Antonangelo, Francisco S. Vargas, Maria Cláudia Nogueira Zerbini, Maria Mirtes Sales, David E. Uip, Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva
Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – São Paulo/SP, Brazil., Phone: 55 11 3069.5695
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Tuberculosis and cancer are the main causes of pleural effusion. Pleural involvement is associated with migration of immune cells to the pleural cavity. We sought to characterize the immunophenotype of leukocytes in the pleural effusion and peripheral blood of patients with tuberculosis or malignancy.

METHODS

Thirty patients with tuberculosis (14) or malignancy (16) were studied. A control group included 20 healthy blood donors.

RESULTS

Malignant phycoerythrin pleural effusions showed higher percentages of CD3, CD4, CD3CD45RO, and CD20CD25 lymphocytes and lower percentages of CD3CD25 and CD20HLA-DR when compared to PB lymphocytes. Compared to PB, tuberculous effusions had a higher percentage of lymphocytes that co-expressed CD3, CD4, CD3CD45RO, CD3TCRαβ, CD3CD28, and CD20 and a lower percentage of CD14, CD8 and CD3TCRγδ-positive lymphocytes. Malignant effusions presented higher expression of CD14 whereas tuberculous effusions had higher expression of CD3 and CD3CD95L. Peripheral blood cells from tuberculosis patients showed higher expression of CD14, CD20CD25 and CD3CD95L. Compared with the control cells, tuberculosis and cancer peripheral blood cells presented a lower percentage of CD3CD4 and CD3CD28-positive cells as well as a higher percentage of CD3CD8, CD3CD25 and CD3CD80-positive cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Tuberculous and malignant peripheral blood is enriched with lymphocytes with a helper/inducer T cell phenotype, which are mainly of memory cells. CD14-positive cells were more frequently found in malignant effusions, while CD3-positive cells expressing Fas ligand were more frequently found in tuberculous effusions.

KEYWORDS:
Pleural fluid
Cancer
Flow cytometry
Monoclonal antibody
Tuberculosis
Texto completo
INTRODUCTION

The accumulation of fluid in the pleural space indicates the presence of systemic or local disease. Pleural exudates involve the migration of immune cells to the pleural cavity.1 Characterization of the cellular composition of such exudates may provide insight into the relevant pathophysiological mechanisms and the functional state of the cells. Tuberculosis and cancer represent the main causes of pleural exudates. In both cases, the pleural fluid is generally lymphocytic, with a predominance of T lymphocytes, particularly CD4-positive T cells.2

Considering the compartmentalization of the pleural space, the association between the local and systemic cellular responses should be analyzed. Some investigators have found that, when compared with peripheral blood, exudates have increased numbers of CD4-positive T lymphocytes. However, the immunophenotypic profile of the pleural fluid does not permit discrimination of the causal diagnosis.2–7

Different cell populations have been described in tuberculous fluid. Kapila et al.8 reported a predominance of CD4- positive T lymphocytes with a CD4/CD29 phenotypic profile when compared to blood, suggesting that these cells represent memory T cells.9,10 On the other hand, Dlugovitzky et al.11 reported an increase in the number of CD25-positive cells (IL-2 receptor-expressing), whereas Faith et al.12 observed expression of the HLA-DR marker, suggesting the presence of activated T cells.

Similarly, several studies have evaluated the lymphocytic profile (pleural fluid and blood) of patients with cancer. These studies generally indicate a predominance of T lymphocytes in the pleural fluid, with increased prevalence of a CD4-positive subpopulation when compared to blood13–17. Baxevanis et al.18 and Mantovani et al.19 demonstrated a lower percentage of natural killer cells (CD16) in the pleural fluid than in peripheral blood. Only a minority of T lymphocytes were activated, which expressed CD38 and HLA-DR surface markers.14 These lymphocytes were found to have natural killer activity and very low antitumor cytotoxicity, which is suggestive of depressed immune function15. Another factor associated with the lack of a T cell-mediated immune response is the existence of an apoptotic mechanism that, in addition to regulating the homeostasis of cell populations, acts to eliminate self-reactive lymphocytes and negatively regulate the immune response.20–22 The apoptotic signal is transmitted to mature T cells through various membrane receptors, mainly CD3/TCR, Fas/Apo/CD95, TNF, CTL-4, and CD2. Only activated T cells develop the cellular substrate required for transmission of the apoptotic signal.23 Thus, the analysis of cell surface markers permits the evaluation of cellular differentiation (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD15, CD20, CD56, TCRαβ, and TCRγδ), cellular activation (CD25, CD45RA, CD45RO, and HLA-DR), and immune co-stimulation (CD28, CD80, CD86 and CD152) in pleural fluid and blood. The aim of this study was to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the genesis of pleural exudates of tuberculous or neoplastic origin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Ethics Committee of our institution approved this study. Thirty patients with pleural exudates (14 tuberculosis, 16 cancer) with no previous treatment were included in the study. These patients were indicated for thoracocentesis and underwent collection of pleural fluid and blood after they signed an informed consent form. Light’s criteria24 were used for classification of transudate or exudate. The diagnosis of tuberculosis was made based on the presence of compatible clinical and radiological signs associated with a M. tuberculosis-positive culture from fluid or pleural fragments, on the presence of caseous granuloma in the pleura, or both. The presence of tumor cells in the pleural fluid or tissue indicated cancer.

Twenty healthy blood donors were included in the study as well (blood control).

Biochemical examinations and pleural fluid cytology

Biochemical examination of blood and pleural fluid (protein and lactate dehydrogenase) and blood count were performed using automatic devices (Cobas Integra 700, West Sussex, UK; Pentra 120, Horiba ABX, Montpellier, France). The total number of nucleated cells (pleural fluid) was quantified in a Neubauer chamber (Hausser Scientific, Horsham, PA). Slides stained with Leishman panoptic stain were used for qualitative and oncotic cytology.

Cell preparation and cell viability testing

The mononuclear cell concentrate was obtained by centrifugation of pleural fluid or blood (1500 rpm for 10 min at 25°C), and the final concentration was adjusted to 2 × 107 cells/mm2. Cell viability was evaluated by Trypan blue exclusion (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY). Only samples with more than 70% viable cells were used in this study.

Flow cytometry

Blood or pleural fluid cells were incubated with monoclonal antibodies conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or phycoerythrin (PE). Direct immunofluorescence was used for the analysis of cell surface antigens other than CD95-L. Autofluorescence of cells and nonspecific binding of monoclonal antibodies were corrected for by using isotypic controls. Antigens were quantified by the detection of fluorescence emitted by fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA) using the CellQuest (Becton Dickinson) program.

Cell populations were identified based on analysis of the cytograms. Cell data were arranged in 2-dimensional cytograms (abscissa: cell size; ordinate: internal cell complexity). Leukocytes were identified by quantification of anti-CD45-labeled cells. Among the CD45-positive population, the group with the lowest internal complexity corresponded to lymphocytes. CD45, CD15- and CD45, CD14-positive cells characterized granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages. T, B, and natural killer lymphocytes were identified based on their staining by CD3, CD20, and CD56 antibodies.

Cell surface markers for activation, co-stimulation, and apoptosis co-expressed by T lymphocytes, B-lymphocytes, or monocytes/macrophages were quantified in cells that were positive for CD3, CD20, and CD14, respectively, on the abscissa with surface antigens on the ordinate.

Apoptosis

Leukocyte apoptosis was analyzed in blood and pleural fluid using the APO-BRDU kit (Pharmigen, San Diego, CA). Mononuclear cells were separated on a density gradient using the Lymphoprep kit (Nycomed Pharma, Oslo, Norway). A suspension of 2 × 106 cells in a 5-ml aliquot of phosphate-buffered saline was held on ice (15 min). After several washes, the cell sediment obtained by centrifugation was diluted in 50 μl of DNA strand-break labeling solution. Cells were then incubated with 0.1 ml of anti-BrDu (FITC) solution, followed by 0.5 ml PI dye/RNase A solution. Apoptosis was quantified based on the fluorescence emitted by the FITC-labeled anti-BrDu antibody in a FACSCalibur cytometer using the Cell Quest program (Becton-Dickinson, São Paulo, Brazil).

Statistical analysis

The paired t test (normal distribution) and Wilcoxon test (not normal distribution) were used for comparisons of blood and pleural fluid. Leukocyte subpopulations (fluid) were compared using the Student’s t test or the Mann-Whitney test. Differences in the blood leukocyte subpopulation percentage among groups were determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons or the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison procedure. The level of significance was set at 0.05, and SPSS 10.0 for Windows statistical software was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were studied: 14 (12 men and 2 women; mean age: 36.9 years) with pleural tuberculosis and 16 (5 men and 11 women; mean age: 60.4 years) with malignant effusion.

Immunophenotypic profile of pleural fluid

Four main patterns of cell distribution were identified using 2-dimensional cytograms (abscissa: cell size; ordinate: internal complexity of cells):

Pattern 1

Small cells of low complexity (region usually occupied by lymphocytes in normal blood).

Pattern 2

Cell population described in pattern 1 plus cells with small size and high internal complexity (corresponding to granulocytes in normal blood).

Pattern 3

Populations 1 and 2, plus medium-sized and medium-complexity cells (corresponding to monocytes in normal blood).

Pattern 4

Population 1, plus cells of variable size and complexity (probably corresponding to macrophages and mesothelial cells in fluid).

Pleural fluid from patients with tuberculosis had cells with patterns 1 (9/14; 64.3%) and 3 (5/14; 35.7%), whereas most fluid secondary to cancer had cells with patterns 4 (10/16; 62.5%) and 1 (4/16; 25.0%).

Comparison of cellular components between tuberculous or malignant fluid showed a significant difference in the percentage of T lymphocytes (CD3) and monocytes/macrophages (CD14). Neoplastic effusions had a higher percentage of CD14-positive cells (monocytes/macrophages) than did tuberculous effusions (p = 0.006), whereas the percentage of CD3-positive cells (T lymphocytes) was higher in tuberculous effusions (p = 0.002). Although the percentage of pro-apoptotic T lymphocytes (CD3, CD95L+) appeared to be higher in tuberculous effusions, the statistical significance was marginal (p = 0.061) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Percentage (mean ± standard deviation) of leukocyte subpopulations in pleural fluid of patients with Tb or cancer

Cells  Tuberculous  Malignant 
CD15  2.3 (2.5)  7.0 (21.7)  0.967 
CD14  5.3 (3.9)  17.4 (15.0)  0.006 
CD14CD86  99.0 (1.0)  81.8 (37.6)  0.867 
Lymphocytes *  87.3 (9.3)  52.3 (23.7)  0.036 
CD3 *  75.2 (9.0)  52.3 (23.7)  0.002 
CD20  6.2 (3.1)  7.9 (6.9)  0.389 
CD56  2.9 (1.4)  2.2 (1.5)  0.150 
CD20HLA  99.5 (0.4)  91.5 (25.4)  0.600 
CD20CD25  25.6 (17.3)  25.8 (21.3)  0.972 
CD20CD80  8.4 (4.7)  15.6 (20.9)  0.570 
CD20CD86  13.4 (11.5)  7.0 (8.0)  0.086 
CD3CD4  73.0 (5.9)  66.6 (19.8)  0.234 
CD3CD8  25.7 (5.9)  32.5 (19.4)  0.202 
CD3CD4/CD3CD8  3.1 (1.1)  3.3 (2.6)  0.780 
CD3TCRαβ  97.6 (1.8)  90.7 (12.9)  0..67 
CD3TCRγδ  2.9 (1.7)  4.3 (3.5)  0.182 
CD3CD45RA  32.1 (15.6)  23.5 (20.8)  0.214 
CD3CD45RO  73.2 (11.6)  66.1 (26.8)  0.349 
CD3HLA  19.7 (10.0)  19.7 (12.4)  0.999 
CD3CD25  22.7 (12.6)  22.8 (15.7)  0.990 
CD3CD28  88.6 (15.1)  73.0 (29.4)  0.076 
CD3CD80  1.5 (1.3)  2.5 (2.3)  0.160 
CD3CD95  79.7 (14.1)  66.2 (33.9)  0.162 
CD3CD95L  55.7 (41.0)  26.5 (26.5)  0.061 
CD3CD152  1.6 (1.3)  2.1 (1.5)  0.421 
*

p < 0.05

Comparison of cells in pleural fluid and blood

The following cell populations were found to be elevated in tuberculous effusions: total lymphocytes (p < 0.001), TCD3 (p < 0.001), CD3CD4 (p < 0.001), CD3CD45RO (p = 0.001), CD3TCRαβ (p = 0.009), CD3CD28 (p = 0.003), and CD20 (p < 0.001). The CD4/CD8 ratio was also higher in pleural fluid (p < 0.001) (Table 2). In malignancy, a higher percentage of the following cell types and subtypes were observed in the pleural fluid: total lymphocytes (p < 0.001), CD3 lymphocytes (p < 0.001), CD3CD4 lymphocytes (p = 0.001), CD3CD45RO lymphocytes (p = 0.002), CD20CD25 lymphocytes (p = 0.006), and CD3TCRαβ lymphocytes (p = 0.028). The CD4/CD8 ratio was also higher in the pleural fluid (p = 0.039) (Table 3).

Table 2.

Percentage (mean ± standard deviation) of leukocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood and pleural fluid of patients with tuberculous pleural effusions

Cells  Pleural fluid  Blood 
CD15 *  2.3 (2.5)  62.4 (8.0)  0.000 
CD14 *  5.3 (3.9)  10.7 (3.0)  0.003 
CD14CD86  99.0 (1.0)  99.3 (0.8)  0.236 
Lymphocytes *  87.3 (9.3)  23.1 (6.8)  0.000 
CD3 *  75.2 (9.0)  13.9 (4.6)  0.000 
CD20 *  6.2 (3.1)  2.0 (1.0)  0.000 
CD56  2.9 (1.3)  4.4 (2.5)  0.109 
CD20HLA  99.5 (0.4)  99.8 (0.2)  0.657 
CD20CD25  25.6 (17.3)  19.3 (18.6)  0.309 
CD20CD80  8.4 (4.7)  9.8 (9.1)  0.875 
CD20CD86  13.4 (11.5)  22.4 (16.2)  0.071 
CD3CD4 *  73.0 (5.9)  50.9 (19.0)  0.000 
CD3CD8 *  25.7 (5.9)  45.0 (13.7)  0.000 
CD3CD4/CD3CD8 *  3.1 (1.1)  1.3 (0.8)  0.000 
CD3TCRαβ *  97.6 (1.8)  93.0 (5.4)  0.009 
CD3TCRγδ *  2.9 (1.7)  8.5 (5.3)  0.001 
CD3CD45RA *  32.1 (15.6)  58.8 (11.7)  0.000 
CD3CD45RO *  73.2 (11.6)  62.5 (10.4)  0.001 
CD3HLA  19.7 (10.0)  22.0 (10.0)  0.554 
CD3CD25  22.7 (12.6)  27.2 (8.4)  0.153 
CD3CD28 *  88.6 (15.1)  70.6 (12.5)  0.003 
CD3CD80  1.5 (1.3)  1.0 (1.0)  0.133 
CD3CD95  79.7 (14.1)  74.7 (16.4)  0.220 
CD3CD95L  55.7 (41.0)  50.9 (34.7)  0.530 
CD3CD152  1.6 (1.3)  1.3 (1.4)  0.277 
*

p < 0.05

Table 3.

Percentage (mean ± standard deviation) of leukocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood and pleural fluid of patients with neoplastic pleural effusions

Cells  Pleural fluid  Blood 
CD15 *  1.5 (1.5)  66.7 (8.2)  0.002 
CD14  20.1 (17.0)  7.4 (2.2)  0.754 
CD14CD86  99.5 (1.1)  95.2 (10.5)  0.237 
Lymphocytes *  76.2 (17.4)  20.5 (7.1)  0.000 
CD3 *  60.2 (18.9)  12.3 (5.1)  0.000 
CD20  7.6 (7.2)  2.9 (2.3)  0.061 
CD56  2.3 (1.5)  3.2 (1.7)  0.268 
CD20HLA *  98.1 (4.4)  99.1 (1.8)  0.033 
CD20CD25 *  23.2 (19.3)  6.9 (6.3)  0.006 
CD20CD80  19.4 (24.9)  17.1 (30.3)  0.849 
CD20CD86  8.2 (8.5)  15.2 (19.5)  0.237 
CD3CD4 *  66.0 (22.0)  47.8 (13.4)  0.001 
CD3CD8  32.9 (21.4)  44.8 (17.9)  0.119 
CD3CD4/CD3CD8 *  3.6 (3.1)  1.4 (0.9)  0.039 
CD3TCRαβ *  97.3 (2.1)  91.9 (7.8)  0.028 
CD3TCRγδ  3.8 (1.5)  6.3 (5.4)  0.217 
002CD3CD45RA *  29.5 (23.4)  53.2 (17.9)  0.002 
CD3CD45RO *  72.7 (21.7)  56.0 (21.0)  0.002 
CD3HLA  19.9 (13.5)  18.6 (12.9)  0.837 
CD3CD25 **  24.6 (14.6)  30.9 (15.6)  0.048 
CD3CD28  80.5 (23.9)  72.0 (11.6)  0.166 
CD3CD80  2.0 (1.7)  0.7 (0.6)  0.055 
CD3CD95  78.6 (16.3)  79.3 (13.6)  0.905 
CD3CD95L  19.5 (21.9)  16.2 (22.1)  0.713 
CD3CD152  2.0 (1.2)  5.2 (12.2)  0.666 
*

p < 0.05

These results demonstrate that lymphocytes represent the predominant cell population in malignant effusions and that these lymphocytes are mainly helper/inducer T cells (CD4) with a memory cell phenotype (CD45RO). The same profile was observed in effusions from patients with tuberculosis.

Comparison of cells in peripheral blood: tuberculosis versus cancer

No significant differences were observed for most surface markers. However, a higher percentage of CD14 (p = 0.012), CD3CD95L (p = 0.005), and CD20CD25 cells (p = 0.006) were observed in the tuberculosis group (Table 4).

Table 4.

Percentage (mean ± standard deviation) of leukocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood of patients with tuberculous and neoplastic pleural effusions as compared to the control group

Cells  Malignant  Tuberculous  Control 
CD15  66.7 (8.2)  62.4 (8.1)  58.6 (13.9)  0.176 
CD14 *  7.4 (2.2)  10.7 (3.0)  7.7 (3.4)  0.012 (2×1; 2×3) 
CD14CD86  95.2 (10.6)  99.3 (0.5)  99.3 (0.5)  0.143 
Lymphocytes  20.5 (7.1)  23.1 (6.8)  27.6 (9.6)  0.074 
CD3 *  12.3 (5.1)  13.9 (4.6)  20.0 (9.4)  0.014 (3×1) 
CD20  2.9 (2.3)  2.0 (1.1)  3.1 (1.6)  0.207 
CD56  3.3 (1.7)  4.4 (2.5)  3.5 (1.6)  0.289 
CD20HLA  99.1 (1.8)  99.8 (0.3)  99.8 (0.3)  0.411 
CD20CD25 *  7.0 (6.3)  19.3 (18.6)  7.0 (2.9)  0.006 (2×1; 2×3) 
CD20CD80  17.1 (30.4)  9.8 (9.1)  5.2 (4.6)  0.391 
CD20CD86 *  15.2 (19.6)  22.4 (16.2)  8.5 (11.9)  0.004 (2×3) 
CD3CD4 *  47.8 (13.4)  50.9 (14.0)  64.4 (8.0)  0.001 (3×1; 3×2) 
CD3CD8 *  44.8 (17.8)  45.0 (13.7)  32.3 (7.3)  0.007 (2×3; 1×3) 
CD3CD4/CD3CD8 *  1.4 (0.9)  1.3 (0.8)  2.1 (0.7)  0.008 (3×2; 3×1) 
CD3TCRαβ  91.9 (7.8)  93.0 (5.4)  89.8 (19.1)  0.740 
CD3TCRγδ *  6.3 (5.4)  8.4 (5.3)  4.7 (2.6)  0.049 (2×3) 
002CD3CD45RA *  53.2 (17.9)  58.8 (11.8)  39.7 (11.9)  0.001 (2×3; 1×3) 
CD3CD45RO  56.0 (21.0)  62.5 (10.3)  59.2 (13.7)  0.563 
CD3HLA *  18.6 (12.9)  22.0 (10.0)  12.4 (6.0)  0.023 (2×3) 
CD3CD25 * *  30.9 (15.6)  27.2 (8.5)  14.7 (4.9)  0.001 (1×3; 2×3) 
CD3CD28 *  72.0 (11.6)  70.6 (2.5)  84.9 (7.7)  0.001 (3×2; 3×1) 
CD3CD80 *  0.7 (0.6)  1.0 (0.9)  0.2 (0.2)  0.001 (2×3; 1×3) 
CD3CD95  79.3 (13.6)  74.7 (16.5)  76.7 (9.6)  0.704 
CD3CD95L *  16.2 (22.1)  50.9 (34.7)  13.2 (9.5)  0.005 (2×1; 2×3) 
CD3CD152 *  5.2 (12.2)  1.3 (1.4)  0.5 (0.4)  0.022 (2×3) 

When we compared blood cell subpopulations between patients with tuberculosis or cancer and the control group, we observed a significant decrease in the percentage of CD4 T lymphocytes in the disease groups (p = 0.001). Despite the reduced percentage of CD4 lymphocytes in patients with cancer, the T cells of these patients coexpressed some activation markers, such as CD25 and CD80. In the tuberculosis group, CD95L and CD152 were increased in addition to these T-cell activation markers. Coexpression of T-cell activation markers suggests that these lymphocytes underwent the first stages of antigen activation.

Determination of apoptosis

The apoptosis data are expressed as the percentage of positive mononuclear cells in the fluid and blood of patients with tuberculosis or cancer and in the blood of control subjects. Apoptotic cells in the pleural fluid were only observed in 6 (20.0%) of the 30 patients studied (5 with tuberculosis: 5/14; 35.7%, and one with cancer: 1/16; 6.2%). The percentage of apoptotic mononuclear cells ranged from 0.2 to 32.9% in the pleural fluid and from 1.7 to 27.0% in the blood (Table 5); in the control group this percentage ranged from 0.2 to 7.9% (Table 6).

Table 5.

Percentage of BrdUTP-positive mononuclear cells in pleural fluid and peripheral blood of patients with tuberculous (1–14) or neoplastic (15–30) pleural effusions

Patient  Diagnosis  Pleural fluid  Blood 
Tuberculosis  30.27  26.66 
  32.88  1.75 
  0.93  — 
  0.57  — 
  0.47  — 
  0.70  — 
  30.25  6.45 
  1.26  — 
  0.64  — 
10    0.70  — 
11    29.86  15.27 
12    1.30  — 
13    20.64  — 
14    0.32  — 
15  Malignant  1.10  — 
16    0.83  — 
17    0.36  — 
18    0.74  — 
19    0.92  — 
20    3.05  1.89 
21    0.62  — 
22    0.53  — 
23    0.70  — 
24    0.76  — 
25    0.76  — 
26    0.23  — 
27    0.62  — 
28    1.91  — 
29    23.58  8.06 
30    0.73  — 
Table 6.

Percentage of BrdUTP-positive mononuclear cells in the peripheral blood of healthy blood donors (control)

Control  Blood 
3.62 
5.94 
5.72 
3.86 
5.60 
7.92 
0.74 
10  1.02 
11  4.46 
12  4.32 
13  2.94 
14  2.74 
15  1.68 
16  0.20 
17  0.20 
18  3.98 
19  7.90 
20  2.86 
DISCUSSION

Tuberculosis and cancer are among the main causes of exudative pleural effusions. Although the effusions are predominantly lymphocytic in both cases, many studies have evaluated the subpopulations, activation state, and relationship with a peripheral blood cellular profile.3–5,18,19

Separate analysis of the pleural fluid showed that only CD3 and CD14 cell subpopulations quantitatively differed between tuberculosis and cancer. CD3 cells predominate in tuberculosis, whereas CD14 cells are more highly expressed in cancer. It should be emphasized that the increase in CD14-positive mononuclear cells in neoplastic effusions was not associated with any change in this cell population in the peripheral blood. Previously, Gjomarkaj et al.25 studied mononuclear cells (CD14) derived from neoplastic effusions and showed that these cells coexpress the HLA-DR antigen (activation marker), produce interleukin 1β and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF α), and stimulate the proliferation of allogenic T lymphocytes. These findings suggest that these cells are involved in the tumor-associated inflammatory reaction.

Although the percentage of apoptotic T lymphocytes appeared to be higher in tuberculosis, the statistical significance of this difference was marginal. This result might be explained by the size of the sample (30 cases); however, the number of antigens analyzed and the complexity of preparations also limited the analysis.

As the pleural cavity represents a separate compartment, it is important to establish the relationship between local phenomena and systemic repercussions. When we compared the cellular composition of pleural fluid and blood, we observed a relative increase in CD4-positive T lymphocytes in the pleural fluid from patients with tuberculosis and patients with cancer (higher in tuberculosis). This increase of CD4-positive T lymphocytes in the pleural fluid has been previously reported and is probably related to the predominance of this cell type over CD8-positive T cells or to reductions in the latter that have been observed in tuberculosis.8,9,12,15–18,26–29

The number of CD3CD45RO cells (activated memory T cells) was higher in the pleural fluid. This finding, together with the reduced CD3CD45RA population (naive T cells), suggests that this phenotype is related to the process of cell activation. No significant differences between fluid and blood were observed for other markers (CD95L, CD152, or HLA-DR).

Despite the importance of apoptosis in pathological processes, few investigations have been conducted on pleural effusions. In our study, the blood and fluid of only 6 (20%) patients showed elevated percentages of apoptotic cells when compared to the blood of healthy subjects. Most (83.3%) samples with an elevated percentage of apoptotic cells were tuberculous exudates. To investigate the possible association between cells undergoing apoptosis and specific immunophenotypes, we evaluated the correlation of apoptosis with surface marker expression (CD14, CD3CD95, CD3CD95L, CD3CD28, CD3HLA-DR, CD3CD45RO, and CD3CD45RA), but no correlation could be established. However, cell apoptosis in these fluids might be related to signaling pathways that involve other molecules, such as Bcl-2 and Bax, or to a deficiency in phagocytotic mechanisms30,31. Further studies of pleural effusions are necessary to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for increased apoptosis.

The increased percentage of CD3CD95L cells in the blood of patients with tuberculosis as compared to controls and patients with cancer might reflect the host response to mycobacterial infection. These bacteria escape destruction by macrophages by preventing the fusion of phagosomes and lysosomes, thereby impairing the bactericidal action of lysosomal components.32,33 Organisms use multiple mechanisms to prevent mycobacterial infection, such as the activation of a Th1-type response. Once activated, these lymphocytes express Fas ligand (CD95L) on their membrane to eliminate a variety of cells, including macrophages, that express the Fas molecule (CD95), resulting in the destruction of cells infected with mycobacteria.31 Our finding of CD95L expression by lymphocytes might be related to this mechanism.

In the present study, we have evaluated various cellular apoptosis markers to characterize the cellular phenotypes of patients with tuberculous or neoplastic pleural effusions. In addition, we used the total cell content of the pleural fluid in our evaluations. This approach minimizes sample manipulation and reduces the loss of leukocyte subpopulations.

CONCLUSION

Tuberculous and malignant pleural effusions are enriched in lymphocytes with a helper/inducer T cell phenotype, which are mainly memory cells. CD14-positive cells were more prevalent in malignant effusions, while CD3-positive cells expressing Fas ligand were more prevalent in tuberculous effusions.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to acknowledge support from the Foundation to Support Research of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP) and the National Council of Research (CNPq), Brazil.

REFERENCES
[1]
C Kroegel , VB Antony .
Immunobiology of pleural inflammation: potencial implications for pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy.
Eur Respir J, 10 (1997), pp. 2411-2418
[2]
G Lucivero , G Pierucci , L Bonomo .
Lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood and pleural fluid.
Eur Respir J, 1 (1988), pp. 337-340
[3]
T Moisan , AJ Chandrasekhar , J Robinson , J McKenna , G Marti .
Distribution of lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with exudative pleural effusions.
Am Rev of Respir Dis, 117 (1978), pp. 507-511
[4]
W Domagala , EE Emeson , LG Koss .
T and B lymphocyte enumeration in the diagnosis of lymphocyte – rich pleural fluids.
Acta Cytol, 25 (1981), pp. 108-110
[5]
S Kochman , J Bernard , F Lavaud , A Cazabat , DE Dubois , JM Montreynaud .
T - lymphocyte subsets in pleural fluids: discrimination according to traditional and monoclonal antibody- defined markers.
Eur J Respir Dis, 65 (1984), pp. 586-591
[6]
AK Ghosh , AI Spriggs , DY Mason .
Immunocytochemical staining of T and B lymphocytes in serous effusions.
J Clin Pathol, 38 (1985), pp. 608-612
[7]
E Ribera , I Ocaña , JM Martinez-Vasquez , M Rossell , T Espanol , A Ruibal .
High level of interferon gamma in tuberculosis pleural effusion.
Chest, 93 (1988), pp. 308-311
[8]
K Kapila , JN Pande , A Garg , K Verna .
T lymphocyte subsets and B lymphocytes in tuberculous pleural effusion.
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci, 28 (1987), pp. 90-93
[9]
PF Barnes , SD Mistry , CL Cooper , C Pirmez , TH Rea , RL Modlin .
Compartmentalization of CD4+ T lymphocyte sub-population in tuberculous pleuritis.
J Immunol, 142 (1989), pp. 1114-1119
[10]
RY Khalil , MM Khalil .
Flow cytometric study of T- cell subsets in lymphocytic pleural effusions.
Cytometry, 30 (1997), pp. 204-205
[11]
D Dlugovitzky , L Rateni , A Torres- Morales , J Ruiz-Silva , R Pinesky , B Canosa , O Molteni , et al.
Levels of interleukin-8 in tuberculous pleurisy and the profile of immunocompetent cells in pleural and peripheral compartments.
Immunol Letters, 55 (1997), pp. 35-39
[12]
A Faith , DM Schellenberg , AD Rees , DM Mitchell .
Antigenic specificity and subset analysis of T cells isolated from the bronchoalveolar lavage and pleural effusion of patients with lung diseases.
Clin Exp Immunol, 87 (1992), pp. 272-278
[13]
C Albera , I Mabritto , P Ghio , Gv Scagliotti , E Pozzi .
Lymphocytes subpopulations analysis in pleural fluid and peripheral blood in patients with lymphocytic pleural effusions.
Respiration, 58 (1991), pp. 65-71
[14]
JS Guzman , KJ Bross , U Costabel .
Malignant pleural effusions due to small cell carcinoma of the lung. An immunocytochemical cell-surface analysis of lymphocytes and tumor cells.
Acta Cytol, 34 (1990), pp. 497-501
[15]
OM Yoshino , S Hazama , K Shimoda , T Suzuki .
The characterization of peritoneal and pleural exudate cells from malignant effusions.
Surg Today, 23 (1993), pp. 500-503
[16]
YM Chen , WK Yang , CC Ting , WY Tsai , DM Yang , Whang-Peng , et al.
Cross regulation by IL-10 and IL-2/IL-12 of the helper T cell and the cytolytic activity of lymphocytes from malignant effusions of lung cancer patients.
Chest, 112 (1997), pp. 960-966
[17]
E Robinson , R Segal , A Vesely , T Mekori .
Lymphocyte subpopulation in peripheral blood and malignant effusions of cancer patients.
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol, 22 (1986), pp. 308-311
[18]
CN Baxevanis , GVZ Dedoussis , AD Gritzapis , GP Stathopoulos , M Papamichail .
Interleukin 1β synergises with interleukin 2 in the outgrowth of autologous tumor-reactive CD8+ effectors.
Br J Cancer, 70 (1994), pp. 625-630
[19]
G Mantovani , A Macciò , R Versace , M Pisano , P Lai , S Esu , M Ghiani , et al.
Tumor-associated lymphocytes (TAL) are competent to produce higher levels of cytokines in neoplastic pleural and peritoneal effusions than those found in sera and are able to release into culture higher leves of IL-2 and IL-6 than those released by PBMC.
J Mol Med, 73 (1995), pp. 409-416
[20]
M Pellegrini , A Strasser .
A protrait of Bcl-2 protein family: Life, death, and the whole picture.
J Clin Immunol, 19 (1999), pp. 365-377
[21]
JA Listman , Y Wang , JE Castro , I Rimm , PW Finn , DL Perkins .
Detection of a rare apoptotic T cell in vivo.
Cytometry, 33 (1998), pp. 340-347
[22]
K Mitani , Y Nishioka , K Yamabe , H Ogawa , T Miki , H Yanagawa , et al.
Soluble fas in malignant pleural effusion and its expression in lung cancer.
[23]
B Mollereau , D Blanchard , O Deas , C Dumont , D Metivier , A Bernard , et al.
Relationship between proliferation and suscepibility to CD95 and CD2 mediated apoptosis in stimulated primary T lymphocytes. T cell manifesting proliferative unresponsiveness are preferentially susceptible to CD95- mediated apoptosis.
J Immunol, 159 (1997), pp. 2668-2677
[24]
RW Light , MI MacGregor , PC Luchsinger , WC Ball .
Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates.
Ann Intern Med, 77 (1972), pp. 507-513
[25]
M Giomarkaj , E Pace , M Melis , M Spatafora , GB Toews .
Mononuclear cells in exudative malignant pleural effusions. Characterization of pleural phagocytic cells.
Chest, 106 (1994), pp. 1042-1049
[26]
K Shimokata , H Kishimoto , E Takagi , T Tsunekawa .
Detemination of the T cell subset producing β Interferon in tuberculous pleural effusion.
Microbiol Immunol, 30 (1986), pp. 353-361
[27]
MF Baganha , A Pego , MA Lima , EV Gaspar , B Pharm , AR Cordeiro .
Serum and pleural adenosine deaminase. Correlation with lymphocytic populations.
Chest, 97 (1990), pp. 605-610
[28]
T Pettersson , M Klockars , PE Helstrom , H Riska , A Wangel .
T and B lymphocytes in pleural effusions.
Chest, 73 (1978), pp. 49-51
[29]
GM Ainslie , JA Solomon , ED Bateman .
Lymphocyte and lymphocyte subset numbers in blood and in bronchoalveolar lavage and pleural fluid in various forms of human pulmonary tuberculosis at presentation and during recovery.
Thorax, 47 (1992), pp. 513-518
[30]
J Savill .
Recognition and phagocitosis of cells undergoing apoptosis.
Br Med Bul, 53 (1997), pp. 491-508
[31]
J Sikora , G Dworacki , R Giersz , J Zeromski .
The role of monocytes/macrophages in TCR-zeta chain downregulation and apoptosis of T lymphocytes in malignant pleural effusions.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 18 (2004), pp. 26-32
[32]
CA Janeway , P Travers , M Walport , JD Capra .
Immunobiology.
The immune system in health and disease, 4th ed, pp. 301
[33]
ZA Malik , GM Denning , DJ Kusner .
Inhibition of Ca2+ signaling by Mycobacterium tuberculosis is associated with reduced phagossome-lysossome fusion and increased survival within human macrophages.
J Exp Med, 191 (2000), pp. 287-302
Copyright © 2008. CLINICS
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos