Información del artículo
Resumen
En este trabajo, examinamos empíricamente el impacto de la cooperación tecnológica sobre los resultados empresariales. Basándonos en la literatura previa sobre el impacto tecnológico de las colaboraciones y en los trabajos que conectan las capacidades tecnológicas con la consecución de ventajas competitivas sostenibles, argumentamos que los acuerdos de cooperación tecnológica tienen un efecto positivo sobre la consecución de innovaciones en producto y/o proceso, las cuales, a su vez, redundan en unos resultados empresariales superiores. Asimismo, también analizamos el efecto diferencial de tres tipos de colaboraciones, vertical, institucional y horizontal. Nuestros resultados indican que, mientras los resultados innovadores median la relación entre la cooperación institucional y los resultados empresariales, la cooperación vertical tiene tanto un efecto directo como indirecto, mediado por los resultados innovadores, sobre tales resultados empresariales. Finalmente, la cooperación horizontal ejerce un efecto negativo tanto en la consecución de innovaciones como en los resultados empresariales.
Palabras clave:
Cooperación Tecnológica
Resultados Innovadores
Socio Tecnológico
Resultados Empresariales
Abstract
In this paper, we empirically examine the impact of technological cooperation on firm performance. Drawing on previous literature on technological impact of cooperation and also studies that connect technological capabilities with the achievement of sustained competitive advantages, we argue that technological cooperation exerts a positive effect on product and/or process innovations. From this point, we establish that innovative results positively impact on firm performance. We also analyse the differential effect of three types of cooperation, namely vertical, institutional and horizontal cooperation. Our results point out that, while innovation results mediate the relationship between institutional cooperation and firm performance, vertical cooperation has both a direct and indirect effect —mediated by innovation results— on firm performance. Finally, horizontal cooperation exerts a negative effect on innovation results as well as on firm performance.
Key words:
Technological Cooperation
Innovation Results
Technological Partner
Firm Performance
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias bibliográficas
[Amit and Shoemaker, 1993]
R. Amit, P. Shoemaker.
Strategic assets and organisational rent.
Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1993), pp. 33-46
[Arora and Gambardella, 1990]
A. Arora, A. Gambardella.
Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology.
Journal of Industrial Economics, XXXVIII (1990), pp. 361-379
[Arundel and Kabla, 1998]
A. Arundel, I. Kabla.
What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms.
Research Policy, 27 (1998), pp. 127-141
[Bailetti and Callahan, 1992]
A.J. Bailetti, J.R. Callahan.
Assessing the impact of university interactions on an R&D organization.
R&D Management, 22 (1992), pp. 145-156
[Baltagi, 2001]
B.H. Baltagi.
Econometric analysis of panel data.
Wiley, (2001),
[Barney, 1991]
J.B. Barney.
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.
Journal of Management, 17 (1991), pp. 99-120
[Barney and Hansen, 1994]
J. Barney, M. Hansen.
Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage.
Strategic Management Journal, 15 (1994), pp. 175-190
[Barney et al., 2001]
J. Barney, M. Wright, D.J. Ketchen.
The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991.
Journal of Management, 27 (2001), pp. 625-641
[Baron and Kenny, 1986]
R. Baron, D. Kenny.
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (1986), pp. 1173-1182
[Bayona et al., 2001]
C. Bayona, T. García-Marco, E. Huerta.
Firms’ motivations for co-operative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms.
Research Policy, 30 (2001), pp. 1289-1307
[Bayona et al., 2003]
C. Bayona, T. García-Marco, E. Huerta.
¿Cooperar en I+D? Con quién y para qué.
Revista de Economía Aplicada, 31 (2003), pp. 103-134
[Becheikh et al., 2006]
N. Becheikh, R. Landry, N. Amara.
Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003.
Technovation, 26 (2006), pp. 644-664
[Becker and Dietz, 2004]
W. Becker, J. Dietz.
R&D co-operation and innovation activities of firmsevidence for the German manufacturing industry.
Research Policy, 33 (2004), pp. 209-223
[Belderbos et al., 2004a]
R. Belderbos, M. Carree, B. Lokshin.
Co-operative R&D and firm performance.
Research Policy, 33 (2004), pp. 1477-1492
[Belderbos et al., 2004b]
R. Belderbos, M. Carree, B. Diederen, B. Lokshin, R. Veugelers.
Heterogeneity in R&D co-operation strategies.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22 (2004), pp. 1237-1263
[Belsley et al., 1980]
D.A. Belsley, E. Kuh, R.E. Welsch.
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity.
John Wiley, (1980),
[Benfratello and Sembenelli, 2002]
L. Benfratello, A. Sembenelli.
Research joint ventures and firm level performance.
Research Policy, 31 (2002), pp. 493-507
[Bonaccorsi and Piccaluga, 1994]
A. Bonaccorsi, A. Piccaluga.
A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships.
R&D Management, 24 (1994), pp. 229-247
[Caloghirou et al., 2003]
Y. Caloghirou, S. Ioannides, N. Vonortas.
Research Joint Ventures.
Journal of Economic Surveys, 17 (2003), pp. 541-570
[Cassiman, 1999]
B. Cassiman.
Cooperación en Investigación y Desarrollo: Evidencia para la Industria Manufacturera Española.
Papeles de Economía Española, 81 (1999), pp. 143-154
[Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002]
B. Cassiman, R. Veugelers.
R&D co-operation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium.
The American Economic Review, 92 (2002), pp. 1169-1185
[Chen and Miller, 2004]
W. Chen, K. Miller.
Determinants of firms’ technological search intensity.
Mimeo, (2004),
[Chung and Kim, 2003]
S. Chung, G.M. Kim.
Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier's standpoint.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 587-603
[Cincera et al., 2003]
M. Cincera, L. Kempen, B. Van Pottelsberghe, R. Veugelers, C. Villegas Sánchez.
Productivity growth, R&D and the role of international collaborative agreements: some evidence for Belgian manufacturing companies.
Brussels Economic Review, 46 (2003), pp. 107-140
[Cohen and Levin, 1989]
W. Cohen, R. Levin.
Innovation and market structure.
Handbook of Industrial Organization,
[Colombo and Garrone, 1996]
M. Colombo, P. Garrone.
Technological co-operative agreements and firm's R&D intensity. A note on causality relations.
Research Policy, 25 (1996), pp. 923-932
[Crépon et al., 1998]
B. Crépon, E. Duguet, J. Mairesse.
Research, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level.
Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7 (1998), pp. 115-158
[Das and Teng, 2000]
T. Das, B. Teng.
A resource-based theory of strategic alliances.
Journal of Management, 26 (2000), pp. 31-61
[Dierickx and Cool, 1989]
I. Dierickx, K. Cool.
Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage.
Management Science, 35 (1989), pp. 1504-1511
[Dodgson, 1994]
M. Dodgson.
Technological Collaboration and Innovation.
The Handbook of Industrial Innovation,
[Donaldson and Preston, 1995]
T.L. Donaldson, L.E. Preston.
The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications.
Academy of Management Review, 20 (1995), pp. 65-91
[Dussauge and Garrette, 1998]
P. Dussauge, B. Garrette.
Anticipating the evolutions and outcomes of strategic alliances between rival firms.
International Studies of Management & Organization, 27 (1998), pp. 104-126
[Dutta and Weiss, 1997]
S. Dutta, A. Weiss.
The relationship between a firm's level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements.
Management Science, 43 (1997), pp. 343-356
[Faems et al., 2004]
FAEMS, D.; VAN LOOY, B. y DEBACKERE, K. (2004), «The role of interorganizational collaboration within innovation strategies: towards a portfolio approach», Journal of Product Innovation Management, in press.
[Fariñas and Jaumandreu, 2000]
J.C. Fariñas, J. Jaumandreu.
Diez años de Encuesta sobre Estrategias Empresariales (ESEE).
Economía Industrial, 329 (2000), pp. 29-42
[Finkelstein and Hambrick, 1990]
S. Finkelstein, D.D. Hambrick.
Top Management-Team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), pp. 484-503
[Fritsch and Lukas, 2001]
M. Fritsch, R. Lukas.
Who co-operates on R&D?.
Research Policy, 30 (2001), pp. 297-312
[Galende and De La Fuente, 2003]
J. Galende, J.M. De La Fuente.
Internal factors determining a firm's innovative behaviour.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 715-736
[Galende and Suárez, 1999]
J. Galende, I. Suárez.
A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities.
Research Policy, 28 (1999), pp. 891-905
[Gemünden et al., 1992]
H.G. Gemünden, P. Heydebreck, R. Herden.
Technological interweavement: a means of achieving innovation success.
R&D Management, 22 (1992), pp. 359-375
[Gibbons et al., 1994]
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow.
The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies.
Sage Publications, (1994),
[Griliches, 1979]
Z. Griliches.
Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth.
The Bell Journal of Economics, 10 (1979), pp. 92-116
[Griliches, 1998]
Z. Griliches.
Productivity Puzzles and I&D: Another Nonexplanation.
The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2 (1998), pp. 9-21
[Gulati, 1995]
R. Gulati.
Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (1995), pp. 619-652
[Hagedoorn, 1993]
J. Hagedoorn.
Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganisational modes of co-operation and sectoral differences.
Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1993), pp. 371-385
[Hagedoorn et al., 2000]
J. Hagedoorn, A. Link, N. Vonortas.
Research partnerships.
Research Policy, 29 (2000), pp. 567-586
[Hillman and Keim, 2001]
A.J. Hillman, G.D. Keim.
Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line?.
Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2001), pp. 125-139
[Hitt et al., 1991]
M.A Hitt, R.E. Hoskisson, D.R. Ireland, J.S. Harrison.
Effects of Acquisitions on R&D Inputs and Outputs.
Academy of Management Journal, 34 (1991), pp. 639-706
[Hitt et al., 1997]
M.A. Hitt, R.E. Hoskisson, H. Kim.
International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms.
Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1997), pp. 767-798
[Hoang and Rothaermel, 2005]
H. Hoang, F. Rothaermel.
The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance.
Academy of Management Journal, 48 (2005), pp. 332-345
[Jorde and Teece, 1992]
T. Jorde, D. Teece.
Innovation, cooperation and antitrust.
Antitrust, Innovation and Competitiveness, pp. 47-70
[Kogut, 1988]
B. Kogut.
Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Strategic Management Journal, 9 (1988), pp. 312-332
[Langfield-Smith and Greenwood, 1998]
K. Langfield-Smith, M. Greenwood.
Developing cooperative buyer-supplier relationships: a case study of Toyota.
Journal of Management Studies, 35 (1998), pp. 332-353
[Leiponen, 2005]
A. Leiponen.
Skills and innovation.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23 (2005), pp. 303-323
[Lewis, 1990]
J. Lewis.
Partnerships for profit.
The Free Press, (1990),
[Lööf and Heshmati, 2002]
H. Lööf, A. Heshmati.
Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: a firm-level innovation study.
International Journal of Production Economics, 76 (2002), pp. 61-85
[Lundvall, 1992]
B.A. Lundvall.
User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation.
National Systems of Innovation,
[Martínez-ROS, 2000]
E. Martínez-ROS.
Explaining the decisions to carry out product and process innovations: the Spanish case.
The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 10 (2000), pp. 223-242
[Miotti and Sachwald, 2003]
L. Miotti, F. Sachwald.
Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 1481-1499
[Molero and Buesa, 1996]
J. Molero, M. Buesa.
Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: the case of the Madrid region.
Research Policy, 25 (1996), pp. 647-663
[Mowery et al., 1998]
D.C. Mowery, J.E. Oxley, B.S. Silverman.
Technological overlap and interfirm co-operation: implications for resource-based view of the firm.
Research Policy, 27 (1998), pp. 507-523
[Neter et al., 1989]
J. Neter, W. Wasserman, M.H. Kutner.
Applied regression models.
Irwin, (1989),
[Nooteboom, 1999]
B. Nooteboom.
Inter-firm Alliances; Analysis and Design.
Routledge, (1999),
[OCDE, 2002]
OCDE (2002), Science, Technology and Industry: Outlook 2002. Paris.
[Patel and Pavitt, 1995]
P. Patel, K. Pavitt.
Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation.
Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change,
[Pisano, 1990]
G.P. Pisano.
The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), pp. 153-176
[Ring et al., 1992]
P.S. Ring, A. Van Der Ven.
Structuring cooperative relations between organizations.
Strategic Management Journal, 13 (1992), pp. 483-498
[Romijn and Albaladejo, 2002]
H. Romijn, M. Albaladejo.
Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England.
Research Policy, 31 (2002), pp. 1053-1067
[Rosenkranz, 2003]
S. Rosenkranz.
Simultaneous choice of process and product innovation when consumers have a preference for product variety.
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50 (2003), pp. 183-201
[Rothwell, 1989]
R. Rothwell.
Small firms, innovation and industrial change.
Small Business Economics, 1 (1989), pp. 51-64
[Rothwell and Dodgson, 1994]
R. Rothwell, M. Dodgson.
Innovation and size of firm.
The Hadbokk of Industrial Innovation,
[Russo and Fouts, 1997]
M.V. Russo, P.A. Fouts.
A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and. Profitability.
Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1997), pp. 534-559
[Sakakibara, 2001]
M. Sakakibara.
The diversity of R&D Consortia and firm behaviour: Evidence from Japanese data.
Journal of Industrial Economics, 49 (2001), pp. 181-196
[Siebert, 1996]
R. Siebert.
The impact of research joint ventures on firm performance: an empirical assessment.
WZB Working Paper, FS IV, pp. 96-103
[Teece et al., 1997]
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen.
Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1997), pp. 509-533
[Tether, 2002]
B. Tether.
Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis.
Research Policy, 31 (2002), pp. 947-967
[Tidd and Trewhella, 1997]
J. Tidd, M. Trewhella.
Organisational and technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition and learning.
R&D Management, 27 (1997), pp. 359-375
[Waddock and Graves, 1997]
S.A. Waddock, S.B. Graves.
The corporate social performance-financial performance link.
Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1997), pp. 303-319
[Wally and Fong, 2000]
S. Wally, C. Fong.
Effects of firm performance, organizational slack, and debt on entry timing: A study of ten emerging product markets in USA.
Industry and Innovation, 7 (2000), pp. 169-182
[Whitley, 2002]
R. Whitley.
Developing innovative competences: the role of institutional frameworks.
Industrial and Corporate Change, 11 (2002), pp. 497-528
Los autores agradecen la ayuda financiera del Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, con el proyecto SEJ2004-08176, y del Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, con el proyecto SEJ2006-01731.
Copyright © 2007. ACEDE
