metricas
covid
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica Actividad in vitro comparativa de garenoxacino (BMS-284756). Programa SENTRY Esp...
Información de la revista
Vol. 21. Núm. 8.
Páginas 404-409 (enero 2003)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 21. Núm. 8.
Páginas 404-409 (enero 2003)
Acceso a texto completo
Actividad in vitro comparativa de garenoxacino (BMS-284756). Programa SENTRY España (1999-2000)
Visitas
5991
Elena Lozaa,e
Autor para correspondencia
eloza.hrc@salud.madrid.org

Dra. E. Loza. Servicio de Microbiología. Hospital Ramón y Cajal. Ctra. de Colmenar, km 9. 28034 Madrid. España
, Rafael Cantóna, Álvaro Pascualb, Fe Tubauc, M.ª Isabel Morosinia, Felisa Almaraza, Evelio Pereab, Rogelio Martínc, Ronald N. Jonesd
a Servicio de Microbiología. Hospital Ramón y Cajal. Madrid
b Servicio de Microbiología. Hospital Virgen Macarena. Sevilla
c Servicio de Microbiología. Hospital Bellvitge. Barcelona. España
d The Jones Group. Iowa. Estados Unidos
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Fundamento

Evaluar la actividad in vitro de la nueva des-fluoro (6) quinolona garenoxacino (BMS-284756) comparativamente con ciprofloxacino, levofloxacino y gatifloxacino frente a microorganismos recogidos en 1999 y 2000 durante el programa SENTRY

Métodos

Se estudiaron 2.599 aislados procedentes del Hospital Ramón y Cajal (Madrid), Virgen Macarena (Sevilla) y Bellvitge (Barcelona). Las concentraciones inhibitorias mínimas (CIM) se realizaron por microdilución (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, NCCLS)

Resultados

Frente a Enterobacteriaceae el rango de Cim modal de garenoxacino fue ≤ 0,03-0,12 mg/l, similar al resto de quinolonas. El 70% de los aislados de Pseudomonas aeruginosa fueron sensibles a garenoxacino y el 85% a ciprofloxacino y levofloxacino. Garenoxacino fue la quinolona más activa en Staphylococcus aureus (sensibles y resistentes a meticilina), con valores de Cim90 de ≤ 0,03 y 2 mg/l, respectivamente. Todos los aislados de Streptococcus pneumoniae fueron sensibles a garenoxacino y su actividad no se modificó en los que presentaban sensibilidad disminuida a penicilina; en términos de Cim90, garenoxacino fue 16 veces más activa que ciprofloxacino y levofloxacino y de 4 a 8 veces más que gatifloxacino. Los seis aislados de S. pneumoniae resistentes a ciprofloxacino presentaron valores de CIM de garenoxacino entre ≤ 0,03 y 0,5 mg/l. Frente a Haemophilus influenzae y Moraxella catarrhalis garenoxacino tuvo una excelente actividad (Cim ≤ 0,06 mg/l), al igual que el resto de quinolonas

Conclusiones

La actividad de garenoxacino fue similar a la del resto de quinolonas frente a Enterobacteriaceae, inferior en P. aeruginosa y superior frente a microorganismos grampositivos, incluyendo S. aureus resistentes a meticilina y S. pneumoniae con sensibilidad disminuida a penicilina

Palabras clave:
Garenoxacino
Fluoroquinolonas
Actividad in vitro
Introduction

Comparative in vitro activity of garenoxacin (BMS-284756). Sentry program, Spain (1999-2000). To evaluate the in vitro activity of the new des-fluoro quinolone, garenoxacin (BMS-284756), compared to activities of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin in clinical isolates recovered over 1999 and 2000 within the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program

Methods

Quinolone-MICs were performed using the standard NCCLS microdilution technique in 2599 isolates recovered from Hospital Ramón y Cajal (Madrid), Virgen Macarena (Sevilla), and Bellvitge (Barcelona)

Results

The modal MIC range value exhibited by garenoxacin (≤ 0.03-0.12 mg/L) for Enterobacteriaceae was similar to that of the other quinolones tested. A total of 70% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to garenoxacin and 85% to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Garenoxacin exhibited the highest activity in Staphylococcus aureus, including both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates, with MIC90 values of ≤ 0.03 and 2 mg/L, respectively. All Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to garenoxacin, regardless of their penicillin susceptibility status; in terms of MIC90, garenoxacin was 16 times more active than ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin and 4-8 times more active than gatifloxacin. All 6 ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains showed garenoxacin MIC values ranging from ≤ 0.03 to 0.5 mg/L. In Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, garenoxacin displayed excellent in vitro activity (MIC ≤ 0.06 mg/L), similar to that of the other quinolones tested

Conclusions

Garenoxacin activity was similar to the activity of other quinolones in Enterobacteriaceae, but was lower in P. aeruginosa. Garenoxacin activity was clearly higher than that of other quinolones in gram-positive isolates, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus and S. pneumoniae with reduced penicillin susceptibility

Key words:
Garenoxacin
Fluoroquinolones
In vitro activity
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
D.C. Hamilton, H. Ludlam.
New anti-Gram-positive agents.
Curr Opin Crit Care, 7 (2001), pp. 232-237
[2.]
C.J. Thomson.
The global epidemiology of resistance to ciprofloxacin and the changing nature of antibiotic resistance: a 10 year perspective.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 43 (1999), pp. 31-40
[3.]
M. Bassetti, L.M. Dembry, P.A. Farrel, D.A. Callan, V.T. Andriole.
Antimicrobial activities of BMS-284756 compared with those of fluoroquinolones and beta-lactams against gram-positive clinical isolates.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 46 (2002), pp. 234-238
[4.]
G.A. Pankuch, K. Nagai, T.A. Davies, M.R. Jacobs, P.C. Appelbaum.
Antipneumococcal activity of BMS 284756 compared to those of six other agents.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 46 (2002), pp. 251-254
[5.]
T.M. Weller, J.M. Andrews, G. Jevons, R. Wise.
The in vitro activity of BMS-284756, a new des-fluorinated quinolone.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 49 (2002), pp. 177-184
[6.]
J.C. Fung-Tomc, B. Minassian, B. Kolek, E. Huczko, L. Aleksunes, T. Stickle, et al.
Antibacterial spectrum of a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone, BMS-284756.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 44 (2000), pp. 3351-3356
[7.]
E.J. Goldstein, D.M. Citron, C.V. Merriam, Y.A. Warren, K.L. Tyrrell, H. Fernández.
In vitro activities of the des-fluoro-6-Quinolone BMS-284756 against aerobic and anaerobic pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue animal and human bite wound infections.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 46 (2002), pp. 866-870
[8.]
M.A. Pfaller, R.N. Jones, G.V. Doern, K. Kugler.
Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with bloodstream infection: Frequencies of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (United States and Canada, 1997).
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 42 (1998), pp. 1762-1770
[9.]
NCCLS, (2001),
[10.]
R.N. Jones, M.A. Pfaller.
In vitro activity of newer fluoroquinolones for respiratory tract infections and emerging patterns of antimicrobial resistance: data from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program.
Clin Infect Dis, 31 (2000), pp. 16-23
[11.]
D.E. Low, M. Muller, C.L. Duncan, B.M. Willey, J.C. De Azavedo, A. McGeer, et al.
Activity of BMS-284756, a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone, against Staphylococcus aureus, including contributions of mutations to quinolone resistance.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 46 (2002), pp. 1119-1121
[12.]
J. Fung-Tomc, L. Valera, B. Minassian, D. Bonner, E. Gradelski.
Activity of the novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone BMS-284756 against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant staphylococci.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 48 (2001), pp. 735-738
[13.]
H.M. Blumberg, D. Rimland, D.J. Carrol, P. Terry, I.K. Wachsmuth.
Rapid development of ciprofloxacin resistance in methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J Infect Dis, 163 (1991), pp. 1279-1285
[14.]
H. Humphreys, E. Mulvihill.
Ciprofloxacin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Lancet, 17 (1985), pp. 383
[15.]
F.J. Boswell, J.M. Andrews, R. Wise.
Comparison of the In vitro activities of BMS-284756 and four fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 48 (2001), pp. 446-447
[16.]
D.J. Biedenbach, R.N. Jones, M.A. Pfaller.
The Sentry Participants Group (Americas and Europe). Activity of BMS284756 against 2,681 recent clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis: Report from The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2000) in Europe, Canada and the United States.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 39 (2001), pp. 245-250
[17.]
S. Malay, P.M. Roblin, T. Reznik, A. Kutlin, M.R. Hammerschlag.
In vitro activities of BMS-284756 against Chlamydia trachomatis and recent clinical isolates of Chlamydia pneumoniae.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 46 (2002), pp. 517-518
[18.]
J. Dubois, C. St-Pierre.
In vitro susceptibility study of BMS-284756 against Legionella species.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 41 (2001), pp. 79-82
[19.]
J. Garau, M. Xercavins, M. Rodríguez-Carballeira, J.R. Gómez-Vera, I. Coll, D. Vidal, et al.
Emergence and dissemination of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the community.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 43 (1999), pp. 2736-2741
[20.]
R.R. Muder, C. Brennen, A.M. Goetz, M.M. Wagener, J.D. Rihs.
Association with prior fluoroquinolone therapy of widespread ciprofloxacin resistance amog gram-negative isolates in a Veteran affairs medical center.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 35 (1991), pp. 246-258
[21.]
J.M. Aguiar, J. Chacón, R. Cantón, F. Baquero.
The emergence of highly fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli in community-acquired urinary tract infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 29 (1992), pp. 349-350
[22.]
J. Carratalá, A. Fernández-Sevilla, F. Tubau, M. Callis, F. Gudiol.
Emergence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli bacteremia in neutropenic patients with cancer who have received prophylactic norfloxacin.
Clin Infect Dis, 20 (1995), pp. 557-560
[23.]
R. Wise, T. Gee, G. Marshall, J.M. Andrews.
Single-dose pharmacokinetics and penetration of BMS 284756 into an inflammatory exudate.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 46 (2002), pp. 242-244
Copyright © 2003. Elsevier España, S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos