metricas
covid
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica Evaluación de los pacientes con neumonía nosocomial y falta de respuesta al tr...
Información de la revista
Vol. 23. Núm. S3.
Neumonía nosocomial
Páginas 52-57 (diciembre 2005)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 23. Núm. S3.
Neumonía nosocomial
Páginas 52-57 (diciembre 2005)
Neumonía nosocomial
Acceso a texto completo
Evaluación de los pacientes con neumonía nosocomial y falta de respuesta al tratamiento
Assessment of patients with poor resolution of HAP
Visitas
3809
Richard G. Wunderink
Autor para correspondencia
r-wunderink@northwestern.edu

Correspondencia: Dr. R.G. Wunderink. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. 676 North St. Clair, Suite 14-044. Chicago, IL 60611. Estados Unidos.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Chicago. Illinois. Estados Unidos
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo

El énfasis en el manejo de la neumonía nosocomial está actualmente centrado en la efectividad del tratamiento antibiótico y su efecto en la mortalidad. Alrededor del 62% de los pacientes con neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica (NAV) cumple al menos un criterio objetivo de fallo terapéutico. Los microorganismos predominantes asociados con fallo terapéutico son Pseudomonas aeruginosa y Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina. Hay múltiples causas de fallo de resolución en NAV: inmunocompromiso, resistencia antibiótica oculta, dosificación inadecuada, sobreinfecciones concomitantes o posteriores. El diagnóstico de fallo antibiótico y la distinción entre sobreinfección o causas no infecciosas es difícil porque los criterios clínicos aislados son inadecuados. La respuesta microbiológica es valorable sólo si se emplean cultivos cuantitativos. Los marcadores bioquímicos pueden ser más precisos que los clínicos, pero todavía no discriminan entre causas. La estrategia diagnóstica adecuada y los algoritmos terapéuticos están en discusión y se precisa mayor investigación en este campo.

Palabras clave:
Neumonía
Antibióticos
Resistencia

Emphasis in VAP management is now shifting to the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy and its effect on subsequent mortality. As many as 62% of patients with VAP meet a set of objective criteria for failure to respond. The predominant microorganisms associated with failure of therapy are Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Multiple causes of failure to respond in VAP exist: compromised host immunity, occult antibiotic resistance, inadequate antibiotic dosing, and concomitant or subsequent superinfections. The diagnosis of antibiotic failure and distinguishing failure from superinfection or noninfectious mimics is difficult because clinical criteria alone are inadequate. Microbiologic response is accurate only if quantitative cultures are used. Biochemical markers may be more accurate than clinical but still don’t discriminate between causes. The appropriate diagnostic strategy and treatment algorithms have not been fully addressed and more research is clearly needed.

Key words:
Pneumonia
Antibiotics
Resistance
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
J.Y. Fagon, J. Chastre, M. Wolff, C. Gervais, S. Parer-Aubas, F. Stephan, et al.
Invasive and noninvasive strategies for management of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. A randomized trial.
Ann Intern Med, 132 (2000), pp. 621-630
[2.]
N. Singh, P. Rogers, C.W. Atwood, M.M. Wagener, V.L. Yu.
Short-course empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit. A proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 162 (2000), pp. 505-511
[3.]
Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 171 (2005), pp. 388-416
[4.]
J. Rello, M. Gallego, D. Mariscal, R. Soñora, J. Vallés.
The value of routine microbial investigation in ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 156 (1997), pp. 196-200
[5.]
E.H. Ibrahim, S. Ward, G. Sherman, R. Schaiff, V.J. Fraser, M.H. Kollef.
Experience with a clinical guideline for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Crit Care Med, 29 (2001), pp. 1109-1115
[6.]
M. Ioanas, M. Ferrer, M. Cavalcanti, R. Ferrer, S. Ewig, X. Filella, et al.
Causes and predictors of nonresponse to treatment of intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia.
Crit Care Med, 32 (2004), pp. 938-945
[7.]
C.E. Luyt, V. Guerin, A. Combes, J.L. Trouillet, S.B. Ayed, M. Bernard, et al.
Procalcitonin kinetics as a prognostic marker of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 171 (2005), pp. 48-53
[8.]
J. Chastre, M. Wolff, J.Y. Fagon, S. Chevret, F. Thomas, D. Wermert, et al.
Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial.
JAMA, 290 (2003), pp. 2588-2598
[9.]
A.F. Shorr, N. Zadeikis, W.L. Jackson, A.S. Ramage, S.C. Wu, A.M. Tennenberg, et al.
Levofloxacin for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a subgroup analysis from a randomized trial.
Clin Infect Dis, 40 (2005), pp. S123-S129
[10.]
M.P. Fink, D.R. Snydman, M.S. Niederman, K.V. Leeper Jr, R.H. Johnson, S.O. Heard, et al.
Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe Pneumonia Study Group.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 38 (1994), pp. 547-557
[11.]
C. Brun-Buisson, J.P. Sollet, H. Schweich, S. Briere, C. Petit.
Treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia with piperacillin- tazobactam/amikacin versus ceftazidime/amikacin: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. VAP Study Group.
Clin Infect Dis, 26 (1998), pp. 346-354
[12.]
J. Fagon, H. Patrick, D.W. Haas, A. Torres, C. Gibert, W.G. Cheadle, et al.
Treatment of gram-positive nosocomial pneumonia. Prospective randomized comparison of quinupristin/dalfopristin versus vancomycin. Nosocomial Pneumonia Group.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 161 (2000), pp. 753-762
[13.]
R.G. Wunderink, S.K. Cammarata, T.H. Oliphant, M.H. Kollef.
Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
Clin Ther, 25 (2003), pp. 980-992
[14.]
G. Zanetti, F. Bally, G. Greub, J. Garbino, T. Kinge, D. Lew, et al.
Cefepime versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, evaluator-blind, prospective, randomized study.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 47 (2003), pp. 3442-3447
[15.]
R.G. Wunderink, J. Rello, S.K. Cammarata, R.V. Croos-Dabrera, M.H. Kollef.
Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia.
Chest, 124 (2003), pp. 1789-1797
[16.]
R.P. Baughman, M.A. Kerr.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia patients who do not reduce bacteria from the lungs have a worse prognosis.
J Intensive Care Med, 18 (2003), pp. 269-274
[17.]
J. Rello, D. Mariscal, F. March.
Recurrent Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in ventilated patients: relapse or reinfection?.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 157 (1998), pp. 912-916
[18.]
D. Talon, B. Mulin, C. Rouget, P. Bailly, M. Thouverez, J.F. Viel.
Risks and routes for ventilator-associated pneumonia with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 157 (1998), pp. 978-984
[19.]
D.R. Silver, I.L. Cohen, P.F. Weinberg.
Recurrent Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in an intensive care unit.
Chest, 101 (1992), pp. 194-198
[20.]
B.S. Crouch, R.G. Wunderink, C.B. Jones, K.V. Leeper Jr.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Chest, 109 (1996), pp. 1019-1029
[21.]
J. Rello, M. Sa-Borges, H. Correa, S.R. Leal, J. Baraibar.
Variations in etiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia across four treatment sites: implications for antimicrobial prescribing practices.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 160 (1999), pp. 608-613
[22.]
K. Wolk, W. Docke, B.V. Von.
Comparison of monocyte functions after LPS- or IL-10-induced reorientation: importance in clinical immunoparalysis.
Pathobiology, 67 (1999), pp. 253-256
[23.]
M. Peters, A. Petros, G. Dixon, D. Inwald, N. Klein.
Acquired immunoparalysis in paediatric intensive care: prospective observational study.
BMJ, 319 (1999), pp. 609-610
[24.]
G.U. Meduri, G.L. Mauldin, R.G. Wunderink, K.V. Leeper Jr, C.B. Jones, E. Tolley, et al.
Causes of fever and pulmonary densities in patients with clinical manifestations of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Chest, 106 (1994), pp. 221-225
[25.]
J.F. Timsit, S. Chevret, J. Valcke, B. Misset, B. Renaud, F.W. Goldstein, et al.
Mortality of nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated patients: influence of diagnostic tools.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 154 (1996), pp. 116-123
[26.]
Y. Carmeli, N. Troillet, G.M. Eliopoulos, M.H. Samore.
Emergence of antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of risks associated with different antipseudomonal agents.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 43 (1999), pp. 1379-1382
[27.]
N. Plipat, G. Livni, H. Bertram, R.B. Thomson Jr.
Unstable vancomycin heteroresistance is common among clinical isolates of methiciliin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J Clin Microbiol, 43 (2005), pp. 2494-2496
[28.]
A. Khosrovaneh, K. Riederer, S. Saeed, M.S. Tabriz, A.R. Shah, M.M. Hanna, et al.
Frequency of reduced vancomycin susceptibility and heterogeneous subpopulation in persistent or recurrent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
Clin Infect Dis, 38 (2004), pp. 1328-1330
[29.]
E. Tuomanen, H. Pollack, A. Parkinson, M. Davidson, R. Facklam, R. Rich, et al.
Microbiological and clinical significance of a new property of defective lysis in clinical strains of pneumococci.
J Infect Dis, 158 (1988), pp. 36-43
[30.]
S.K. Fridkin, J.C. Hageman, M. Morrison, L.T. Sanza, K. Como-Sabetti, J.A. Jernigan, et al.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities.
N Engl J Med, 352 (2005), pp. 1436-1444
[31.]
P.A. Moise-Broder, G. Sakoulas, G.M. Eliopoulos, J.J. Schentag, A. Forrest, R.C. Moellering Jr.
Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy.
Clin Infect Dis, 38 (2004), pp. 1700-1705
[32.]
G. Sakoulas, G.M. Eliopoulos, R.C. Moellering Jr.
Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) group II: is there a relationship to the development of intermediate-level glycopeptide resistance?.
J Infect Dis, 187 (2003), pp. 929-938
[33.]
A.R. Hauser, E. Cobb, M. Bodi, D. Mariscal, J. Vallès, J.N. Engel, et al.
Type III protein secretion is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Crit Care Med, 30 (2002), pp. 521-528
[34.]
G.S. Schulert, H. Feltman, S.D. Rabin, C.G. Martin, S.E. Battle, J. Rello, et al.
Secretion of the toxin ExoU is a marker for highly virulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia.
J Infect Dis, 188 (2003), pp. 1695-1706
[35.]
C. Lamer, V. De Beco, P. Soler, S. Calvat, J.Y. Fagon, M.C. Dombret, et al.
Analysis of vancomycin entry into pulmonary lining fluid by bronchoalveolar lavage in critically ill patients.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 37 (1993), pp. 281-286
[36.]
M. Wysocki, F. Thomas, M.A. Wolff, Y. Pean, Y. Ravaud, B. Herman.
Comparison of continuous with discontinuous intravenous infusion of vancomycin in severe MRSA infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 35 (1995), pp. 352-354
[37.]
D.P. Nicolau, C.D. Freeman, P.P. Belliveau, C.H. Nightingale, J.W. Ross, R. Quintiliani.
Experience with a once-daily aminoglycoside program administered to 2,184 adult patients.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 39 (1995), pp. 650-655
[38.]
D.L. George, P.S. Falk, M.G. Umberto, K.V. Leeper Jr., R.G. Wunderink, E.L. Steere, et al.
Nosocomial sinusitis in patients in the medical intensive care unit: a prospective epidemiological study.
Clin Infect Dis, 27 (1998), pp. 463-470
[39.]
J.J. Rouby, P. Laurent, M. Gosnach, E. Cambau, G. Lamas, A. Zouaoui, et al.
Risk factors and clinical relevance of nosocomial maxillary sinusitis in the critically ill.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 150 (1994), pp. 776-783
[40.]
P.J. Dennesen, A.J. Van der Ven, A.G. Kessels, G. Ramsay, M.J. Bonten.
Resolution of infectious parameters after antimicrobial therapy in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163 (2001), pp. 1371-1375
[41.]
C.M. Luna, D. Blanzaco, M.S. Niederman, W. Matarucco, N.C. Baredes, P. Desmery, et al.
Resolution of ventilator-associated pneumonia: prospective evaluation of the clinical pulmonary infection score as an early clinical predictor of outcome.
Crit Care Med, 31 (2003), pp. 676-682
[42.]
L. Vidaur, B. Gualis, A. Rodríguez, R. Ramírez, A. Sandiumenge, G. Sirgo, et al.
Clinical resolution in patients with suspicion of VAP: A cohort study comparing patients with and without ARDS.
Crit Care Med, 33 (2005), pp. 1248-1253
[43.]
J.J. Schentag.
Correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters to efficacy of antibiotics: Relationships between serum concentrations, MIC values, and bacterial eradication in patients with gram-negative pneumonia.
Scand J Infect Dis, 74 (1991), pp. 218-234
[44.]
F.D. Sottile, T.J. Marrie, D.S. Prough, C.D. Hobgood, D.J. Gower, L.X. Webb, et al.
Nosocomial pulmonary infection: Possible etiologic significance of bacterial adhesion to endotracheal tubes.
Crit Care Med, 14 (1986), pp. 265-270
[45.]
P. Montravers, J.Y. Fagon, J. Chastre, M. Lecso, M.C. Dombret, J.L. Trouillet, et al.
Follow-up protected specimen brushes to assess treatment in nosocomial pneumonia.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 147 (1993), pp. 38-44
[46.]
C.H. A’Court, C.S. Garrard, D. Crook, I. Bowler, C. Conlon, T. Peto, et al.
Microbiological lung surveillance in mechanically ventilated patients, using nondirected bronchial lavage and quantitative culture.
Quart J Med, 86 (1993), pp. 635-648
[47.]
C.S. Garrard, C.D. A’Court.
The diagnosis of pneumonia in the critically ill.
Chest, 108 (1995), pp. 17S-25S
[48.]
S. Gibot, A. Cravoisy, M.N. Kolopp-Sarda, M.C. Bene, G. Faure, P.E. Bollaert, et al.
Time-course of sTREM (soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells)-1, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein plasma concentrations during sepsis.
Crit Care Med, 33 (2005), pp. 792-796
[49.]
S. Gibot, A. Cravoisy, B. Levy, M.C. Bene, G. Faure, P.E. Bollaert.
Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells and the diagnosis of pneumonia.
N Engl J Med, 350 (2004), pp. 451-458
[50.]
S. Gibot, P.E. Le Renard, P.E. Bollaert, M.N. Kolopp-Sarda, M.C. Bene, G.C. Faure, et al.
Surface triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 expression patterns in septic shock.
Intensive Care Med, 31 (2005), pp. 594-597
[51.]
J.H. Kim, H.A. Gallis.
Observations on spiralling empiricism: Its causes, allure, and perils, with particular reference to antibiotic therapy.
Am J Med, 87 (1989), pp. 201-206
[52.]
N. Sopena-Galindo, M. Sabrià-Leal.
Neumonía nosocomial en el enfermo no intubado.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 23 (2005),
[53.]
L. Vidaur, M. Ochoa, E. Díaz, J. Rello.
Enfoque clínico del paciente con neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 23 (2005),
[54.]
D. Koulenti, P. Myrianthefs, G. Dimopoulos, G. Baltopoulos.
Neumonía nosocomial causada por Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 23 (2005),
[55.]
P.A. Moise, A. Forrest, M.C. Birmingham, J.J. Schentag.
The efficacy and safety of linezolid as treatment for Staphylococcus aureus infections in compassionate use patients who are intolerant of, or who have failed to respond to, vancomycin.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 50 (2002), pp. 1017-1026
[56.]
J. Vallés, D. Mariscal.
Neumonía por Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 23 (2005), pp. 24-29
[57.]
R.B. Brown, J.A. Kruse, G.W. Counts, J.A. Russell, N.V. Christou, M.L. Sands.
Double-blind study of endotracheal tobramycin in the treatment of gram-negative bacterial pneumonia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 34 (1990), pp. 269-272
Copyright © 2005. Elsevier España S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos