metricas
covid
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica Tratamiento actual de la candidemia. Papel de anidulafungina
Información de la revista
Vol. 26. Núm. S14.
Anidulafungina en el tratamiento de la infección fúngica invasora
Páginas 21-28 (diciembre 2008)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 26. Núm. S14.
Anidulafungina en el tratamiento de la infección fúngica invasora
Páginas 21-28 (diciembre 2008)
Acceso a texto completo
Tratamiento actual de la candidemia. Papel de anidulafungina
Current treatment of candidemia. Role of anidulafungin
Visitas
2978
Benito Almirantea,
Autor para correspondencia
balmirante@vhebron.net

Correspondencia: Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron. Pg. Vall d’Hebron, 119-129. 08035 Barcelona. España.
, Javier Pemánb
a Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron. Barcelona. España
b Servicio de Microbiología. Hospital Universitario La Fe. Valencia. España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo

A pesar de los recientes avances en el tratamiento antifúngico, la incidencia y la mortalidad de las infecciones invasoras por Candida no han variado en los últimos años. En los estudios de vigilancia publicados hasta la fecha la incidencia estimada de candidemia difiere según el área geográfica, que es sensiblemente mayor en Estados Unidos que en Europa. Las principales condiciones predisponentes para el desarrollo de la candidemia son la neutropenia, los defectos en la inmunidad celular y la alteración de la flora microbiana normal. Como factores de riesgo independientes se han reconocido la colonización previa, la antibioterapia, el catéter venoso central, la neutropenia y la disfunción renal. En las últimas dos décadas la proporción de infecciones causadas por especies de Candida distintas de albicans se ha incrementado notablemente. Aunque la utilización de fluconazol se ha considerado uno de los factores principales en el cambio epidemiológico de la candidiasis invasora, particularmente en el aumento de especies menos sensibles a él, esta relación no ha sido demostrada. Los cambios epidemiológicos recientes son de especial relevancia para la elección del tratamiento de las candidemias. Las equinocandinas, y entre ellas la anidulafungina, constituyen un avance para el tratamiento de estas infecciones. La eficacia clínica, la tolerancia y la seguridad de la anidulafungina han sido demostradas en ensayos clínicos controlados de candidemia y candidiasis invasora. Las recomendaciones actuales incluyen a este antifúngico en la terapia empírica inicial de determinados pacientes, especialmente en situación clínica grave, con antecedentes de exposición a los azoles o con posibilidad de desarrollar efectos adversos o interacciones medicamentosas.

Palabras clave:
Candidemia
Anidulafungina
Tratamiento antifúngico
Equinocandinas

Despite recent advances in antifungal therapy, the incidence of invasive Candida infections and resulting mortality have remained unchanged in the last few years. In surveillance studies published to date, the estimated incidence of candidemia differs depending on the geographic area and is significantly higher in North America than in Europe. The main predisposing conditions for candidemia are neutropenia, cellular immunity deficit, and alteration of normal microbial flora.

Some independent risk factors have been identified, such as previous colonization, antibiotic therapy, central venous catheters, neutropenia, and renal dysfunction. In the last two decades, the proportion of infections due to non-albicans Candida has markedly increased. Although fluconazole use has been considered one of the main causes for the epidemiologic change in invasive candidiasis, especially in the increase of species less sensitive to this agent, this association remains unproven. These recent epidemiological changes are highly important when selecting treatment for candidemia. The echinocandins, which include anidulafungin, represent a step forward in the treatment of these infections. The clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of anidulafungin have been demonstrated in controlled clinical trials in candidemia and invasive candidiasis. Current recommendations include this antifungal agent in the initial empirical therapy of certain patients, especially in those with a critical clinical situation, previous azole exposure, or the possibility of developing adverse events or drug interactions.

Key words:
Candidemia
Anidulafungin
Antifungal therapy
Echinocandins
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
G.S. Martin, D.M. Mannino, S. Eaton, M. Moss.
The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.
N Engl J Med, 348 (2003), pp. 1546-1554
[2.]
M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema.
Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 20 (2007), pp. 133-163
[3.]
M.B. Edmond, S.E. Wallace, D.K. McClish, M.A. Pfaller, R.N. Jones, R.P. Wenzel.
Nosocomial bloodstream infections in United States hospitals: a three-year analysis.
Clin Infect Dis, 29 (1999), pp. 239-244
[4.]
M. Sota, C. Ezpeleta, R. Cisterna.
Descripción de 165 episodios de funguemia de un estudio multicéntrico.
Rev Iberoam Micol, 16 (1999), pp. 30-35
[5.]
A.M. Rentz, M.T. Halpern, R. Bowden.
The impact of candidemia on length of hospital stay, outcome, and overall cost of illness.
Clin Infect Dis, 27 (1998), pp. 781-788
[6.]
O. Gudlaugsson, S. Gillespie, K. Lee, B.J. Vande, J. Hu, S. Messer, et al.
Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidemia, revisited.
Clin Infect Dis, 37 (2003), pp. 1172-1177
[7.]
A.S. Kao, M.E. Brandt, W.R. Pruitt, L.A. Conn, B.A. Perkins, D.S. Stephens, et al.
The epidemiology of candidemia in two United States cities: results of a population-based active surveillance.
Clin Infect Dis, 29 (1999), pp. 1164-1170
[8.]
R.A. Hajjeh, A.N. Sofair, L.H. Harrison, G.M. Lyon, B.A. Arthington-Skaggs, S.A. Mirza, et al.
Incidence of bloodstream infections due to Candida species and in vitro susceptibilities of isolates collected from 1998 to 2000 in a population-based active surveillance program.
J Clin Microbiol, 42 (2004), pp. 1519-1527
[9.]
B. Almirante, D. Rodriguez, B.J. Park, M. Cuenca-Estrella, A.M. Planes, M. Almela, et al.
Epidemiology and predictors of mortality in cases of Candida bloodstream infection: results from population-based surveillance, Barcelona, Spain, from 2002 to 2003.
J Clin Microbiol, 43 (2005), pp. 1829-1835
[10.]
E. Canton, A. Viudes, J. Peman.
Infección sistémica nosocomial por levaduras.
Rev Iberoam Micol, 18 (2001), pp. 51-55
[11.]
L. Saiman, E. Ludington, M. Pfaller, S. Rangel-Frausto, R.T. Wiblin, J. Dawson, et al.
Risk factors for candidemia in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit patients. The National Epidemiology of Mycosis Survey study group.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 19 (2000), pp. 319-324
[12.]
M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema.
Rare and emerging opportunistic fungal pathogens: concern for resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus.
J Clin Microbiol, 42 (2004), pp. 4419-4431
[13.]
D. Abi-Said, E. Anaissie, O. Uzun, I. Raad, H. Pinzcowski, S. Vartivarian.
The epidemiology of hematogenous candidiasis caused by different Candida species.
Clin Infect Dis, 24 (1997), pp. 1122-1128
[14.]
V. Krcmery, A.J. Barnes.
Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance.
J Hosp Infect, 50 (2002), pp. 243-260
[15.]
C. Girmenia, P. Martino.
Fluconazole and the changing epidemiology of candidemia.
Clin Infect Dis, 27 (1998), pp. 232-234
[16.]
A.F. Shorr, D.R. Lazarus, J.H. Sherner, W.L. Jackson, M. Morrel, V.J. Fraser, et al.
Do clinical features allow for accurate prediction of fungal pathogenesis in bloodstream infections? Potential implications of the increasing prevalence of non-albicans candidemia.
Crit Care Med, 35 (2007), pp. 1077-1083
[17.]
A.M. Tortorano, J. Peman, H. Bernhardt, L. Klingspor, C.C. Kibbler, O. Faure, et al.
Epidemiology of candidaemia in Europe: results of 28-month European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) hospital-based surveillance study.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 23 (2004), pp. 317-322
[18.]
J. Peman, E. Canton, M. Gobernado.
Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from blood: results of a 2-year multicentre study in Spain.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 24 (2005), pp. 23-30
[19.]
M. Cuenca-Estrella, A. Gomez-Lopez, E. Mellado, M.J. Buitrago, A. Monzon, J.L. Rodriguez-Tudela.
Head-to-head comparison of the activities of currently available antifungal agents against 3,378 Spanish clinical isolates of yeasts and filamentous fungi.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 50 (2006), pp. 917-921
[20.]
M.A. Pfaller, L. Boyken, R.J. Hollis, S.A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, D.J. Diekema.
In vitro susceptibilities of Candida spp. to caspofungin: four years of global surveillance.
J Clin Microbiol, 44 (2006), pp. 760-763
[21.]
A.M. Tortorano, E. Biraghi, A. Astolfi, C. Ossi, M. Tejada, C. Farina, et al.
European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) prospective survey of candidaemia: report from one Italian region.
J Hosp Infect, 51 (2002), pp. 297-304
[22.]
P. Sandven, L. Bevanger, A. Digranes, H.H. Haukland, T. Mannsaker, P. Gaustad.
Candidemia in Norway (1991 to 2003): results from a nationwide study.
J Clin Microbiol, 44 (2006), pp. 1977-1981
[23.]
M.Y. Lin, Y. Carmeli, J. Zumsteg, E.L. Flores, J. Tolentino, P. Sreeramoju, et al.
Prior antimicrobial therapy and risk for hospital-acquired Candida glabrata and Candida krusei fungemia: a case-case-control study.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 4555-4560
[24.]
E. Sarvikivi, O. Lyytikainen, D.R. Soll, C. Pujol, M.A. Pfaller, M. Richardson, et al.
Emergence of fluconazole resistance in a Candida parapsilosis strain that caused infections in a neonatal intensive care unit.
J Clin Microbiol, 43 (2005), pp. 2729-2735
[25.]
P.G. Pappas, J.H. Rex, J.D. Sobel, S.G. Filler, W.E. Dismukes, T.J. Walsh, et al.
Guidelines for treatment of candidiasis.
Clin Infect Dis, 38 (2004), pp. 161-189
[26.]
J. Gavalda, I. Ruiz.
Guidelines for the treatment of invasive fungal infection. Invasive fungal infection by Candida spp. Invasive Fungal Infection Study Group (MICOMED) and Infection in Transplantation Study Group (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society for Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC).
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 21 (2003), pp. 498-508
[27.]
B.J. Spellberg, S.G. Filler, J.E. Edwards Jr..
Current treatment strategies for disseminated candidiasis.
Clin Infect Dis, 42 (2006), pp. 244-251
[28.]
J.H. Rex, J.E. Bennett, A.M. Sugar, P.G. Pappas, C.M. Van der Horst, J.E. Edwards, et al.
A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia. Candidemia Study Group and the National Institute.
N Engl J Med, 331 (1994), pp. 1325-1330
[29.]
P. Phillips, S. Shafran, G. Garber, C. Rotstein, F. Smaill, I. Fong, et al.
Multicenter randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. Canadian Candidemia Study Group.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 16 (1997), pp. 337-345
[30.]
B. Almirante, D. Rodriguez, M. Cuenca-Estrella, M. Almela, F. Sanchez, J. Ayats, et al.
Epidemiology, risk factors, and prognosis of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections: case-control population-based surveillance study of patients in Barcelona, Spain, from 2002 to 2003.
J Clin Microbiol, 44 (2006), pp. 1681-1685
[31.]
R. Kim, D. Khachikian, A.C. Reboli.
A comparative evaluation of properties and clinical efficacy of the echinocandins.
Expert Opin Pharmacother, 8 (2007), pp. 1479-1492
[32.]
C. Wagner, W. Graninger, E. Presterl, C. Joukhadar.
The echinocandins: comparison of their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical applications.
Pharmacology, 78 (2006), pp. 161-177
[33.]
J. Mora-Duarte, R. Betts, C. Rotstein, A.L. Colombo, L. Thompson-Moya, J. Smietana, et al.
Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis.
N Engl J Med, 347 (2002), pp. 2020-2029
[34.]
E.R. Kuse, P. Chetchotisakd, C.A. Da Cunha, M. Ruhnke, C. Barrios, D. Raghunadharao, et al.
Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive candidosis: a phase III randomised double-blind trial.
Lancet, 369 (2007), pp. 1519-1527
[35.]
A.C. Reboli, C. Rotstein, P.G. Pappas, S.W. Chapman, D.H. Kett, D. Kumar, et al.
Anidulafungin versus fluconazole for invasive candidiasis.
N Engl J Med, 356 (2007), pp. 2472-2482
[36.]
P.G. Pappas, C.M. Rotstein, R.F. Betts, M. Nucci, D. Talwar, J.J. De Waele, et al.
Micafungin versus caspofungin for treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis.
Clin Infect Dis, 45 (2007), pp. 883-893
[37.]
R. Petraitiene, V. Petraitis, A.H. Groll, M. Candelario, T. Sein, A. Bell, et al.
Antifungal activity of LY303366, a novel echinocandin B, in experimental disseminated candidiasis in rabbits.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 43 (1999), pp. 2148-2155
[38.]
D.S. Krause, J. Reinhardt, J.A. Vazquez, A. Reboli, B.P. Goldstein, M. Wible, et al.
Phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging study evaluating the safety and efficacy of anidulafungin in invasive candidiasis and candidemia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 48 (2004), pp. 2021-2024
[39.]
M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema, L. Boyken, S.A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, R.J. Hollis, et al.
Effectiveness of anidulafungin in eradicating Candida species in invasive candidiasis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 4795-4797
[40.]
J.D. Sobel, S.G. Revankar.
Echinocandins-first-choice or first-line therapy for invasive candidiasis?.
N Engl J Med, 356 (2007), pp. 2525-2526
[41.]
B.D. Brielmaier, E. Casabar, C.M. Kurtzeborn, P.S. McKinnon, D.J. Ritchie.
Early clinical experience with anidulafungin at a large tertiary care medical center.
Pharmacotherapy, 28 (2008), pp. 64-73
[42.]
L.R. Asmundsdottir, H. Erlendsdottir, M. Gottfredsson.
Increasing incidence of candidemia: results from a 20-year nationwide study in Iceland.
J Clin Microbiol, 40 (2002), pp. 3489-3492
[43.]
H.G. Prentice, C.C. Kibbler, A.G. Prentice.
Towards a targeted, risk-based, antifungal strategy in neutropenic patients.
Br J Haematol, 110 (2000), pp. 273-284
[44.]
M.C. Arendrup, K. Fuursted, B. Gahrn-Hansen, I.M. Jensen, J.D. Knudsen, B. Lundgren, et al.
Seminational surveillance of fungemia in Denmark: notably high rates of fungemia and numbers of isolates with reduced azole susceptibility.
J Clin Microbiol, 43 (2005), pp. 4434-4440
[45.]
K.B. Laupland, D.B. Gregson, D.L. Church, T. Ross, S. Elsayed.
Invasive Candida species infections: a 5 year population-based assessment.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 56 (2005), pp. 532-537
[46.]
M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema.
Role of sentinel surveillance of candidemia: trends in species distribution and antifungal susceptibility.
J Clin Microbiol, 40 (2002), pp. 3551-3557
[47.]
P.G. Pappas, J.H. Rex, J. Lee, R.J. Hamill, R.A. Larsen, W. Powderly, et al.
A prospective observational study of candidemia: epidemiology, therapy, and influences on mortality in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients.
Clin Infect Dis, 37 (2003), pp. 634-643
[48.]
D.L. Yamamura, C. Rotstein, L.E. Nicolle, S. Ioannou.
Candidemia at selected Canadian sites: results from the Fungal Disease Registry, 1992-1994. Fungal Disease Registry of the Canadian Infectious Disease Society.
CMAJ, 160 (1999), pp. 493-499
[49.]
A.L. Colombo, M. Nucci, R. Salomao, M.L. Branchini, R. Richtmann, A. Derossi, et al.
High rate of non-albicans candidemia in Brazilian tertiary care hospitals.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 34 (1999), pp. 281-286
[50.]
Y.C. Chen, S.C. Chang, K.T. Luh, W.C. Hsieh.
Stable susceptibility of Candida blood isolates to fluconazole despite increasing use during the past 10 years.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 52 (2003), pp. 71-77
[51.]
C. Viscoli, C. Girmenia, A. Marinus, L. Collette, P. Martino, B. Vandercam, et al.
Candidemia in cancer patients: a prospective, multicenter surveillance study by the Invasive Fungal Infection Group (IFIG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC).
Clin Infect Dis, 28 (1999), pp. 1071-1079
Copyright © 2008. Elsevier España S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos