covid
Buscar en
Estudios Gerenciales
Toda la web
Inicio Estudios Gerenciales Constant Leverage And Constant Cost Of Capital: A Common Knowledge Half-Truth
Información de la revista
Vol. 24. Núm. 107.
Páginas 13-33 (abril - junio 2008)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 24. Núm. 107.
Páginas 13-33 (abril - junio 2008)
Open Access
Constant Leverage And Constant Cost Of Capital: A Common Knowledge Half-Truth
Visitas
1899
Ignacio Vélez–Pareja
Ingeniero Industrial, M. Sc. en Ingeniería Industrial.Profesor Asociado, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, Cartagena, Colombia
Rauf Ibragimov
Matemático, Ph.D en Ciencias (Candidato), Maestría en Administración.Profesor asociado, Graduate School of Finance and Management, Moscow, Russia
Joseph Tham
Matemático, EdD, Harvard University.Profesor asistente visitante, Duke University - Duke Center for International Development, Estados Unidos
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Abstract

A typical approach for valuing finite cash flows is to assume that leverage is constant (usually as target leverage) and the cost of equity, Ke and the Weighted Average Cost of Capital, WACC are also assumed to be constant. For cash flows in perpetuity, and with the cost of debt, Kd as the discount rate for the tax shield, it is indeed the case that the Ke and WACC applied to the FCF are constant if the leverage is constant. However this does not hold true for finite cash flows.

In this document we show that for finite cash flows, Ke and hence WACC depend on the discount rate that is used to value the tax shield, TS and as expected, Ke and WACC are not constant with Kd as the discount rate for the tax shield, even if the leverage is constant. We illustrate this situation with a simple example. We analyze five methods: DCF using APV, FCF and traditional and general formulation for WACC, present value of CFE plus debt and Capital Cash Flow, CCF.

Key words:
WACC
constant cost of capital
constant leverage
cash flows
Resumen

Un enfoque típico para valorar flujos de caja finitos es suponer que el endeudamiento es constante (generalmente como un endeudamiento objetivo o deseado) y que por tanto, el costo del patrimonio, Ke y el costo promedio ponderado de capital CPPC, también son constantes. Para los flujos de caja perpetuos, y con el costo de la deuda, Kd como la tasa de descuento para el ahorro en impuestos o escudo fiscal, Ke y el CPPC aplicado al flujo de caja libre FCL son constantes si el endeudamiento es constante. Sin embargo esto no es verdad para los flujos de caja finitos.

En este documento mostramos que para flujos de caja finitos, Ke y por lo tanto el CPPC dependen de la tasa de descuento que se utiliza para valorar el ahorro en impuestos, AI y según lo esperado, Ke y el CPPC no son constantes con Kd como la tasa de descuento para el ahorro en impuestos, aunque el endeudamiento sea constante. Ilustramos esta situación con un ejemplo simple. Analizamos cinco métodos: el flujo de caja descontado, FCD, usando APV, el FCD y la formulación tradicional y general del CPPC, el valor presente del flujo de caja del accionista, FCA más deuda y el flujo de caja de capital, FCC.

Palabras Clave:
Costo promedio ponderado de capital
CPPC
costo de capital constante
endeudamiento constante
flujos de caja
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliography
[Abrams, 2001]
J.B. Abrams.
Quantitative Business Valuation: A Mathematical Approach for Today's Professional.
McGraw-Hill, (2001),
[Benninga, 2006]
S.Z. Benninga.
Principles of Finance with Excel.
Oxford University Press, (2006),
[Benninga and Oded, 1997]
S.Z. Benninga, H.S. Oded.
Corporate Finance. A Valuation Approach.
McGraw-Hill, (1997),
[Brealey and Myers, 2000]
R. Brealey, S.C. Myers.
Principles of Corporate Finance.
6th, McGraw Hill Irwin, (2000),
[Brealey and Myers, 2003]
R. Brealey, S.C. Myers.
Principles of Corporate Finance.
7th, McGraw Hill-Irwin, (2003),
[Brealey et al., 2006]
R. Brealey, S.C. Myers, F. Allen.
Principles of Corporate Finance.
8th, McGraw Hill Irwin, (2006),
[Copeland et al., 1995]
T.E. Copeland, T. Koller, J. Murrin.
Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies.
2nd, John Wiley & Sons, (1995),
[Copeland et al., 2000]
T.E. Copeland, T. Koller, J. Murrin.
Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies.
3rd, John Wiley & Sons, (2000),
[Damodaran, 2002]
A. Damodaran.
Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset.
2nd, John Wiley & Sons, (2002),
[Fernandez, 2002]
P. Fernandez.
Valuation Methods and Shareholder Value Creation.
Academic Press, (2002),
[Hamada, 1972]
R.S. Hamada.
The Effect of the Firm's Capital Structure on the Systematic Risk of Common Stock.
Journal of Finance, 27 (1972), pp. 435-452
[Inselbag and Kaufold, 1997]
I. Inselbag, H. Kaufold.
Two DCF Approaches in Valuing Companies under Alternative Financing Strategies (and How to Choose between Them).
Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 10 (1997), pp. 114-122
[International Bank for Reconstruction et al., 2002]
International Bank for Reconstruction Development – The World Bank.
Financial Modeling of Regulatory Policy., (2002),
[Mian and Velez-Pareja, 2008]
M.A. Mian, I. Velez-Pareja.
Applicability of the Classic WACC Concept in Practice.
Latin American Business Review, 2 (2008),
[Miles and Ezzell, 1980]
J. Miles, J.R. Ezzell.
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital, Perfect Capital Markets, and Project Life: A Clarification.
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15 (1980), pp. 719-730
[Pratt et al., 2000]
S.P. Pratt, R.F. Reilly, P. Schweihs.
Valuing A Business: The Analysis and Appraisal of Closely Held Companies.
4th, McGraw-Hill, (2000),
[Shapiro, 2005]
A.C. Shapiro.
Capital Budgeting and Investment Analysis.
Pearson Prentice Hall, (2005),
[Taggart, 1991]
R.A. Taggart Jr..
Consistent Valuation and Cost of Capital Expressions with Corporate and Personal Taxes.
Financial Management, 20 (1991), pp. 8-20
[Tham and Velez–Pareja, 2002]
J. Tham, I. Velez–Pareja.
An Embarrassment of Riches: Winning Ways to Value with the WACC (SSRN Working Paper 352180), (2002),
[Tham and Velez-Pareja, 2004]
J. Tham, I. Velez-Pareja.
Principles of Cash Flow Valuation An Integrated Market Approach.
Academic Press, (2004),
[Tham and Velez–Pareja, 2005]
J. Tham, I. Velez–Pareja.
Modeling Cash Flows with Constant Leverage: A Note (SSRN Working Paper 754444), (2005),
[Velez-Pareja, 2004]
I. Velez-Pareja.
Modeling the Financial Impact of Regulatory Policy: Practical Recommendations and Suggestions The Case of World Bank (SSRN Working Paper 580042), (2004),
[Velez-Pareja, 2005]
I. Velez-Pareja.
Cash Flow Valuation in an Inflationary World: The Case of World Bank for Regulated Firms (SSRN Working Paper 643266), (2005),
[Velez–Pareja and Burbano, 2006]
I. Velez–Pareja, A. Burbano.
Consistency in Valuation: A Practical Guide (SSRN Working Paper 758664), (2006),
[Velez–Pareja and Tham, 2001]
I. Velez–Pareja, J. Tham.
A Note on the Weighted Average Cost of Capital WACC (SSRN Working Paper 254587), (2001),
[Velez-Pareja and Tham, 2004]
I. Velez-Pareja, J. Tham.
Consistency in Chocolate. A Fresh Look at Copeland's Hershey Foods & Co Case (SSRN Working Paper 490153), (2004),
[Velez–Pareja and Tham, 2006a]
I. Velez–Pareja, J. Tham.
Constant Leverage Modeling: A Reply to “A Tutorial on the McKinsey Model for Valuation of Companies” (SSRN Working Paper 906786), (2006),
[Velez-Pareja and Tham, 2006]
I. Velez-Pareja, J. Tham.
The Mismatching of APV and the DCF in Brealey, Myers and Allen 8th Edition of Principles of Corporate Finance (SSRN Working Paper 931805), (2006),
[Velez–Pareja and Tham, 2006c]
I. Velez–Pareja, J. Tham.
Valuation of Cash Flows with Constant Leverage: Further Insights (SSRN Working Paper 879505), (2006),
Copyright © 2008. Universidad ICESI
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo