covid
Buscar en
Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa
Toda la web
Inicio Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa COMBATIENDO LA ALIENACIÓN DEL EMPLEADO EN EL TRABAJO:¿QUÉ PAPEL PUEDE JUGAR L...
Información de la revista
Vol. 17. Núm. 2.
Páginas 161-171 (mayo - agosto 2011)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 17. Núm. 2.
Páginas 161-171 (mayo - agosto 2011)
Open Access
COMBATIENDO LA ALIENACIÓN DEL EMPLEADO EN EL TRABAJO:¿QUÉ PAPEL PUEDE JUGAR LA JUSTICIA ORGANIZATIVA?
TACKLING EMPLOYEE ALIENATION AT WORK: WHAT ROLE COULD PLAY ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE?
Visitas
2504
Zoghbi Manrique de Lara Pabloa, Caamaño Brito Guillermob
a Departamento de Economía y Dirección de Empresas, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Campus Universitario de Tafira, Edificio Empresariales. Módulo C-2.18, E-35017 LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA, España
b Exalia, Avda. Ventisquero de la Condesa, 12, 1∘A. E-28035 MADRID, España
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
RESUMEN

Este estudio examina el impacto de la justicia organizativa (JO) sobre tres dimensiones identificadas por Seeman (1959) de la alienación laboral (AL): a saber, sentimientos de powerlessness o de impotencia en el trabajo, meaninglessness o falta de sentido y self-estrangement o desarraigo. Se argumenta que las percepciones de los tres tipos habituales de justicia organizativaprocedimental (JP), distributiva (JD) e interpersonal (JI)podrían conducir a los empleados a percibir a su organización como ilegítima y carente de valores y, por tanto, a perder su identificación y sentirse ajenos y alienados de la misma (AL). Mediante el análisis de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM) se identificó una relación negativa y significativa entre la justicia organizativa (JO) y los sentimientos de alienación laboral (AL) pero sólo en el caso de la justicia distributiva (JD) y, en particular, con las dimensiones powerlessness y meaninglessness. Los hallazgos sugieren que políticas para monitorizar el grado de justicia percibida de las recompensas en el trabajo (JD) pudieran erigirse en eficaces para combatir la alienación del empleado (AL) y, por ende, sus reconocidos efectos adversos sobre el trabajo. El artículo finalmente ofrece implicaciones, limitaciones y futuras investigaciones.

PALABRAS CLAVE:
Justicia Organizativa
Alienación Laboral
CLASIFICACIÓN JEL:
M12
M54
ABSTRACT

The present study examines the impact of organizational justice on the three dimensions of work alienation identified by Seeman (1959), i.e., powerlessness, meaninglessness and self-estrangement. It is argued that the three common types of organizational justice (i.e., procedural, distributive, and interactional) could lead employees to perceive their organization as illegitimate and lacking values and, hence, to feel detached and alienated from it. Structural equation modeling (SEM) results found a significant negative relationship between organizational justice and work alienation in the case of distributive justice and, in particular, for the powerlessness and meaninglessness dimensions of work alienation. The findings suggest that policies for the monitoring of distributive justice perceptions by the employees may be effective in combating work alienation and, hence, its harmful recognized effects in the workplace. The article also offers implications, limitations and avenues for future research.

KEY WORDS:
Organizational Justice
Work Alienation
JEL CLASSIFICATION:
M12
M54
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
[AQUINO et al., 1999]
K. AQUINO, M.U. LEWIS, M. BRADFIELD.
Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: a proposed model and empirical test.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (1999), pp. 1073-1091
[BENTLER y CHOU, 1987]
P.M. BENTLER, C.-P. CHOU.
Practical issues in structural modeling.
Sociological Methods & Research, 16 (1987), pp. 78-117
[BIEL y THØGERSEN, 2007]
A. BIEL, J. THØGERSEN.
Activation of social norms in social dilemmas.
Journal of Economic Psychology, 28 (2007), pp. 93-112
[BLAUNER, 1964]
R. BLAUNER.
Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry, University of Chicago Press, (1964),
[DEAN, 1961]
D.G. DEAN.
Alienation: It's meaning and measurement.
American Sociological Review, 26 (1961), pp. 753-758
[DURKHEIM, 1984]
E. DURKHEIM.
The Division of labor in society, Free Press, (1984),
[DURKHEIM, 1951]
E. DURKHEIM.
Suicide: A study in sociology, Free Press, (1951),
[FOLGER y CROPANZANO, 1998]
R. FOLGER, R. CROPANZANO.
Organizational justice and human resource management, Sage Publications, (1998),
[FROMM, 1955]
E. FROMM.
The sane society, Rinehart and Co., Inc, (1955),
[GILLILAND y CHAN, 2001]
S.W. GILLILAND, D. CHAN.
Justice in organizations: theory, methods, and applications.
Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology, 2 (2001), pp. 143-165
[GREENBERG, 1990]
J. GREENBERG.
Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow.
Journal of Management, 16 (1990), pp. 399-432
[GREENBERG, 1990]
J. GREENBERG.
Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (1990), pp. 561-568
[HIRSCHFELD y FEILD, 2000]
R.R. HIRSCHFELD, H.S. FEILD.
Work centrality and work alienation: Distinct aspects of a general commitment to work.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21 (2000), pp. 879-890
[HOROWITZ, 1966]
I.L. HOROWITZ.
On Alienation and the Social Order.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 27 (1966), pp. 230-237
[JOHNSON, 1973]
F. JOHNSON.
Alienation: Concept, Term, and Meanings, Seminar Press Inc, (1973),
[JÖRESKOG y SÖRBOM, 1986]
K.G. JÖRESKOG, D. SÖRBOM.
Lisrel IV: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationship by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods, 4th ed, Scientific Software, (1986),
[KIRSCH y LENGERMANN, 1971]
B.A. KIRSCH, J.J. LENGERMANN.
An empirical test of Robert Blauner's ideas on alienation in work as applied to different type jobs in a white-collar setting.
Sociology and Social Research, 56 (1971), pp. 180-194
[KOHN, 1976]
M.L. KOHN.
Occupational structure and alienation.
The American Journal of Sociology, 82 (1976), pp. 111-130
[LIND y TYLER, 1988]
E.A. LIND, T.R. TYLER.
The social psychology of interactional justice, Plenum, (1988),
[MARX, 1844]
K. MARX.
Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, Progress Publishers, (1844),
[MOTTAZ, 1981]
C.J. MOTTAZ.
Some Determinants of Work Alienation.
The Sociological Quarterly, 22 (1981), pp. 515-529
[MOORMAN, 1991]
R.H. MOORMAN.
Relationships between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (1991), pp. 845-855
[NAIR y VOHRA, 2010]
N. NAIR, N. VOHRA.
An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers.
Management Decision, 48 (2010), pp. 600-615
[NIEHOFF y MOORMAN, 1993]
B.P. NIEHOFF, R.H. MOORMAN.
Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior.
Academy of Management Journal, 36 (1993), pp. 527-556
[SARROS, 2002]
J.C. SARROS, et al.
Work Alienation and Organizational Leadership.
British Journal of Management, 13 (2002), pp. 285-304
[SCHROTH y SHAH, 2000]
H. SCHROTH, P. SHAH.
Procedures: do we really want to know them? An examination of the effects of procedural justice on self-esteem.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (2000), pp. 462-471
[SEEMAN, 1959]
M. SEEMAN.
On the Meaning of Alienation.
American Sociological Review, 24 (1959), pp. 783
[SEEMAN, 1967]
M. SEEMAN.
On the Personal Consequences of Alienation in Work.
American Sociological Review, V32 (1967), pp. P273
[SHEPARD, 1977]
J. SHEPARD.
Technology, alienation, and job satisfaction.
Annual Review of Sociology, 3 (1977), pp. 1-21
[TYLER, 2006]
T.R. TYLER.
Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance, Princeton University Press, (2006),
[TYLER y BLADER, 2005]
T.R. TYLER, S.L. BLADER.
Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings.
Academy of Management Journal, 48 (2005), pp. 1143-1158
[TYLER y LIND, 1992]
T.R. TYLER, E.A. LIND.
A relational model of authority in groups.
Advances in experimental social psychology,
[WILLIAMS y HAZER, 1986]
L.J. WILLIAMS, J.T. HAZER.
Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (1986), pp. 219-231
[ZOGHBI MANRIQUE DE LARA y CAAMANO BRITO, 2010]
P. ZOGHBI MANRIQUE DE LARA, G. CAAMANO BRITO.
El Impacto de la Alienación Laboral sobre las Conductas Desviadas en el Trabajo: Un Estudio Exploratorio.
Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 26 (2010), pp. 79-92
Copyright © 2011. Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos