covid
Buscar en
Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa
Toda la web
Inicio Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa FACTORES DETERMINANTES DE LA UTILIZACIÓN DE LAS SPIN-OFFS COMO MECANISMO DE TRA...
Información de la revista
Vol. 16. Núm. 2.
Páginas 115-135 (mayo - agosto 2010)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 16. Núm. 2.
Páginas 115-135 (mayo - agosto 2010)
Open Access
FACTORES DETERMINANTES DE LA UTILIZACIÓN DE LAS SPIN-OFFS COMO MECANISMO DE TRANSFERENCIA DE CONOCIMIENTO EN LAS UNIVERSIDADES
DETERMINANT FACTORS OF THE USE OF SPIN-OFFS LIKE MECHANISM OF KNOWLEGDE TRANSFER IN THE UNIVERSITIES
Visitas
2941
J.M. Beraza Garmendia, A. Rodríguez Castellanos
Universidad del País Vasco
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
RESUMEN

Si bien tradicionalmente las vías utilizadas para la transferencia del conocimiento generado en las universidades han sido la publicación de los resultados de investigación en revistas científicas y los contratos con las empresas, en los últimos tiempos se está extendiendo la utilización de otros dos mecanismos: la concesión de licencias a las empresas y la creación de spin-offs. El presente trabajo, por medio de una revisión de la literatura, trata de identificar los factores determinantes de la utilización de las spin-offs como mecanismo de transferencia. Los factores identificados son los siguientes: el interés del investigador, el sistema de incentivos existente en la universidad, las características de la tecnología explotada, el área académica origen de la invención, las características del sector industrial en el que se va a explotar la tecnología, la posible mayor rentabilidad a obtener con este mecanismo de transferencia y las características de las unidades de transferencia de conocimiento universitario.

PALABRAS CLAVE:
Transferencia de Conocimiento
Licencias
Spin-offs Universitarias
OTRI
Universidad
CLASIFICACIÓN JEL:
O32
L26
ABSTRACT

Although traditionally the roads used for the transfer of the knowledge generated in the universities have been the publication of the investigation results in scientific magazines and the contracts with the companies, in the last times he/she is expanding the use of other two mechanisms: the concession of licenses and the spin-offs creation. The present work, by means of a revision of the literature, is about identifying the decisive factors of the use of the spin-offs like transfer mechanism. The identified factors are the following ones: the investigator's interest, the existent system of incentives in the university, the characteristics of the exploited technology, the area academic origin of the invention, the characteristics of the industrial sector in which will exploit the technology, the bigger possible profitability to obtain with this transfer mechanism and the characteristics of the units of transfer.

KEYWORDS:
Technology Transfer
Licenses
Academic Spin-offs
OTT
University
JEL CLASSIFICATION:
O32
L26
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
[ALLEN and NORLING, 1991]
D.N. ALLEN, F. NORLING.
“Exploring Perceived Threats in Faculty Commercialization of Research”.
University Spin-off Companies, Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs, and Technology Transfer,
[ARORA, 1995]
A. ARORA.
“Licensing tacit knowledge: intellectual property rights and the market for know-how”.
Economics of innovation and New Technology, (1995), pp. 41-59
[AUTIO, 1997]
E. AUTIO.
“New technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts”.
Research Policy, (1997), pp. 263-281
[AUTIO and LAAMANEN, 1995]
E. AUTIO, T. LAAMANEN.
“Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators”.
International Journal of Technology Management, 10 (1995), pp. 643-664
[BEKKERS and VAN DER STEEN, 2003]
R. BEKKERS, M. VAN DER STEEN.
“IP-based spin-offs of public research organizations in the Dutch life sciences and ICT sectors”.
Turning science into business: Patenting and licensing at public research organisations,
[BRAY and LEE, 2000]
M.J. BRAY, J.N. LEE.
“University revenues from technology transfer: licensing fees vs. Equity positions”.
Journal of Business Venturing, 15 (2000), pp. 385-392
[CALLAN, 2001]
B. CALLAN.
“Generating Spin-offs. Evidence from across the OECD”.
Science Technology Industry review, (2001), pp. 13-56
[CHIESA and PICCALUGA, 2000]
V. CHIESA, A. PICCALUGA.
“Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the general framework and the case of academic spin-off companies”.
R&D Management, (2000), pp. 329-340
[CHUKUMBA and JENSEN, 2005]
C.O. CHUKUMBA, R.A. JENSEN.
“University Invention, Entrepreneurship, and Start-Ups”, NBER Working Paper No. 11475, pp. 33
[CONDOM, 2003]
CONDOM, P. (2003): Transferència de tecnologia universitària. Modalitats i estratègies, Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Girona.
[COTEC, 2003]
COTEC (2003): Nuevos mecanismos de transferencia de tecnología. Debilidades y oportunidades del Sistema Español de Transferencia de Tecnología, Encuentros Empresariales COTEC 9, Fundación COTEC para la Innovación Tecnológica, Madrid.
[DAHLSTRAND, 1997]
A. DAHLSTRAND.
“Entrepreneurial spinoff enterprises in Goteborg, Sweden”.
European Planning Studies, 5 (1997), pp. 659-674
[DEL CAMPO et al., 1999]
A. DEL CAMPO, A. SPARKS, R. HILL, R. KELLER.
“The transfer and commercialization of university-developed medical imaging technology: opportunities and problems”.
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46 (1999), pp. 289-298
[DI GREGORIO and SHANE, 2003]
D. DI GREGORIO, S. SHANE.
“Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?”.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 209-227
[DOUTRIAUX, 1984]
DOUTRIAUX, J. (1984): “Academic entrepreneurial firms revisited: 1980-1984”, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College Conference, pp. 521-537.
[DOUTRIAUX and DEW, 1992]
DOUTRIAUX, J. y DEW G. (1992): “Motivation of academic entrepreneurs and spin-off development: analysis of regional and university effects through case studies”, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College Conference, pp. 231-232.
[ETZKOWITZ and LEYDESDORFF, 2000]
H. ETZKOWITZ, L. LEYDESDORFF.
“The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations”.
Research Policy, (2000), pp. 109-123
[EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2002]
EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Cooperation between the research system and industry to promote innovative firms, Office for Official publications of the European Communities, (2002),
[FELDMAN et al., 2002]
M. FELDMAN, I. FELLER, J. BERCOVITZ, R. BURTON.
“Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities”.
Management Science, 48 (2002), pp. 105-121
[FERNÁNDEZ et al., 2007]
J.C. FERNÁNDEZ, M. TRENADO, A. UBIERNA, E. HUERGO.
“Las nuevas empresas de base tecnológica y la ayuda pública, evidencia para España”.
Economía Industrial, (2007), pp. 161-177
[GOLDFARB and HENREKSON, 2003]
B. GOLDFARB, M. HENREKSON.
“Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property”.
Research Policy, (2003), pp. 639-658
[GOLOB, 2003]
GOLOB, E. R. (2003): Generating spin-offs from university-based research: an institutional and entrepreneurial analysis., Ph.D. dissertation, The State University of New Jersey.
[GREGORY and SHEAHEN, 1991]
W. GREGORY, P. SHEAHEN.
“Technology Transfer by Spin-off Companies versus Licensing”.
University Spin-off Companies, Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs, and Technology Transfer,
[HELM and MAURONER, 2007]
R. HELM, O. MAURONER.
“Success of research-based spin-offs. State-of-the-art and guidelines for further research”.
Review of Managerial Science, 1 (2007), pp. 237-270
[HSU and BERNSTEIN, 1997]
D. HSU, T. BERNSTEIN.
“Managing the university technology licensing process”.
Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, (1997), pp. 1-33
[JANSEN and DILLON, 1999]
C. JANSEN, H. DILLON.
“Where do leads for licenses come from? Source data from six institutions”.
Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, (1999), pp. 51-66
[JENSEN and THURSBY, 2001]
R. JENSEN, M.C. THURSBY.
“Proofs and prototypes for sale the tale of university licensing”.
American Economic Review, (2001), pp. 240-259
[LOCKETT et al., 2003]
A. LOCKETT, M. WRIGHT, S. FRANKLIN.
“Technology Transfer and Universities’ Spin-Out Strategies”.
Small Business Economics, 20 (2003), pp. 185-200
[LOCKETT and WRIGHT, 2005]
A. LOCKETT, M. WRIGHT.
“Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies”.
Research Policy, (2005), pp. 1043-1057
[LOWE, 1993]
J. LOWE.
“Commercialization of University research: A policy perspective”.
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5 (1993), pp. 27-37
[LOWE, 2002]
LOWE, R.A. (2002): Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship: The Commercialization of University Research by Inventor-founded Firms, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
[MCDONALD, 2004]
MCDONALD ET AL. (2004): Management of intellectual property in publicly-funded research organisations: Towards European Guidelines, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
[MACHO-STADLER et al., 2006]
I. MACHO-STADLER, D. PÉREZ-CASTRILLO, R. VEUGELERS.
“Designing Contracts for University Spin-offs”, XXII Jornadas de Economía Industrial.
[MARKMAN et al., 2005]
G.D. MARKMAN, P.H. PHAN, D.B. BALKIN, P.T. GIANIODIS.
“Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer”.
Journal of Business Venturing, (2005), pp. 241-263
[MATKIN, 1990]
G.W. MATKIN.
Technology Transfer and the University, Macmillan Publishing Company, (1990),
[MCQUEEN and WALLMARK, 1991]
D.H. MCQUEEN, J.T. WALLMARK.
“University Technical Innovation: Spin-offs and Patents, in Göteborg, Sweden”.
University Spin-off Companies, Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs, and Technology Transfer,
[MUSTAR, 1997]
P. MUSTAR.
“Spin-off enterprises. How French academics create hi-tech companies: the conditions for success and failure”.
Science and Public Policy, (1997), pp. 37-43
[NELSEN, 1991]
L. NELSEN.
“The lifeblood of biotechnology: University-industry technology transfer”.
The Business of Biotechnology,
[OECD, 2001]
OECD (Ed.) (2001): “Special issue on fostering high-tech spin-offs: a public strategy for innovation”, Science technology industry review, N° 26. OECD, París.
[OLOFSSON and WAHLBIN, 1993]
OLOFSSON, C. y WAHLBIN, C. (1993): “Firms started by university researchers in Sweden – Roots, roles, relations and growth patterns”, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College Conference, pp. 610-620.
[POWERS and MCDOUGALL, 2005]
J.B. POWERS, P.P. MCDOUGALL.
“Policy orientation effects on performance with licensing to start-ups and small companies”.
Research Policy, (2005), pp. 1028-1042
[ROBERTS and MALONE, 1996]
E.B. ROBERTS, D. MALONE.
“Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations”.
R&D Management, 26 (1996), pp. 17-48
[SCHUTTE et al., 2001]
F. SCHUTTE, P. VAN DER SIJDE, J. VAN TILBURG.
“Entrepreneurship Skills and Incentives”.
Science Technology Industry review, (2001), pp. 143-164
[SHANE, 2004]
S. SHANE.
Academic Entrepreneurship. University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, Edward Elgar, (2004),
[SHANE, 2001a]
S. SHANE.
“Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation”.
Management Science, 47 (2001), pp. 205-220
[SHANE, 2001b]
S. SHANE.
“Technology Regimes and New Firm Formation”.
Management Science, 47 (2001), pp. 1173-1190
[SHANE and KHURANA, 2003]
S. SHANE, R. KHURANA.
“Bringing individuals back in: The effects of career experience on new firm founding”.
Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (2003), pp. 519-543
[SIEGEL, et al., 2003]
D. SIEGEL, D. WALDMAN, A. LINK.
“Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study”.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 27-48
[SOLÉ, 2005]
F. SOLÉ.
“La creación de empresas desde la universidad como contribución al desarrollo regional”.
La contribución de las universidades españolas al desarrollo,
[SOLÉ, 2002]
F. SOLÉ.
“Creación de Empresas de Base Tecnológica y desarrollo territorial. El rol de la universidad”.
Creación y gestión de Nuevas Empresas de Base Tecnológica. Reflexiones y propuestas. Experiencias en el País Vasco,
[STOREY and TETHER, 1998]
D.J. STOREY, B.S. TETHER.
“New technology-based firms in the European Union: an introduction”.
Research Policy, (1998), pp. 933-946
[TEECE, 1986]
D.J. TEECE.
“Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy”.
Research Policy, (1986), pp. 285-306
[THURSBY et al., 2001]
J.G. THURSBY, R. JENSEN, M.C. THURSBY.
“Objetives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing a survey of mayor U.S. universities”.
Journal of Technology Transfer, (2001), pp. 59-72
[TORNATZKY et al., 1995]
L. TORNATZKY, P. WAUGAMAN, L. CASSON, S. CROWELL, C. SPAHR, F. WONG.
Benchmarking best practices for university-industry technology transfer: Working with start-up companies, Southern Technology Council, (1995),
[UNISPIN, 1999]
UNISPIN.
Good practice guide, University of Twente, (1999),
[UTTERBACK, 1994]
J.M. UTTERBACK.
Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, (1994),
[VENDRELL and ORTÍN, 2008]
F. VENDRELL, P. ORTÍN.
“OTRI: agenda de investigación”.
Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 14 (2008), pp. 67-78
[VOHORA et al., 2004]
A. VOHORA, M. WRIGHT, A. LOCKETT.
“Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies”.
Research Policy, (2004), pp. 147-175
[WALLMARK, 1997]
J. WALLMARK.
“Inventions and patents at universities: The case of Chalmers University of Technology”.
Technovation, 17 (1997), pp. 127-139
Copyright © 2010. Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos