covid
Buscar en
Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Toda la web
Inicio Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología Caracterización preoperatoria de las tumoraciones de ovario mediante ecografía...
Información de la revista
Vol. 44. Núm. 5.
Páginas 205-215 (enero 2001)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 44. Núm. 5.
Páginas 205-215 (enero 2001)
Acceso a texto completo
Caracterización preoperatoria de las tumoraciones de ovario mediante ecografía, Doppler y determinación sérica de CA125. Estudio comparativo
Preoperative characterization of ovarian tumors by Doppler ultrasonography and serum CA125 determination
Visitas
11133
M.J. Canto
Autor para correspondencia
26625jmc@comb.es

Correspondencia: Ctra. Sant Cugat, 11–15, 2.° 1.a.08035 Barcelona.
, J.M. Martínez, B. Puerto, L.M. Puig-Tintoré, J.A. Vanrell
Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetrícia i Neonatologia (ICGON). Hospital Clínic. Barcelona
J. Ojuel*
* Unitat de Bioestadística. Universitat de Barcelona
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Objetivo

Determinar la capacidad diagnóstica de la ecografía, el Doppler-color y pulsado, y la determinación sérica de CA125 en el diagnóstico diferencial de las tumoraciones anexiales.

Material Y Métodos

Un total de 126 pacientes con una tumoración anexial fueron evaluadas mediante ecografía, Doppler-color y pulsado y determinación sérica de CA125 de forma previa a la cirugía. Se calcula la capacidad de cada parámetro en términos de sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos positivo y negativo, precisión global y razón de riesgo.

Resultados

Un total de 98 (77,7%) tumores fueron benignos y 28 (22,2%) malignos. Los tumores malignos presentaron, de forma significativa, mayor volumen, paredes y tabiques más gruesos, mayor frecuencia de partes sólidas y de ascitis, vascularización más intensa, distribución central de los vasos y valores superiores de CA125 que los tumores benignos. El tipo ecográfico más frecuentemente asociado a malignidad fue el quiste sólido multilocular, siendo la presencia de partes sólidas la variable con mayor potencia discriminatoria.

Conclusiones

La información que aporta el estudio ecográfico convencional es superior a la que aporta el estudio de la vascularización del tumor y el marcador tumoral CA125.

Palabras clave:
Tumor ovario
Ecografía
Doppler
CA125
Abstract
Objective

The aim of our study is to evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound, color and pulsed Doppler and serum CA125 in the prediction of malignancy in ovarian masses.

Material And Methods

Over a one year period, 126 women diagnosed of an adnexal mass underwent a complete ultrasound color and pulsed Doppler examination and a serum determination of CA125 previously to surgical procedure. Results were correlated with histological findings. Several ultrasound and Doppler parameters were assessed by means of standard statistical analysis in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and odds ratio.

Results

Twenty-eight (22.2%) ovarian cancers were diagnosed. Malignant tumors showed higher levels of CA125 and were of greater volume, thicker walls and septae, with solid parts and ascites, and more abundant, and centrally located pattern of vascularity. The multicystic with solid parts type was the one most frequently was associated with malignancy, being the presence of solid parts the most powerful discrimatory variable.

Conclusions

In the preoperative evaluation of an adnexal mass, conventional ultrasound examination is more effective than vascularity evaluation by means of Doppler or serum CA125, in order to predict malignancy.

Keywords:
Ovarian tumor
Ultrasound
Doppler
CA125
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
E.L. Trimble.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment and follow-up.
Gynecol Oncol, 55 (1994), pp. S4-S14
[2.]
N.H. Nguyen, H.E. Averette, a.l. Hoskins W et.
National survey of ovarian carcinoma IV. Critical assessment of current International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology staging system.
Cancer, 72 (1993), pp. 3007-3011
[3.]
F. Peterson.
Annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer (FIGO).
Int J Gynecol Obstet, 36 (1991), pp. 238-277
[4.]
Z. Weiner, Y. Thaler, D. Beck, S. Rottem, M. Deutch, J.M. Brandes.
Differentiating malignant from benign ovarian tumors with transvaginal color flow imaging.
Obstet Gynecol, 79 (1992), pp. 159-162
[5.]
U.M. Hamper, S. Sheth, F.M. Abbas, B.N. Rosenshein, D. Aronson, J.R. Kurman.
Transvaginal color Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malignant lesions.
Am J Roentgenol, 160 (1993), pp. 1225-1228
[6.]
B. Bromley, H. Goodman, B.R. Benacerraf.
Comparison between sonographic morphology and Doppler waveform for the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy.
Obstet Gynecol, 83 (1994), pp. 434-437
[7.]
D.L. Brown, M.C. Frates, F.C. Laing, D.N. DiSalvo, P.M. Doubilet, C.B. Benson, et al.
Ovarian masses: can benign and malignant lesions be differentiated with color and pulsed Doppler US?.
Radiology, 190 (1994), pp. 333-336
[8.]
M. Kawai, F. Kikkawa, H. Ishikawa, K. Tamakoshi, O. Maeda, a.l. Hasegawa N et.
Differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors by transvaginal color-pulse Doppler sonography.
Gynecol Oncol, 54 (1994), pp. 209-214
[9.]
J.L. Alcázar, M.L. Ruiz-Pérez, T. Errasti.
Transvaginal color Doppler sonography in adnexal masses: which parameter performs best?.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 8 (1996), pp. 114-119
[10.]
L. Valentin.
Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 14 (1999), pp. 273-283
[11.]
H.G.D. Malkasian, R.C. Knapp, P.T. Lavin, V.R. Zurawski.
Preoperative evaluation of serum CA125 levels in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with pelvic masses: Discrimination of benign from malignant disease.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 159 (1988), pp. 341-346
[12.]
I.J. Jacobs, R.C. Bast.
The CA125 tumour-associated antigen: a review of the literature.
Hum Reprod, 4 (1989), pp. 1-12
[13.]
J.R. Van Nagell, P.D. DePriest, L.E. Puls, E.S. Donaldson, H.H. Gallion, D.E Powell, et al.
Ovarian cancer screening in asymptomatic postmenopausal women by transvaginal sonography.
Cancer, 68 (1991), pp. 458-462
[14.]
L. Valentin, P. Sladkevicius, K. Marsal.
Limited contribution of Doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic tumors.
Obstet Gynecol, 83 (1994), pp. 425-433
[15.]
E. Ferrazzi, G. Zanetta, D. Dordoni, N. Berlanda, R. Mezzopane, G. Lissoni.
Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 10 (1997), pp. 192-197
[16.]
S.F. Serov, R.E. Scully, L.H. Sobin.
International Histological Classification of Tumors, N.° 9, Histological Typing of Ovarian Tumors,
[17.]
J.H. Sheperd.
Revised FIGO staging for gynecological cancer.
Br J Obstet Gynecol, 96 (1989), pp. 889-892
[18.]
J.R. Van Nagell, R.V. Higgins, E.S. Donaldson.
Transvaginal sonography as a screening method for ovarian cancer. A report of the first 1000 cases screened.
Gynecol Oncol, 39 (1990), pp. 69-71
[19.]
T.H. Bourne, S. Campbell, C.V. Steer, M.I. Whitehead, W.P. Collins.
Transvaginal colour flow imaging: a possible new screening technique for ovarian cancer.
Br Med J, 299 (1989), pp. 1367-1370
[20.]
A. Kurjak, Y. Zalud, D. Jurkovic, Z. Alfirevic, M. Miljan.
Transvaginal color Doppler for the assessment of pelvic circulation.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 68 (1989), pp. 131-134
[21.]
A. Tekay, P. Jouppila.
Validity of pulsatily and resistance indices in classification of adnexal tumors with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound, pp. 338-344
[22.]
A.C. Fleischer, J.A. Cullinan, D.M. Kepple, L.L. Williams.
Conventional and color Doppler transvaginal sonography of pelvic masses: a comparison of relative histologic specificities.
J Ultrasound Med, 12 (1993), pp. 705-712
[23.]
A. Kurjak, S. Kupesik.
Transvaginal color Doppler and pelvic tumor vascularity: lessons learned and future challenges.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, (1995), pp. 145-159
[24.]
Z. Maly, P. Riss, J. Deutinger.
Localization of blood vessels and qualitative assessment of blood flow in ovarian tumors.
Obstet Gynecol, 85 (1995), pp. 33-35
[25.]
M.A. Pascual, R. Labastida, P.J. Grases, O. Carreras, L. Hereter, S. Dexeus.
Diagnóstico ecográfico de los quistes malignos de ovario. Estudio de las variables asociadas a malignidad mediante regresión logística no condicional.
Prog Obstet Ginecol, 41 (1998), pp. 515-522
[26.]
N.A. Janovski, J.L. Paramanandhan.
Ovarian tumors.
Tumors and tumors-like conditions of the ovaries, fallopian tubes and ligaments of the uterus, George Thieme, (1973),
[27.]
J. González Merlo.
Tumores del ovario.
5.aed, pp. 496-546
[28.]
M.J. Quintana.
Epidemiología y factores etiológicos del cáncer de ovario.
Ginecología oncológica, VI curso intensivo de formación continuada, pp. 233-236
[29.]
L. Abad, L. Balagueró, F. Calero, L. Chivas, G. López, S. Menjón, et al.
Cáncer de ovario. Documentos de Consenso SEGO, pp. 11-43
[30.]
S. Franceschi.
Reproductive factors and cancers of the breast, ovary and endometrium.
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol, 25 (1989), pp. 1933-1943
[31.]
S. Grandberg, A. Norstrom, M. Wikland.
Tumors in the lower pelvis as imaged by transvaginal sonography.
Gynecol Oncol, 37 (1990), pp. 224-229
[32.]
R. Osmers, M. Osmers, B. Von Maydell, B. Wagner, W. Kuhn.
Preoperative evaluation of ovarian tumors in the premenopause by transvaginosonography.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 175 (1996), pp. 428-434
[33.]
P.J. DiSaia.
Ovarian disorders.
Danforth's obstetrics and gynecology, 6.aed, pp. 1067-1120
[34.]
P.D. DePriest, B.S. Shenson, A. Fried, J.E. Hunter, S.J. Andrews, H.H. Gallion, et al.
A morphology index based on sonographic findings of ovarian cancer.
Gynecol Oncol, 51 (1993), pp. 7-11
[35.]
D. Levine, B. Gosink, S.I. Wolf, M.R. Feldman, D.H. Pretorius.
Simple adnexal cyst: The natural history in postmenopausal women.
Radiology, 194 (1992), pp. 653-659
[36.]
A.M. Sassone, I.E. Timor-Tritsch, A. Artner, C. Westhoff, W. Warren.
Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy.
Obstet Gynecol, 78 (1991), pp. 70-76
[37.]
J.P. Lerner, I.E. Timor-Tritsch, A. Federman, G. Abramovich.
Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 170 (1994), pp. 81-85
[38.]
J.M. Bajo, J.I. Olaizola, M.T. González, V. Borobio, M. García Alarilla, P. De la Fuente.
Hallazgos ecográficos en las tumoraciones malignas de ovario: nuestra experiencia en 67 casos confirmados anatomopatológicamente.
Ultrasonidos, 4 (1986), pp. 159-168
[39.]
M.A. Huertas, C. Uguet, A. Romo, J.M. Bajo.
Estudio ultrasonográfico de las formaciones orgánicas del ovario. Score ecográfico. Valoración Doppler.
Ultrasonografía ginecológica, guía práctica, 1.aed,
[40.]
A.C. Fleischer, W.H. Rodgers, B.J. Rao, D.M. Keppler, J.A. Worrell, L. Williams, et al.
Assessment of ovarian tumor vascularity with transvaginal color Doppler sonography.
J Ultrasound Med, 10 (1991), pp. 563-568
[41.]
A. Kurjak, H. Shalan, S. Kupesic, M. Predanic, I. Zalud, a.l. Breyer B et.
Transvaginal color Doppler sonography in the assessment of pelvic tumor vascularity.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 3 (1993), pp. 137-154
[42.]
J. Carter, A. Saltzman, E. Hartenbach, J. Fowler, L. Carson, L.B. Twiggs.
Flow characteristics in benign and malignant gynecologic tumors using transvaginal color flow Doppler.
Obstet Gynecol, 83 (1994), pp. 125-130
[43.]
G. Zanetta, P. Vergani, A. Lissoni.
Color Doppler ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 73 (1994), pp. 637-641
[44.]
A. Kurjak, S. Kupesic, B. Breyer, V. Sparac, S. Jukic.
The assessment of ovarian tumor angiogenesis: what does three-dimensional power Doppler add?.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 12 (1998), pp. 136-146
[45.]
A.C. Fleischer.
Mean values or lowest values of pulsatility and resistance indices?.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 3 (1993), pp. 70-71
[46.]
A. Kurjak, I. Zalud.
The characterization of uterine tumors by transvaginal color Doppler.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1 (1991), pp. 50-52
[47.]
A. Kurjak, I. Zalud.
Highest or lowest values of impedance flow in malignancy.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1 (1991), pp. 374
[48.]
A.C. Fleischer, L.C. Williams, H.W. III. Jones.
Transabdominal or transvaginal color Doppler sonography of ovarian masses.
Early detection of ovarian cancer with transvaginal sonography: potentials and limitations,
[49.]
A.C. Fleischer, J.A. Cullinan, C.V. Peery, H.W. Jones.
Early detection of ovarian carcinoma with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 174 (1996), pp. 101-106
Copyright © 2001. Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos