covid
Buscar en
Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Toda la web
Inicio Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología Histerectomía laparoscópica frente a no laparoscópica
Información de la revista
Vol. 46. Núm. 1.
Páginas 4-9 (enero 2003)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 46. Núm. 1.
Páginas 4-9 (enero 2003)
Acceso a texto completo
Histerectomía laparoscópica frente a no laparoscópica
Laparoscopic versus non-laparoscopic hysterectomy
Visitas
4125
S. Dexeus*, J.C. Surís, R. Fábregas, G. Cabero, C. Escayola
Cátedra de Investigación en Obstetricia y Ginecología. Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Instituto Universitario Dexeus. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Barcelona. España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Objetivo

Mostrar la evolución en nuestro servicio de las indicaciones y vías de abordaje de la histerectomía.

Material y métodos

Se estudian los datos obtenidos de 418 pacientes sometidas a histerectomía en el período 1994-1998. Se comparan las indicaciones, la edad, el peso y la talla de las pacientes y las características de las piezas obtenidas.

Resultados

La edad de las pacientes de nuestro estudio fue de 49,9 años (28–93), con una talla media de 159cm (141–174) y un peso de 61,6kg (42-92). Las indicaciones para la histerectomía abdominal han sido: fibromiomatosis (51,3%), procesos neoplásicos (31%) y prolapsos uterinos (1,3%). En el caso de la histerectomía vaginal las indicaciones han sido: prolapso uterino (70,8%), mioma uterino (18,58%) y neoplasia (1,77%). Las indicaciones para la histerectectomía vaginal laparoscópicamente asistida (HVLA) han sido: fibromatosis (37%), prolapso (13,7%), neoplasia (9,59%), endometriosis el (9,6%) y enfermedades anexiales asociadas (12,3%).

Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos para la edad y el peso de las pacientes. También se encontraron diferencias en el peso, el tamaño y el volumen de las muestras.

La morbilidad durante este período que ha requerido de cirugía complementaria ha sido de un 4,7% para la histerectomía abdominal, de un 5,5% para la cirugía vaginal y de un 2,3% para la HVLA.

Conclusiones

En los últimos años hemos reducido el número global de histerectomías gracias a diferentes alternativas terapéuticas, observando un incremento progresivo de la técnica vaginal (pura o laparoscópica) frente a la abdominal.

Palabras clave:
Histerectomía
HVLA
Histerectomía vaginal
Mioma
Prolapso
Summary
Objective

To present changes in the indications and surgical approach used in hysterectomy in our department.

Material and methods

We studied data from 418 patients who underwent hysterectomy between 1994 and 1998. Indications, age, weight and height of the patients, as well as the morphologic features of the uterus, were studied.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 49.9 years (28–93), with a mean height of 159cm (141–174) and a mean weight of 61.6Kg (42-92). Indications for abdominal hysterectomy were myoma (51.3%), neoplastic disease (31%) and prolapse of the uterus (1.3%). Indications for vaginal hysterectomy were prolapse of the uterus (70.8%), myomas (18.6%) and neoplastic disease (1.8%). Indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) were myoma (37%), prolapse of the uterus (13.7%), neoplasia (9.6%), endometriosis (9.6 %) and associated annexal disease (12.3 %). Statistically significant differences were observed between groups in patients' age and weight. Differences were also observed in the weight, as well as size and volume of the uterus.

Morbidity requiring additional surgery during this period was 4.7% in abdominal hysterectomy, 5.5% in vaginal hysterectomy and 2.3% in LAVH.

Conclusions

In the last 10 years, the overall number of hysterectomies performed has decreased due to various therapeutic alternatives. The use of vaginal hysterectomy (open or laparaoscopic) has progressively increased while use of the abdominal route has decreased.

Keywords:
Hysterectomy
Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)
Vaginal hysterectomy
Myoma
Prolapse of uterus
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
S. Dexeus, L. Marqués, J.M. Tusquets.
Análisis comparativo entre histerectomía vaginal y abdominal.
Primer curso teóricopráctico de cirugía ginecológca, Libro de Ponencias, (1987),
[2.]
J.C. Rhodes, K.H. Kjerulff, P.W. Langenberg, G.M. Guzinski.
Hysterectomy and sexual functioning.
JAMA, 282 (1999), pp. 1934-1941
[3.]
J.M. Shwayder.
Laparoscopically assited vaginal hysterectomy.
Gynecol Operat Endosc, 26 (1999), pp. 169-187
[4.]
A. Shushan, H. Mohamed, A.L. Magos.
A case-control study to compare the variability of operating time in laparoscopic and open surgery.
Human Reproduction, 14 (1999), pp. 1467-1469
[5.]
S.E. Ikhena, M. Oni, N.J. Naftalin, J.C. Konje.
The effect of the learning curve on the duration and peri-operative complications of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 78 (1999), pp. 632-635
[6.]
W.J. Harris.
Complications of hysterectomy.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 40 (1997), pp. 928-938
[7.]
J.F. Steege.
Indications for hysterectomy: have they changed?.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 40 (1997), pp. 878-885
[8.]
J.C. Gambone, R.C. Do, Reiter.
Hysterectomy: improving the patient's decision-Making process.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 40 (1997), pp. 868-877
[9.]
S.T. Haas.
Making a decision to perform an hysterectomy.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 35 (1992), pp. 865-870
[10.]
S.R. Kovac.
Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications.
Obstet Gynecol, 95 (2000), pp. 787-793
[11.]
G.R. Meeks, R.L. Harris.
Surgical approach to hysterectomy: abdominal, laparoscopy-assisted, or vaginal.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 40 (1997), pp. 886-894
[12.]
C.h. Ottosen, G. Lingman, L. Ottosen.
Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 107 (2000), pp. 1380-1385
[13.]
R.L. Jr Summitt, T.G. Stovall, J.F. Steege, G.H. Lipscomb.
A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates.
Obstet Gynecol, 92 (1998), pp. 321-326
[14.]
S.F. Meikle, E. Weston Nugent, M. Orleans.
Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.
Obstet Gynecol, 89 (1997), pp. 304-311
[15.]
A. Perino, G. Cucinella, R. Venezia, A. Castelli, E. Cittadini.
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study.
Human Reprod, 14 (1999), pp. 2996-2999
[16.]
J.H. Dorsey, P.M. Holtz, R.I. Griffiths, M.M. McGrath, E.P. Steinberg.
Costs and charges associated with three alterantive techniques of hysterectomy.
N Engl J Med, 335 (1996), pp. 476-482
[17.]
A. Johns, B. Carrera, J. Jones, F. DeLeon, R. Vincent, C.h. Safely.
The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 172 (1995), pp. 1709-1719
[18.]
A.M. Weber, J.C.h. Lee.
Use of alternative techniques of hysterectomy in Ohio, 1988-1994.
N Engl J Med, 335 (1996), pp. 483-489
[19.]
R. Marana, M. Busacca, E. Zupi, N. Garcea, P. Paparella, G.F. Catalano.
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 180 (1999), pp. 270-275
[20.]
R.L. Jr Summitt.
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: A review of usefulness and outcomes.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 43 (2000), pp. 584-593
[21.]
G.H. Lipscomb.
Laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: is it ever indicated?.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 40 (1997), pp. 895-902
[22.]
R. Varma, S. Tahseen, A.U. Lokugamage, D. Kunde.
Vaginal route as the norm when planning hysterectomy for benign conditions: change in practice.
Obstet Gynecol, 97 (2001), pp. 613-616
Copyright © 2003. Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos