covid
Buscar en
Revista de Administração e Inovação
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Administração e Inovação Capacidades dinâmicas baseadas em conhecimento e tipos de inovação: proposiç...
Información de la revista
Vol. 12. Núm. 1.
Páginas 271-302 (enero - marzo 2015)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 12. Núm. 1.
Páginas 271-302 (enero - marzo 2015)
Open Access
Capacidades dinâmicas baseadas em conhecimento e tipos de inovação: proposição de um framework de análise
Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Performance
Visitas
595
Mateus Panizzon
Doutorando em Administração pela em associação ampla da Universidade de caxias – USC e Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUC/RS, (Brasil)
Gabriel Sperandio Milan
Doutor em Engenharia de Produção na Área de Sistemas de Qualidade pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS Professor e pesquisador da Universidade de Caxias do Sul – USC, (Brasil)
Marcelo Gattermann Perin
Doutor em Administração pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS Professor e Pesquisador da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS, (Brasil)
Cláudio Hoffmann Sampaio
Doutor em Administração pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS Professor e Pesquisador da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS Brasil
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
RESUMO

As Capacidades Dinâmicas (CD) consistem um conceito bastante desenvolvido e pesquisado na área de Estratégia, mas que, no entanto, evidenciam uma falta de uniformidade em sua definição e dimensões componentes quando abordadas pelos diferentes autores. Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo propor um framework de análise das Capacidades Dinâmicas Baseadas em Conhecimento (CDBC) e os distintos tipos de Inovação, construído a partir da síntese de estudos tipo survey desenvolvidos analisando a relação entre as CDBC e desempenho de inovação. Partindo-se das categorias identificados por Denford (2013) para compreensão deste e por meio da estratégia de análise de conteúdo, buscou-se identificar a dimensões associadas, de que forma foram operacionalizadas e que tipo de relação foi encontrada. Como resultado, após discussão das convergências e divergências entre as abordagens de CDBC, este trabalho propõe um framework para orientar pesquisas futuras entre CDBC e Inovação, o Modelo Unificado das Capacidades Dinâmicas Baseadas em Conhecimento.

Palavras-chave:
VBC – Visão Baseada em Conhecimento
Capacidades dinâmicas
Capacidades dinâmicas baseadas em conhecimento
Recursos
Inovação
Desempenho de inovação
ABSTRACT

The Dynamic Capabilities (DC) are one of the most important and researched topic in the Strategy field. However, there is some lack of uniformity about your definition and distinguished dimensions are used when this theme is presented by different authors. This research aim to propose an analytic framework of Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities (KDBC) and types of innovation, developed from the synthesis of survey studies that relate KDBC and Innovation Performance. From Denford (2013) categories proposal, and using content analysis strategy, this study identified the associated dimensions, how they were operationalized and the type of relationship. As result, this paper introduces a framework to better understand the relationship between the different types of Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation, and can guide future research in the field.

Key words:
KBV – Knowledge-based View
Dynamic capabilities
Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities
Resources
Innovation
Innovation performance
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
REFERÊNCIAS
[Acedo et al., 2006]
F.J. Acedo, C. Barroso, J.L. Galan.
The resource-based theory: dissemination and main trends.
Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2006), pp. 621-636
[Bardin, 2009]
L. Bardin.
Análise de conteúdo, Edições, (2009),
70
[Barrales-Molina et al., 2012]
V. Barrales-Molina, O.F. Bustinza, L.J. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez.
Explaining the causes and effects of dynamic capabilities generation: a multiple-indicator multiple-cause modeling approach.
British Journal of Management, 24 (2012), pp. 571-591
[Branzei and Vertinsky, 2006]
O. Branzei, I. Vertinsky.
Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs.
Journal of Business Venturing, 21 (2006), pp. 75-105
[Brühl et al., 2010]
R. Brühl, N. Horch, M. Osann.
Improving integration capabilities with management control.
European Journal of Innovation Management, 13 (2010), pp. 385-408
[Camisón and Monfort-Mir, 2012]
C. Camisón, V.M. Monfort-Mir.
Measuring innovation in tourism from the Schumpeterian and the dynamic-capabilities perspectives.
Tourism Management, 33 (2012), pp. 776-789
[Canoa et al., 2004]
C.R. Canoa, F.A. Carrillat, F. Jaramillo.
A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: evidence from five continents.
International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (2004), pp. 179-200
[Cepeda and Vera, 2007]
G. Cepeda, D. Vera.
Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: a knowledge management perspective.
Journal of Business Research, 60 (2007), pp. 426-437
[Cheng and Chen, 2013]
C.C.J. Cheng, J.S. Chen.
Breakthrough innovation: the roles of dynamic innovation capabilities and open innovation activities.
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28 (2013), pp. 444-454
[Conner and Prahalad, 1996]
K.R. Conner, C.K. Prahalad.
A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge vs opportunism.
Organization Science, 7 (1996), pp. 477-501
[Delmas, 2002]
M.A. Delmas.
Innovating against European rigidities institutional environment and dynamic capabilities.
Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13 (2002), pp. 19-43
[Denford, 2013]
J.S. Denford.
Building knowledge: developing a knowledge-based dynamic capabilities typology.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 17 (2013), pp. 175-194
[Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000]
K.M. Eisenhardt, J.A. Martin.
Dynamic capabilities: what are they?.
Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2000), pp. 1.105-1.121
[Fleury et al., 2013]
A. Fleury, M.T.L. Fleury, F.M. Borini.
The Brazilian multinationals’ approaches to innovation.
Journal of International Management, 19 (2013), pp. 260-275
[García-Morales et al., 2012]
V.J. García-Morales, M.M. Jiménez-Barrionuevo, L. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez.
Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation.
Journal of Business Research, 65 (2012), pp. 1.040-1.050
[García-Morales et al., 2007]
V.J. García-Morales, F.J. Lloréns-Montes, A.J. Verdú-Jover.
Influence of personal mastery on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation in large firms and SMEs.
Technovation, 27 (2007), pp. 547-568
[Gibbs, 2008]
G. Gibbs.
Analyzing qualitative data, Sage Publications, (2008),
[Grant, 1996]
R.M. Grant.
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.
Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1996), pp. 109-122
[Hambrick, 1984]
D.C. Hambrick.
Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy: some conceptual and methodological issues.
Journal of Management, 10 (1984), pp. 27-41
[Hao et al., 2011]
J. Hao, A. Ilan, C. Yu.
Environmental dynamism, innovation, and dynamic capabilities: the case of China.
Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 5 (2011), pp. 131-144
[Helfat and Peteraf, 2003]
C.E. Helfat, M.A. Peteraf.
The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles.
Strategic Management Journal, 24 (2003), pp. 997-1.010
[Hennink et al., 2011]
M. Hennink, I. Hutter, A. Bailey.
Qualitative research methods, Sage Publications, (2011),
[Hodgkinson and Healey, 2011]
G.P. Hodgkinson, M.P. Healey.
Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: reflexion and reflection in strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal, 32 (2011), pp. 1.500-1.516
[Hofmann et al., 2012]
K.H. Hofmann, G. Theyel, C.H. Wood.
Identifying firm capabilities as drivers of environmental management and sustainability practices – evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers.
Business Strategy and the Environment, 21 (2012), pp. 530-545
[Hsu and Sabherwal, 2012]
I.C. Hsu, R. Sabherwal.
Relationship between intellectual capital and knowledge management: an empirical investigation.
Decision Sciences, 43 (2012), pp. 489-524
[Huang, 2011]
K.F. Huang.
Technology competencies in competitive environment.
Journal of Business Research, 64 (2011), pp. 172-179
[Im et al., 2013]
S. Im, M.M. Montoya, J.P. Workman.
Antecedents and consequences of creativity in product innovation teams.
Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (2013), pp. 170-185
[Jarratt, 2008]
D. Jarratt.
Testing a theoretically constructed relationship management capability.
European Journal of Marketing, 42 (2008), pp. 1.106-1.132
[Junell and Ståhle, 2011]
J. Junell, P. Ståhle.
Measuring organizational renewal capability: case training service business.
Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 21 (2011), pp. 247-268
[Killen and Hunt, 2010]
C.P. Killen, R.A. Hunt.
Dynamic capability through project portfolio management in service and manufacturing industries.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3 (2010), pp. 157-169
[Kirca et al., 2005]
A.M. Kirca, S. Jayachandran, W.O. Bearden.
Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance.
Journal of Marketing, 69 (2005), pp. 24-41
[Kogut and Zander, 1992]
B. Kogut, U. Zander.
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology.
Organization Science, 3 (1992), pp. 383-397
[Kohlbacher, 2013]
M. Kohlbacher.
The impact of dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement on innovation: the role of business process orientation.
Knowledge and Process Management, 20 (2013), pp. 71-76
[Lee and Kelley, 2008]
H. Lee, D. Kelley.
Building dynamic capabilities for innovation: an exploratory study of key management practices.
R&D Management, 38 (2008), pp. 155-168
[Lee et al., 2011]
P.Y. Lee, H.T. Lin, H.H. Chen, Y.H. Shyr.
Dynamic capabilities exploitation of market and hierarchy governance structures: an empirical comparison of Taiwan and South Korea.
Journal of World Business, 46 (2011), pp. 259-370
[Lew et al., 2013]
Y.K. Lew, R.R. Sinkovics, O. Kuivalainen.
Upstream internationalization process: roles of social capital in creating exploratory capability and market performance.
International Business Review, 22 (2013), pp. 1.101-1.120
[Liao et al., 2009]
J. Liao, J.R. Kickul, H. Ma.
Organizational dynamic capability and innovation: an empirical examination of internet firms.
Journal of Small Business Management, 47 (2009), pp. 263-286
[Makkonen et al., 2013]
H. Makkonen, M. Pohjola, R. Olkkonen, A. Koponen.
Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis.
Journal of Business Research, 67 (2013), pp. 2.707-2.719
[March, 1991]
J.G. March.
Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.
Organization Science, 2 (1991), pp. 71-87
[Marsh and Stock, 2006]
S.J. Marsh, G.N. Stock.
Creating dynamic capability: the role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation.
Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23 (2006), pp. 422-436
[Nelson and Winter, 1982]
R.R. Nelson, S.G. Winter.
An evolutionary theory of economic change, Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, (1982),
[Ray et al., 2004]
G. Ray, J.B. Barney, W.A. Muhanna.
Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view.
Strategic Management Journal, 25 (2004), pp. 23-37
[Remler and Van Ryzin, 2011]
D.K. Remler, G.G. Van Ryzin.
Research methods in practice: strategies for description and causation, Sage Publications, (2011),
[Rothaermel and Alexandre, 2009]
F.T. Rothaermel, M.T. Alexandre.
Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role of absorptive capacity.
Organization Science, 20 (2009), pp. 759-780
[Schreier, 2012]
M. Schreier.
Qualitative content analysis in practice, Sage Publications, (2012),
[Scott and Garner, 2013]
G. Scott, R. Garner.
Doing qualitative research: designs, methods, and techniques, 1st edition, Pearson, (2013),
[Shoham et al., 2005]
A. Shoham, G.M. Rose, F. Kropp.
Market orientation and performance: a meta-analysis.
Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23 (2005), pp. 435-454
[Smart et al., 2007]
P. Smart, J. Bessant, A. Gupta.
Towards technological rules for designing innovation networks: a dynamic capabilities view.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27 (2007), pp. 1.069-1.092
[Stefano et al., 2014]
G. Stefano, M. Peteraf, G. Verona.
The organizational drivetrain: a road to integration of dynamic capabilities research.
The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28 (2014), pp. 307-327
[Teece et al., 1997]
D.J. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen.
Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1997), pp. 509-533
[Teece, 2007]
D. Teece.
Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.
Strategic Management Journal, 1350 (2007), pp. 1319-1350
[Teece, 2014]
D. Teece.
The foundations of enterprise performance: dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms.
The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28 (2014), pp. 328-352
[Teece, 2009]
D.J. Teece.
Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Oxford University Press, (2009),
[Triguero and Córcoles, 2013]
A. Triguero, D. Córcoles.
Understanding innovation: an analysis of persistence for Spanish manufacturing firms.
Research Policy, 42 (2013), pp. 340-352
[Uhlaner et al., 2012]
L.M. Uhlaner, A. Van Stel, V. Duplat, H. Zhou.
Disentangling the effects of organizational capabilities, innovation and firm size on SME sales growth.
Small Business Economics, (2012), pp. 1-55
[Verona and Ravasi, 2003]
G. Verona, D. Ravasi.
Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation.
Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (2003), pp. 577-606
[Von Krogh et al., 2001]
G. Von Krogh, I. Nonaka, M. Aben.
Making the most of your company’s knowledge: a strategic framework.
Long Range Planning, 34 (2001), pp. 421-439
[Winter, 2000]
S.G. Winter.
The satisficing principle in capability learning.
Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2000), pp. 981-996
[Wu, 2006]
L.Y. Wu.
Resources, dynamic capabilities and performance in a dynamic environment: perceptions in Taiwanese IT enterprises.
Information & Management, 43 (2006), pp. 447-454
[Yang, 2012]
J. Yang.
Innovation capability and corporate growth: an empirical investigation in China.
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29 (2012), pp. 34-46
[Zahra and George, 2002]
S.A. Zahra, G. George.
Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension.
Academy of Management Review, 27 (2002), pp. 213-240
[Zahra et al., 2006]
S.A. Zahra, H.J. Sapienza, P. Davidsson.
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda.
Journal of Management Studies, 43 (2006), pp. 917-955
[Zheng et al., 2011]
S. Zheng, W. Zhang, X. Wu, J. Du.
Knowledge- based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (2011), pp. 1.035-1.051
[Zollo and Winter, 2002]
M. Zollo, S.G. Winter.
Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities.
Organization Science, 13 (2002), pp. 339-351
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltda. on behalf of Departamento de Administração Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade Universidade de São Paulo ¿ FEA/USP
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo