covid
Buscar en
Revista de Administração e Inovação
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Administração e Inovação Relação entre as dimensões das capacidades dinâmicas e o processo de inovaç...
Información de la revista
Vol. 11. Núm. 4.
Páginas 213-234 (octubre - diciembre 2014)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 11. Núm. 4.
Páginas 213-234 (octubre - diciembre 2014)
Open Access
Relação entre as dimensões das capacidades dinâmicas e o processo de inovação: estudo de caso de uma empresa do setor de serviços de valor agregado
Relationship Between the Dimensions of Dynamic Capabilities and the Innovation Process: Case Study of a Company in the Value Added Services Sector
Visitas
734
Tânia Letícia Santos
Mestre em Administração de Empresas pela Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie – MACKENZIE, Professora da Faculdade Sumaré, (Brasil)
Moisés Ari Zilber
Doutor em Administração pela Universidade de São Paulo – USP, Professor da Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie – MACKENZIE, (Brasil)
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
RESUMO

O objetivo do presente artigo é analisar a relação entre as dimensões das capacidades dinâmicas das organizações (Teece, 2007, 2009) e o ciclo de inovação de uma empresa do setor de Serviços de Valor Agregado (SVA), com base nas distintas fases do modelo dinâmico do processo de inovação proposto por Abernathy e Utterback (1978). Para atingir os objetivos propostos para este artigo, foi adotado o método de pesquisa qualitativa de estudo de caso único de uma empresa de Serviços de Valor Agregado (SVA). Com base no referencial teórico e no estudo de caso, é possível propor que as dimensões detecção, apreensão e reconfiguração das capacidades dinâmicas das organizações têm diferente relevância nas fases fluida, transitória e específica do processo dinâmico de inovação.

Palavras-chave:
Capacidades dinâmicas
Ciclo de inovação
Inovação de produto
Inovação de processo
SVA
ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between the dimensions of dynamic capabilities of organizations (Teece, 2007, 2009) and the of innovation cycle of a value added services (VAS) sector company based on the dynamic model of the different phases of the innovation process proposed by Abernathy and Utterback (1978). To achieve the proposed objectives for this article a case study qualitative research method of a company’s Value Added Services (VAS) was adopted. Based on the theory and the single case study it is possible to propose that the dimensions sensing, seizing and reconfiguration of organizations dynamic capabilities have different relevance in fluid, transitional and specific phase of the dynamic innovation process.

Keywords:
Dynamic capabilities
Innovation cycle
Product innovation
Process innovation
VAS
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
REFERÊNCIAS
[Abernathy and Clark, 1985b]
W.J. Abernathy, K.B. Clark.
Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction.
Research Policy, 14 (1985), pp. 3-22
[Abernathy and Utterback, 1978]
W.J. Abernathy, J.M. Utterback.
Patterns of industrial innovation.
Technology Review, 80 (1978), pp. 41-47
[Afuah, 1998]
A. Afuah.
Innovation management: strategies, implementation, and profits, Oxford University Press, (1998),
[Afuah and Barham, 1995]
A. Afuah, N. Barham.
The hypercube of innovation.
Research Policy, 24 (1995), pp. 51-76
[Amit and Zott, 2001]
R. Amit, C. Zott.
Value creation in e-business.
Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2001), pp. 493-520
[Anderson and Tushman, 1990]
P. Anderson, M. Tushman.
Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), pp. 604-633
[Associação Brasileira de Telecomunicações, 2011]
Associação Brasileira de Telecomunicações.
[Barney and Hesterly, 2007]
J.B. Barney, W.S. Hesterly.
Administração estratégica e vantagem competitiva: casos brasileiros, Pearson, (2007),
[Christensen and Bower, 1996]
C.M. Christensen, J.L. Bower.
Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms.
Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1996), pp. 197-218
[Christensen et al., 1996]
C.M. Christensen, F.F. Suarez, J.M. Utterback.
Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries (Working Paper 97-009), Harvard Business School, (1996),
[Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000b]
K.M. Eisenhardt, J.A. Martin.
Dynamic capabilities: what are they?.
Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2000), pp. 1105-1121
[Ellonen et al., 2011]
H. Ellonen, A. Jantunen, O. Kuivalainen.
The role of dynamic capabilities in developing innovation-related capabilities.
International Journal of Innovation Management, 15 (2011), pp. 459-478
[Gibbs, 2009]
G. Gibbs.
Análise de dados qualitativos, Bookman, (2009),
[Helfat et al., 2007b]
C.E. Helfat, S. Finkelstein, W. Mitchell, M.A. Peteraf, H. Singh, D.J. Teece, S.G. Winter.
Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organizations, Blackwell, (2007),
[Helfat and Peteraf, 2009]
C.E. Helfat, M.A. Peteraf.
Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path.
Strategic Organization, 7 (2009), pp. 91-102
[Henderson and Clark, 1990]
R.M. Henderson, K.B. Clark.
Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), pp. 9-30
[Hobday, 1998]
M. Hobday.
Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization.
Research Policy, 26 (1998), pp. 689-710
[Inteligência em Telecomunicações, 2011]
Inteligência em Telecomunicações.
Monitor Acision de VAS móvel (MAVAM), (2011),
[Katkalo et al., 2010]
V.S. Katkalo, C.N. Pitelis, D.J. Teece.
Introduction: on the nature and scope of dynamic capabilities.
Industrial and Corporate Change, 19 (2010), pp. 1175-1186
[Kodama, 1995]
F. Kodama.
Emerging patterns of innovation: sources of Japan’s technological edge, Harvard Business School Press, (1995),
[Parthasarathy et al., 2011]
R. Parthasarathy, C. Huang, S. Ariss.
Impact of dynamic capability on innovation, value creation and industry leadership.
IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (2011), pp. 59-73
[Pisano, 2006]
G. Pisano.
Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution.
Research Policy, 35 (2006), pp. 1122-1130
[Ridder, 2012]
A. Ridder.
External dynamic capabilities: creating competitive advantage in innovation via external resource renewal (Working Paper), School of Business and Economics, (2012),
[Schumpeter, 1950]
J.A. Schumpeter.
Capitalism, socialism, and democracy, Harper, (1950),
[Schumpeter, 1985]
J.A. Schumpeter.
Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico, 2 ed., Nova Cultural, (1985),
[Suarez and Utterback, 1995]
F. Suarez, J. Utterback.
Dominant designs and the survival of firms.
Strategic Management Journal, 16 (1995), pp. 415-430
[Sundbo and Gallouj, 1998b]
J. Sundbo, F. Gallouj.
Innovation in services (SI4S Synthesis Paper S2), Step Group, (1998),
[Teece, 1986]
D.J. Teece.
Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy.
Research Policy, 15 (1986), pp. 285-305
[Teece, 2007b]
D.J. Teece.
Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.
Strategic Management Journal, 28 (2007), pp. 1319-1550
[Teece, 2009]
D.J. Teece.
Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Oxford University Press, (2009),
[Teece et al., 1997]
D.J. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen.
Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1997), pp. 509-533
[Tidd et al., 2008b]
J. Tidd, J. Bessant, K. Pavitt.
Gestão da inovação, 3 ed., Bookman, (2008),
[Tushman and Anderson, 1986]
M.L. Tushman, P. Anderson.
Technological discontinuities and organizational environments.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (1986), pp. 439-465
[Tushman and Murmann, 2003]
M.L. Tushman, J.P. Murmann.
Dominant designs, technology cycles, and organizational outcomes.
Managing in the modular age: architectures, networks and organizations, pp. 316-348
[Tushman and Rosenkopf, 1992]
M. Tushman, L. Rosenkopf.
Organizational determinants of technological change: toward a sociology of technological evolution.
Research in Organizational Behavior, 14 (1992), pp. 311-347
[Utterback, 1996]
J.M. Utterback.
Mastering the dynamics of innovation, Harvard Business School Press, (1996),
[Yin, 2009]
R.K. Yin.
Case study research: design and methods, 4th ed., Sage, (2009),
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltda. on behalf of Departamento de Administração Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade Universidade de São Paulo ¿ FEA/USP
Opciones de artículo