covid
Buscar en
Revista de Calidad Asistencial
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Calidad Asistencial Uso de las guías de práctica clínica por los médicos de un hospital general
Información de la revista
Vol. 19. Núm. 4.
Páginas 232-237 (enero 2004)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 19. Núm. 4.
Páginas 232-237 (enero 2004)
Acceso a texto completo
Uso de las guías de práctica clínica por los médicos de un hospital general
Visitas
3537
Jesús Pablo Domínguez-Rodríguez1, Matilde Cháfer-Rudilla, Matilde Cháfer-Rudilla, Carlos García-Fernández, José María Bleda-García, Lázaro Ávila-Alexandre, Consolación Sauquillo-Talaya
Unidad de Calidad. Complejo Hospitalario y Universitario de Albacete. Albacete. España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Objetivos

Conocer el porcentaje de médicos que utiliza las guías de práctica clínica en nuestro centro, sus motivos, el tipo de guías que emplean, su opinión sobre ellas y cómo las evalúan.

Material y métodos

Se encuestó a 161 médicos de 32 especialidades clínicas. El cuestionario tenía 17 preguntas cerradas y una abierta, referidas al uso de las guías de práctica clínica.

Resultados

Respondieron 78 médicos (48,4%) de 30 especialidades. De ellos, 38 (48,7%) contestaron que nunca o pocas veces utilizan las guías de práctica clínica, 61 (78,2%) consideran que las guías disminuyen la variabilidad, 64 (82%) que mejoran la calidad asistencial, 31 (39,7%) que están influenciadas por la industria farmacéutica, y 60 (76,9%) que es útil elaborar guías propias. De los 40 (51,3%) médicos que utilizan las guías, 35 (87,5%) las emplean para mejorar la asistencia, 21 (52,5%) usan las de las sociedades científicas, 5 (12,5%) las propias, y 14 (35%), ambas. En la mayoría de los servicios las guías rara vez se evalúan o bien se valoran mediante opiniones individuales.

Conclusiones

Un porcentaje significativo de nuestros clínicos no utiliza habitualmente las guías de práctica clínica, a pesar de que la mayoría las considera útiles. Los que las suelen utilizar lo hacen para mejorar la calidad asistencial y emplean habitualmente las de las sociedades científicas. Un 40% opina que las guías están influenciadas por la industria farmacéutica. La mayoría considera útil elaborar guías propias. Las guías no se suelen utilizar de forma homogénea ni se evalúan convenientemente.

Palabras clave:
Guías de práctica clínica
Médicos especialistas
Encuesta
Abstract
Objectives

To determine the percentage of physicians who use clinical practice guidelines in our center, their motives, the type of guidelines they use, their opinion of these guidelines, and how they are evaluated.

Material and methods

A survey of 161 physicians from 32 clinical specialties was performed. The questionnaire contained 17 closed questions and 1 open question referring to the use of clinical practice guidelines.

Results

Seventy-eight physicians (48.4%) from 30 specialties responded. Of these, 38 (48.7%) reported that they never or infrequently follow clinical practice guidelines, 61 (78.2%) believe that guidelines reduce variability, 64 (82%) believe that they improve healthcare quality, 31 (39.7%) believe that guidelines are influenced by the pharmaceutical industry, and 60 (76.9%) consider that creating their own guidelines is useful. Of the 40 physicians (51.3%) who use guidelines, 35 (87.5%) do so to improve clinical care, 21 (52.5%) use the guidelines of the medical specialty societies, 5 (12.5%) use their own guidelines and 14 (35%) use both. In most departments, guidelines are seldom evaluated or they are evaluated on the basis of individual opinion.

Conclusions

A significant percentage of our physicians does not usually employ clinical practice guidelines, although most physicians consider them to be useful. The physicians who habitually use them do so to improve healthcare quality and usually follow those of the medical specialty societies. Forty percent believe that guidelines are influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. Most physicians believe that creating their own guidelines is useful. Guidelines are not used homogeneously nor are they properly evaluated.

Key words:
Clinical practice guidelines
Specialist physicians
Survey
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
M.J. Field, M.J. Lohr.
National Academy Press, (1990),
[2.]
J.M. Grimshaw, I.T. Russell.
Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.
Lancet, 342 (1993), pp. 1317-1322
[3.]
S.H. Woolf, R. Grol, A. Hutchinson, M. Eccles, J. Grimshaw.
Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.
BMJ, 318 (1999), pp. 527-530
[4.]
L. Thomas, N. Cullum, E. McColl, N. Rousseau, J. Soutter, N. Steen.
Guidelines in professions allied to medicine.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2 (2000),
[5.]
C.D. Mansfield.
Attitudes and behaviors towards clinical guidelines: the clinicians’ perspective.
Qual Health Care, 4 (1995), pp. 250-255
[6.]
F. Olesen, T. Lauritzen.
Do general practitioners want guidelines? Attitudes toward a county-based and a national collegebased approach.
Scand J Prim Health Care, 15 (1997), pp. 141-145
[7.]
D.E. Pathman, T.R. Konrad, G.L. Freed, V.A. Freeman, G.G. Koch.
The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. The case of pediatric vaccine recommendations.
Med Care, 34 (1996), pp. 873-889
[8.]
L.I. Solberg, M.L. Brekke, T.E. Kottke.
How important are clinician and nurse attitudes to the delivery of clinical preventive services?.
J Fam Pract, 44 (1997), pp. 451-461
[9.]
R. Grilli, J. Lomas.
Evaluating the message: the relationship between compliance rate and the subject of a practice guideline.
Med Care, 32 (1994), pp. 202-213
[10.]
K.C. Stange, R. Kelly, J. Chao, et al.
Physician agreement with US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
J Fam Pract, 34 (1992), pp. 409-416
[11.]
J. Newton, D. Knight, G. Woolhead.
General practitioners and clinical guidelines: a survey of knowledge, use and beliefs.
Br J Gen Pract, 46 (1996), pp. 513-517
[12.]
R. Grol, J. Dalhuijsen, S. Thomas, C. Veld, G. Rutten, H. Mokkink.
Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study.
BMJ, 317 (1998), pp. 858-861
[13.]
M.D. Cabana, C.S. Rand, N.R. Powe, et al.
Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.
JAMA, 282 (1999), pp. 1458-1465
[14.]
R. Thomson, H. McElroy, M. Sudlow.
Guidelines on anticoagulant treatment in atrial fibrillation in Great Britain: variation in content and implications for treatment.
BMJ, 316 (1998), pp. 509-513
[15.]
N. Unwin, R. Thomson, A.M. O’Byrne, M. Laker, H. Armstrong.
Implications of applying widely accepted cholesterol screening and management guidelines to a British adult population: cross sectional study of cardiovascular disease and risk factors.
BMJ, 317 (1998), pp. 1125-1130
[16.]
A. Hibble, D. Kanka, D. Pencheon, F. Pooles.
Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel?.
BMJ, 317 (1998), pp. 862-863
[17.]
H. Varonen, M. Makela.
Practice guidelines in Finland: availability and quality.
Qual Health Care, 6 (1997), pp. 75-79
[18.]
J.A. Muir Gray.
Where’s the chief knowledge officer?.
BMJ, (1998), pp. 317-832
[19.]
R. Grilli, N. Magrini, A. Penna, G. Mura, A. Liberati.
Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal.
[20.]
R. Harbour, J. Miller.
A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines.
BMJ, 323 (2001), pp. 334-336
[21.]
G.P. Browman.
Development and aftercare of clinical guidelines: the balance between rigor and pragmatism.
JAMA, 286 (2001), pp. 1509-1511
[22.]
Appraisal of Guidelines Research,Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) Collaborative Group. Guideline development in Europe. An international comparison.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 16 (2000), pp. 1039-1049
[23.]
T.M. Shaneyfelt, M.F. Mayo-Smith, J. Rothwangl.
Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature.
JAMA, 281 (1999), pp. 1900-1905
[24.]
P. Littlejohns, F. Cluzeau, R. Bale, J. Grimshaw, G. Feder, S. Moran.
The quantity and quality of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression in primary care in the UK.
Br J Gen Pract, 49 (1999), pp. 205-210
[25.]
H.T. Stelfox, G. Chua, K. O’Rourke, A.S. Detsky.
Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists.
N Engl J Med, 338 (1998), pp. 101-106
[26.]
N.K. Choudhry, H.T. Stelfox, A.S. Detsky.
Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry.
JAMA, 287 (2002), pp. 612-617
[27.]
A. Seaton.
There’s none so blind as the double blind. Discuss.
BMJ, 326 (2003), pp. 889
[28.]
G. Walt, R. Brugha, A. Haines.
Working with the private sector: the need for institutional guidelines.
BMJ, 325 (2002), pp. 432-435
[29.]
E. Wager.
How to dance with porcupines: rules and guidelines on doctors’ relations with drug companies.
BMJ, 326 (2003), pp. 1196-1198
[30.]
X. Bonfill, M. Marzo.
Guías de práctica clínica: tenerlas, que sean de calidad y que salgan del armario.
Med Clin (Barc, 120 (2003), pp. 496-497
[31.]
R.W. Putnam, L. Curry.
Impact of patient care appraisal on physician behaviour in the office setting.
Can Med Assoc J, 132 (1985), pp. 1025-1029
[32.]
F. Medina, M.C. Lillo, J. Montilla, S. Sánchez, A.B. Meseguer, A. Martínez.
Opinión de los fisioterapeutas sobre los factores que influyen en el uso de los protocolos. Estudio cualitativo.
Rev Calidad Asistencial, 17 (2003), pp. 632-638
[33.]
North of England Study of StandardsPerformance in General Practice. Medical audit in general practice (I): effects on doctors’ clinical behaviour for common childhood conditions.
BMJ, 304 (1992), pp. 1480-1484
Copyright © 2004. Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos