covid
Buscar en
Revista Médica del Hospital General de México
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Médica del Hospital General de México Prevalence of uterine diseases in healthy women with hysteroscopy as part of rou...
Información de la revista
Vol. 79. Núm. 4.
Páginas 189-193 (octubre - diciembre 2016)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
2347
Vol. 79. Núm. 4.
Páginas 189-193 (octubre - diciembre 2016)
Original Article
Open Access
Prevalence of uterine diseases in healthy women with hysteroscopy as part of routine gynecological evaluation
Prevalencia de patologías uterinas en mujeres sanas con histeroscopia como parte de evaluación ginecólogica habitual
Visitas
2347
J.C. Paredes Palmaa,
Autor para correspondencia
Ju.paredes@issste.gob.mx

Corresponding author at: Departamento de Enseñanza e Investigación Zona sur del ISSSTE, Avenida San Fernando 15, Barrio San Fernando, Mexico City, Mexico. Tel.: +52 54471323x13035.
, C. Paredes Palmaa, L. Balladares Macedoa, A. Hernández Denisb, J. Audifred Salomónc, D. Bautista Segundod, V. Moreira Armandod
a Sub delegación sur ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico
b Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia PEMEX Picacho, Mexico City, Mexico
c Hospital Manuel GEA González SSA, Mexico City, Mexico
d Ginecología y Obstetricia Hospital General Darío Fernández Fierro, Mexico City, Mexico
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (3)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Distribution of uterine diseases discovered by hysteroscopy in a sample of healthy women.
Abstract
Background

Hysteroscopy is a clinical procedure that allows a gynecologist to see inside the uterus through endoscopy. This can be done for diagnosis or treatment of intrauterine conditions and as a method of surgery.

Purpose

To establish the prevalence of uterine disease in a group of healthy patients who underwent hysteroscopy as part of their gynecological examination.

Materials and methods

It was an observational study. 18 patients who attended a regular consultation provided by the clinical services of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the General Hospital Pemex Picacho were studied; a hysteroscopy was performed in 7 (38.8%) patients who only attended a usual gynecological examination, were asymptomatic and were without known gynecological pathology.

Results

When performing hysteroscopy, 6 (85.7%) patients with gynecological pathology not previously known were found. The disease most commonly found in this sample was the internal cervical stenosis (28.5%).

Conclusions

Hysteroscopy showed a high prevalence of detecting uterine pathologies that were never previously described in a population of healthy women in a common sample of patients attending the outpatient Hospital Pemex Picacho.

Keywords:
Hysteroscopy
Regular gynecological examination
Uterine pathology
Resumen
Antecedentes

La histeroscopía es un procedimiento clínico que le permite a un ginecólogo ver el interior del útero por medio de una endoscopia. Este procedimiento puede realizarse con fines de diagnóstico o para tratamientos de patologías intrauterinas y como método de intervención quirúrgica.

Objetivo

Establecer la prevalencia de enfermedades uterinas en un grupo de pacientes sanas que se les realiza una histeroscopía como parte de su revisión ginecológica.

Material y métodos

Estudio experimental, observacional, se estudiaron a 18 pacientes que acudieron a una consulta habitual por parte del servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital General de Pemex Picacho, se realizó histeroscopía a 7 (38.8%) pacientes que solo acudieron a revisión ginecológica habitual, asintomáticas y sin patología ginecológica conocida.

Resultados

Al realizar una histeroscopía se encontró a 6 (85.7%) pacientes con patología ginecológica antes no conocida. La patología más frecuentemente encontrada en esta muestra fue la de estenosis cervical interna (28.5%).

Conclusiones

La histeroscopía mostro una alta prevalencia de detección de patologías uterinas nunca previamente descrita en una población de mujeres sanas dentro de una muestra habitual de pacientes que acuden a consulta externa del Hospital Pemex Picacho.

Palabras clave:
Histeroscopía
Examen ginecológico habitual
Patologías uterinas
Texto completo
Background

Hysteroscopy is a clinical procedure that allows gynecologist to perform an exploration of the uterine cavity through an endoscopy. This can be done for diagnosis or treatment of diseases and as an intrauterine surgery method. First developed in 1865, the first operation performed with a hysteroscope was the removal of uterine polyps in 1869.1–3

The hysteroscope has an optical system, usually connected to a VCR and is luminogenic, with transmission by optical fibers. The gynecologist inserts a lens to view the inside of the uterus; this lens you may connect to a camera to view the image on a monitor. The camera, in turn, can be connected to a VCR, DVD recorder or other recording device video.4–8

Saline, sorbitol or dextrose solution or carbon dioxide is used to distend the uterine cavity; currently, a physiological solution is most often used. After cervical expansion, hysteroscope is guided into the uterine cavity for inspection. If abnormalities are found, it proceeds with the channel of the hysteroscope where you can introduce specialized surgical instruments, such as scissors, tweezers and bipolar electrodes, to operate in the cavity uterina.9–12

Previously, an intervention by hysteroscopy was always performed under general anesthesia, whereas diagnostic hysteroscopy using smaller caliber instruments and being non-invasive was performed without anesthesia. However, nowadays, small diameter (3mm) hysteroscopes have been developed to allow interventions in the query without the need for anesthesia, with a total duration of the procedure no more than twenty minutes.13–25

Primary objective

To establish the prevalence of uterine disease in a sample of healthy patients who underwent a hysteroscopy as part of a gynecological examination.

Specific objectives

  • 1.

    To determine uterine pathology most frequently found in a group of healthy patients.

  • 2.

    To determine the correlation between age and degree of referred pain in hysteroscopy.

  • 3.

    To determine the correlation between the degree of pain in healthy patients undergoing hysteroscopy with the time taken by the procedure.

Materials and methods

It is an observational, descriptive and cross-sectional pilot study. 18 patients attending a regular consultation provided by the clinical services of Gynecology and Obstetrics General Hospital Pemex Picacho, asymptomatic and without known gynecological pathology were studied.

Selection criteria: Women over 18 years, with active sexual life and without any known uterine pathology based on a previous ultrasonography.

Exclusion criteria: Women who have undergone surgical events affecting the uterine structure as curettage, diagnostic hieroscopias, cesarean section, myomectomy and tubal occlusion.

Results

The age range varied from 31 to 65 years and the average age was 48.1 and the standard deviation was 18.6. When performing a hysteroscopy in the clinic without sedation, experts found 15 (83.3%) patients with gynecological pathology not previously known (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of uterine diseases discovered by hysteroscopy in a sample of healthy women.

Patient  Age  Reference diagnostic  Hysteroscopic diagnostic  Pain grade  Duration of hysteroscopy (min) 
46  Control  Bicornual uterus  14 
65  Control  Bicornual uterus  12 
58  Control  Endocervical polyp  10  23 
24  Control  Stenosis of intern cervical orifice  13 
31  Control  Right cornual leukoplakia  24 
43  Control  Two myomas of 5mm  8.5  34 
46  Control  Stenosis of intern cervical orifice  12 
48  Control  Normal  10  10 
36  Control  Right occluded ostium, left with endometrial tissue. 
10  62  Control  Occlusion cervical atrophy  11 
11  61  Control  Stenosis of intern cervical orifice  14 
12  47  Control  Stenosis of intern cervical orifice  17 
13  36  Control  Normal  12 
14  31  Control  Left occluded ostium  14 
15  55  Control  Stenosis of intern cervical orifice  18 
16  51  Control  Normal  15 
17  48  Control  Stenosis of intern cervical orifice  15 
18  27  Control  Asherman's syndrome  10  13 

Uterine diseases most frequently encountered in these patients are described. The disease most commonly found in this sample was the internal cervical stenosis in 6 patients (33.3%).

Pearson test was performed to correlate ages of healthy women with the degree of pain expressed according to a visual analog scale R=−0.002 finding and P 0.05 (Graph 1).

Graph 1.

Correlation between the ages of women and the grade of pain referred to in a visual analog scale.

(0.08MB).

A P-Pearson test was performed to establish the correlation between the degree of pain in healthy women undergoing hysteroscopy and time taken to perform the procedure finding an R=0.20 with a P 0.05 (Graph 2).

Graph 2.

Correlation between the grade of pain in healthy patients undergoing an office hysteroscopy and duration of the procedure.

(0.1MB).

The prevalence of uterine pathology found in a sample of healthy patients was 83.3% (Graph 3).

Graph 3.

Healthy women with uterine pathology detected by hysteroscopy.

(0.07MB).
Discussion

In 2012, Alanis Fuentes and colleagues published a causality detection of abnormal uterine bleeding in a group of study of 1,482 women without a clear diagnosis. In 2013, Sanchez and colleagues identified a diagnostic concordance in the diagnosis of uterine infertility in women when compared with hysterosonography and hysterosalpingography, with greater functionality to establish causality of uterine infertility. Hysteroscopy is considered only as a diagnostic tool for diseases previously diagnosed by clinical or imaging studies; however, in women who are asymptomatic and are considered healthy, uterine pathology requiring treatment can be found in our study in about 83% of the patients; patients who underwent hysteroscopy incidentally diagnosed a condition that would warrant possibly treatment. So, it should be a tool to be incorporated into routine clinical evaluation of care in gynecological patients. As for the correlation between the degree of pain and age, an inversely proportional relationship but with very weak association was found. During this study, a direct relationship was observed, but it was not significant. These last two results are due to the sample size; you must increase the number of participants to make clear if the strength of association is significant.

Conclusions

Hysteroscopy showed a high prevalence of detection of uterine pathologies never previously described in a population of healthy women in a typical sample of patients attending outpatient Hospital Pemex Picacho.

Ethical disclosureProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References
[1]
P. Ricci, R. Lema, V. Solá.
Desarrollo de la cirugía laparoscópica: Pasado, presente y futuro. Desde Hipócrates hasta la introducción de la robótica en laparoscopia ginecológica.
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol, 73 (2008), pp. 63-75
[2]
P. Christopher, A. DeSimone, R. Frederick, et al.
Laparoscopia ginecológica.
Surg Clin N Am, 88 (2009), pp. 319-341
[3]
C. Chapron, A. Fauconnier, F. Goffinet, et al.
Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynaecologic pathology. Results of a meta-analysis.
Hum Reprod, 17 (2002), pp. 1334-1342
[4]
Laparoscopia Técnicas y vías de abordaje. Protocolos Endoscopia Ginecológica SEGO.
(2006),
[5]
D. Molloy, P.D. Kaloo, M. Cooper, et al.
Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry.
Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol, 42 (2002), pp. 246-254
[6]
F.W. Jansen, W. Kolkman, E. Bakkum, et al.
Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed versus open entry technique.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 190 (2004), pp. 634-638
[7]
P.J. Hajenius, B.W. Mol, P.M. Bossuyt, et al.
Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2000),
[8]
H. Fernández, L. Marchal, Y. Vincent.
Fertility after radical surgery for tubal pregnancy.
Fertil Steril, 70 (1998), pp. 680-686
[9]
L.R. Medeiros, J.M.G. Fachel, R. Garry, et al.
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for tumors ovarian benign.
Cochrane Rev Cochrane Library, (2008),
[10]
E. Leblanc, D. Querleu, F. Narducci, et al.
Laparoscopic restaging of early-stage adnexal tumors: a 10 year experience.
Gynecol Oncol, 94 (2004), pp. 624-629
[11]
Tratamiento laparoscópico de masas anexiales. Protocolos Endoscopia Ginecológica SEGO.
(2006),
[12]
C.B. Wykes, T.J. Clark, S. Chakravati, et al.
Efficacy of laparoscopic excision of visually diagnosed peritoneal endometriosis in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 125 (2006), pp. 129-133
[13]
J. Balasch.
Tratamiento de la Endometriosis y medicina basada en la Evidencia.
Prog Obstet Ginecol, 46 (2003), pp. 24-37
[14]
Surgical alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of the leiomyomas. Clinical Management Guidelines for the Obstetrician-Gynecologist.
ACOG, 16 (2004), pp. 665-673
[15]
Miomectomía laparoscópica. Protocolos Endoscopia Ginecológica SEGO.
(2010),
[16]
P. Klatsky, N. Tran, A. Caughey, et al.
Fibroids and reproductive outcome: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 80 (2008), pp. 357-366
[17]
A. Lathaby, B. Vollenhoben, M. Sowter.
Preoperative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2004),
[18]
R. Sinha, A. Hegde, N. Warty, et al.
Laparoscopic myomectomy: enucleation of the myoma by morcellation while it is attached to the uterus.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 12 (2005), pp. 284-289
[19]
J. Drahonovsky, L. Haakova, M. Otcenasek, et al.
A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 148 (2010), pp. 172-176
[20]
E. Theoroor, N. Johnson, A. Lethaby.
Surgical in hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions.
Cochrane Rev Collis Cochrane Library, (2009),
[21]
Abordaje laparoscópico en Histerectomía: vaginal asistida, supracervical, total. Protocolos Endoscopia Ginecológica SEGO.
(2010),
[22]
A. Lethaby, V. Ivanova, N.P. Johnson.
Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for diseases benign gynecologic.
Cochrane Rev Cochrane Library, (2008),
[23]
A. González Paredes, A. Rodríguez Oliver.
Histerectomía laparoscópica. Protocolos Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves.
(2005),
[24]
C.B. Bijen, K.M. Vermeulen, M.J. Mourits.
Cost effectiveness of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial.
Gynecol Oncol, 121 (2011), pp. 76-82
[25]
A. Obermair, T.P. Manolitsas, Y. Leung, et al.
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrence and survival.
Gynecol Oncol, 92 (2004), pp. 789-793
Copyright © 2016. Sociedad Médica del Hospital General de México
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo