covid
Buscar en
Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial Clinical Performance of an Experimental Veneering Composite in FPDs. One-year re...
Información de la revista
Vol. 48. Núm. 3.
Páginas 133-139 (julio - septiembre 2007)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 48. Núm. 3.
Páginas 133-139 (julio - septiembre 2007)
Investigação
Open Access
Clinical Performance of an Experimental Veneering Composite in FPDs. One-year report.
Visitas
2698
Jaime Portugal, Mário Filipe Bernardo, Cristiana Pereira, Pedro Rabaço, Leonel González, Manuel Marques, Tiago Mourão, António Vasconcelos Tavares, Jorge Leitão
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumo
Objectivos

Avaliar o desempenho clínico de pontes fixas com 3 elementos, construídas com um compósito experimental microparticulado, sobre infra-estrutura em compósito com fibra ou em metal.

Materiais e métodos

Foram fabricadas 60 pontes com uma versão experimental do compósito de revestimento, SR Adoro. Metade das pontes tinha uma infra-estrutura em Vectris, e a outra metade numa liga de ouro. Os parâmetros avaliados foram: “estabilidade cromática”, “textura de superfície”, “contorno marginal”, “fenda marginal”, “fractura”, “cárie secundária”, “retenção” e “sensibilidade dos dentes pilares”. As pontes foram classificadas como: R (ideal), S (aceitável) ou T/V (inaceitável). Os resultados obtidos foram analisados estatisticamente com os testes de Mann-Whitney e Wilcoxon.

Resultados

No grupo Adoro/Ouro, a comparação dos resultados obtidos em Baseline e 1-ano demonstrou não haver alteração na “estabilidade cromática”. Foi no entanto encontrada uma degradação estatisticamente significativa em “textura superficial” (p=0.007), “contorno marginal” (p=0.014), “fenda marginal” (p=0.034) e “fractura” (p=0.025). As alterações observadas foram de R para S excepto no critério “fenda marginal” com uma ponte classificada T/V, e “fractura” com 5 classificações T/V. Uma vez que se trataram apenas de pequenas fracturas do SR Adoro, apenas uma ponte foi substituída. No grupo Adoro/Vectris, apenas se observou degradação estatisticamente significativa na “textura de superfície” (p=0.001). A comparação dos resultados obtidos nos dois grupos, em cada período, evidenciou diferenças estatisticamente significativas para “sensibilidade” em Baseline (p<0,001).

Conclusões

Após 1 ano, embora revelando alguns problemas, a performance global deste novo material pode ser considerada como boa.

Palavras-Chave:
Prostodontia
Ensaio clínico, Compósito de revestimento
Compósitos reforçados com fibras
Abstract
Purpose

To evaluate the clinical performance of an experimental veneering composite in 3-unit fixed partial dentures and to assess the influence of the framework material on the mentioned performance.

Materials and Methods

A total of 60 fixed partial dentures were made with the experimental version of SR Adoro veneering composite. Half had a Vectris framework, and the other half gold alloy. Evaluation criteria were: shade match, surface texture, marginal shoulder, marginal gap, fracture, recurrent caries, retention, and abutment tooth hypersensitivity. The fixed partial dentures were rated as: R (ideal), S (acceptable) or T/V (unacceptable). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests.

Results

Comparison between Baseline and 1-Year in the Adoro/Gold group showed no change in color match. A statistical significant degradation in surface texture (p=0.007), marginal shoulder (p=0.014), marginal gap (p=0.034), and fracture (p=0.025) was found. All changes were minor from R to S except in the criteria marginal gap where 1 bridge was rated T/V, and fracture with 5 T/V ratings. Since fractures consisted in loss of small parts of veneering composite, 4 of these fixed partial dentures remained in service and only 1 was replaced. In Adoro/Vectris group only surface texture degradation was statistically significant (p=0.001). Nevertheless, SR Adoro maintained a clinically acceptable surface texture. Comparing the results for the two groups in each period, the only statistically significant differences found, was on hypersensitivity at Baseline (p<0.001).

Conclusions

After one year, the overall performance of the experimental veneering composite was acceptable.

Key-words:
Prosthodontics
Clinical trial
Veneering composite
Fixed partial dentures
Glass-fiber reinforced framework
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[1-]
Report on base metal alloys for crown and bridge applications: benefits and risks.
Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment.
J Am Dent Assoc, 111 (1985), pp. 479-483
[2-]
M.A. Freilich, J.C. Meiers, J.P. Duncan, et al.
Fiber-reinforced composites in clinical dentistry.
Quintessence Publishing, (2000),
[3-]
M. Behr, M. Rosentritt, E. Ledwinsky, et al.
Fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of conventionally cemented fiberreinforced composite three-unit FPDs.
Int J Prosthodont, 15 (2002), pp. 467-472
[4-]
I. Krejci, R. Boretti, P. Giezendanner, et al.
Adhesive crowns and fixed partial dentures fabricated of ceromer/FRC: clinical and laboratory procedures.
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 10 (1998), pp. 487-498
[5-]
T.N. Gohring, W.H. Mormann, F. Lutz.
Clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: preliminary results after one year.
J Prosthet Dent, 82 (1999), pp. 662-668
[6-]
M. Behr, M. Rosentritt, G. Handel.
Fiber-reinforced composite crowns and FPDs: a clinical report.
Int J Prosthodont, 16 (2003), pp. 239-243
[7-]
F. Bohlsen, M. Kern.
Clinical outcome of glass-fiber-reinforced crowns and fixed partial dentures: a three-year retrospective study.
Quintessence Int, 34 (2003), pp. 493-496
[8-]
C. Monaco, M. Ferrari, G.P. Miceli, et al.
Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite inlay FPDs.
Int J Prosthodont, 16 (2003), pp. 319-325
[9-]
P. Chaabane, S. Wigren, G. Zappini.
Flexural properties of indirect resin composites after aging.
J Dent Res, 83 (2004),
[10-]
S. Wigren, P. Chaabane, G. Zappini.
Wear and mechanical properties of indirect resin composites.
J Dent Res, 83 (2004),
[11-]
Quality evaluation for dental care: guidelines for the assessment of clinical quality and professional performance. Los Angeles: California Dental Association; 1977.
[12-]
R.C. Fraga, L.R. Luca-Fraga, L.A. Pimenta.
Physical properties of resinous cements: an in vitro study.
J Oral Rehabil, 27 (2000), pp. 1064-1067

(Portugal J, Bernardo MF, Pereira C, Rabaço P, González L, Marques M, Mourão T, Tavares AV, Leitão J. Clinical Performance of an Experimental Veneering Composite in FPDs. One-year report. Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac 2007;48:133–139)

Copyright © 2007. Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos