metricas
covid
Buscar en
Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española
Toda la web
Inicio Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española Comparación entre los resultados del fonetograma manual y el fonetograma autom...
Journal Information
Vol. 57. Issue 7.
Pages 313-318 (September 2006)
Share
Share
Download PDF
English PDF
More article options
Vol. 57. Issue 7.
Pages 313-318 (September 2006)
Comparación entre los resultados del fonetograma manual y el fonetograma automático
Comparison of the results obtained through manual and automatic phonetogram
Visits
2694
J. Montojo1
Corresponding author
josemontojo@hotmail.com

Correspondencia: José Montojo Woodeson Leopoldo Alas Clarín, 2 - 1ºC 28035 Madrid
, G. Garmendia, I. Cobeta
Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias. Alcalá de Henares. Madrid
This item has received
Article information
Resumen
Introducción

El fonetograma (F) es la representación gráfica del potencial fonatorio de un individuo. El F obtenido empleando un sonómetro y un analizador de frecuencias se denomina “fonetograma manual” (FM), y el obtenido mediante programas informáticos se denomina “fonetograma automático” (FA).

Material y métodos

Se ha realizado en 12 cantantes líricos un FM standard y un FA con el programa Dr. Speech Science 3.0, midiendo la correlación entre ambos sistemas.

Resultados

Se objetivó una diferencia entre los dos sistemas para 14 de las 15 medidas fonetométricas con una p0,0005, y con una p0,05 para la restante, siendo los resultados numéricos del FA habitualmente mayores que los del FM, mostrando una correlación entre los resultados de ambos métodos.

Conclusiones

El FA obtenido con el programa Dr. Speech Science 3.0 es un sistema más rápido y sencillo que el empleado para el FM, mostrando sin embargo diferencias por exceso respecto al FM en todos los parámetros fonetométricos habituales.

Palabras clave:
Fonetograma
Perfil del rango vocal
Abstract
Introduction

The phonetogram (F) is the graphic representation of a person phonatory potential. The F carried out with a sonometer and a frequency analyser is what is called “manual phonetogram” (MPh), and the one obtained by means of a computer is called the “automatic phonetogram” (APh).

Material and methods

We have carried out in 12 lyrical singers a standard MPh and an APh with the program Dr. Speech Science 3.0.

Results

It was showed a significant difference with a p0,0005 in 14 of the 15 measures compared, and a p0,05 for the other one, being in general the results of the automatic test different from those of the manual in excess, with a correlation between the results obtained through both methods.

Conclusions

The APh obtained with the program Dr. Speech Science 3.0 is a faster and easier way to obtain the phonetogram than the one used to obtain the MPh, showing however big differences in excess compared with the ones of the MPh in all the usual phonetometric parameters.

Key words:
Phonetogram
Vocal range profile

Article

These are the options to access the full texts of the publication Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española
Subscriber
Subscriber

If you already have your login data, please click here .

If you have forgotten your password you can you can recover it by clicking here and selecting the option “I have forgotten my password”
Subscribe
Subscribe to

Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española

Purchase
Purchase article

Purchasing article the PDF version will be downloaded

Price 19.34 €

Purchase now
Contact
Phone for subscriptions and reporting of errors
From Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. (GMT + 1) except for the months of July and August which will be from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Calls from Spain
932 415 960
Calls from outside Spain
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos