Abstracts of the 2023 Annual Meeting of the ALEH
More infoNo
Introduction and ObjectivesPts with ACLF should be assessed for liver transplant (LT) due to the high mortality without LT (28-day mortality: grade 1 = 14.6%, 2 = 32%, 3 = 78.6%). There is a survival benefit for ACLF grades 2-3 with LT (85-89% at 3-months and 70-80% at 3-years). Grade 2, and specially grade 3 ACLF pts remain a challenge for LT teams. New scoring systems (eg. SALT-M) have been developed to assist decision-making. There is limited data on this topic in Chile and Latin America. Aim: To characterize ACLF pts who underwent LT in our center between January 2020 and March 2024.
Patients / Materials and MethodsObservational retrospective study. Clinical and laboratory data were collected. The cohort was divided into 3 groups based on ACLF grade. We calculated ACLF scores and assessed outcomes at 28-days and 3-months after LT.
Results and DiscussionA total of 100 LT were performed between January 2020 and March 2024. 31 pts (31%) had ACLF before LT. Table 1 shows general data of ACLF LT pts. Alcohol and autoimmune were the most frequent etiologies. Infection was the most frequent extrahepatic comorbidity before and after LT (80.7% and 93.6% respectively). Length of stay (LOS) was influenced by the grade of ACLF, with grade 3 patients having the longest ICU stay (20.92 days). 28-day and 3-month survival rates were 90.3% and 87.1%, respectively. Only grade 3 ACLF LT pts showed a difference between 28-day and 3-month survival. Multi organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) was the main reported cause of death (75%).
ConclusionsShort term outcomes were consistent with national and international data. Infections were the main complication before and after LT. SALT-M score correlates with ACLF severity but would not have changed the decision to perform LT. A prolonged LOS is expected in ACLF LT pts.