metricas
covid
Buscar en
Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición (English ed.)
Toda la web
Inicio Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición (English ed.) Experience in diagnosis and treatment of prolactinomas in pediatric patients and...
Journal Information
Vol. 69. Issue 10.
Pages 911-913 (December 2022)
Vol. 69. Issue 10.
Pages 911-913 (December 2022)
Scientific letter
Full text access
Experience in diagnosis and treatment of prolactinomas in pediatric patients and young adults
Experiencia en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de prolactinomas en pacientes pediátricos y adultos jóvenes
Visits
272
Soraya Lanes Iglesiasa,
Corresponding author
sorayalanes@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Alba Megido Armadaa, Luis Antonio Castaño Gonzálezb, Edelmiro Luis Menéndez Torreb, Isolina Riaño Galánb
a Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
b Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text
Dear Editor,

Pituitary adenomas are rare in childhood, with an approximate incidence of 0.1 cases per million children, of which around 50% are prolactinomas. The associated clinical signs and symptoms are associated with age, mass effect, hyperprolactinaemia and secondary hormone deficiency. Dopamine agonists are the medical treatment of choice.1 These usually achieve a significant reduction in tumour size, normalisation of prolactin blood levels and gonadal axis recovery in most patients.2

A retrospective review of patients under 21 years diagnosed with prolactin-producing adenoma (prolactinoma) in a tertiary hospital was conducted within the last six years. Patients' clinical, biochemical and radiological characteristics were collected, a genetic study performed and their clinical course assessed after the administration of medical treatment.

A total of nine patients (four males) took part, with a mean age of 15.3 years [11–20] and with mean resting prolactin levels at diagnosis of 1,205.2ng/mL [106.6−3,892]. Mean blood prolactin levels in male patients was 1,818.2ng/mL, while in female patients, it was 714.8ng/mL. MRI revealed a pituitary macroadenoma in all cases, with a mean greatest diameter of 17.6mm [22.5 in males and 13.8 in females]. Four patients (three male) had gonadotropic axis involvement at diagnosis. Two of these also manifested secondary hypothyroidism, requiring hormone replacement therapy.

Its clinical presentation was as follows: secondary amenorrhoea in three females, primary amenorrhoea in one female, short stature in three patients (two males), visual disturbance (inferior hemianopia with central involvement in the left eye) in one male patient, and delayed puberty in another (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical, biochemical and radiological characteristics of the sample.

Case  Age at diagnosis (years)  Gender  Symptoms  PRL (ng/mL)  Lesion size (mm)  Visual disturbance  Involvement of other axes 
11  Secondary amenorrhoea  406  9×11  Yes  No 
12  Short stature  875  14×11  No  No 
13  Short stature  2,673  20×24  No  Gonadotropic, thyroid 
16  Secondary amenorrhoea  253.1  10×No  No 
17  Secondary amenorrhoea  241.3  14×13  No  No 
15  Short stature  2,049  22×26  No  Gonadotropic 
20  Visual disturbance  3,892  38×25  Yes  Gonadotropic 
17  Delayed puberty  456.9  12×10  No  Gonadotropic, thyroid 
17  Primary amenorrhoea  106.6  10×No  No 

F, female; M, male; PRL, prolactin level.

Physical examination revealed delayed development of secondary sexual characteristics, all of which were in males.

Genetic testing was performed on seven of the subjects using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (Ampliseq custom panel/Ion Torrent™ PGM) of the flanking exonic and intronic regions and 5'UTR regions of nine genes related to pituitary adenomas: MEN1, PRKAR1A, AIP, CDKN1B, GNAS, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD and DICER1. No pathogenic variants were found in five patients. In the other two, a variant of uncertain significance was found: c.34G>A; p.Gly12Ser in heterozygosis in exon 1 of the SDHD gene. Genetic testing of the parents and sister of one of the patients was performed, finding that the mother also had the same variant.3,4 In the other case, no genetic testing of family members was performed. No screening for other tumours was performed at diagnosis.

All patients were treated with cabergoline at a mean weekly dose of 1.44mg [0.5−3mg/week], achieving normal prolactin levels in six subjects. Prolactin levels partially decreased in the other three patients, so their cabergoline dose was progressively adjusted.

In terms of clinical response, all secondary and primary amenorrhoea cases were resolved a few months after starting treatment. At the time of writing, the menstrual cycle of all affected patients is regular. As for patients with short stature, one reached their target height after 4 years, while an adequate growth rate was observed in another after two years of treatment with cabergoline. In the case of the third patient, it is too soon to assess response, as treatment was only initiated six months ago at the time of writing. In the patient with visual disturbance, the normal field of vision was observed in the last eye examination performed three months after treatment was started.

Regarding radiological progression, MRI performed at least 6 months after the start of treatment revealed a progressive decrease in sellar mass in 6 patients. In the rest, diagnosis is recent and no imaging tests have yet been performed.

The finding of the same variant of uncertain significance of the SDHD gene in two patients (c.34G>A; p.Gly12Ser) is striking. Although this variant has been identified in 1% of the chromosomes of cancer patients (pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma), it has also been identified in 1.1% of European–American control chromosomes (in some homozygous individuals) at a frequency of 0.007268, which is approximately 4,652 times the maximum expected allele frequency of a pathogenic variant of SDHD (0.0000016), suggesting that this variant is probably a benign polymorphism. However, since there is insufficient evidence in this regard, these patients should be closely followed up.5–7 In summary, a similar prevalence of prolactinomas in both males and females of paediatric age was found. Prolactinomas should be clinically suspected in any paediatric patient with short stature and/or delayed puberty, and in girls with abnormal menstrual cycles. It seems important to conduct genetic testing in all young patients with pituitary adenomas, in order to identify the risk of developing other tumours and tailor specific follow-up.

Funding

This study did not receive funding of any kind.

References
[1]
T. Breil, C. Lorz, D. Choukair, J. Mittnacht, I. Inta, D. Klose, et al.
Clinical features and response to treatment of prolactinomas in children and adolescents: a retrospective single-centre analysis and review of the literature.
Horm Res Paediatr., 89 (2018), pp. 157-165
[2]
E. Eren, Ş. Yapıcı, E.D. Çakır, L.A. Ceylan, H. Sağlam, Ö. Tarım.
Clinical course of hyperprolactinemia in children and adolescents: a review of 21 cases.
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol., 3 (2011), pp. 65-69
[3]
O. Gimm, M. Armanios, H. Dziema, H.P. Neumann, C. Eng.
Somatic and occult germ-line mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in nonfamilial pheochromocytoma.
Cancer Res, 60 (2000), pp. 6822-6825
[4]
1000 Genomes Project Consortium, G.R. Abecasis, D. Altshuler, A. Auton, L.D. Brooks, R.M. Durbin, et al.
A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
Nature., 467 (2010), pp. 1061-1073
[5]
E. Panizza, T. Ercolino, L. Mori, E. Rapizzi, M. Castellano, G. Opocher, et al.
Yeast model for evaluating the pathogenic significance of SDHB, SDHC and SDHD mutations in PHEO-PGL syndrome.
Hum Mol Genet., 22 (2013), pp. 804-815
[6]
É Saskői, Z. Hujber, G. Nyírő, I. Likó, B. Mátyási, G. Petővári, et al.
The SDHB Arg230His mutation causing familial paraganglioma alters glycolysis in a new Caenorhabditis elegans model.
Dis Model Mech., 13 (2020),
[7]
F. Guerrero Pérez, A. Lisbona Gil, M. Robledo, P. Iglesias, C. Villabona Artero.
Pituitary adenoma associated with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: a new form of multiple endocrine neoplasia.
Endocrinol Nutr, 63 (2016), pp. 506-508
Copyright © 2022. SEEN and SED
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.endien.2021.11.001
No mostrar más