was read the article
array:24 [ "pii" => "S252998402300023X" "issn" => "25299840" "doi" => "10.1016/j.enfie.2022.11.001" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-07-01" "aid" => "434" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Enfermería Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (SEEIUC)" "copyrightAnyo" => "2022" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Enferm Intensiva. 2023;34:148-55" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1130239922001146" "issn" => "11302399" "doi" => "10.1016/j.enfi.2022.11.002" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-07-01" "aid" => "434" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Enfermería Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (SEEIUC)" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Enferm Intensiva. 2023;34:148-55" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "es" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">ORIGINAL</span>" "titulo" => "Percepción de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en un área de críticos" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "148" "paginaFinal" => "155" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Perception of the safety culture in a critical area" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "R.M. Peradejordi-Torres, J. Valls-Matarín" "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN" "nombre" => "R.M." "apellidos" => "Peradejordi-Torres" ] 1 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "PhD, MSR, RN" "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Valls-Matarín" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S252998402300023X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.enfie.2022.11.001" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S252998402300023X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1130239922001146?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/11302399/0000003400000003/v1_202307241018/S1130239922001146/v1_202307241018/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S2529984023000526" "issn" => "25299840" "doi" => "10.1016/j.enfie.2023.08.008" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-07-01" "aid" => "408" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Enfermería Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (SEEIUC)" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "rev" "cita" => "Enferm Intensiva. 2023;34:156-72" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review article</span>" "titulo" => "Nursing interventions in palliative care in the intensive care unit: A systematic review" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "156" "paginaFinal" => "172" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Intervenciones de enfermería en cuidados paliativos en la unidad de cuidados intensivos: una revisión sistemática" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 2818 "Ancho" => 2508 "Tamanyo" => 505055 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Prisma flow diagram 2020 (adapted).</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "M.C.R. Araujo, D.A. da Silva, A.M.M.M. Wilson" "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN" "nombre" => "M.C.R." "apellidos" => "Araujo" ] 1 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN" "nombre" => "D.A." "apellidos" => "da Silva" ] 2 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "MSN" "nombre" => "A.M.M.M." "apellidos" => "Wilson" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2529984023000526?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/25299840/0000003400000003/v3_202311101448/S2529984023000526/v3_202311101448/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2529984023000228" "issn" => "25299840" "doi" => "10.1016/j.enfie.2022.10.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-07-01" "aid" => "431" "copyright" => "The Author(s)" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Enferm Intensiva. 2023;34:138-47" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Transitions and empowerment theory: A framework for nursing interventions during intensive care unit patient transition" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "138" "paginaFinal" => "147" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Teoría de las transiciones y empoderamiento: un marco para las intervenciones enfermeras durante la transición del paciente de la unidad de cuidados intensivos" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 2326 "Ancho" => 1675 "Tamanyo" => 298150 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Main secondary analysis (SA) themes.</p> <p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Translated and adapted from Schumacher and Meleis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a></p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "C. Cuzco, P. Delgado-Hito, R. Marin-Pérez, A. Núñez-Delgado, M. Romero-García, M.A. Martínez-Momblan, G. Martínez-Estalella, P. Castro" "autores" => array:8 [ 0 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN, MSc, PhD" "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Cuzco" ] 1 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN, MSc, PhD" "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Delgado-Hito" ] 2 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN, MSc" "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Marin-Pérez" ] 3 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN, MSc" "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Núñez-Delgado" ] 4 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN, MSc, PhD" "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Romero-García" ] 5 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN, MSc, PhD" "nombre" => "M.A." "apellidos" => "Martínez-Momblan" ] 6 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "RN, MSc" "nombre" => "G." "apellidos" => "Martínez-Estalella" ] 7 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "MD, PhD" "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Castro" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1130239922001122" "doi" => "10.1016/j.enfi.2022.10.003" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1130239922001122?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2529984023000228?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/25299840/0000003400000003/v3_202311101448/S2529984023000228/v3_202311101448/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:18 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Perception of the safety culture in a critical area" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "148" "paginaFinal" => "155" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "R.M. Peradejordi-Torres, J. Valls-Matarín" "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => array:5 [ "preGrado" => "RN" "nombre" => "R.M." "apellidos" => "Peradejordi-Torres" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "rmperadejordi@yahoo.es" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "preGrado" => "PhD, MSR, RN" "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Valls-Matarín" ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "entidad" => "Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Percepción de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en un área de críticos" ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><elsevierMultimedia ident="tb0005"></elsevierMultimedia></p><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Introduction</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Client safety has been a concept of concern to all types of companies since the last century.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> In 1999, the US Institute of Medicine published the study "To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System",<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> which revealed that adverse events (AE) in the healthcare system, understood as unintentional harm caused to the patient by the healthcare intervention and not by the underlying pathology,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> were leading causes of death.</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As a result of the US study, actions related to patient safety were initiated worldwide.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> ENEAS,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> the national study on adverse events and SYREC,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> the study on safety and risk among critically ill patients, were conducted in Spain, which established an AE incidence of 9.3% and 33.8% respectively, of which a high percentage, 42.8% and 60%, were potentially avoidable.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Meanwhile, AE reporting systems were started in the healthcare system, with the aim of learning from errors, because their analysis enables measures for improvement. Furthermore, in 2013, the Department of Health of the Government of Catalonia launched the digital platform termed the TPSC Cloud (The Patient Safety Company), a tool for reporting all types of incidents related to patient safety, which is voluntary, confidential, non-punitive, and anonymous.</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Safety culture is defined as the product of individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and patterns of behaviour that determine the commitment to an organisation's safety management system,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7,8</span></a> aimed at minimising the risks of harm to the patient arising from healthcare practice.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9,10</span></a> Therefore, systematic analysis is crucial to initiate changes in the philosophy of individuals, groups, and institutions.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Intensive care units (ICU) are among the most complex in the hospital system due to their high degree of technification. Patients are increasingly complex, requiring a great many interventions and the handling of large amounts of data. Therefore, these characteristics, intrinsic to the critical patient, are not modifiable and predispose them to undesirable events.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4,6,11</span></a></p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Research into safety culture can be considered the first step towards improvement in patient safety. Following the COVID-19 crisis it needs to be talked about again, because few assessments were made during this period in our setting. Therefore, the aim of this research study was to determine the care team’s perception of patient safety culture in a critical care area (CCA).</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Method</span><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in an adult CCA in September 2021. The area consists of two ICU units with 20 beds and a semi-critical unit with 25 beds. The sample size was not calculated using a mathematical formula, because the entire population was included due to its accessibility. The sample comprised 118 professionals from the area's healthcare team: nursing staff comprising 78 nurses and 22 auxiliary nursing care technicians (ANCTs), and 18 doctors, regardless of their employment contract, years of work experience, or experience in critical care. Those who did not wish to participate were excluded.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The self-administered questionnaire on patient safety, the Spanish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0060"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a> validated in Spanish by the Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs and the University of Murcia in 2005,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0065"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> was used as the measuring instrument.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0065"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a></p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This questionnaire consists of 42 items grouped into 12 dimensions and divided into three sections:<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0005"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0005"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Section A. Service/Unit: 22 questions with Likert scale responses ranging from strongly disagree, disagree, indifferent, agree, strongly agree.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0010"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Section B. Hospital: 11 questions with Likert scale responses ranging from strongly disagree, disagree, indifferent, indifferent, agree, strongly agree.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0015"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Section C. Communication in the service: 9 questions with Likert scale responses ranging from never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, always.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The questionnaire also includes a final section with complementary information, with a total of 12 closed questions and one open question. One question on assessment of the degree of patient safety in the CCA, with a Likert scale of 10 points, 0 being minimum and 10 maximum safety. Eleven questions on socio-demographic and occupational characteristics: profession (doctor/nurse/ANCT), service (ICU/semi-critical care/multi-skilled (multi-skilled being defined as an individual who works in the CCA as well as other hospital services), contact with the patient (yes/no), and number of incidents reported in the last year. The questions from the original questionnaire on years in the profession, years of work in the hospital, and years of work in the department, not affecting the validation or construct of the questionnaire, were merged into one question: total years of professional experience. Age/gender and other questions relevant to the setting in which the study was conducted were added, such as training on the TPSC Cloud platform (yes/no), knowledge of how to report via the TPSC Cloud (yes/no), knowledge of the person responsible for safety in the department (yes/no), and general training in patient safety (yes/no).</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A section was included at the beginning of the survey with information on the time required to complete the questionnaire and informed consent, which had to be given to access the questionnaire.</p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The questionnaire was distributed digitally in Google Forms format via two systems: the service's WhatsApp group and with a QR code enabled in the area through information posters. A reminder was sent after 15 days using the same system. As it was a digital form, it was possible to design it in such a way that all the questions, except for the open question, were obligatory. In this way, the form could only be submitted once all the answers had been completed.</p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The items of the questionnaire with five response options were coded into three categories: positive, neutral, and negative response, considering that the questionnaire has both positive and negative questions. The coding was made as follows:<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0010"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0020"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the questions formulated in the positive, the following were considered a positive response: strongly agree/agree/almost always/always; neutral response: indifferent/sometimes and; a negative response: strongly disagree/disagree/never/almost never.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0025"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">For questions formulated in the negative, a positive response was considered: strongly disagree/disagree/never/almost never; a neutral response: indifferent/sometimes; and a negative response: strongly agree/agree/almost always/always.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This enabled calculation of each dimension using the following formula:<elsevierMultimedia ident="eq0005"></elsevierMultimedia></p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The dimensions were classified as strengths or weaknesses of the safety culture according to the criteria used and recommended by AHRQ, where a strength is considered:<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0015"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0030"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">≥75% positive responses (strongly agree/agree, or always/almost always) to questions formulated in the positive.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0035"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">≥75% negative responses strongly disagree/disagree, or never/almost never) to questions formulated in the negative.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">And an opportunity for improvement or weakness:<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0020"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0040"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">≥50% negative responses (strongly disagree/disagree, or never/almost never) to questions formulated in the positive.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0045"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">≥50% positive responses (strongly agree/agree, or always/almost always) to questions formulated in the negative.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The responses to the open-ended question were grouped into four recurrent themes: questionnaire, feelings, training, and working conditions.</p><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Descriptive statistics with mean (standard deviation), absolute, and relative frequencies. The percentage of both negative and positive responses was expressed with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Bivariate analysis with Student's <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span>-test to determine the relationship between the assessment of the degree of safety and socio-occupational variables (service, training, professional category).</p><p id="par0165" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We used χ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> to determine the relationship between the dimensions classified as weakness and profession (nursing staff/medical staff), sex (male/female), service (ICU/semi-critical/multi-skilled), and training (yes/no).</p><p id="par0170" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">ANOVA was used to determine the difference between dimensions categorised as weakness and years of experience or age.</p><p id="par0175" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The level of statistical significance was considered <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> ≤ .05.</p><p id="par0180" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">SPSS® version 19 Windows® (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA.) was used for the statistical analysis.</p><p id="par0185" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The study was approved by the institution’s ethics and research committee.</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Results</span><p id="par0190" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A total of 94 questionnaires were collected, representing 79.7% of the sample. The response rate for each group was 83.3% for nurses, 78.8% for doctors, and 68.2% for ANCT.</p><p id="par0195" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The socio-occupational data are shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Assessment of the degree of safety</span><p id="par0200" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The degree of patient safety in the CCA scored an average of 7.1 (1.2) points. Multi-skilled staff scored it with a mean of 6.9 (1.2) points vs. 7.8 (.9) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = .04) scored by staff with an assigned position in the area.</p><p id="par0205" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There were no statistically significant differences between the safety rating and whether or not they had training, years of experience in the CCA, or professional category (doctor/nurse).</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Analysis of strengths and weaknesses</span><p id="par0210" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the scores for each dimension (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>), the perception of teamwork within the CCA obtained the highest percentage of positive responses at 73.4% (95% CI: 68.7−77.6), although according to AHRQ criteria, no dimension reached the level of strength in safety culture.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0215" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In reference to negative responses, the dimension of safety perception at 57.7% (95% CI 52.7−62-6), staffing at 81.7% (95% CI 77.4−85.2), and management support at 69.9% (95% CI 64.3−74.9) had the highest percentages of negative safety perception.</p><p id="par0220" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There was no statistically significant difference between dimension 2 (perception of safety) and having or not having training, either in relation to professional category – doctor/nurse – or in relation to years of experience in the service.</p><p id="par0225" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Nor were statistically significant differences established between dimension 9 (staffing) and socio-occupational variables such as years of experience, training, or professional category – doctor/nursing staff.</p><p id="par0230" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Nursing staff, at 90.0 vs. 57.2% of medical staff (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < .01), and women, at 89.5 vs. 66.7% for the men (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = .04) had a more negative perception of dimension 10 (management support).</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Notification of events</span><p id="par0235" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Out of all the respondents, 51 care team members (54.3%) stated that they knew the procedure for reporting an incident in the TPSC Cloud, of these 27 (53%) reported no incidents in the last year, 22 (43%) reported between one and five incidents, and 2 (4%) between 6 and 10. The medical professionals reported on average 1.5 (2.7) errors per year vs. .4 (1) for the nursing staff (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < .01). Although no statistically significant differences were found in knowledge of how to report an error among the medical staff at 71.4% vs. 51.3% of the nursing staff.</p><p id="par0240" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A total of 64.3% of the doctors said they were aware of the role of the safety officer vs. 16.3% of the nursing staff (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < .01).</p><p id="par0245" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The open-ended question received a total of 18 responses (19.14%). It was classified into four categories for exploration. Perception of high workload was most commented with eight responses (44.4%), followed by insufficient training with seven responses (38.8%), complexity of the TPSC Cloud form with two responses (11.3%), and fear of reporting errors with one response (5.5%).</p></span></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Discussion</span><p id="par0250" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The CCA care team detected weaknesses in PS culture, with low reporting of AEs. The staff's rating of the degree of PS in the CCA was moderately high, as in several studies carried out recently in different hospital contexts<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7,14,15</span></a> and slightly lower compared with the study conducted in a Spanish ICU<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> after the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, which obtained a score of eight out of ten, and where the more senior professionals had a higher perception than new recruits. Although it is difficult to know the impact of the coronavirus crisis on this score, in this study it was not the years of experience but the multi-skilled professionals who scored almost one point lower. This may be because staff turnover prevents knowledge of aspects specific to each unit that directly influence the perception of safety.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a></p><p id="par0255" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Although no dimensions were found that reached the level of strength, as in other studies,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,14,18</span></a> the dimension of teamwork within the same service achieved the highest rate of positive responses, and a healthy working environment, with good collaboration between doctors and nurses, or having experienced nurses, as reported in the literature review by Al Ma’mari et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> improves the perception of quality of care.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4,18,20</span></a></p><p id="par0260" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The weaknesses detected were perception of safety, staffing, and management support. With regard to the perception of safety, understood as the professional's belief that they work in a way that may compromise patient safety to an extent, which may be due to the intense work rhythm of an ICU<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4,21</span></a> and to factors such as fatigue, emotional exhaustion, and workload, because physical and mental tiredness may alter neurocognitive functions such as attention and concentration.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> Indeed, staffing was another dimension identified as a weakness. There are consistent studies on workload, which conclude that areas with higher patient/healthcare staff ratios are more at risk of AEs.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22,23</span></a> Specifically, in the study by Neuraz et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a> conducted in eight French ICUs, the risk of death was found to increase by 3.5 (95% CI 1.3–9.1) when the patient-to-nurse ratio was higher than 2.5 patients and by 2.0 (95% CI 1.3–3.2) when the patient-to-doctor ratio was higher than 14 patients. Similarly, in the study by Khanna et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a> they observed that ICU stay was prolonged when the patient-nurse ratio increased, with a hazard ratio of .96 (95% CI .94–.98, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < .001). It can be stated, therefore, that the ratio influences the care team's perception of safety.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a></p><p id="par0265" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is surprising, therefore, that the CCA team members’ assessment of the degree of safety was high yet the perception of safety dimension, which includes the questions specific to this concept, was detected as a weakness. This potential contradiction may be due to a lack of knowledge of all the parameters encompassed under the concept of patient safety,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> although we cannot rule out the influence of the great care pressure to which the ICUs of the Spanish health system have been subjected, which even had to readapt all the Zero projects to this new scenario due to the difficulty in maintaining its recommendations.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a></p><p id="par0270" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Management support was another area identified for improvement, as in other studies.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16,29</span></a> Levine et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> concluded that the nursing supervisor is an essential figure in fostering a favourable climate to encourage reporting errors, providing support, and responsiveness. In a qualitative study conducted by Souza et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> in Brazilian ICUs, the sources of institutional or system error were perceived as excessive staff turnover, care overload, undervaluing of professionals, and poor working conditions, and the fact that when an error occurs, changes are slow and impermanent or, as Varallo et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> report, there is no feedback between care staff and managers. In fact, more than three quarters of the professionals were unaware of the person responsible for safety in the CCA, which may increase the perception of remoteness and lack of support.</p><p id="par0275" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Belonging to the nursing team or being female are factors that significantly influence the perception of lack of support from management. This could be due to the difference between nursing and medical management in the context studied, and because there is high nursing staff turnover, constant shift changes, and new recruits, which could lead to the impression that management does not value these professionals.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a></p><p id="par0280" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The low rate of incident reporting is striking, almost half of the participants had not reported any incident in the last 12 months and, although this is not classified as a weakness of the system, the existence of a punitive culture in the event of error was perceived, as in the review by Batista et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> It is known that error produces guilt, stress, fear, anger, and shame,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> which can be highlighted as potential causes of under-reporting, and more than half of the population studied stated that they were not aware of the reporting system, which reveals shortcomings in training.</p><p id="par0285" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the area studied, doctors report more compared to nursing staff, unlike other studies, where exactly the opposite occurs.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> This could be related to the characteristics of the area where the study was conducted, since the person responsible for safety is also the department’s head physician, who is present at daily meetings, visiting hours, and on-call duty, and therefore these professionals may be invited or encouraged to make a report. Varallo et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> point out that nurses cite lack of knowledge, guilt in making an error or in reporting the error of others, lack of time, and increased workload as justification for under-reporting, since they are at the bedside 24 h a day, and prioritise caring for the needs of patients and relatives.</p><p id="par0290" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Data collection being in a single hospital and the introduction of new questions without a prior pilot may be limitations of the study, and therefore the results should be viewed with some caution. However, the high participation gives a broad view on the perception of safety in a CCA and the new questions do not interfere with the construct of the questionnaire, are specific to the context studied, easy to understand, and were considered important as they have been little explored in the past.</p><p id="par0295" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is also not possible to determine what impact the COVID-19 pandemic may have had on these results. However, the results were similar to studies prior to this pandemic, and therefore it appears that these are endemic weaknesses that have not been resolved over time and need to be addressed.</p><p id="par0300" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Although there are other ICU-specific surveys to assess safety culture, we used the AHRQ because it has been validated in our setting.</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Conclusions</span><p id="par0305" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The assessment of the degree of patient safety in the CCA is considerable, although multi-skilled staff working in different units have a lower perception.</p><p id="par0310" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">No strengths were found. The weaknesses detected were perception of safety, staffing, and management support.</p><p id="par0315" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Many staff are unaware of who the person responsible for safety is in the service or how to report an incident, and the reporting rate is low, which suggests the need for new training proposals and improvements in communication and dissemination strategies.</p><p id="par0320" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Analysis of the safety culture is crucial to diagnose the area and offers the opportunity to implement improvement plans.</p><p id="par0325" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">With results such as these, it should be mandatory for organisations to react and lead projects to strengthen the safety culture.</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Funding</span><p id="par0330" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">No funding was received for this study.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Conflict of interests</span><p id="par0335" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:12 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres2008342" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Aim" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Method" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Results" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1720711" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres2008343" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Introducción" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Método" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0045" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0050" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1720712" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Method" ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Results" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Assessment of the degree of safety" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Analysis of strengths and weaknesses" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Notification of events" ] ] ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Funding" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Conflict of interests" ] 11 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2022-07-10" "fechaAceptado" => "2022-11-04" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1720711" "palabras" => array:3 [ 0 => "Patient safety" 1 => "Intensive care" 2 => "Adverse event" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1720712" "palabras" => array:3 [ 0 => "Seguridad del paciente" 1 => "Cuidados intensivos" 2 => "Evento adverso" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Introduction</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Critical care Area (CCA) is one of the most complex in the hospital system, requiring a high number of interventions and handling of amounts of information. Therefore, these areas are likely to experience more incidents that compromise patient safety (PS).</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Aim</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">To determine the perception of the healthcare team in a critical care area about the patient safety culture.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Method</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Cross-sectional descriptive study, September 2021, in a polyvalent CCA with 45 beds, 118 health workers (physicians, nurses, auxiliary nursing care technicians). Sociodemographic variables, knowledge of the person in charge in PS and their general training in PS and incident notification system were collected. The validated Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire, measuring 12 dimensions was used.</p><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Positive responses with an average score ≥75%, were defined as an area of strength while ≥50% negative responses were defined as an area of weakness.</p><p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis: X2 and <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span>-Student tests, and ANOVA. Significance <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> ≤ 0.05.</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Results</span><p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">94 questionnaires were collected (79.7% sample). The PS score was 7.1 (1.2) range 1−10. The rotational staff scored the PS with 6.9 (1.2) compared to 7.8 (0.9) for non-rotational staff (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.04). A 54.3% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span> = 51) was familiar with the incident reporting procedure, 53% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span> = 27) of which had not reported any in the last year. No dimension was defined as strength. There were three dimensions that behaved like a weakness: security perception: 57.7% (95% CI: 52.7−62.6), staffing: 81.7% (95% CI: 77.4−85.2) and management support: 69 .9% (95% CI: 64.3−74.9).</p></span> <span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Conclusions</span><p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The assessment of PS in the CCA is moderately high, although the rotational staff has a lower appreciation. Half of the staff do not know the procedure for reporting an incident. The notification rate is low. The weaknesses detected are perception of security, staffing and management support. The analysis of the patient safety culture can be useful to implement improvement measures.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Aim" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Method" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Results" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Introducción</span><p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">El área de críticos (AC) es una de las más complejas dentro del sistema hospitalario, se requiere un elevado número de intervenciones e información, por tanto, son susceptibles de padecer más incidentes que comprometan la seguridad del paciente.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Objetivo</span><p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Determinar la percepción de la cultura de seguridad del paciente del equipo asistencial en un área de críticos.</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Método</span><p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Estudio descriptivo transversal, septiembre 2021, en un AC polivalente con 45 camas, 118 sanitarios (médicos, enfermeras, técnicos en cuidados auxiliares de enfermería). Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, conocimiento del responsable en seguridad del paciente (SP), formación en SP y en el sistema de notificación de incidentes. Se utilizó el cuestionario validado Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture que evalúa 12 dimensiones. Se consideró una dimensión como fortaleza con ≥75% respuestas positivas y debilidad con ≥50% respuestas negativas. Estadística descriptiva y análisis bivariante: prueba de X2 y t-Student, y ANOVA. Significación estadística p ≤ 0,05.</p></span> <span id="abst0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Resultados</span><p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se recogieron 94 cuestionarios (79,7% muestra). La valoración del grado de SP fue 7,1 (1,2) sobre 10. El personal polivalente la puntuó con 6,9 (1,2) frente al 7,8 (0,9) del personal sin rotación (p = 0,04). El 54,3% (n = 51) conocía el procedimiento para notificar un incidente, de los cuales el 53% (n = 27) no notificó ninguno en el último año. Ninguna dimensión alcanzó grado de fortaleza. Fueron detectadas como debilidad: percepción de seguridad: 57,7% (IC95%:52,7-62,6), dotación de personal: 81,7% (IC95%:77,4-85,2) y apoyo de gerencia: 69,9% (IC95%:64,3-74,9).</p></span> <span id="abst0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0080" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La valoración del grado de SP en el AC es moderadamente alta, aunque el personal polivalente tiene una apreciación inferior. La mitad del personal no conoce cómo notificar un incidente. La tasa de notificación es baja. Las debilidades detectadas son percepción de seguridad, dotación de personal y apoyo de gerencia. El análisis de la cultura de seguridad puede ser útil para implementar medidas de mejora.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Introducción" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Método" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0045" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0050" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:4 [ 0 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">ANCT: Auxiliary nursing care technicians; TPSC: the Patient Safety Company.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Age (years) mean (SD) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">38.5 (9.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Sex <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span> (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Male 18 (19.2)Female 76 (80.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Mean years of professional experience (SD) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">15.2 (10.2) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Professional category <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span> (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Nurse 65 (69.2)Doctor 14 (14.9)ANCT 15 (15.9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Reference unit <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span> (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ICU 66 (70.2)Semi-critical 9 (9.6)Multi-skilled 19 (20.2) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Working in direct contact with the patient n (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">94 (100) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">General training in patient safety (yes) n (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">62 (66) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Knowledge of the person responsible for safety (yes) n (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">22 (23.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Specific training in TPSC Cloud (yes) n (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">23 (24.5) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3334795.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Socio-demographic characteristics and complementary data of the sample (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span> = 94).</p>" ] ] 1 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0010" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:3 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Dimensions \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Positive% (95% CI) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Neutral% (95% CI) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Negative% (95% CI) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Frequency of reported events \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">26.6 (21.8−31.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">29.1 (24.1−34.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">44.3 (38.5−50.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Perception of safety \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">25.8 (21.7−30.5) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">16.5 (13.1−20.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">57.7<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> (52.7−62-6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Unit management/supervisory expectations and actions in safety support \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">29 (24.6−33.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">26.3 (22.1−31.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">44.7 (39.7−49.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Organisational learning/Continuous improvement \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">49.3 (43.5−55.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">23.7 (19.2−29.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">27 (22.1−32.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Teamwork in the Unit/Service \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">73.4 (68.7−77.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9.8 (7.2−13.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">16.8 (13.3−20.9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Openness in communication \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">35.8 (30.4−41.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">41.3 (35.6−47.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">22.9 (18.4−28.2) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Feedback and communication on errors \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">27.2 (22.4−32.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">35.5 (30.1−41.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">37.3 (31.8−43.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Non-punitive response to errors \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">33.0 (27.8−38.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">24.4 (19.8−29.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">42.6 (36.9−48.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Staffing \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8.5 (6.1−11.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9.8 (7.2−13.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">81.7<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> (77.4−85.2) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Management support in patient safety \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4.3 (2.5−7.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">25.8 (21.1−31.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">69.9<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> (64.3−74.9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Teamwork between units \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">36.1 (31.5−41.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">26.1 (21.9−30.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">37.8 (33–42.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Problems with shift changes and transactions between units \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">39.1 (34.3−44.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">18.1 (14.5−22.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">42.8 (37.9−47.9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3334796.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0005" "etiqueta" => "a" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Weakness in safety culture.</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Positive, negative, and neutral scores for each dimension of the AHRQ questionnaire.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:5 [ "identificador" => "eq0005" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFORMULA" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "Formula" => array:5 [ "Matematica" => "∑ responsespositive,negative, or neutral in the items of each dimension×100Number of total responses in the items of one dimension" "Fichero" => "STRIPIN_si1.jpeg" "Tamanyo" => 4432 "Alto" => 27 "Ancho" => 363 ] ] 3 => array:5 [ "identificador" => "tb0005" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATEXTO" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "texto" => array:1 [ "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec9005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect5065">What is known/what is the contribution of this?</span><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Measuring safety culture is an indicator of best practice and promoting it reduces the incidence of adverse events. Safety culture in critical care areas is an underexplored topic after the COVID-19 crisis, and tackling this issue again offers an opportunity for further improvement.</p></span><span id="sec1010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect4070">Implications of the study</span><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Detecting weaknesses enables activities to promote safety in the critical care area. We need to optimise staffing, improve adverse event reporting, implement safety training for healthcare staff, and improve the perception of safety and management support.</p></span></span>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:32 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "“Coneixement, innovació i tecnologia”, treballem junts per millorar la seguretat del pacient: aplicació proactiva en seguretat dels pacients proSP" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M. Gens Barberà" 1 => "N. Hernández Vidal" 2 => "Y. Mengíbar García" 3 => "D. Ayala Villuendas" 4 => "O. Hernández Villén" 5 => "F. Martín Luján" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Med (Barc 1976)" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "104" "paginaInicial" => "6" "paginaFinal" => "10" ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "To err is human: building a safer health system" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "L.T. Kohn" 1 => "J.M. Corrigan" 2 => "M.S. Donaldson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.17226/9728" "Libro" => array:3 [ "fecha" => "2000" "editorial" => "National Academy of Sciences" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Washington" ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Marco conceptual de la Clasificación Internacional para la Seguridad del Paciente [Internet]" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "Organización Mundial de la Salud" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "WWW" => array:2 [ "link" => "http://www.bienestar.unal.edu.co/fileadmin/user_upload/documentos/Marco_conceptual_de_la_clasificacion_internacional_para_la_seguridad_del_paciente.pdf" "fecha" => "2009" ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cultura de seguridad y calidad en salud: desafíos para la práctica de enfermería" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "V. Reyes Alcázar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.03.003" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Enferm Clin" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "27" "paginaInicial" => "68" "paginaFinal" => "70" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28343484" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Análisis de la cultura sobre seguridad del paciente en el ámbito hospitalario del Sistema Nacional de Salud español" ] ] "host" => array:2 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Informes,estudios e investigación 2009" "fecha" => "2009" "editorial" => "Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Madrid" ] ] 1 => array:1 [ "WWW" => array:1 [ "link" => "https://www.sanidad.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/docs/Analisis_cultura_SP_ambito_hospitalario.pdf" ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Plan de calidad Sistema Nacional de Salud. Incidentes y eventos adversos en medicina intensiva. Seguridad y riesgo en el enfermo crítico. SYREC 2007. Informe del Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad. Madrid, 2009; [Accessed 10 November 2021]. Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.seguridaddelpaciente.es/resources/documentos/syrec.pdf">https://www.seguridaddelpaciente.es/resources/documentos/syrec.pdf</a>." ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Diferencias entre los profesionales de enfermería y medicina respecto a la cultura de la seguridad del paciente quirúrgico" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J. Batista" 1 => "E.D. Drehmer de Almeida Cruz" 2 => "F. Taporosky Alpendre" 3 => "D. Parreira da Silva" 4 => "M. Borges Brandão" 5 => "C.S. Gabriel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.6018/eglobal.441571" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Enfermería Global" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "86" "paginaFinal" => "126" ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cultura de Seguridad del Paciente y Docencia: un instrumento para evaluar conocimientos y percepciones en profesionales del sistema sanitario de la Comunidad de Madrid" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.M. Aranaz Andrés" 1 => "A. Pardo Hernández" 2 => "P. López Pereira" 3 => "J.L. Valencia-Martín" 4 => "C. Diaz-Agero Pérez" 5 => "N. López Fresneña" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Salud Pública [Internet]" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "92" ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clima de seguridad del paciente en quirófanos de hospitales colombianos: diferencias por profesión y tipo de contrato" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J.H. Arias-Botero" 1 => "ÁM. Segura-Cardona" 2 => "F. Acosta Rodríguez" 3 => "C.A. Saldarriaga" 4 => "R.D. Gómez-Arias" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Colomb J Anesthesiol [Internet]" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "48" "paginaInicial" => "71" "paginaFinal" => "77" ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0050" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Percepción de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en el Hospital Ángeles Metropolitano, mediante la aplicación de la encuesta de la Agencia para la Investigación Sanitaria y la Calidad (AHRQ), por sus siglas en inglés" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "A.V. Ramirez" 1 => "C.V.J.A. Pérez" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.35366/100442" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Acta Med Grupo Angeles" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "19" "paginaInicial" => "195" "paginaFinal" => "203" ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0055" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Seguridad y calidad en la atención del paciente crítico" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M.I. González-Méndez" 1 => "L. López-Rodríguez" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.02.006" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Enferm Clin" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "27" "paginaInicial" => "113" "paginaFinal" => "117" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28274547" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0060" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Hospital Survey on Patient Safety" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "AHRQ" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "WWW" => array:2 [ "link" => "http://www.ahrq.gov/legacy/qual/patientsafetyculture/hospscanform.pdf" "fecha" => "2020" ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0065" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "host" => array:2 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Cuestionario sobre seguridad de los pacientes: versión española del Hospital Survey on Patient Safety" "fecha" => "2005" "editorial" => "Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Madrid" ] ] 1 => array:1 [ "WWW" => array:1 [ "link" => "https://seguridaddelpaciente.es/es/proyectos/financiacion-estudios/percepcion-opinion/2005/" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0070" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cultura de la seguridad del paciente en seis centros quirúrgicos de Antioquia" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "ÁM. Maya" 1 => "D.M. Marín" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Cuid [Internet]" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "11" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0075" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Relación entre la satisfacción laboral y la cultura de seguridad del paciente" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.J. Merino-Plaza" 1 => "F.J. Carrera-Hueso" 2 => "M.R. Roca-Castelló" 3 => "M.D. Morro-Martín" 4 => "A. Martínez-Asensi" 5 => "N. Fikri-Benbrahim" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.02.009" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Gac Sanit" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "32" "paginaInicial" => "352" "paginaFinal" => "361" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529097" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0080" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Valoración de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en la UCI de un hospital de segundo nivel al finalizar la tercera oleada de COVID-19" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Gil-Aucejo" 1 => "S. Martínez-Martín" 2 => "P. Flores-Sánchez" 3 => "C. Moyano-Hernández" 4 => "P. Sánchez-Morales" 5 => "M. Andrés-Martínez" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.enfi.2021.09.006" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Enferm Intensiva" "fecha" => "2022" "volumen" => "33" "paginaInicial" => "185" "paginaFinal" => "196" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898979" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0085" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Patient safety culture in intensive care units: perspective of health professionals" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "C.S. Souza" 1 => "J.G. Tomaschewski-Barlem" 2 => "L.P. Rocha" 3 => "E.L.D. Barlem" 4 => "T.L. Silva" 5 => "B.R.D.S. Neutzling" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180294" "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Gaucha Enferm" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "40" ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical practitioners’ perception of the dimensions of patient safety culture in a government hospital: A one-sample correlational survey" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Alenezi" 1 => "R.P.M. Pandaan" 2 => "J.U. Almazan" 3 => "I.N. Pandaan" 4 => "F.S. Casison" 5 => "J.P. Cruz" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/jocn.15038" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Nurs" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "28" "numero" => "23-24" "paginaInicial" => "4496" "paginaFinal" => "4503" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31408560" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Fatigue, burnout, work environment, workload and perceived patient safety culture among critical care nurses" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "Q. Al Ma’mari" 1 => "L.A. Sharour" 2 => "O. Al Omari" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.12968/bjon.2020.29.1.28" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Nurs" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "28" "paginaFinal" => "34" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31917951" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The state of the science of nurse work environments in the United States: A systematic review" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "H. Wei" 1 => "K.A. Sewell" 2 => "G. Woody" 3 => "M.A. Rose" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.04.010" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int J Nurs Sci" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "287" "paginaFinal" => "300" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406839" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cultura de seguridad del paciente y registro de eventos adversos por enfermeras [Tesis doctoral especialidad enfermería]" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "L.A. Cruz Bustamante" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "WWW" => array:2 [ "link" => "http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12773/12978" "fecha" => "2019" ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Association of Intensive Care Unit Patient-to-Intensivist Ratios With Hospital Mortality" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "H.B. Gershengorn" 1 => "D.A. Harrison" 2 => "A. Garland" 3 => "M.E. Wilcox" 4 => "K.M. Rowan" 5 => "H. Wunsch" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8457" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "JAMA Intern Med" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "177" "paginaInicial" => "388" "paginaFinal" => "396" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28118657" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Impact of Intensivist and Nursing Staff on Critically Ill Patient Mortality: A Retrospective Analysis of the Korean NHIS Cohort Data, 2011-2015" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S.H. Lee" 1 => "J.H. Hong" 2 => "Y.S. Kim" 3 => "E.C. Park" 4 => "S.M. Lee" 5 => "C.H. Han" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3349/ymj.2021.62.1.50" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Yonsei Med J" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "62" "paginaInicial" => "50" "paginaFinal" => "58" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33381934" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Patient Mortality Is Associated With Staff Resources and Workload in the ICU: A Multicenter Observational Study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Neuraz" 1 => "C. Guérin" 2 => "C. Payet" 3 => "S. Polazzi" 4 => "F. Aubrun" 5 => "F. Dailler" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/CCM.0000000000001015" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care Med" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "43" "paginaInicial" => "1587" "paginaFinal" => "1594" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25867907" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "International variation in length of stay in intensive care units and the impact of patient-to-nurse ratios" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.K. Khanna" 1 => "S.O. Labeau" 2 => "K. McCartney" 3 => "S.I. Blot" 4 => "M. Deschepper" 5 => "DecubICUs study Team and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Trials Group collaborators (Supplementary material)" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103265" "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Intensive Crit Care Nurs" "fecha" => "2022" "volumen" => "72" ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Association between workload of the nursing staff and patient safety outcomes" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.M.M. Magalhães" 1 => "D.G.D. Costa" 2 => "C.O. Riboldi" 3 => "T. Mergen" 4 => "A.D.S. Barbosa" 5 => "G.M.S.S. Moura" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1590/s1980-220x2016021203255" "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esc Enferm USP" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "51" ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cultura de seguridad en los profesionales sanitarios" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "C. Hernández Magide" 1 => "M.C. Partera Luque" 2 => "A. Caro Miquela" 3 => "M. Rus García" 4 => "M. Valls García" 5 => "D. Fernández Iruela" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Metas Enferm" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "6" "paginaFinal" => "15" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Miembros del Consejo Asesor del Programa de Seguridad de pacientes críticos. Adaptación en la UCI de las recomendaciones de los proyectos zero durante la pandemia por Sars-CoV-2. Versión 20 Octubre 2020; [Accessed January 2022]. Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sanidad.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/ccayes/alertasActual/nCov/documentos/ADAPTACION_EN_LA_UCI_DE_LAS_RECOMENDACIONES_DE_LOS_PROYECTOS_ZERO-COVID19-V1.pdf">https://www.sanidad.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/ccayes/alertasActual/nCov/documentos/ADAPTACION_EN_LA_UCI_DE_LAS_RECOMENDACIONES_DE_LOS_PROYECTOS_ZERO-COVID19-V1.pdf</a>." ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Análisis de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en un hospital universitario" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M. Mella Laborde" 1 => "M.T. Gea Velázquez" 2 => "J.M. Aranaz Andrés" 3 => "G. Ramos Forner" 4 => "A.F. Compañ Rosique" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.10.004" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Gac Sanit" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "34" "paginaInicial" => "500" "paginaFinal" => "513" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642698" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The influence of organizational culture, climate and commitment on speaking up about medical errors" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "K.J. Levine" 1 => "M. Carmody" 2 => "K.J. Silk" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/jonm.12906" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Nurs Manag" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "28" "paginaInicial" => "130" "paginaFinal" => "138" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733166" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "31" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Incidents reporting: barriers and strategies to promote safety culture" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "F.R. Varallo" 1 => "A.C. Passos" 2 => "T.R. Nadai" 3 => "P.C. Mastroianni" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1590/S1980-220X2017026403346" "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esc Enferm USP" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "52" ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "32" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Análisis de las barreras y oportunidades legales-éticas de la comunicación y disculpa de errores asistenciales en España" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P. Giraldo" 1 => "J. Corbella" 2 => "C. Rodrigo" 3 => "M. Comas" 4 => "M. Sala" 5 => "X. Castells" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.11.007" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Gac Sanit" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "117" "paginaFinal" => "120" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26708473" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/25299840/0000003400000003/v3_202311101448/S252998402300023X/v3_202311101448/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "65070" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Original articles" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/25299840/0000003400000003/v3_202311101448/S252998402300023X/v3_202311101448/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S252998402300023X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]