Corresponding author: Departamento de Psicoloxía Organizacional, Xurídico-Forense e Metodoloxía das Ciencias do Comportamento, Facultade de Psicoloxía, Campus Vida, s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, España.
was read the article
array:25 [ "pii" => "S1697260016000041" "issn" => "16972600" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-05-01" "aid" => "61" "copyright" => "Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual" "copyrightAnyo" => "2016" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016;16:201-10" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 13561 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 93 "HTML" => 12111 "PDF" => 1357 ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1697260015000666" "issn" => "16972600" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.005" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-05-01" "aid" => "47" "copyright" => "Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016;16:211-9" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3323 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 40 "HTML" => 2368 "PDF" => 915 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">theoretical article</span>" "titulo" => "Psychological treatments to improve quality of life in cancer contexts: A meta-analysis" "tienePdf" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "211" "paginaFinal" => "219" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Tratamientos psicológicos para mejorar la calidad de vida en contextos oncológicos: un meta-análisis" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1858 "Ancho" => 2315 "Tamanyo" => 214110 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Flow diagram of study selection.</p> <p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Note.</span> Screening review was based on title article, abstract, and key words.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Alejandro de la Torre-Luque, Hilda Gambara, Escarlata López, Juan Antonio Cruzado" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Alejandro" "apellidos" => "de la Torre-Luque" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Hilda" "apellidos" => "Gambara" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Escarlata" "apellidos" => "López" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Juan Antonio" "apellidos" => "Cruzado" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1697260015000666?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/16972600/0000001600000002/v1_201604150051/S1697260015000666/v1_201604150051/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S169726001500109X" "issn" => "16972600" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.11.002" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-05-01" "aid" => "58" "copyright" => "Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016;16:186-200" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 1939 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 52 "HTML" => 1225 "PDF" => 662 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Validation of the Portuguese version of the Personal Outcomes Scale" "tienePdf" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "186" "paginaFinal" => "200" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Validación de la versión Portuguesa de la Escala de Resultados Personales" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 7585 "Ancho" => 6017 "Tamanyo" => 1699211 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The second-order model of Schalock by the self-report measure.</p> <p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Note</span>. I<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Independence; SP<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Social participation; WB<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Well-being; PD<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Personal development; SD<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Self-determination; IR<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Interpersonal relations; SI<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Social inclusion; R<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Rights; EW<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Emotional well-being; PW<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Physical well-being; MW<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Material well-being; D<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Disturbance (structural error); E<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Error.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Cristina Simões, Sofia Santos, Rui Biscaia" "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Cristina" "apellidos" => "Simões" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Sofia" "apellidos" => "Santos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rui" "apellidos" => "Biscaia" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S169726001500109X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/16972600/0000001600000002/v1_201604150051/S169726001500109X/v1_201604150051/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:20 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "201" "paginaFinal" => "210" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Bárbara G. Amado, Ramón Arce, Francisca Fariña, Manuel Vilariño" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Bárbara G." "apellidos" => "Amado" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Ramón" "apellidos" => "Arce" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "ramon.arce@usc.es" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Francisca" "apellidos" => "Fariña" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Manuel" "apellidos" => "Vilariño" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Universidade de Vigo, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author: Departamento de Psicoloxía Organizacional, Xurídico-Forense e Metodoloxía das Ciencias do Comportamento, Facultade de Psicoloxía, Campus Vida, s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, España." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Criterios de realidad del Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) en adultos: una revisión meta-analítica" ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The credibility of a testimony, primarily the victim's and in particular in relation to crimes committed in private (e.g., sexual offenses, domestic violence), is the key element determining legal judgements (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130">Novo & Seijo, 2010</a>), affecting an estimated 85% of cases worldwide (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0075">Hans & Vidmar, 1986</a>). Though an array of tools for evaluating credibility have been designed and tested (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185">Vrij, 2008</a>), Criteria-Based Content Analysis [CBCA] (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150">Steller & Köhnken, 1989</a>) remains the technique of choice, enjoys wide acceptance among the scientific community (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005">Amado, Arce, & Fariña, 2015</a>), and is admissible as valid evidence in the law courts of in several countries (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0145">Steller & Böhm, 2006; Vrij, 2008</a>). Though the technique was initially designed to be applied to the testimony of victims of child abuse sexual, its application has been extended to adults, witnesses, offenders, and other case types by Forensic Psychology Institutes in judicial proceedings (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025">Arce & Fariña, 2012</a>). The meta-analysis of <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005">Amado et al. (2015)</a> found that the technique underpinning the Undeutsch Hypothesis (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160">Undeutsch, 1967</a>) that contends that memories of self-experienced events differ in content and quality to memories of fabricated or fictitious accounts, was equally valid in other contexts and age ranges up to the age of 18 years. Prior to the present review, empirical studies had already contrasted the validity of the Hypothesis in adult populations and in different contexts (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0180">Vrij, 2005, 2008</a>). Moreover, as the Hypothesis was grounded on memory content, it had been theoretically advanced that the Hypothesis would be equally applicable to adults and contexts different to sexual abuse (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040">Berliner & Conte, 1993</a>).</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">CBCA consists of 19 reality criteria which are grouped into two factors: cognitive (criteria 1 to 13), and motivational (criteria 14 to 18). According to the original formulation, both factors are underpinned by the Undeutsch Hypothesis, but Raskin, Esplin, and Horowitz (1991) have underscored that only 14 conform to the aforementioned Hypothesis (14-criteria version).</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">CBCA has encompassed additional categories, some applicable to all contexts (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085">Höfer, Köhnken, Hanewinkel, & Bruhn, 1993</a>), and others for specific cases (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0020">Arce & Fariña, 2009; Juárez, Mateu, & Sala, 2007; Volbert & Steller, 2014</a>), which may be combined with other techniques with diverse theoretical underpinnings such as memory attributes (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185">Vrij, 2008</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">CBCA is extensively used in forensic practice as a tool for discriminating the memories of adults of self-experienced and fabricated events in different case types. However, due to the numerous inconsistencies in the literature (e.g., designs failing to meet the requirements for applying CBCA, conclusions of non-significant effects not substantiated by the data given the poor statistical power of the studies, 1-β<.80), and the contradictory use of CBCA in adults, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the Undeutsch Hypothesis in an adult population; the discriminating efficacy of CBCA and additional reality criteria; and the effect of the context (case type), lie coaching effect, witness status, and the research paradigm.</p><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Method</span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Literature search</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">An extensive scientific literature search was undertaken to identify empirical studies applying content analysis to adult testimony in order to discriminate between self-experienced and fabricated statements, be they deliberately invented or implanted memories. The literature search consisted of a multimethod approach to meta-search engines (Google, Google Scholar, Yahoo); world leading scientific databases (PsycInfo, MedLine, Web of Science, Dissertation Abstracts International); academic social networks for the exchange of knowledge in the scientific community (i.e., Researchgate, Academia.edu); <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">ancestry approach</span> (crosschecking the bibliography of the selected studies); and contacting researchers to request unpublished studies mentioned in published studies. A list of descriptors was generated for successive approximations (i.e., the descriptors of the keywords in the selected articles were included): reality criteria, content analysis, verbal cues, verbal indicators, testimony, CBCA, Criteria Based Content Analysis, credibility, adult, statement, allegation, deception, detection, lie detection, truthful account, Statement Validity Assessment, SVA. These descriptors were used to formulate the search algorithms applied to the literature search.</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Inclusion and exclusion criteria</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Though reality criteria are mainly applied in judicial contexts to ensure a victim's testimony is admitted as valid evidence, a review of the literature reveals they have been also applied to both witnesses and offenders so both populations were included as the studies were numerically sufficient for performing a meta-analysis. The concept of adult in the judicial context is associated with being 18 years of age, and the vast majority of studies endorsed this legal age; notwithstanding, in a few studies the legal age was set at 17 years. Since this difference in age has no effect on the capacity to give testimony either on cognitive or legal grounds, the studies with 17-year-old adult populations were included. The inclusion criteria for primary studies were that the effect sizes of the reality criteria analysed for discriminating between truthful and fabricated statements were reported, or in their absence, the statistical data allowing for them to be computed, including studies with errors in data analysis that nonetheless enabled the effect sizes to be computed.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The exclusion criteria were data derived from a unit of analysis which was not the statement, or when two CBCA criteria were combined into one new criterion (failing the ‘mutual’ exclusion requirement for creating methodic categorical systems). As for the additional criteria, data that were not formulated as additional to CBCA or were specific to only one context were excluded. Likewise, the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">duplicate publication of data</span> was eliminated, but not the piecemeal (independent data).</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Finally, 39 primary studies fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Total CBCA score was calculated using 31 effect sizes, whereas as for the individual criteria, the effect sizes ranged from 5 for criteria 10 and 19, to 35 for criteria 3 and 8.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Procedure</span><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The procedure observed the stages in meta-analysis by <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045">Botella and Gambara (2006)</a>. Having performed the literature search and selected the studies for the present meta-analysis, these were coded according to variables that have been found to have a moderating role i.e., previous studies (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0065">Fariña, Arce, & Real, 1994; Höfer et al., 1993; Raskin et al., 1991; Volbert & Steller, 2014; Vrij, 2005</a>); previous meta-analysis with a child population (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005">Amado et al., 2015</a>); the research paradigm (field vs. experimental studies) under the US law of precedence (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0055">Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 1993</a>); compliance with the Daubert standard publication criterion (DSPC) i.e., peer-reviewed journals for evidence to be admitted as scientifically valid legal evidence; the lie coaching condition in reality criteria; and the version of the categorical system (full reality criteria vs. 14-criteria version). Having applied a procedure of successive approximations for the coding of the primary studies (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0060">Fariña, Arce, & Novo, 2002</a>), the following moderators were detected: status of the declarant i.e., testimony target (victim, offender, or witness); event target (self-experienced events or video-observed events/witness), judicial context i.e., case type.</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As some researchers had renamed the original criteria (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150">Steller & Köhnken, 1989</a>), a <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Thurstone style</span> evaluation was used consisting of 10 judges who evaluated the degree of overlapping between the original and reformulated criterion. When the interval between Q1 and Q3 was within the region of criteria independence it was considered additional criteria, whereas when it was in the region of dependence with the original, it was considered original criteria.</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The coding of the studies and moderators carried out by two independent researchers showed total coincidence (kappa<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1).</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Data analysis</span><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The effect sizes were taken directly from the primary studies when these were disclosed, or the effect size <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span> was computed using the means, and standard deviations/standard error of the mean (Cohen's <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span> when <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">N</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">1</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">N</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> and Glass's Δ when <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">N</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">1</span>≠<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">N</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>), the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span> value, or the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">F</span> value. When the results were expressed as proportions the effect size δ (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080">Hedges & Olkin, 1985</a>) was equivalent to Cohen's <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span>, whereas when they were expressed in 2X2 contingency tables, the phi obtained was transformed into Cohen's <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span>.</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the procedure of <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095">Hunter and Schmidt (2015)</a>, the unit of analysis (n) was the number of statements, the effect sizes were weighted for sample size i.e., the number of statements (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">w</span>), and effect sizes were corrected for criterion reliability (δ).</p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The differences between effect sizes were estimated using the difference between correlations (q statistic; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050">Cohen, 1988</a>), by transforming the effect sizes into correlations. In the study of moderators the average criteria for each moderator was computed.</p><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In order to estimate the practical utility of the results of the meta-analysis in forensic settings, three recommended statistics were employed (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005">Amado et al., 2015</a>): U1, the Binomial Effect Size Display (BESD), and the Probability of Superiority (PS).</p></span></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Criterion reliability</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Not all of the primary studies provided data on inter-rater reliability, or agreement for the reality criteria and for the total CBCA score. Moreover, the informed reliability coefficients varied among studies, and in some studies, several were reported, in which case those approximating the results obtained by <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Anson, Golding, and Gully (1993)</a> and <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090">Horowitz et al. (1997)</a> were taken. Owing to the lack of data on coding reliability in studies on specific criteria, average reliability was estimated for the criteria and for the total CBCA score, bearing in mind that reliability is different for the criteria than for the instrument (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090">Horowitz et al., 1997</a>). Reliability was estimated on the basis of reliability coefficients, since agreement indexes do not measure reliability. Thus, on the basis of 172 reliability coefficients of CBCA criteria in the primary studies, the average reliability for CBCA reality criteria was <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">r</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.61 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">EEM</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.020, 95%CI<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.57, 0.65); and for the total CBCA score the Spearman-Brown prediction formula obtained an <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">r</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.97. Moreover, the average reliability for the proposed additional reality criteria was calculated using 7 reliability coefficients with an <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">r</span> of .74 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">EEM</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.041, 95%CI<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.66, 0.82). The low average reliability observed was sometimes considered as a methodological weakness of the system. Nevertheless, this potential methodological deficiency is corrected for criteria unreliability in Hunter and Schmidt's (2015) meta-analytical procedure.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Results<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Study of outliers</span><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">An analysis and initial control of outliers was carried out in each of the reality criteria, and the total CBCA score and conditions. The criterion chosen was the ±3*IQR (extreme cases) of the simple size weighted mean effect size, given that the results of more conservative criteria such as ±1.5*IQR or ±2<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span>, eliminated more than 10% of the effect sizes, indicating they were more probably moderators than outliers (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155">Tukey, 1960</a>).</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Global meta-analysis of reality criteria in adults</span><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The results (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>) show a positive (between criteria presence and statement reality), and significant (when the confidence interval had no zero, indicating the effect size was significant) mean true effect size (δ) for the CBCA reality criteria, with the exception of ‘self-deprecation’ and ‘pardoning the perpetrator’ criteria, and the total CBCA score. Nevertheless, these results are not generalizable (criteria 10 and 19 were affected by a second order sampling error, so the results were invalid for this estimate) to future samples (when the credibility interval had zero, indicating the effect size was not generalizable to 80% of other samples). For the additional criteria (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085">Höfer et al., 1993</a>), the meta-analysis revealed a positive, significant and generalizable mean true effect size for ‘reporting style’ and ‘display of insecurities’ criteria. The mean true effect size for the ‘repetitions’ criterion was <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">negative</span> and significant, confirming it was not reality criteria, but no generalizable. As for the ‘providing reasons for lack of memory’ and ‘clichés’ criteria, a non-significant mean true effect size was found. The criteria repetitions and clichés were related to fabricated events, that is, they were not reality criteria in themselves, so they were not included in successive analyses. The 75% rule and the credibility interval (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095">Hunter & Schmidt, 2015</a>) warranted the study de moderators.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Study of moderators</span><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The study of moderators (criteria average as dependent variable; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>) showed a positive and significant mean true effect size, but not generalizable, in all of the moderators analysed. As for the magnitude of the effect sizes, excluding the witness condition with a medium effect size (δ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.50), all were small (0.20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>δ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.50). <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020">Arce and Fariña (2009)</a> have suggested (and designed) the specifications of categorical systems based on bottom-up rather than ‘top-down’ procedures to ensure only categories that effectively discriminate between memories of experienced events and fabricated memories form part of the system. This maximizes the efficacy of the resulting categorical system by eliminating the noise produced by non-discriminating ‘top-down’ categories. Thus, the meta-analyses were repeated with the categories of content analysis with significant effect size i.e., the confidence interval for <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span> did not contain zero. The results (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>) revealed a significant increase in the effect size of field studies, q<span class="elsevierStyleInf">c</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.119, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.05 (one-tailed; a larger effect size was expected with significant criteria), thus the effect size was significantly larger with significant criteria. Moreover, for significant criteria, the results (not all of the reality criteria were generalizable) became generalizable (the credibility interval had no zero). As for the experimental studies on the remaining moderators, the results did not corroborate the Hypothesis as the reality categories had been initially or subsequently screened to eliminate the non-significant ones.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The meta-analytical technique does not take into account the theoretical foundations or the reliability of the studies included in the original theories, that is, all of the studies on categories of reality are included. Moreover, the experimental designs of studies on witnesses are not really on witnesses of self-experienced events, but on non-self-experienced events i.e., video-observed events (watched on video, not involving self-experienced events) that do not fulfil the original theory hypothesizing that reality criteria discern between memories of self-experienced real-life events and fabricated or fictitious memories. Only one of the studies on witnesses involved self-experienced events (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0070">Gödert, Gamer, Rill, & Vossel, 2005</a>), and for the total reality criteria, were found to discriminate significantly real witness from real offenders giving false testimony, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.59, 1-β<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.78, and from uninvolved participants, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.83, 1-β<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.96. Nevertheless, reality criteria also discriminated between both memories of video-observed events and fabricated events. The only study (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120">Lee, Klaver, & Hart, 2008</a>) comparing memories of self-experienced events (truth condition) and video-observed events (lie condition) found CBCA reality criteria, and the total CBCA score discriminated significantly between both memories in line with the Undeutsch Hypothesis.</p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The high observed variability in effect sizes in field studies, which was mostly due to one study alone, suggested differences in experimental design (the crime context in this study was found to be different to the other studies). As the effect of context has been hypothesized (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0105">Köhnken, 1996; Volbert & Steller, 2014</a>), and found (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0035">Arce, Fariña, & Vilariño, 2010; Vilariño, Novo, & Seijo, 2011</a>) to mediate the discriminating efficacy of reality categories, the meta-analysis was repeated in field studies on sexual offences and intimate partner violence (IPV) cases (crimes committed in the privacy of one's home according to the categorization of <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015">Arce & Fariña, 2005</a>). The results showed a positive, significant and generalizable (not generalizable in all field studies) mean true effect size for studies under this condition. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect sizes were significantly larger in sexual offences and IPV cases than in all field studies in all the reality criteria (0.45 for all field studies vs. 0.87 for sexual offences and IPV cases), q<span class="elsevierStyleInf">c</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.199, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.01 (one-tailed; a higher effect size was expected in specific criminal contexts), and in the significant criteria, q<span class="elsevierStyleInf">c</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.168, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.05 (0.69 vs. 0.96). Likewise, reality criteria were significantly more efficacious, q<span class="elsevierStyleInf">c</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.2622, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.01, in sexual offences and IPV cases than in all other types of cases (0.32 vs. 0.87).</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Results (meta-analysis could not be performed because <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">k</span>s and <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span>s were insufficient and research designs incomparable) for the comparison between statements of participants instructed to lie (lie coaching condition) with truthful statements were inconclusive<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fn0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> in relation to the effectiveness of reality criteria to discriminate between truthful and false statements.</p></span></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Discussion</span><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The following conclusions may be drawn from the results of this study. First, the results confirmed the Undeutsch Hypothesis, that is, reality criteria discriminated between memories of self-experienced and fabricated events [File Drawer Analysis (FDA): to bring down this hypothesis to a trivial effect (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125">McNatt, 2000</a>), .05, for the average of the CBCA criteria, it would be necessary 184 studies with null effect; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095">Hunter & Schmidt, 2015</a>. It is unlikely to happen]. Besides fulfilling the DSPC, this Hypothesis was also valid for memories of victims/claimants and offenders (for witness of self-experienced events further research is required); and robust in both experimental studies (high internal validity), and field studies (high external validity). Notwithstanding, the reality criteria also discriminated between memories of video-observed events i.e., non-self-experienced events, and fabricated events for which the Hypothesis was not formulated, and research findings are inconclusive as to the validity of the Hypothesis with lie coached subjects. Second, though the results validated CBCA as a categorical system based on the Undeutsch Hypothesis, neither were all of the criteria validated, nor were they generalizable, and some even contradicted the Hypothesis. Thus, these criteria can be used neither in all types of contexts, nor indiscriminately. Both versions of the CBCA (all criteria or 14 criteria) were exactly the same (δ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.36) in discriminating between memories of self-experienced and fabricated events. Though the results open the door to the inclusion of new reality criteria, additional criteria have been proposed that fail to fulfil the Undeutsch Hypothesis (significant negative effect sizes i.e., not reality criteria), so they cannot be included in the CBCA. Third, in field studies the discriminating power of reality criteria was significantly higher in sexual offences and IPV cases (FDA: to bring the results in sexual offences and IPV cases down to a trivial effect, it would be necessary 62 and 69 studies with null effect for all criteria and significant criteria, respectively. It is unlikely to occur) in comparison to other types of contexts (FDA: to reduce the efficacy of the reality criteria to discriminate between real and fabricated memories in any context of field studies to a trivial effect it would be necessary 35 studies with null effect. It is unlikely to happen). Succinctly, the areas of both populations do not overlap in 54% (U1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.54), that is, they were totally independent, thus the efficacy of the reality criteria in discriminating between memories of self-experienced and fabricated events in sexual and IPV cases was total in 54% of the evaluations of credibility. Moreover, 75% of statements of self-experienced events contained more reality criteria than fabricated events (probability of superiority, PS<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.75), the probability of false positives was 28% (BESD). These results were highly robust i.e., not only establishing a positive and significant relation between reality criteria and true statements, but were also generalizable to all types of sexual offences and IPV cases, and were homogeneous (i.e., subject to little variability since the correlation between the effect sizes was .72).</p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As for the implications for forensic practice, the results of the present meta-analysis reveal that the reality criteria were statistically effective for discriminating between memories of self-experienced and fabricated events, but this does not imply they are directly generalizable to forensic practice. Even under the best discriminating conditions i.e., field studies in sexual and IPV cases, the probability of false positives may reach .22, whilst this probability must be zero in forensic settings (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030">Arce, Fariña, & Fraga, 2000</a>). In general, only significant reality criteria i.e., scientifically attested evidence, were admissible for forensic practice (see note of <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>), since the results were generalizable, whereas for all criteria they were not. However, as the credibility interval lower limit was 0.05, the practical utility of these categories was almost negligible (PS<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.51), that is, in only 51% of true statements there were more reality criteria than in false statements, and under what specific conditions this contingency occurred remains unknown. However, the credibility interval lower limit of the reality criteria applied to cases of sexual offences and IPV, which were also generalizable both in terms of all the criteria and the significant criteria, was larger, PS<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.73 and .75 (Hedges and Olkin's δ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.59 and 0.65, test value<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.51), for all the reality criteria and the significant criteria, respectively. However, these conclusions are not directly applicable to forensic practice as the decision criteria which in the forensic context must the ‘strict decision criterion’ in which a type II error (classify a false statement as true) is not admissible i.e., must be equal to zero. Regarding the strict decision criterion, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035">Arce et al. (2010)</a> found up to 13 CBCA reality criteria in fabricated statements of IPV cases, which means that at least 14 reality criteria would have to be detected in a statement to conclude that the testimony was true, with a correct classification of true positives (true statements classified as such) of 36%. Succinctly, the CBCA reality criteria were a poor tool for assigning the credibility of IPV victim testimony. Thus, to enhance efficacy, CBCA reality criteria must be complemented with additional criteria. In this line, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020">Arce and Fariña (2009)</a>, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165">Vilariño (2010)</a> and <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0170">Vilariño et al. (2011)</a> combined CBCA and SRA criteria, memory attributes, and additional reality criteria specific to IPV cases derived from real statements (judicial judgements as ground truth), to create and validate a categorical system specific for IPV cases, including sexual offences, with a strict decision criterion to reduce the rate of false negatives to 2%. In any way, only results with a strict decision criterion can be translated into forensic practice.</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In terms of future research, the results of the present meta-analysis underscored the need for further studies with experimental designs assessing the efficacy of reality criteria in discriminating between memories of self-experienced events and video witnessed non-self-experienced events; between self-experienced witnessed events vs. fabricated events; between memories of participants coached to lie and honest; and research driven to find new reality categories (bottom-up), mainly for a specific context i.e., crime victimization.</p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This meta-analysis is subject to the following limitations. First, previous publications have biased the results in that the non-significant results or predictably inefficacious categories were eliminated (favouring the validation of the Undeutsch Hypothesis). Second, the feigning methodology (experimental studies) had no proven external validity (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140">Sarwar, Allwood, & Innes-Ker, 2014</a>), but only ‘face validity’ (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115">Konecni & Ebbesen, 1992</a>). Third, for some experimental literature, statements are insufficient material for reality content analysis (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110">Köhnken, 2004</a>), which favours the rejection of the Undeutsch Hypothesis. Fourth, there was no control on the effects of the interviewer on the contents of the statement, or on the reliability of the interviews, which were often carried out by poorly trained interviewers. Fifth, few studies comply with SVA standards that are a requirement for applying CBCA. Sixth, the results of some meta-analysis may be subject to a degree of variability, given that <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">N</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">s</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>400, did not guarantee stability in sample estimates (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095">Hunter & Schmidt, 2015</a>). Seventh, primary studies did not estimate the reliability of the codings, thus results’ reliability is uncertainty.</p></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Funding</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This research has been sponsored by a grant of the Spanish <span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs0005">Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness</span> (PSI2014-53085-R).</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:11 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres628231" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec641302" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres628230" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec641303" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Method" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Literature search" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Inclusion and exclusion criteria" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Procedure" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Data analysis" ] ] ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Criterion reliability" ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Results" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Study of outliers" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Global meta-analysis of reality criteria in adults" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Study of moderators" ] ] ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Funding" ] 9 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Further reading</span>" ] 10 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fn0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span></a><span class="elsevierStyleFootnote" id="fn0015"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">*</span><p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0030">Indicates the primary studies included in the meta-analysis.</p></span>" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2015-11-24" "fechaAceptado" => "2016-01-20" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec641302" "palabras" => array:5 [ 0 => "Criteria-Based Content Analysis" 1 => "Adults" 2 => "Statements" 3 => "Credibility" 4 => "Meta-analysis" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec641303" "palabras" => array:5 [ 0 => "Criteria-Based Content Analysis" 1 => "adultos" 2 => "declaraciones" 3 => "credibilidad" 4 => "meta-análisis" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Background/Objective</span>: Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) is the tool most extensively used worldwide for evaluating the veracity of a testimony. CBCA, initially designed for evaluating the testimonies of victims of child sexual abuse, has been empirically validated. Moreover, CBCA has been generalized to adult populations and other contexts though this generalization has not been endorsed by the scientific literature. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Method</span>: Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the Undeutsch Hypothesis and the CBCA checklist of criteria in discerning in adults between memories of self-experienced real-life events and fabricated or fictitious memories. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Results</span>: Though the results corroborated the Undeutsch Hypothesis, and CBCA as a valid technique, the results were not generalizable, and the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">self-deprecation</span> and <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">pardoning the perpetrator</span> criteria failed to discriminate between both memories. The technique can be complemented with additional reality criteria. The study of moderators revealed discriminating efficacy was significantly higher in filed studies on sexual offences and intimate partner violence. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Conclusions</span>: The findings are discussed in terms of their implications as well as the limitations and conditions for applying these results to forensic settings.</p></span>" ] "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Antecedentes/Objetivo</span>: El <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Criteria-Based Content Analysis</span> (CBCA) constituye la herramienta mundialmente más utilizada para la evaluación de la credibilidad del testimonio. Originalmente fue creado para testimonios de menores víctimas de abuso sexual, gozando de amparo científico. Sin embargo, se ha generalizado su práctica a poblaciones de adultos y otros contextos sin un aval de la literatura para tal generalización. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Método</span>: Por ello, nos planteamos una revisión meta-analítica con el objetivo de contrastar la Hipótesis Undeutsch y los criterios de realidad del CBCA para conocer su potencial capacidad discriminativa entre memorias de eventos auto-experimentados y fabricados en adultos. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Resultados</span>: Los resultados confirman la hipótesis Undeutsch y validan el CBCA como técnica. No obstante, los resultados no son generalizables y los criterios <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">auto-desaprobación</span> y <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">perdón al autor del delito</span> no discriminan entre ambas memorias. Además, se encontró que la técnica puede ser complementada con criterios adicionales de realidad. El estudio de moderadores mostró que la eficacia discriminativa era significativamente superior en estudios de campo en casos de violencia sexual y de género. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Conclusiones</span>: Se discute la utilidad, así como las limitaciones y condiciones para la transferencia de estos resultados a la práctica forense.</p></span>" ] ] "NotaPie" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "etiqueta" => "1" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0020">Additional results and resources at <a class="elsevierStyleInterRef" id="intr0005" href="http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ramon_Arce">http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ramon_Arce</a></p>" "identificador" => "fn0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "etiqueta" => "2" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0025">Conclusions in the primary studies about non-significant results are inconclusive as the statistical power, 1-β<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.80, is insufficient to conclude (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−0.44, 1-β<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.41, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225">Bogaard, Meijer, & Vrij, 2013</a>; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.37, 1-β<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.26, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0190">Vrij, Akehurst, Soukara, & Bull, 2002</a>; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.11, 1-β<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.06, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0195">Vrij, Kneller, & Mann, 2000</a>).</p>" "identificador" => "fn0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "etiqueta" => "*" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0030">Indicates the primary studies included in the meta-analysis.</p>" "identificador" => "fn0015" ] ] "multimedia" => array:3 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">• Reporting style (is long-winded when interviewee described irrelevant aspects that were not asked). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">• Display insecurities (uncertainty about the description of an item). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">• Providing reasons lack memory (express reasons for not being able to give a detailed description). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">• Clichés (expressions or utterances that introduce delays into the report). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">• Repetitions (elements already described were repeated without additional details). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1030795.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Additional criteria.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Note</span>. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">k</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>number of studies; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>total sample size; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">w</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>effect size weighted for sample size; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>observed standard deviation of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span>; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">pre</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>standard deviations of observed <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span>-values corrected from all artifacts; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">res</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>standard deviation of observed <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span>-values after removal of variance due to all artifacts; δ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>effect size corrected for criterion reliability; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">δ</span></span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>standard deviation of δ; %Var<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>variance accounted for by artifactual errors; 95% CI<span class="elsevierStyleInf"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span></span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>95% confidence interval for <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span>; 80% CV<span class="elsevierStyleInf"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">δ</span></span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>80% credibility interval for δ.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">CBCA Criterion \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">k</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">w</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">pre</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">res</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">δ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">δ</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">%Var \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">95% CI<span class="elsevierStyleInf"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">80% CV<span class="elsevierStyleInf">δ</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">1. Logical structure \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">30 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,265 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.48 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6990 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2503 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6527 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.62 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.8493 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.40, 0.56 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.46, 1.71 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">2. Unstructured production \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1,987 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.53 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.9241 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2570 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.8876 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.69 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1.1551 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.45, 0.61 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.79, 2.17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">3. Quantity of details \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,714 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.55 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.8294 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2529 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.7899 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.71 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1.0279 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.47, 0.63 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.60, 2.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">4. Contextual embedding \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">29 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,137 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.19 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6169 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2372 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5868 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.24 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.7411 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">15 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.11, 0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.70, 1.19 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">5. Description of interactions \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">29 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,243 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3742 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2349 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2912 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.36 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3790 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">39 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.19, 0.35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.13, 0.84 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">6. Reproduction conversations \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,528 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4990 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.1780 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4662 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.44 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6067 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.26, 0.42 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.33, 1.22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">7. Unexpected complications \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">29 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1,956 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3788 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2498 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2847 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.32 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3705 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">43 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.17, 0.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.15, 0.79 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">8. Unusual details \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,441 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.31 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6532 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2489 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6039 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.41 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.7859 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.23, 0.39 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.59, 1.42 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">9. Superfluous details \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1,863 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5676 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2437 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5126 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6670 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.04, 0.24 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.67, 1.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">10. Details misunderstood \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">376 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.1208 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2357 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.0000 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.0000 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.02, 0.42 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">11. External associations \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1,612 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4781 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2405 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3268 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5376 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.16, 0.36 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.35, 1.02 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">12. Subjective mental state \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,170 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4843 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2312 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4256 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.23 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5538 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">23 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.10, 0.26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.47, 0.94 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">13. Perpetrator's mental state \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">31 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,232 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.09 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6212 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2376 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5741 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.7470 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">15 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.01, 0.17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.84, 1.07 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">14. Spontaneous corrections \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">29 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1,842 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.16 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5276 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2545 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4622 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6014 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">23 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.06, 0.26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.56, 0.97 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">15. Admitting lack of memory \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,305 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3823 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2494 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2897 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.32 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3770 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">42 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.17, 0.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.16, 0.80 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">16. Doubts one's testimony \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1,755 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4521 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2478 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3781 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4919 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">30 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.10, 0.30 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.37, 0.89 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">17. Self-deprecation \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">948 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4629 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2354 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3985 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5186 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.08, 0.16 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.61, 0.71 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">18. Pardoning the perpetrator \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">680 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.02 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2796 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2178 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.1753 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.02 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2281 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">61 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.18, 0.14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.31, 0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Details characteristics offence \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">562 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.1894 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.1966 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.0000 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.36 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.0000 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.12, 0.44 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.36 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">TOTAL CBCA SCORE \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">31 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,124 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.55 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6759 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2475 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6290 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.56 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6386 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.47, 0.63 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.25, 1.37 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Average (original criteria) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">46 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3,223 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5032 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2368 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4269 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5614 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">32 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.17, 0.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.39, 1.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Additional Criteria</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Reporting style \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">357 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.41 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2030 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.1874 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.0781 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.48 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.0909 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">85 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.20, 0.63 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.36, 0.59 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Display insecurities \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">297 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.67 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5540 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2111 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5122 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.78 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5965 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.43, 0.90 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.01, 1.54 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Providing reasons lack memory \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">447 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.15 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2877 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.1902 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2158 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2514 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">44 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.03 0.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.14, 0.50 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Clichés \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">267 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5145 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2134 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4682 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.21 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5452 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.41, 0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.90, 0.49 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Repetitions \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">417 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.47 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5851 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2011 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5494 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.54 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6399 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">12 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.67, −0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−1.36, 0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Average (original</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">+</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">additional)</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">46 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3,223 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4821 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2313 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4053 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5275 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.19, 0.35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.33, 1.01 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1030794.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Results of global meta-analysis for individual reality criteria and total CBCA score, and additional criteria.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0015" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:3 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Note</span>.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Moderator \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">k</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">w</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">pre</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">res</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">δ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">δ</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">%Var \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">95% CI<span class="elsevierStyleInf"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">80% CV<span class="elsevierStyleInf">δ</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">CBCA significant criteria (17)</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">46 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3,223 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5187 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2380 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4433 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.36 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5835 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">31 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.19, 0.35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.39, 1.11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">14-criteria version</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">45 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3,143 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5567 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2394 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4906 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.36 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6465 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.22, 0.34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.47, 1.19 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Daubert standard publication criterion</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>All criteria (22) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,256 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4575 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2407 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3733 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4786 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">39 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.12, 0.28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.35, 0.87 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Self-experienced events</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>All criteria (22) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,277 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4647 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2371 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3879 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5022 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">40 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.18, 0.34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.31, 0.97 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Non self-experienced events (witness)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>All criteria (13) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">625 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.39 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5835 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2707 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5032 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.51 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.6548 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">65 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.23, 0.55 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.33, 1.35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Offenders</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>All criteria (21) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1,067 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4662 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2024 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3743 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4975 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">41 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.15, 0.39 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.29, 0.99 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Victims</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>All criteria (18) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">840 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4781 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2355 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4012 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5221 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.13, 0.41 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.32, 1.02 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Field studies</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>All field studies (18) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">422 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4948 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2385 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4153 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.45 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.5404 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.14, 0.54 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.24, 1.14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Significant criteria (10)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">422 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.53 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4774 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2458 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3834 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.69 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4989 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">42 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.33, 0.73 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.05, 1.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Sexual and IPV field studies</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>All criteria (17)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">263 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.67 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3587 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2871 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.1957 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.87 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2459 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">72 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.41, 0.92 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.55, 1.18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Significant criteria (15)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">263 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.74 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3654 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2892 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2134 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.96 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2478 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">72 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.48, 0.99 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.64, 1.28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="12" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Experimental studies</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>All criteria (22) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">39 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2,721 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4497 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2336 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.3934 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.32 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.4933 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">37 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.17, 0.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">−0.31, 0.95 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1030793.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0005" "etiqueta" => "a" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Significant criteria (CBCA criteria, as for additional criteria, studies were insufficient): 1-3, 5-8, 11, 12 and 19.</p>" ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0010" "etiqueta" => "b" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0010">Significant criteria (CBCA criteria): 1-9, 11-18.</p>" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0015" "etiqueta" => "c" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0015">Significant criteria (CBCA criteria): 1-9, 11-12, 14-17.</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Results of the meta-analysis of moderators.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fn0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span></a><span class="elsevierStyleFootnote" id="fn0015"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">*</span><p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0030">Indicates the primary studies included in the meta-analysis.</p></span>" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:39 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "Amado et al., 2015" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Undeutsch hypothesis and Criteria Based Content Analysis: A meta-analytic review" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "B.G. Amado" 1 => "R. Arce" 2 => "F. Fariña" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.002" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "3" "paginaFinal" => "12" ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "Anson et al., 1993" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Child sexual abuse allegations: Reliability of Criteria-Based Content Analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D.A. Anson" 1 => "S.L. Golding" 2 => "K.J. Gully" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/BF01044512" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Law and Human Behavior" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "17" "paginaInicial" => "331" "paginaFinal" => "341" ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "Arce and Fariña, 2005" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Peritación psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio: la huella psíquica y la simulación: El Sistema de Evaluación Global (SEG)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R. Arce" 1 => "F. Fariña" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Papeles del Psicólogo" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "26" "paginaInicial" => "59" "paginaFinal" => "77" ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "Arce and Fariña, 2009" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluación psicológica forense de la credibilidad y daño psíquico en casos de violencia de género mediante el Sistema de Evaluación Global" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R. Arce" 1 => "F. Fariña" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Violencia de género. Tratado psicológico y legal" "paginaInicial" => "147" "paginaFinal" => "168" "serieFecha" => "2009" ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "Arce and Fariña, 2012" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Psicología social aplicada al ámbito jurídico" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R. Arce" 1 => "F. Fariña" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Psicología social aplicada" "paginaInicial" => "157" "paginaFinal" => "182" "serieFecha" => "2012" ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "Arce et al., 2000" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Género y formación de juicios en un caso de violación [Gender and juror judgment making in a case of rape]" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "R. Arce" 1 => "F. Fariña" 2 => "A. Fraga" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Psicothema" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "12" "paginaInicial" => "623" "paginaFinal" => "628" ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "Arce et al., 2010" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Contraste de la efectividad del CBCA en la evaluación de la credibilidad en casos de violencia de género" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "R. *Arce" 1 => "F. Fariña" 2 => "M. Vilariño" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.5093/in2010v19n2a2" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Intervención Psicosocial" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "19" "paginaInicial" => "109" "paginaFinal" => "119" ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "Berliner and Conte, 1993" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Sexual abuse evaluation: Conceptual and empirical obstacles" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "L. Berliner" 1 => "J.R. Conte" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/0145-2134(93)90012-T" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Child Abuse and Neglect" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "17" "paginaInicial" => "111" "paginaFinal" => "125" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8435777" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "Botella and Gambara, 2006" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Doing and reporting a meta-analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J. Botella" 1 => "H. Gambara" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1080/15384101.2016.1170269" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "International Journal of Clinical & Health Psychology" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "425" "paginaFinal" => "440" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074587" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0050" "etiqueta" => "Cohen, 1988" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "J. Cohen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:4 [ "edicion" => "2nd ed." "fecha" => "1988" "editorial" => "LEA" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Hillsdale, NJ" ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0055" "etiqueta" => "Daubert, 1993" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993)." ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0060" "etiqueta" => "Fariña et al., 2002" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Heurístico de anclaje en las decisiones judiciales [Anchorage in judicial decision making]" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "F. Fariña" 1 => "R. Arce" 2 => "M. Novo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Psicothema" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "14" "paginaInicial" => "39" "paginaFinal" => "46" ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0065" "etiqueta" => "Fariña et al., 1994" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ruedas de identificación: De la simulación y la realidad" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "F. Fariña" 1 => "R. Arce" 2 => "S. Real" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Psicothema" "fecha" => "1994" "volumen" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "395" "paginaFinal" => "402" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0070" "etiqueta" => "Gödert et al., 2005" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Statement Validity Assessment: Inter-rater reliability of Criteria-Based Content Analysis in the mock-crime paradigm" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "H.W. *Gödert" 1 => "M. Gamer" 2 => "H.G. Rill" 3 => "G. Vossel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1348/135532505X52680" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Legal and Criminological Psychology" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "10" "paginaInicial" => "225" "paginaFinal" => "245" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0075" "etiqueta" => "Hans and Vidmar, 1986" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Judging the jury" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "V.P. Hans" 1 => "N. Vidmar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:3 [ "fecha" => "1986" "editorial" => "Plenum Press" "editorialLocalizacion" => "New York" ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0080" "etiqueta" => "Hedges and Olkin, 1985" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Statistical methods for meta-analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "L.V. Hedges" 1 => "I. Olkin" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:3 [ "fecha" => "1985" "editorial" => "Academic Press" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Orlando, FL" ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0085" "etiqueta" => "Höfer et al., 1993" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Höfer, E., Köhnken, G., Hanewinkel, R., & Bruhn, C. (1993). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Diagnostik und attribution von glaubwürdigkeit</span>. Unpublished final report. University of Kiel, Germany." ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "Horowitz et al., 1997" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Reliability of criteria-based content analysis of child witness statements" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S.W. Horowitz" 1 => "M.E. Lamb" 2 => "P.W. Esplin" 3 => "T.D. Boychuk" 4 => "O. Krispin" 5 => "L. Reiter-Lavery" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j. 2044-8333.1997.tb00329.x" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Legal and Criminological Psychology" "fecha" => "1997" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "11" "paginaFinal" => "21" ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "Hunter and Schmidt, 2015" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J.E. Hunter" 1 => "F.L. Schmidt" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:3 [ "fecha" => "2015" "editorial" => "Sage" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Newbury Park, CA" ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "Juárez et al., 2007" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "*Juárez, J.R., Mateu, A., & Sala, E. (2007). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Criterios de evaluación de la credibilidad en las denuncias de violencia de género</span>. Retrieved from <a id="intr0010" class="elsevierStyleInterRef" href="http://justicia.gencat.cat/web/.content/documents/arxius/sc-3-143-07-cas.pdf">http://justicia.gencat.cat/web/.content/documents/arxius/sc-3-143-07-cas.pdf</a>." ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "Köhnken, 1996" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Social psychology and the law" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "G. Köhnken" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Applied social psychology" "paginaInicial" => "257" "paginaFinal" => "282" "serieFecha" => "1996" ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "Köhnken, 2004" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Statement Validity Analysis and the detection of the truth" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "G. Köhnken" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1017/CBO9780511490071.003" "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "The detection of deception in forensic contexts" "paginaInicial" => "41" "paginaFinal" => "63" "serieFecha" => "2004" ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "Konecni and Ebbesen, 1992" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Methodological issues on legal decision-making, with special reference to experimental simulations" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "V.J. Konecni" 1 => "E.B. Ebbesen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Psychology and law. International perspectives" "paginaInicial" => "413" "paginaFinal" => "423" "serieFecha" => "1992" ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "Lee et al., 2008" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Psychopathy and verbal indicators of deception in offenders" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "Z. *Lee" 1 => "J.R. Klaver" 2 => "S.D. Hart" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1080/10683160701423738" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Psychology, Crime & Law" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "14" "paginaInicial" => "73" "paginaFinal" => "84" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27061441" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "McNatt, 2000" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary management: A meta-analysis of the result" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "D.B. McNatt" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.314" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Applied Psychology" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "85" "paginaInicial" => "314" "paginaFinal" => "322" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10783547" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "Novo and Seijo, 2010" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Judicial judgement-making and legal criteria of testimonial credibility" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M. Novo" 1 => "D. Seijo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "91" "paginaFinal" => "115" ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "Raskin et al., 1991" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Raskin, D.C., Esplin, F.W., & Horowitz, S. (1991). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Investigative interviews and assessment of children in sexual abuse cases</span>. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Utah." ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "Sarwar et al., 2014" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Effects of different types of forensic information on eyewitness’ memory and confidence accuracy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "F. Sarwar" 1 => "C.M. Allwood" 2 => "A. Innes-Ker" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.5093/ejpalc2014a3" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "17" "paginaFinal" => "27" ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "Steller and Böhm, 2006" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cincuenta años de jurisprudencia del Tribunal Federal Supremo alemán sobre la psicología del testimonio. Balance y perspectiva" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M. Steller" 1 => "C. Böhm" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Nuevos caminos y conceptos en la psicología jurídica" "paginaInicial" => "53" "paginaFinal" => "67" "serieFecha" => "2006" ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "Steller and Köhnken, 1989" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Criteria-Based Content Analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M. Steller" 1 => "G. Köhnken" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence" "paginaInicial" => "217" "paginaFinal" => "245" "serieFecha" => "1989" ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "Tukey, 1960" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "J.W. Tukey" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Contributions to probability and statistics" "paginaInicial" => "448" "paginaFinal" => "485" "serieFecha" => "1960" ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "Undeutsch, 1967" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Beurteilung der glaubhaftigkeit von aussagen" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "U. Undeutsch" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Handbuch der psychologie, Vol. 11: Forensische psychologie" "paginaInicial" => "26" "paginaFinal" => "181" "serieFecha" => "1967" ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "Vilariño, 2010" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "*Vilariño, M. (2010). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">¿Es posible discriminar declaraciones reales de imaginadas y huella psíquica real de simulada en casos de violencia de género</span>? (Doctoral thesis, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain). Retrieved from <a id="intr0015" class="elsevierStyleInterRef" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10347/2831">http://hdl.handle.net/10347/2831</a>." ] ] ] 33 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "Vilariño et al., 2011" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Estudio de la eficacia de las categorías de realidad del testimonio del Sistema de Evaluación Global (SEG) en casos de violencia de género" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Vilariño" 1 => "M. Novo" 2 => "D. Seijo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "26" ] ] ] ] ] ] 34 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "Volbert and Steller, 2014" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Is this testimony truthful, fabricated, or based on false memory? Credibility assessment 25 years after Steller and Köhnken (1989)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R. Volbert" 1 => "M. Steller" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1027/1016-9040/a000200" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "European Psychologist" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "19" "paginaInicial" => "207" "paginaFinal" => "220" ] ] ] ] ] ] 35 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "Vrij, 2005" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "A. Vrij" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "11" "paginaInicial" => "3" "paginaFinal" => "41" ] ] ] ] ] ] 36 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0185" "etiqueta" => "Vrij, 2008" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "A. Vrij" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:4 [ "edicion" => "2nd ed." "fecha" => "2008" "editorial" => "John Wiley and Sons." "editorialLocalizacion" => "Chichester, England" ] ] ] ] ] ] 37 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0190" "etiqueta" => "Vrij et al., 2002" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Will the truth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching and social skills on CBCA scores" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "A. Vrij" 1 => "L. Akehurst" 2 => "S. Soukara" 3 => "R. Bull" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1023/A:1015313120905" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Law and Human Behavior" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "26" "paginaInicial" => "261" "paginaFinal" => "283" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12061619" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 38 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0195" "etiqueta" => "Vrij et al., 2000b" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The effect of informing liars about Criteria-Based Content Analysis on their ability to deceive CBCA-raters" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. *Vrij" 1 => "W. Kneller" 2 => "S. Mann" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1348/135532500167976" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Legal and Criminological Psychology" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "57" "paginaFinal" => "70" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "lecturaRecomendada" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "vista" => "all" "titulo" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Further reading</span>" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "vista" => "all" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:33 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0200" "etiqueta" => "Akehurst et al., 2015" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "An evaluation of a new tool to aid judgements of credibility in the medico-legal setting" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. *Akehurst" 1 => "S. Easton" 2 => "E. Fullar" 3 => "G. Drane" 4 => "K. Kuzmin" 5 => "S. Litchfield" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/lcrp.12079" "Revista" => array:2 [ "tituloSerie" => "Legal and Criminological Psichology" "fecha" => "2015" ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0205" "etiqueta" => "Beaulieu-Prévost, 2001" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "*Beaulieu-Prévost, D.;1; (2001). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Analyse de validité de la déclaration (SVA), mensonge et faux souvenirs: Validité et efficacité chez les adultes</span>. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. MQ60609)." ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0210" "etiqueta" => "Bensi et al., 2009" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Discerning truth from deception: The sincere witness profile" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "L. *Bensi" 1 => "E. Gambetti" 2 => "R. Nori" 3 => "F. Giusberti" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "101" "paginaFinal" => "121" ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0215" "etiqueta" => "Biland et al., 1999" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluer la sincérité d’un témoin grâce à trois techniques d’analyse, verbales et non verbale" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C. *Biland" 1 => "J. Py" 2 => "S. Rimboud" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "European Review of Applied Psychology" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "49" "paginaInicial" => "115" "paginaFinal" => "122" ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0220" "etiqueta" => "Blandón-Gitlin et al., 2009" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Criteria-Based Content Analysis of true and suggested accounts of events" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "I. *Blandón-Gitlin" 1 => "K. Pezdek" 2 => "D.S. Lindsay" 3 => "L. Hagen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/acp.1504" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Applied Cognitive Psychology" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "23" "paginaInicial" => "901" "paginaFinal" => "917" ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0225" "etiqueta" => "Bogaard et al., 2013" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Using an example statement increases information but does not increase accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "G. *Bogaard" 1 => "E.H. Meijer" 2 => "A. Vrij" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/jip.1409" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "11" "paginaInicial" => "151" "paginaFinal" => "163" ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0230" "etiqueta" => "Caso et al., 2006" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Deceptive responses: The impact of verbal and non-verbal countermeasures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "L. *Caso" 1 => "A. Vrij" 2 => "S. Mann" 3 => "G. de Leo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1348/135532505X49936" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Legal and Criminological Psychology" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "11" "paginaInicial" => "99" "paginaFinal" => "111" ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0235" "etiqueta" => "Critchlow, 2011a" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "*Critchlow, N. (2011). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Applying Criteria Based Content Analysis to assessing the veracity of rape statements</span> (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK." ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0240" "etiqueta" => "Critchlow, 2011b" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "*Critchlow, N. (2011). [A field validation of CBCA when assessing authentic police rape statements: evidence for discriminant validity to prescribe veracity to adult narrative]. Unpublished raw data." ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0245" "etiqueta" => "Dana-Kirby, 1997" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "*Dana-Kirby, L. (1997). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Discerning truth from deception: Is Criteria-Based Content Analysis effective with adult statements?</span> (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Oregon, Oregon." ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0250" "etiqueta" => "Evans et al., 2013" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a psychologically based credibility assessment tool" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "J. *Evans" 1 => "S.W. Michael" 2 => "C.A. Meissner" 3 => "S.E. Brandon" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.02.002" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "33" "paginaFinal" => "41" ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0255" "etiqueta" => "Godoy and Higueras, 2008" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "*Godoy, V., & Higueras, L. (2008). El análisis de contenido basado en criterios (CBCA) y la entrevista cognitiva aplicados a la credibilidad del testimonio en adultos. In F. Rodríguez, C., Bringas, F. Fariña, R. Arce, & A. Bernardo (Eds.), <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Psicología Jurídica: Entorno judicial y delincuencia</span> (pp. 117-125). Retrieved from <a id="intr0020" class="elsevierStyleInterRef" href="http://gip.uniovi.es/T5EJD.pdf">http://gip.uniovi.es/T5EJD.pdf</a>." ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0260" "etiqueta" => "Honts and Devitt, 1993" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "*Honts, C.R., & Devitt, M.K. (1993). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Credibility Assessment of Verbatim Statements (CAVS)</span>. Retrieved from <a id="intr0025" class="elsevierStyleInterRef" href="http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a271575.pdf">http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a271575.pdf</a>." ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0265" "etiqueta" => "Johnston et al., 2014" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Attributes of truthful versus deceitful statements in the evaluation of accused child molesters" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "S. *Johnston" 1 => "A. Candelier" 2 => "D. Powers-Green" 3 => "S. Rahmani" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1177/2158244014548849" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Sage Open" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "10" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25599003" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0270" "etiqueta" => "Köhnken et al., 1995" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults’ statements" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "G. *Köhnken" 1 => "E. Schimossek" 2 => "E. Aschermann" 3 => "E. Höfer" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.671" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Applied Psychology" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "80" "paginaInicial" => "671" "paginaFinal" => "684" ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0275" "etiqueta" => "Leal et al., 2015" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "S. *Leal" 1 => "A. Vrij" 2 => "L. Warmelink" 3 => "Z. Vernham" 4 => "R.P. Fisher" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/lcrp.12017" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Legal and Criminological Psychology" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "129" "paginaFinal" => "146" ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0280" "etiqueta" => "Merckelbach, 2004" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "H. *Merckelbach" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.007" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Personality and Individual Differences" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "37" "paginaInicial" => "1371" "paginaFinal" => "1382" ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0285" "etiqueta" => "Porter and Yuille, 1996" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "S. *Porter" 1 => "J.C. Yuille" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/BF01498980" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Law and Human Behavior" "fecha" => "1996" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "443" "paginaFinal" => "458" ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0290" "etiqueta" => "Porter et al., 1999" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The nature of real, implanted, and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. *Porter" 1 => "J.C. Yuille" 2 => "D.R. Lehman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1023/A:1022344128649" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Law and Human Behavior" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "23" "paginaInicial" => "517" "paginaFinal" => "537" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10487147" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0295" "etiqueta" => "Rassin and van-der-Sleen, 2005" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Characteristics of true versus false allegations of sexual offences" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "E. *Rassin" 1 => "J. van-der-Sleen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.2466/pr0.97.2.589-598" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Psychological Reports" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "97" "paginaInicial" => "589" "paginaFinal" => "598" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16342590" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0300" "etiqueta" => "Schelleman-Offermans and Merckelbach, 2010" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal lie detection tools" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "K. *Schelleman-Offermans" 1 => "H. Merckelbach" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/jip.121" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "247" "paginaFinal" => "260" ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0305" "etiqueta" => "Sporer, 1997" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "S.L. *Sporer" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<373::AID-ACP461>3.0.CO;2-0" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Applied Cognitive Psychology" "fecha" => "1997" "volumen" => "11" "paginaInicial" => "373" "paginaFinal" => "397" ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0310" "etiqueta" => "Ternes, 2009" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Verbal credibility assessment of incarcerated violent offenders’ memory reports" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "M. *Ternes" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:3 [ "fecha" => "2009" "editorial" => "Vancouver" "editorialLocalizacion" => "University of British Columbia" ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0315" "etiqueta" => "Vrij et al., 2004a" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "A. *Vrij" 1 => "L. Akehurst" 2 => "R. Soukara" 3 => "R. Bull" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j. 1468-2958.2004.tb00723.x" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Human Communication Research" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "8" "paginaFinal" => "41" ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0320" "etiqueta" => "Vrij et al., 2004b" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Rapid judgements in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie detection" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "A. *Vrij" 1 => "H. Evans" 2 => "L. Akehurst" 3 => "S. Mann" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/acp.964" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Applied Cognitive Psychology" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "283" "paginaFinal" => "296" ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0325" "etiqueta" => "Vrij et al., 2001" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "People's insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. *Vrij" 1 => "K. Edward" 2 => "R. Bull" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1348/000712601162248" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "British Journal of Psychology" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "92" "paginaInicial" => "373" "paginaFinal" => "389" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11802879" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0330" "etiqueta" => "Vrij et al., 2000a" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "A. *Vrij" 1 => "K. Edward" 2 => "K.P. Roberts" 3 => "R. Bull" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1023/A:1006610329284" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Nonverbal Behavior" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "24" "paginaInicial" => "239" "paginaFinal" => "263" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0335" "etiqueta" => "Vrij et al., 2000c" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "I think it was a green scarf but I am not sure. Raising doubts about one's own testimony during lying and truth telling" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. *Vrij" 1 => "S. Mann" 2 => "K. Edward" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Forensic psychology and law. Traditional questions and new ideas" "paginaInicial" => "205" "paginaFinal" => "207" "serieFecha" => "2000" ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0340" "etiqueta" => "Vrij and Heaven, 1999" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "A. *Vrij" 1 => "S. Heaven" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1080/10683169908401767" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Psychology, Crime and Law" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "203" "paginaFinal" => "215" ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0345" "etiqueta" => "Vrij and Mann, 2006" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Criteria-Based Content Analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "A. *Vrij" 1 => "S. Mann" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1080/10683160500129007" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Psychology, Crime and Law" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "12" "paginaInicial" => "337" "paginaFinal" => "349" ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0350" "etiqueta" => "Vrij et al., 2007" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "A. *Vrij" 1 => "S. Mann" 2 => "S. Kristen" 3 => "R.P. Fisher" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s10979-006-9066-4" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Law and Human Behavior" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "31" "paginaInicial" => "449" "paginaFinal" => "518" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17211688" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0355" "etiqueta" => "Willén and Strömwall, 2011" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Offender's uncoerced false confessions: A new application of statement analysis?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R.M. *Willén" 1 => "L.A. Strömwall" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02018.x" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Legal and Criminological Psychology" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "17" "paginaInicial" => "346" "paginaFinal" => "359" ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0360" "etiqueta" => "Wojciechowski, 2014" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Content analysis algorithms: An innovative and accurate approach to statement veracity assessment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "B.W. *Wojciechowski" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.2478/ep-2014-0010" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "European Poligraph" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "8" "paginaInicial" => "119" "paginaFinal" => "128" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/16972600/0000001600000002/v1_201604150051/S1697260016000041/v1_201604150051/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "26683" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Original articles" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/16972600/0000001600000002/v1_201604150051/S1697260016000041/v1_201604150051/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1697260016000041?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "pdfAlternativo" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "idioma" => "es" "documentoPdf" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/file/16972600/addon/S1697260016000041/S300/es/355v16n02a90451916pdf001_2.pdf" "portada" => "355v16n02a90451916pdf001_2.png" ] ] ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 October | 78 | 15 | 93 |
2024 September | 114 | 58 | 172 |
2024 August | 68 | 38 | 106 |
2024 July | 123 | 31 | 154 |
2024 June | 96 | 39 | 135 |
2024 May | 88 | 27 | 115 |
2024 April | 96 | 32 | 128 |
2024 March | 132 | 63 | 195 |
2024 February | 91 | 19 | 110 |
2024 January | 145 | 39 | 184 |
2023 December | 84 | 31 | 115 |
2023 November | 123 | 84 | 207 |
2023 October | 101 | 27 | 128 |
2023 September | 74 | 31 | 105 |
2023 August | 87 | 31 | 118 |
2023 July | 68 | 36 | 104 |
2023 June | 79 | 37 | 116 |
2023 May | 96 | 31 | 127 |
2023 April | 73 | 20 | 93 |
2023 March | 67 | 20 | 87 |
2023 February | 40 | 31 | 71 |
2023 January | 29 | 34 | 63 |
2022 December | 45 | 32 | 77 |
2022 November | 29 | 47 | 76 |
2022 October | 42 | 55 | 97 |
2022 September | 42 | 41 | 83 |
2022 August | 44 | 28 | 72 |
2022 July | 42 | 30 | 72 |
2022 June | 49 | 31 | 80 |
2022 May | 39 | 25 | 64 |
2022 April | 45 | 55 | 100 |
2022 March | 51 | 33 | 84 |
2022 February | 42 | 30 | 72 |
2022 January | 99 | 29 | 128 |
2021 December | 43 | 38 | 81 |
2021 November | 54 | 58 | 112 |
2021 October | 47 | 80 | 127 |
2021 September | 38 | 39 | 77 |
2021 August | 42 | 17 | 59 |
2021 July | 27 | 35 | 62 |
2021 June | 72 | 41 | 113 |
2021 May | 58 | 33 | 91 |
2021 April | 183 | 73 | 256 |
2021 March | 108 | 46 | 154 |
2021 February | 44 | 50 | 94 |
2021 January | 75 | 52 | 127 |
2020 December | 58 | 58 | 116 |
2020 November | 299 | 56 | 355 |
2020 October | 83 | 28 | 111 |
2020 September | 107 | 64 | 171 |
2020 August | 125 | 62 | 187 |
2020 July | 94 | 68 | 162 |
2020 June | 136 | 56 | 192 |
2020 May | 124 | 71 | 195 |
2020 April | 121 | 54 | 175 |
2020 March | 302 | 32 | 334 |
2020 February | 361 | 25 | 386 |
2020 January | 705 | 45 | 750 |
2019 December | 275 | 56 | 331 |
2019 November | 602 | 20 | 622 |
2019 October | 678 | 40 | 718 |
2019 September | 448 | 57 | 505 |
2019 August | 101 | 38 | 139 |
2019 July | 344 | 40 | 384 |
2019 June | 270 | 38 | 308 |
2019 May | 417 | 64 | 481 |
2019 April | 355 | 32 | 387 |
2019 March | 567 | 27 | 594 |
2019 February | 489 | 21 | 510 |
2019 January | 595 | 21 | 616 |
2018 December | 799 | 20 | 819 |
2018 November | 329 | 28 | 357 |
2018 October | 552 | 20 | 572 |
2018 September | 117 | 13 | 130 |
2018 August | 100 | 16 | 116 |
2018 July | 144 | 3 | 147 |
2018 June | 109 | 8 | 117 |
2018 May | 132 | 6 | 138 |
2018 April | 134 | 15 | 149 |
2018 March | 146 | 0 | 146 |
2018 February | 103 | 3 | 106 |
2018 January | 93 | 8 | 101 |
2017 December | 98 | 6 | 104 |
2017 November | 119 | 14 | 133 |
2017 October | 114 | 22 | 136 |
2017 September | 126 | 8 | 134 |
2017 August | 107 | 10 | 117 |
2017 July | 123 | 9 | 132 |
2017 June | 190 | 16 | 206 |
2017 May | 143 | 21 | 164 |
2017 April | 151 | 13 | 164 |
2017 March | 130 | 95 | 225 |
2017 February | 110 | 14 | 124 |
2017 January | 206 | 7 | 213 |
2016 December | 197 | 28 | 225 |
2016 November | 132 | 20 | 152 |
2016 October | 214 | 62 | 276 |
2016 September | 216 | 24 | 240 |
2016 August | 282 | 74 | 356 |
2016 July | 476 | 90 | 566 |
2016 June | 47 | 80 | 127 |
2016 May | 34 | 54 | 88 |
2016 April | 29 | 33 | 62 |